Jack’s gone to the dogs in Alaska February 25, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Randomized Complete Block and Repeated Measures (Each Subject Receives Each Treatment) Designs KNNL – Chapters 21,
Advertisements

Experimental Statistics - week 5
Combined Analysis of Experiments Basic Research –Researcher makes hypothesis and conducts a single experiment to test it –The hypothesis is modified and.
Combined Analysis of Experiments Basic Research –Researcher makes hypothesis and conducts a single experiment to test it –The hypothesis is modified and.
The Purpose of an Experiment We usually want to answer certain questions posed by the objectives of the experiment Irrigation experiment (a 2 x 2 factorial)
STT 511-STT411: DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS AND ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE Dr. Cuixian Chen Chapter 14: Nested and Split-Plot Designs Design & Analysis of Experiments.
Sub - Sampling It may be necessary or convenient to measure a treatment response on subsamples of a plot –several soil cores within a plot –duplicate laboratory.
ANOVA lecture Fixed, random, mixed-model ANOVAs
Nested Designs Study vs Control Site. Nested Experiments In some two-factor experiments the level of one factor, say B, is not “cross” or “cross classified”
N-way ANOVA. Two-factor ANOVA with equal replications Experimental design: 2  2 (or 2 2 ) factorial with n = 5 replicate Total number of observations:
Analysis of Variance: ANOVA. Group 1: control group/ no ind. Var. Group 2: low level of the ind. Var. Group 3: high level of the ind var.
The Statistical Analysis Partitions the total variation in the data into components associated with sources of variation –For a Completely Randomized Design.
Lesson #23 Analysis of Variance. In Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), we have: H 0 :  1 =  2 =  3 = … =  k H 1 : at least one  i does not equal the others.
Every achievement originates from the seed of determination. 1Random Effect.
1 Chapter 7 Blocking and Confounding in the 2 k Factorial Design.
The Two-way ANOVA We have learned how to test for the effects of independent variables considered one at a time. However, much of human behavior is determined.
Slide 1 Larger is better case (Golf Ball) Linear Model Analysis: SN ratios versus Material, Diameter, Dimples, Thickness Estimated Model Coefficients for.
22-1 Factorial Treatments (§ 14.3, 14.4, 15.4) Completely randomized designs - One treatment factor at t levels. Randomized block design - One treatment.
1 Experimental Statistics - week 7 Chapter 15: Factorial Models (15.5) Chapter 17: Random Effects Models.
Fixed vs. Random Effects
1 Experimental Statistics - week 6 Chapter 15: Randomized Complete Block Design (15.3) Factorial Models (15.5)
Conducting ANOVA’s. I.Why? A. more than two groups to compare.
Psychology 301 Chapters & Differences Between Two Means Introduction to Analysis of Variance Multiple Comparisons.
Chapter 10: Analyzing Experimental Data Inferential statistics are used to determine whether the independent variable had an effect on the dependent variance.
Multiple Comparisons.  Multiple Range Tests  Tukey’s and Duncan’s  Orthogonal Contrasts.
Balanced Incomplete Block Design Ford Falcon Prices Quoted by 28 Dealers to 8 Interviewers (2 Interviewers/Dealer) Source: A.F. Jung (1961). "Interviewer.
1 Nested (Hierarchical) Designs In certain experiments the levels of one factor (eg. Factor B) are similar but not identical for different levels of another.
1 Every achievement originates from the seed of determination.
1 Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture 8 Analysis of Variance.
Control of Experimental Error Blocking - –A block is a group of homogeneous experimental units –Maximize the variation among blocks in order to minimize.
