Impact of the Netherlands Coal Tax on: - the use of power stations - costs to end-users and government revenues - support for energy transition July 20,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electricity distribution and embedded renewable energy generators Martin Scheepers ECN Policy Studies Florence School of Regulation, Workshop,
Advertisements

Toward a Sustainable Future Name of Conference, Event, or Audience Date Presenter’s Name | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All.
1.  Purpose  To present Staff’s Preliminary Findings on the 2012 Integrated Resource Plans of:  APS – Arizona Public Service Company  TEP – Tucson.
22 April 2010 EWEC 2010 Warsaw2 Jesper Munksgaard Ph.D., Senior Consultant Merit Order Effect of Wind Power – Impact on EU 2020 Electricity Prices.
Bruce Mountain Director Market power and generation from renewables: the case of wind in the South Australian electricity market Presentation to IAEE 35.
FOREST FUEL - RENEWABLE ENERGY. Renewable energy Today, renewable energy is an important part of the Swedish energy budget. With its share in the energy.
11 Energy Policy in Denmark MONGOLIAN ENERGY DELEGATION 9 September 2013 Danish Energy Agency.
David Schlissel and Cathy Kunkel When, Not If: Bridgeport’s Future and the Retirement of PSEG’s Coal Plant January 23, 2014.
IPCC Synthesis Report Part IV Costs of mitigation measures Jayant Sathaye.
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY World Energy Outlook 2004: Key Trends and Challenges Marco Baroni Energy Analyst Economic Analysis Division INTERNATIONAL HYDROGEN.
The Hungarian Energy Policy and the Renewable Energy Situation The Hungarian Energy Policy and the Renewable Energy Situation Dr. Poós.
IS THERE AN ENERGY CRISIS? David Brewer, BA., ACMA Director General Confederation of UK Coal Producers Presented to RICS Minerals and Waste Management.
Arnoud Kamerbeek CEO DELTA NV Dutch Energy Day 2015 Amsterdam, June 25th 2015 The decarbonisation of the power sector could and should be faster and cheaper.
Johnthescone The IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation.
ERCOT PUBLIC 4/22/2014 Updates for 2014 LTSA Scenario and Data Assumptions 4/22/2014.
Financing new electricity supply in the UK market with carbon abatement constraints Keith Palmer 08 March 2006 AFG.
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE 1 Dr. Robert K. Dixon Head, Energy Technology Policy Division International Energy Agency.
EMPIRE- modelling the future European power system under different climate policies Asgeir Tomasgard, Christian Skar, Gerard Doorman, Bjørn H. Bakken,
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
Options for climate friendly technologies for power generation and their related costs and potential environmental impacts Sustainable Energy Development.
RES Integration for Increasing of Energy Supply Security in Latvia: ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMICAL FACTORS NEEDS FORUM 2 “Energy and Supply Security – Present.
THE CHALLENGES OF EUROPEAN ENERGY SECURITY Jiří Feist, CEZ Group.
© OECD/IEA – 2011 Key Insights from IEA Indicator Analysis ENERGY INDICATORS Efficient Power Generation 2011 Roundtable 4: Efficient use of energy in the.
[Legislative] [Danish Policy] Energy 2000, Target to reduce CO2 emissions in 2005 by 20% compared to 1988 levels. Energy 21, Reinforce targets.
Estonian energy scenarios Reference and single track scenarios in Balmorel.
1 Comparison of energy systems: On methods, parameters and system boundaries Leif Gustavsson Mid-Sweden University September.
Energy Efficiency – The First Fuel The Danish Experience Jiangsu - May 21st 2015 Counsellor Christian van Maarschalkerweerd – Embassy of Denmark.
1 Status of and Outlook for Coal Supply and Demand in the U.S. Imagine West Virginia Spring 2010 Board of Governors Meeting April 13, 2010 Scott Sitzer.
Estonian energy scenarios The first Balmorel model runs.
Spain: Can we give up any of the primary energy sources? Alejo Vidal-Quadras Roca Vice-President of the European Parliament Member of the Industry, Energy.
1 IEA Energy Scenarios for India for 2030 Lars Strupeit Malé Declaration: Emission inventory preparation / scenarios / atmospheric transport modelling.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
