The Balanced Scorecard Approach

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 of 21 Information Strategy Developing an Information Strategy © FAO 2005 IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Strategy Developing.
Advertisements

Some Historic Reference…….. In 1992,
Management, Leadership, & Internal Organization………..
HR SCORECARD Presented By ADEEL TARIQ MOBASHIR ALI.
Paul R. Niven BALANCED SCORECARD STEP-BY-STEP
Planning and Strategic Management
CISB444 - Strategic Information Systems Planning
Chapter 2 DO How can you create a strategic map for your hotel?
Developing and Enacting Strategic Marketing Plans
The Balanced Scorecard. Developed by Robert Kaplan and David Norton. Introduced in the early 1990s. Motivated in part by Wall Street’s focus on quarterly.
Balanced Scorecard as a Performance Management Tool
Performance Measurement and Strategic Information Management
THE BALANCED SCORECARD
Info-Tech Research Group1 Improving Business Satisfaction Moving from Measurement to Action.
Learning and Development Developing leaders and managers
Total Quality, Competitive Advantage, and Strategic Management
Chapter 2 Strategic Training
The Library Balanced Scorecard: The Results Please! Joe Matthews American Library Association June 2007.
P e r f o r m a n c e Measuring Results of Organizational Performance Lesson 4 Performance Methodology: The Balanced Scorecard.
MGT-555 PERFORMANCE AND CAREER MANAGEMENT
Objective Explain What is the Balanced Scorecard
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Management Overview OverviewOf The Monthly Performance Review (MPR) May 2011.
Leaders Facilitate the Planning Process
Measuring for Performance: The Balanced Scorecard
The Information Component: Help Desk Performance Measures
1 Workshop on the Strategic Planning Model. 2 Strategic Planning Model A B C D E Environmental Scan A ssessment Background Information Situational Analysis.
McLean & Company1 Improving Business Satisfaction Moving from Measurement to Action.
Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Planning and Strategic Management Chapter 04.
Copyright © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies All Rights ReservedMcGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 1 Strategic Planning and the Marketing Management Process.
THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF QUALITY, 5e, © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning TM 1 Chapter 8 Performance Measurement and Strategic Information Management.
Culture of Quality Governance Utah is committed to providing value to our citizens through consistently improving services we offer. We are continuing.
E P R E nterprise P erformance R eporting A Fundamentally Better Way to do Business TM.
Logistics and supply chain strategy planning
TRANSFORMING CAPABILITY SUPPORT MATERIALS LEADING VISION CREATION Balanced Scorecard Introduction The balanced scorecard can be used for translating a.
S TRATEGIC M ANAGEMENT. Translating a Mission and Overall Goals into Strategic Outcomes Mission (Why We Exist) To Increase enterprise Value Mission (Why.
Development of Evaluation Tool (KPI) for e-Gov Development Veselin Stoyanov Management consultant, ICB 11 Mar 20111BG-KR eGov Experts Workshop:
AFM The Balanced Scorecard By Isuru Manawadu B.Sc in Accounting Sp. (USJP), ACA.
Enterprise Risk Management Chapter One Prepared by: Raval, Fichadia Raval Fichadia John Wiley & Sons, Inc
The Balanced Score Card
Chapter 1 The Nature of Strategic Management
Formulating a Simulation Project Proposal Chapter3.
Leadership and Management – Part 1 Business Organization and Management 120.
The Balanced Scorecard
Strategic Plan Development Using KPIs to Develop the Strategic Plan.
1 Balanced Scorecard Conference Nikko Hotel, Kuala Lumpur July 2004 Best Practice Implementation: CSFs & Lesson Learned Presenter: Ungku Harun Al’Rashid.
2 Developing Marketing Strategies and Plans
Version 10.0  The High Performance Organisation Ltd Creating A Process Based Management System 1 Welcome Creating a Process Based Management.
Information, Analysis, and Knowledge Management in the Baldrige Criteria Examines how an organization selects, gathers, analyzes, manages, and improves.
Design, Development and Roll Out
Implementing Strategy Chapter 7. Objectives Upon completion of this chapter, you should be able to:  Translate strategic thought to organisational action.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute While there is no prescribed format for a good delivery plan, it should answer 10 questions What a good delivery.
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
Balance Score Card. Balance score card The balanced scorecard is a strategic planning and management system that is used extensively in.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage the IT Portfolio World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Balanced Scorecard René Ewing Governor’s Special Assistant for Management and Quality Improvement Balanced Scorecard René Ewing Governor’s Special Assistant.
Vision, values, culture, mission, aims, objectives, strategy and tactics.
Balanced Scorecard The University of Texas at El Paso Division of the Vice President for Business Affairs.
Data Utilization: Using Baldrige and the Balanced Scorecard to Improve Performance Presented by: Dave Distel, Superintendent Deb Myers, Director of HR.
1 Management Planning & Control System Balanced Scorecard Planning for Long-Run Organizational Success.
1 Balanced Scorecard Philosophy, Basics, Fundamentals, and Functions.
Organisation Control KPI’s & an industry Review
The Balanced Scorecard
Prof. Dr. Dan Dumitru Popescu
Policies and Planning Premises: Strategic Management
Contents A GENERIC IT BALANCED SCORECARD
The Siliwangi University Post Graduate Programs
KEC Dhapakhel Lalitpur
Define Your IT Strategy
Presentation transcript:

The Balanced Scorecard Approach

What is a Balanced Scorecard? The Balanced Scorecard is a strategic planning and management system used to align business activities to the vision and strategy of the organization by monitoring performance against strategic goals. Was first published in 1992 by Kaplan and Norton, a book followed in 1996. The approach is to provide 'balance' to the financial perspective

Why Use a Balanced Scorecard? Improve organizational performance by measuring what matters Increase focus on strategy and results Align organization strategy with workers on a day-to-day basis Focus on the drivers key to future performance Improve communication of the organization’s Vision and Strategy Prioritize Projects / Initiatives

4 Original Business Perspectives The Balanced Scorecard model suggests that we view the organization from 4 perspectives. Then Develop metrics, collect data and analyze it relative to each of these perspectives Adapted from The Balanced Scorecard by Kaplan & Norton

4 Business Perspectives Financial What must we do to create sustainable economic value? Internal Business Process To satisfy our stakeholders, what must be our levels of productivity, efficiency, and quality? Learning and Growth How does our employee performance management system, including feedback to employees, support high performance? Customer What do our customers require from us and how are we doing according to those requirements?

Balanced Scorecard Measurements

4 Business Perspectives 1)The Financial Perspective Timely and accurate funding data will always be a priority, and managers will do whatever necessary to provide it. In fact, often there is more than enough handling and processing of financial data. With the implementation of a corporate database, it is hoped that more of the processing can be centralized and automated. But the point is that the current emphasis on financials leads to the "unbalanced" situation with regard to other perspectives. There is perhaps a need to include additional financial-related data, such as risk assessment and cost-benefit data, in this category. 2)The Business Process Perspective This perspective refers to internal business processes. Metrics based on this perspective allow the managers to know how well their business is running, and whether its products and services conform to customer requirements (the mission). These metrics have to be carefully designed by those who know these processes most intimately; with our unique missions these are not something that can be developed by outside consultants.

4 Business Perspectives 3) The Learning & Growth Perspective This perspective includes employee training and corporate cultural attitudes related to both individual and corporate self-improvement. In a knowledge-worker organization, people -- the only repository of knowledge -- are the main resource. In the current climate of rapid technological change, it is becoming necessary for knowledge workers to be in a continuous learning mode. Metrics can be put into place to guide managers in focusing training funds where they can help the most. In any case, learning and growth constitute the essential foundation for success of any knowledge-worker organization. Kaplan and Norton emphasize that 'learning' is more than 'training'; it also includes things like mentors and tutors within the organization, as well as that ease of communication among workers that allows them to readily get help on a problem when it is needed. It also includes technological tools; what the Baldrige criteria call "high performance work systems."

4 Business Perspectives 4)The Customer Perspective Recent management philosophy has shown an increasing realization of the importance of customer focus and customer satisfaction in any business. These are leading indicators: if customers are not satisfied, they will eventually find other suppliers that will meet their needs. Poor performance from this perspective is thus a leading indicator of future decline, even though the current financial picture may look good. In developing metrics for satisfaction, customers should be analyzed in terms of kinds of customers and the kinds of processes for which we are providing a product or service to those customer groups.

PROCESS OF BALANCED SCORECARD Phase 1: Corporate Scorecard Step One: Organizational Assessment Step One of the scorecard building process is about a number of things: to finalise the Balanced Scorecard Plan which will detail, among others, all the teams that will be involved in the designing of the scorecard and the training they will require.  Secondly, Step One involves conducting the organization assessment of the strategic elements: the mission and vision, SWOT and organization values.  Thirdly, Step One is also about preparing a change management plan for the organization, which will entail conducting a change readiness review to determine how ready the organization is in embarking on such a journey and what needs to be put in place to make it ready, as well as defining communications strategy which will identify the target audience, key messages, media channels, timing, and messengers of the communication. The change management activities will take place throughout each step. Step Two: Strategy Step Two (Strategy) is about determining the strategic themes, including strategic results, strategic themes, and perspectives, which are developed to focus attention on the customer needs and their value proposition. The most important element of this step is to ensure that you have unpacked what your customers are looking for from your organisation in terms of function, relationship and image to determine whether you are providing value to your customers.