Strip-Plot Designs Sometimes called split-block design For experiments involving factors that are difficult to apply to small plots Three sizes of plots.
1 Psych 5510/6510 Chapter 14 Repeated Measures ANOVA: Models with Nonindependent ERRORs Part 3: Factorial Designs Spring, 2009.
TREND ANALYSIS DEVELOPED BY KIRK ET AL J.AM.SOC.HORT. SCI. STATISTICAL PROCEDURE TO ACCOUNT FOR SPATIAL VARIBILITY EACH PLOT IS IDENTIFIED BY ROW.
The Purpose of an Experiment We usually want to answer certain questions posed by the objectives of the experiment Irrigation experiment (a 2 x 2 factorial)
Latin Square Designs KNNL – Sections Description Experiment with r treatments, and 2 blocking factors: rows (r levels) and columns (r levels)
Chapter 13 Complete Block Designs. Randomized Block Design (RBD) g > 2 Treatments (groups) to be compared r Blocks of homogeneous units are sampled. Blocks.
ETM U 1 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Suppose we want to compare more than two means? For example, suppose a manufacturer of paper used for grocery.
Three or More Factors: Latin Squares
1 Experimental Statistics Spring week 6 Chapter 15: Factorial Models (15.5)
Fixed and Random Effects. Theory of Analysis of Variance Source of variationdfEMS Between treatmentsn-1  e 2 + k  t 2 Within treatmentsnk-n e2e2 Totalnk-1.
IE241: Introduction to Design of Experiments. Last term we talked about testing the difference between two independent means. For means from a normal.
Be careful about the text treatment of this  1. What is Blocking? Blocking is: A way to control for a source of Variation in an Experiment. It may also.
Experimental Design. So Far In Experimental Design  Single replicate Designs.  Completely Randomized Blocks.  Randomized Complete Blocks.  Latin Square.
Chapter 9 More Complicated Experimental Designs. Randomized Block Design (RBD) t > 2 Treatments (groups) to be compared b Blocks of homogeneous units.
1 An example of a more complex design (a four level nested anova) 0 %, 20% and 40% of a tree’s roots were cut with the purpose to study the influence.
Quadrats, ANOVA. Quadrat shape ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1. Edge effects best worst.
ANOVA Overview of Major Designs. Between or Within Subjects Between-subjects (completely randomized) designs –Subjects are nested within treatment conditions.
Analyses of Variance. Simple Situation Genotype AGenotype B
1 Mixed and Random Effects Models 1-way ANOVA - Random Effects Model 1-way ANOVA - Random Effects Model 2-way ANOVA - Mixed Effects Model 2-way ANOVA -
HIERARCHICAL LINEAR MODELS. NESTED DESIGNS A factor A is said to be nested in factor B if the levels of A are divided among the levels of B. This is given.
1 G Lect 13b G Lecture 13b Mixed models Special case: one entry per cell Equal vs. unequal cell n's.
Latin Square Design Price Valuations for 8 Varieties of Tea, Prepared on 8 Days in 8 Orders Harrison and Bose (1942), Sankhya, Vol6,#2,pp
1 Experimental Statistics - week 8 Chapter 17: Mixed Models Chapter 18: Repeated Measures.
Factorial BG ANOVA Psy 420 Ainsworth. Topics in Factorial Designs Factorial? Crossing and Nesting Assumptions Analysis Traditional and Regression Approaches.
Nested Designs Ex 1--Compare 4 states’ low-level radioactive hospital waste A: State B: Hospital Rep: Daily waste.
Two way ANOVA with replication
i) Two way ANOVA without replication
Two way ANOVA with replication
Thought Questions.
Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs
Fixed and Random Effects
ANalysis Of VAriance (ANOVA)
Ch. 14: Comparisons on More Than Two Conditions
Balanced Incomplete Block Design
Analyses of Variance Review
Analyses of Variance.
Latin Square Designs KNNL – Sections
Balanced Incomplete Block Design
A Bestiary of ANOVA tables
Experimental Statistics - week 8
Presentation transcript:

Jack’s gone to the dogs in Alaska February 25, 2005

Alaskan Wedding Feast Marvelous Marvin father of the Groom

Analyses of Lattice Squares Y ijk =  + r i + b a j + t a k + e ijk See Table 5 & 6, Page 105 & 106

Analyses of Lattice Squares  Calculate sub-block totals (b) and replicate totals (R).  Calculate the treatment totals (T) and the grand total (G).  For each treatment, calculate the B t values which is the sum of all block totals that contain the i th treatment.

Analyses of Lattice Squares  Calculate sub-block totals (b) and replicate totals (R).  Calculate the treatment totals (T) and the grand total (G).  For each treatment, calculate the B t values which is the sum of all block totals that contain the i th treatment.

Analyses of Lattice Squares  Treatment 5 is in block 2, 5, 10, 15, and 20, so B 5 = =  Note that the sum of the B t values is G x k, where k is the block size.  For each treatment calculate: W = kT – (k+1)B t + G W 5 = 4(816)-(5)(3,411)+13,746 = -45

Lattice Square ANOVA - d.f. Sourcedf Repsk4 Trt(unadj)k 2 – 115 Block(adj)k 2 – 115 Intra-Block Error(k-1)(k 2 -1)45 Trt (adj)k 2 – 115 Effective Error(k-1)(k 2 -1)45 Totalk 2 (k+1)-179

Analyses of Lattice Squares  Compute the total correction factor as: CF = (∑x ij ) 2 /n CF = G 2 /[(k 2 )(k+1)] (13,746) 2 /(16)(5) 2,361,906

Analyses of Lattice Squares  Compute the total SS as: Total SS =  x ij 2 – CF [ … ] – 2,361,906 = 58,856

Analyses of Lattice Squares  Compute the replicate block SS as: Replicate SS =  R 2 /k 2 – CF [ … ]/16 – 2,361,906 = 5,946

Analyses of Lattice Squares  Compute the unadjusted treatment SS as: Treatment (unadj) SS =  T 2 /(k+1)–CF [ … ]/5 – 2,361,906 = 26,995

Analyses of Lattice Squares  Compute the adjusted block SS as: Block (adj) SS =  W 2 /k 3 (k+1) – CF [ … ]/320 – 2,361,906 = 11,382

Analyses of Lattice Squares  Compute the intra-block error SS as: IB error SS = TSS–Rep SS–Treat(unadj) SS–Blk(adj) SS 58, , , ,382 = 14,533

Lattice Square ANOVA SourcedfSSMS Reps45,9461,486 T(unadj)1526,9951,800 Blk(adj)1511, Intra block error4514,  Calculate Mean Squares for block(adj) and IBE.

Analyses of Lattice Squares  Compute adjusted treatment totals (T’) as: T ’ i = T i +  W i  = [Blk(adj) MS-IBE MS]/[k 2 Blk(adj) MS]

Analyses of Lattice Squares  Compute adjusted treatment totals (T’) as:   = [ ]/(16)(759) = T’ = T +  W  = [Blk(adj) MS-IBE MS]/[k 2 Blk(adj) MS]

Analyses of Lattice Squares  Compute adjusted treatment totals (T’) as:  Note if IBE MS > Blk(adj) MS, then  =zero. So no adjustment. T’ = T +  W  = [Blk(adj) MS-IBE MS]/[k 2 Blk(adj) MS]

Analyses of Lattice Squares  Compute adjusted treatment totals (T’) as:  Note also greatest adjustment when Blk(adj) MS large and IBE MS is small. T’ = T +  W  = [Blk(adj) MS-IBE MS]/[k 2 Blk(adj) MS]

Analyses of Lattice Squares  Compute adjusted treatment totals (T’) as:  T ’ 5 = T 5 +  W 5  T ’ 5 = x (-45) = 814 T’ = T +  W  = [Blk(adj) MS-IBE MS]/[k 2 Blk(adj) MS]

Analyses of Lattice Squares  Compute adjusted treatment means (M’) as: M’ = T’/[k+1]

Analyses of Lattice Squares  Compute adjusted treatment SS as: Treat (adj) SS =  T’ 2 /(k+1) – CF [ … ]/5 – 2,361,906 = 24,030

Analyses of Lattice Squares  Compute effective error MS as: EE MS = (Intra-block error MS)(1+k  ) 323[1 + 4(0.0359)] 369

Lattice Square ANOVA SourcedfSSMSF Reps45,946 T(unadj)1526,995 Blk(adj)1511,382 Intra error4514,533 T(adj)1524,030 Eff. Error4516,605

Lattice Square ANOVA SourcedfSSMSF Reps45,9461, * T(unadj)1526,9951,800- Blk(adj)1511, ns Intra error4514, T(adj)1524,0301, ** Eff. Error4516,

Efficiency of Lattice Design 100 x [Blk(adj)SS+Intra error SS]/k(k-1)EMS 100 x [Blk(adj)SS+Intra error SS]/k(k 2 -1)EMS 100 [11, ,533]/4(16) % I II III IV V I II III I II III IV V