1 Macroeconomic Impacts of EU Climate Policy in AIECE November 5, 2008 Olavi Rantala - Paavo Suni The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
Jenell Katheiser Doug Murray Long Term Study Scenarios and Generation Expansion Update January 22, 2013.
Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants: Economic and Environmental Impacts 15 June 2011 Professor Paul Fischbeck Carnegie Mellon University
Technologies of Climate Change Mitigation Climate Parliament Forum, May 26, 2011 Prof. Dr. Thomas Bruckner Institute for Infrastructure and Resources Management.
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
Preliminary Results with the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory.
1 Introduction to exercise in emission scenario building Lars Strupeit Malé Declaration: Emission inventory preparation / scenarios / atmospheric transport.
World Energy Outlook 2006 Scenarios for the World and the European Union Presentation to European Wind Energy Conference Milan, Italy, 7-10 May 2007.
Johnthescone The IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation UN Climate Change Conference June 2011 Bonn, Germany, 7.
Revis James Director Energy Technology Assessment Center 2010 AABE Conference May 20, 2010 Creating a Low-Carbon Future EPRI’s 2009 Prism- MERGE Study.
Efficiency in industry through electro-technologies Paul Baudry, EDF / R&D The future of Energy in Enlarged Europe, Warsaw 7-8th october 2004.
Huntley Generating Station: Coal Plant’s Weak Financial Outlook Calls For Corporate And Community Leadership January 28, 2014.
Combining options for commitments AIXG, OECD, 22 March Combining options for commitments: results from modelling exercises Patrick Criqui, LEPII-EPE,
September 21, 2005 ICF Consulting RGGI Electricity Sector Modeling Results Updated Reference, RGGI Package and Sensitivities.
IFIEC Europe International Federation of Industrial Energy Consumers 1 Promotion of Renewable Energies in the EU Member States Consequences on the Price.
Johnthescone The IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation.
Allocation of CO 2 Emission Allowances in RGGI Dallas Burtraw, Karen Palmer, Danny Kahn Resources for the Future Presentation to RGGI Stakeholder Meeting.
World Energy Outlook 2015 Deputy Director General Petteri Kuuva WEC Finland, 23 Nov
Dutch Reference Outlook Energy and Greenhouse Gases Remko Ybema, ECN Policy Studies Workshop on Energy-related National and EU-Wide Projections.
Paul-Frederik Bach Towards 50% Wind Electricity in Denmark 23 September 2015Energy Group Meeting 1 Paul-Frederik.
Danish Energy Consumption Revolution Morten Bæk
CAFE Baseline dissemination workshop 27/09/2004 Dr. Leonidas Mantzos E3M-LAB/ICCS NTUA contact: Energy projections as input to the.
Riemara M. Schuivens GCET 2010, Bangkok Source:
Energy Sector of Turkey “General Overview and Policy Objectives” Sinem ÇAYNAK General Directorate for Energy Affairs IEA Turkey IDR Meeting December 8,
ENERGY & CLIMATE ASSESSMENT TEAM National Risk Management Research Laboratory U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research.
Climate Policy and Green Tax Reform in Denmark Some conclusions from the 2009 report to the Danish Council of Environmental Economics Presentation to the.
Subsidies to renewable energy in inflexible power markets Orvika Rosnes June 9, 2008 NOREL Workshop, Stockholm.
SLED Electricity Modelling results – Serbia László Szabó, András Mezősi
1 Environmental taxation under imperfect competition within electricity auctions with dominant firm Francesco Gullì Università Bocconi, Milano International.
ГММ -1( а ) Li Jianfei. By 2040, the world and, in particular, countries which have large and technologically advanced economies – such as the USA,
© 2016 Portland General Electric. All rights reserved. I NTEGRATED R ESOURCE P LAN 2016 OPUC Meeting April 21, 2016.
World Energy and Environmental Outlook to 2030
Pan-Canadian Wind Integration Study (PCWIS) Prepared by: GE Energy Consulting, Vaisala , EnerNex, Electranix, Knight Piésold Olga Kucherenko.
SLED Electricity Modelling results – Serbia
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
Coal as Green Energy Source
Scaling up of Renewable Energy for Power Generation in the Western Balkan countries
The Risks to Coal Plants in Coming Years
Presentation transcript:

Impact of the Netherlands Coal Tax on: - the use of power stations - costs to end-users and government revenues - support for energy transition July 20, 2012

Introduction The aim of this study is to chart the impact of the coal taxation instrument on the Dutch electricity market. The study is based on an analysis of the highly integrated electricity markets of the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany. The situation now and in the years to come: low margins for coal-fired power plants, largely negative margins for gas-fired power plants and low CO 2 price. The result is a lower demand for gas and a higher demand for coal than anticipated electricity production. The introduction of a coal tax in the Netherlands will lead to an increase in the marginal costs for coal- fired power plants. This presentation summarises the key findings with regard to the consequences of the introduction of a coal tax for the various stakeholders in the energy value chain: The use of power stations Government revenues and costs to end users Support for energy transition 1

2 The introduction of a coal tax of EUR per tonne will lead to a greater use of combined heat and power plants; the coal tax would have to be at least EUR 35 for the greater use of stand-alone gas-fired power plants. Summary A coal tax will result in higher government revenues from the coal tax itself and a slight saving on the sustainable energy subsidy (SDE+). Current situation: Share of coal is rising strongly Switch from coal to gas at a CO 2 price from EUR 40 Coal tax: lower CO 2 emissions Higher e-production from gas and limited imports Slight impact on prices Higher Government revenues CO 2 emissions from gas-fired power plants are substantially lower than from old and new coal-fired power plants (45 to 70% lower). However, the available capacity of coal-fired power plants in the Netherlands is increasing substantially. This expansion means the production of electricity from coal will rise to 46 per cent of the total amount of electricity produced in the Netherlands in At current prices for gas and coal, the switch from coal to gas will only take place from a CO 2 price of EUR 40 per tonne (current CO 2 price is EUR 7 per tonne). Additional measures are needed to bring about the energy transition until the CO 2 price significantly increases again. A coal tax of EUR per tonne will result in higher electricity production from gas (17 per cent in 2015) and a limited rise in electricity imports. A coal tax of EUR will reduce CO 2 emissions by 3 per cent in the Netherlands, including a slight import effect. A higher coal tax will have a higher CO 2 effect. The effect of a coal tax on wholesale prices is slight (2 per cent) and consequently also on end-user prices. A coal tax will have less of an effect on prices than a high CO 2 price. Coal tax: Greater use of gas- fired power plants

Gas-fired power plants: lower CO 2 emissions than coal-fired power plants CO 2 emissions from gas-fired power plants are substantially lower than from old and new coal- fired power plants (45 to 70 per cent lower). Adding and including the combustion of biomass reduces CO 2 emissions from coal-fired power plants, but not at the same level as from gas-fired plants. 3 Sources: team analyses, Paper_2003_10_CO2_EF_fuels.pdf

If policy does not change, available capacity of coal-fired power plants in NL will double Development of capacity of coal-fired power plants in the Benelux and Germany Total coal capacity in the Benelux and Germany will increase until 2016, by 15,388 MW over the entire period from 2010 to 2020 (exclusive of lignite capacity). This mainly refers to power plants already under construction. Plans for construction of new power plants in the period from 2017 to 2020 are very advanced. Subsidies for addition and inclusion of biomass ensure it remains viable to use older coal-fired power plants. Our analysis reveals that the business case in which biomass is added and included in the combustion process is viable in particular for old coal-fired power plants from a compensation level of EUR 45 per MWh. Growth > Replacement Development of available capacity in the Netherlands Source: team analyses 4

Electricity production is impacted by trend changes Total electricity production has slightly increased and this growth is likely to continue. While the gas share did increase until 2010, market conditions have changed dramatically since then. The price of CO 2 has decreased by more than 50 per cent compared to 2010, the price of natural gas has increased by 20 per cent, while the price of coal has decreased by 5 per cent. This means the gap between the marginal costs of coal vis-à-vis gas has further increased. More coal-fired power plants will come on-line and the Netherlands will import more inexpensive power) from Germany (surplus of solar PV and wind energy). So if no policy changes are implemented, the production of coal-fired power plants will rise further while that of natural gas-fired power plants will decrease. 5 Source: CBS, team analyses Historical and forecast electricity production in the Netherlands historicalmodel

Switch from “old” coal to gas from a CO 2 price of EUR 40 The moment when it is viable to switch from an old coal-fired power plant such as Gelderland- 13 to a modern stand-alone gas-fired power plant such as Sloe is when the CO 2 price is EUR 40 per tonne. This is somewhat lower for combined heat and power plants. A coal tax rate of EUR per tonne reduces the moment when it is viable to switch to a CO 2 price of EUR 29 per tonne. The Parliamentary Spring Agreement included a resolution to terminate exemption for coal-fired power plants in respect of this tax. For a new coal-fired power plants such as Maasvlakte-3, the switch moment is still above EUR 60 per tonne. N.B. Calculation includes addition and inclusion of biomass by Gelderland-13 and Maasvlakte-3, for which it is assumed that compensation for co-firing is EUR 45 per MWh. Without coal tax a CO 2 price of EUR 40 per tonne is necessary for the switch At a coal tax rate of EUR 13.73, a CO 2 price of EUR 29 per tonne would be necessary for the switch 6 Source: team analyses CO 2 EUR/t

Coal tax increases the use of gas-fired power plants A coal tax of EUR per tonne results in increased competition of the flexible part of combined heat and power plants. The moment it is viable to switch between new gas- fired power plants and old coal-fired power plants in the merit order is ever approaching. At a level of EUR 35 per tonne, gas-fired power plants are (in the example of the new Sloe power plant) break-even with old coal-fired power plants. In practice, gas-fired power plants are then preferable owing to their lower start/stop costs, for example. DM-34: gas-fired combined heat and power plant in Diemen; MV-3: new coal-fired power plant Maasvlakte-3; GE-13 : old coal-fired power plant Gelderland-13; Sloe: new gas-fired power plants in the Province of Zeeland N.B. The adjacent graphs do not take renewable energy production and import capacity into account. Merit order Q Peak coal tax coal tax 35 DM-34 (must-run) MV-3 GE-13 DM-34 (flex) Sloe Peak demand coal tax 0 7 Source: team analyses (model output)