PROCESS OF BALANCED SCORECARD StepThree: Objectivess Step Three (Objectives) is about determining your organisation’s objectives – that is your organisation’s continuous improvement activities, which should link to your strategic themes, perspectives and strategic results. Step Four: Strategy Maps  The objectives designed in Step Three are linked in cause-effect relationships to produce a strategy map for each strategic theme. The theme strategy maps are then merged into an overall corporate strategy map that shows how the organisation creates value for its customers and stakeholders. Step Five: Performance Measures  In Step Five, the performance measures are developed for strategic objectives. Performance measures should be defined clearly, differentiating the outcome and output measures, as well as the leading measures (future expected performance) and lagging measures (past performance history). In this step, you will also design your performance targets. This might be perceived as the most difficult and confusing step, so it is important that a bit of time is apportioned so that the performance measures will be meaningful. Step Six: Strategic Initiatives In Step Six, the strategic initiatives are developed that support the strategic objectives. This is where the projects that have to be undertaken to ensure the success of the organisation (the extent to which the organisation fulfills its mandate or vision) are drafted and assigned. To build accountability throughout the organization, performance measures and strategic initiatives are assigned to owners and documented in data definition tables

PROCESS OF BALANCED SCORECARD Step Seven: Software and Automation Step Seven (Software and Automation) involves automating the Balanced Scorecard system, and consists of analysing software options and user requirements to make the most cost-effective software choice for today and to meet enterprise performance information requirements in the future Step 8: Evaluation Step 9 (Evaluation) involves evaluating the success of chosen business strategies. The key question asked is: Were the expected results achieved?  The evaluation step includes the following:   Ensuring that organisational learning and knowledge building are incorporated into planning Making adjustments to existing service programmes Adding new programmes if they are more cost effective Eliminating programmes that are not delivering cost effective services or meeting customer needs Linking planning to budgeting Phase 2: Business Unit or Departmental and Individual Scorecards Implementation Score card: In this phase, the organisation’s balance scorecard is further broken in to departmental level scorecard, so that each department can focus on the elements of the complete organization scorecard. This helps in micromanaging the activities and their monitoring at lower level at intervals best suited to specific goals. The overall scorecard of the organization reports data from departmental scorecard and is viewed by higher management on monthly quarterly meetings

Balanced Scorecard Strategy Map

Department Level Scorecard Example

ADVANTAGES OF BALANCE SCORE CARD 1)Consensus on the strategy at executive level: Building a balanced scorecard requires brain storming at Board/Higher level where discussion are held on organization’ s vision and its core values. This helps in everyone getting aligned about these basics and helps executives look for growth strategies clearly. Balanced scorecard sets the priorities for the organization and senior executives can visualize the future more clearly 2) Communicate Strategy to the Organization: It clearly defines the steps the organization would take to achieve its goals through well planned strategy. The working of the strategy,setting priorities in line with various internal and external constraints helps the leader to appreciate the chosen strategy and its need. 3)Translates Strategy into meaningful goals: It gives clear instruction to the organization about the clear vision what is to be done to achieve it goals. With the priorities and the game plan clearly defined, every one now focuses to achieve the goals. 4)Employee identify themselves with Goals: It helps the employees to clearly identify themselves with how they are helping the organization to achieve its growth. It is very important that employees are explained the balance score card at each possible opportunity to help them understand the way their achievements are paving path for the organization future. Employees then feel proud to be involved in the efforts they put in on day to day basis. This further

ADVANTAGES OF BALANCE SCORE CARD helps employees getting aligned to company’s goals and vision. 5) Processes Focus to Achieve Strategic Goals: It focuses on various process to modify the key processes of the organization’s to achieve identified goals. Since the key processes directly affect the organization performance , more importance should be given to key processes which also in turn helps to meet the customer expectations more efficiently and helps make the organization more competitive. 6) Periodic Reporting Of Status of Strategic Goals: It is keypart of the management system and therefore is discussed periodically. This helps keeping everyone in the organization aligned and achieve growth through balanced score card.

DISADVANTAGES OF BALANCE SCORE CARD 1) Distracts from Achieving Actual goals: It can add a new type of reporting without improving quality, so it seems to be additional set of non value added reporting or worse, distracting from achieving goals. 2) Performance is Subjective: Since performance is on one own feelings and not on facts the data collected will not be accurate. 3) A Scorecard and not Decision making tool: Since it helps only in assessing performance it cannot be used as a tool for decision making 4)Leads to Lack of Focus: It leads to lack of focus on the underlying actions that produce a good score. 5)Ignores bottom up perspective: It only focus on top down perspective and not bottom line 6)Leads to Reluctance to Change: 7) Produces Measures form Diversified Divisions: It produces measures from diversified divisions that cannot be aggregated at the corporate level 8)Does not give timely information 9)High Initial Cost: Implementing a balanced scorecard system can cost a lot of money in training time and additional money for any consultants that are needed during the process