Lattice Square ANOVA SourcedfSSMSF Reps45,9461, * T(unadj)1526,9951,800- Blk(adj)1511, ns Intra error4514, T(adj)1524,0301, ** Eff. Error4516,

RCB ANOVA SourcedfSSMSF Reps45,9461, * T(unadj)1526,9951, ** Error6025,

Lattice Square ANOVA SourcedfSSMSF Reps45,9461, * T(unadj)1526,9951,800- Blk(adj)151, ns Intra error4524, T(adj)1524,0301, * Eff. Error4526,

 CV Lattice = 11.2%; CV RCB = 12.1%.  Range Lattice 119 to 197; Range RCB 116 to 199.  Variation between treatments is small compared to environmental error or variation. Lattice Square ANOVA

Comparison of Rankings

ANOVA of Factorial Designs

Factorial AOV Example  Spring barley ‘Malter’  Three seeding rates (low, Medium and High).  Six nitrogen levels (90, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140 units).  Three replicates  Page 107 of class notes

Factorial AOV Example CF = (297.0) 2 /54 = TSS = [ … ]-CF = Rep SS = [ ]/18-CF = 0.01

Factorial AOV Example Seed rate Nitrigen level Total High Med Low Total Seed rate SS = [ ]/18 – CF = 2.75

Factorial AOV Example Seed rate Nitrigen level Total High Med Low Total N rate SS = [ … ]/9 – CF = 2.75

Factorial AOV Example Seed rate Nitrigen level Total High Med Low Total Seed x N SS = [ … ]/3 – CF - Seed rate SS – Nitrogen SS = 1.33

Factorial AOV Example Error SS=TSS–Seed SS–N SS–NxS SS–Rep SS

Factorial AOV Example SourcedfSSMSF Reps ns Seed Density *** Nitrogen *** S x N *** Error Total

Factorial AOV Example CV =  /  x 100 =  0.041/5.50 = 3.38% R 2 = [TSS-ESS]/TSS = [ ]/87.03 = 96.2%

Factorial AOV Example SourcedfSSMSF Reps x Seed Rate ns Rep x N rate ns Rep x Seed x N

Factorial AOV Example Seed rate Nitrigen level Total High Med Low Total sed[within] =  (2  2 /3) = sed[Seed rate] =  (2  2 /18) = sed[N rate] =  (2  2 /9) = 0.095

Factorial AOV Example

SourcedfSSMSF Reps ns Seed Density *** Nitrogen *** S x N *** Error Total

Factorial AOV Example SourcedfSSMSF Reps x Seed Rate ns Rep x N rate ns Rep x Seed x N

Split-plot AOV SourcedfSSMSF Reps Seed Density Reps x Seed Nitrogen S x N Rep x N rate Rep x Seed x N Total

Split-plot AOV SourcedfSSMSF Reps ns Seed Density *** Error (1) Nitrogen *** S x N *** Error (2) Total

Strip-plot AOV SourcedfSSMSF Reps Seed Density Reps x Seed Nitrogen Rep x N rate S x N Rep x Seed x N Total

Strip-plot AOV SourcedfSSMSF Reps ns Seed Density *** Error 1 (Seed) Nitrogen *** Error 2 (N) S x N *** Error 3 (SxN) Total

Fixed and Random Effects

Expected Mean Squares  Dependant on whether factor effects are Fixed or Random.  Necessary to determine which F-tests are appropriate and which are not.

Setting Expected Mean Squares  The expected mean square for a source of variation (say X) contains.  the error term.  a term in  2 x. (or S 2 x )  a variance term for other selected interactions involving the factor X.

Coefficients for EMS Coefficient for error mean square is always 1 Coefficient of other expected mean squares is n times the product of factors levels that do not appear in the factor name.

Expected Mean Squares  Which interactions to include in an EMS?  All the letter (i.e. A, B, C, …) appear in X.  All the other letters in the interaction (except those in X) are Random Effects.

A and B Fixed Effects

A and B Random Effects

A Fixed and B Random

A, B, and C are Fixed

A, B, and C are Random

A Fixed, B and C are Random

Analysis of Split-plots and Strip-plots and nested designs Multiple Comparisons