Coal tax: higher e-production from gas and limited import growth At a coal tax rate of EUR per tonne, coal- fired power plants will partly be replaced by gas- fired power plants (combined heat and power plants in particular). Electricity production from gas is increasing, particularly owing to the increased use of combined heat and power plants. At a coal tax rate of EUR 35 per tonne, stand-alone gas-fired power plants such as Sloe are just competitive. The import of electricity increases to a limited degree in all scenarios. This is attributable to the already extensive use of cross-border capacity. Higher electricity production from gas-fired power plants Annual production of Dutch gas and coal-fired power plants and the change in imports at different levels for coal tax 8 Source: team analyses

Coal tax; lower CO 2 emissions including the effect of imports There will be 3 per cent less CO 2 emissions in 2015 as a consequence of the coal tax (EUR per tonne). The “imported” CO 2 emissions are limited, as the coal tax has a limited effect on imports. In the case of high CO 2 prices, the CO 2 reducing effect would be much more pronounced on account of the significant increase in the operational level of gas-fired units. The impact on NO x emissions has not been investigated, but it is not expected to be a negative one. CO 2 emissions from Dutch electricity production under various scenarios for coal tax and the change in emissions of imports 9 Source: team analyses

The impact of coal tax when CO 2 prices are high (EUR 32 per tonne) A combination of high CO 2 prices and a high coal tax results in a significant production increase by gas-fired power plants. In this scenario, the Netherlands would import less and export more compared to a scenario with low CO 2 prices (CO 2 emissions in NL would also increase, but would decrease in other countries). CO 2 emissions from Dutch electricity production under various scenarios for coal tax and the change in emissions of imports Annual production of Dutch gas and coal-fired power plants and the change in imports at different levels for coal tax 10 Compared to a scenario with low CO 2 prices, the CO 2 intensity of additional imports would increase on account of the high prices in the Netherlands. But this increase will be amply offset by the greater use of gas-fired power plants in the Netherlands (more than 75 per cent rise). source: team analyses

Effect on wholesale prices is slight A coal tax rate of EUR per tonne will have a minimal effect on the wholesale prices of approx. 2 per cent; for consumers this means a rise of approx. 0.5 per cent (a factor of 4 lower). A rise in the coal tax rate to EUR 25 per tonne and EUR 35 per tonne is likely to result in an increase in wholesale prices of 6 per cent and 9 per cent respectively in The increase in 2013 will be 4 per cent and 7 per cent. A higher CO 2 price would have a higher impact on prices than a coal tax. A rise in the CO 2 price from today's EUR 7 to EUR 32 per tonne results in an increase in the wholesale price of almost 30 per cent. Conclusions Change in wholesale-market prices in 2013 Change in wholesale-market prices in Source: team analyses

Government revenues in 2013 Higher revenues for Government The extra revenues directly from the coal tax rate of EUR per tonne will be EUR 174 mln in The Parliamentary Spring Agreement mentioned EUR 115 mln, while our analyses reveal a higher figure. If additional volumes to be used by gas-fired power plants come from Dutch resources, they will result in additional benefits. In addition, and on account of the slight increase in wholesale prices, there will be an SDE “windfall” of between EUR 5 mln (coal tax rate of in 2013) and EUR 26 mln (coal tax rate of 35 in 2015). Government revenues in Conclusions Source: team analyses

Annex Key assumptions Quantifying the impacts of a Dutch Coal Tax 13

Key assumptions The analysis takes typical power plants as its basis, representing a group of power plants for which more or less the same conclusions may be drawn. ₋ Old coal-fired power plant: Gelderland-13 or G-13, efficiency: 38% (LHV) ₋ New coal-fired power plant: Maasvlakte-3 or MV-3, efficiency: 45% (LHV) ₋ New gas-fired power plants: Sloe, efficiency: 59% (LHV) ₋ Combined heat and power plant: Diemen 34, efficiency: 59% (LHV) The prices for the key commodities are: ₋ Coal $ 95 per tonne ₋ Gas $ per MWh ₋ Currency1.25 $/€ ₋ CO 2 € 7.5 per tonne Start/stop costs are not included in the analysis 2015 is taken as the basis for all analyses, unless otherwise indicated The standard assumption is that coal-fired power plants include biomass in their combustion mix insofar as this is economically feasible at a level of compensation for an unremunerative maximum EUR 45 per MWh CO 2 content: for coal this is assumed to be 9.83 kg per GJ, and for gas 5.62 kg per GJ (source: IEA) 14