Economics
The study of how we use limited resources to meet unlimited wants This means that SCARCITY is at the heart of our understanding of modern economics
Ascribed to Adam Smith (who was not necessarily a capitalist) Claims that markets direct individual self- interest towards socially desirable outcomes Has become the foundation of free market capitalism
Economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production Is driven by the production of goods and services for a profit Types of capitalism Mercantilism Free-market economy Social market economy State-ownership Mixed economy
Economic system based on collective ownership of the means of production Is driven by the production of goods and services to meet social needs Covers a variety of sociopolitical systems Anarchism (libertarian socialism) Authoritarian communism Democratic socialism Syndicalism
Describes how many markets determine prices If supply increases relative to demand, prices DECLINE… If supply decreases relative to demand, prices INCREASE If demand increases relative to supply, prices INCREASE If demand decreases relative to supply, prices DECREASE
Describes the degree to which one economic variable affects others ELASTIC variables exhibit large responses to relatively small changes in another variable INELASTIC variables exhibit small responses to relatively large changes in another variable
Value of expenditures on final goods and services U.S. GDP has increased steadily—when you hear about “economic growth”, they are usually referencing GDP ‘Recession’ means 6 months (2 quarters) of negative growth GDP as a measure of economic performance can be misleading—non-monetarized labor, shift of non-monetarized labor into the market
School of economic thought arising from the ideas of John Maynard Keynes Claims that markets often produce inefficient outcomes that can/should be corrected by government intervention Interventionary instruments include Fiscal policy Monetary policy Debate about effectiveness usually centers on interpreting the effectiveness of FDRs response to the Great Depression
Theory that economic growth should be stimulated by lowering barriers to production Generally means lowering tax rates on income (individual and corporate) and capital gains Strongly associated with “Ronald Reagan” and “trickle down economics”
Commodities: exchange, in bulk, of everything from orange juice to petroleum— include both ‘spot’ and ‘futures’ contracts Currency: exchange of different national currencies Debt: issuance and trading of bonds (promises to pay in the future) Equity: issuance and trading of stocks (shares in a company)
Describes the ability of a particular group (company, sector, nation) to sell goods in a given market RELATIVE to other groups in the same market Competitiveness expresses profitability, which is directly tied to income, wealth, etc. EXP: Saudi vs. tar sand oil production
Describes the efficiency of production Productivity increases when greater output becomes possible with the same input Often couched in terms of “worker productivity”, but is also a measure of technological efficiency Growth rates of 1-2% are good
Rate at which one currency is exchanged for another and/or the value of one nation’s currency in terms of another currency Appreciation: increase in value of a currency relative to others—benefits consumers and hurts producers, ceteris paribus Depreciation: decrease in value of a currency relative to others—benefits producers and hurts consumers, ceteris paribus Currencies typically are pegged, floating, or mixed
Is usually expressed in terms of ‘unemployment’ The official unemployment rate is 7.6%-- percentage of the workforce that is seeking employment but is unable to find a position Including the number of people who are no longer actively seeking employment takes the rate up to 15%+ ‘Normal’ unemployment levels are between 4 and 6 percent
Inflation: rise of general level of prices of goods and services over time Deflation: decline of general level of prices of goods and services over time PREDICTABILITY is key, although economies tend to do best with relatively low, steady inflation (1-4%) Deflation, over any extended period, and hyper-inflation can quickly wreck economies
Rate at which interest is paid by a borrower to a lender for the use of money Are important because they directly affect consumer spending, the housing market, etc, and thus impact all financial markets Key interest rates are: Federal funds rate (rate for overnight, uncollateralized loans between banks) Prime rate—general FFR+3% Are generally linked to inflation on an inverse basis Stagflation!
Consumer confidence: expression of consumer sentiment about the current and future status of the economy Often used as a predictor of future consumer behavior Particularly important because consumer spending makes up over two-thirds of the economy Business confidence: expression of business sentiment about the current and future status of the economy Often used as a predictor of future business behavior (hiring, tech investment)
Expression of the relative distribution of income (and wealth) across the population Is highly variable, both across time and between countries Income inequality is growing rapidly in the U.S.
Governments usually borrow through the use of bonds U.S. national debt has two parts Public debt—securities held by non-federal investors ($12T) Inter-Government debt—IOUs held by federal accounts on other federal entities ($5T) Influences interest rates, and more broadly, market sentiment
Influence the economy—a little bit
Premise 1: economic collapse is inevitable Premise 2: collapse sooner is better than collapse later
Leadership
Realist Maximalists Neoconservatives George H.W. Realist Minimalists Isolationists Offshore balancers (Layne) Liberal Maximalists Wilsonians (spread democracy around the world) Clintonians (power used in the spread of ideals) Liberal/Constructive Minimalists Fukuyama (let markets do their work) Diamond (let freedom do its work politically)
How does one define hegemony? Easiest definition is holding a preponderance of power relative to other states—power as a goal of states, a measure of influence, an outcome of victory, control over resources and capabilities Hegemony can be measured along several axes Military power (power projection)—ability to enforce your will through military might Economic power—ability to pay for militaries, bribe allies, exert pressure on other states Cultural power—attractiveness of yoru way of life Ideological power—attractiveness of your ideas
The international system is often describes as having “poles,” conglomerations of power around one or more states Apolar (no dominant power) Unipolar (one dominant power) Bipolar (two competing powers) Multipolar (multiple competing powers) Hegemony can also be described in terms of global and regional influence
Major powers (global influence) Middle powers (global prominence, regional influence) Other states of influence
China European Union France Germany Great Britain Japan Russia United States
Australia Brazil Canada Egypt India Indonesia Iran Israel Italy Pakistan South Africa South Korea Turkey
Oil Producers (Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi, Venezuela) High Population States (Bangladesh, Mexico) Emerging Regional Powers (Ethiopia, Nigeria, Vietnam, Thailand) Major Aid Providers (Nordic states, Netherlands)
Military Power Outspends the world Unmatched power projection capabilities (aircraft, carriers, missiles) Unmatched surveillance capabilities Unmatched technological edge (smart weapons, space weapons, etc) Large population base from which to draw soldiers)
Economic Power One-fourth of the world’s gross product Center of technological innocation Most important banks and stockmarkets Massive corporate power Huge trade flows—mutual dependenceis Magnet for high-skilled labor from other countries Vast personal wealth
Cultural Influence Media English language (2 billion speakers/learners) Pop culture
Ideological Influence Democratic attractiveness Free markets Reputation [does Obama fix this?]
Equilibrium theory says that powers will be balanced, and various theories of decline argue that a state can only remain dominant for so long before it loses the economic, military, and/or political capacity to do so That raises the question—who might replace the U.S. as a unipolar power, or challenge the U.S. in a bi- or multi-polar system?
Pros High degree of soft power Large population Powerful economy Strong education system Powerful corporations Relatively large collective military Cons Military is weak, out- dated, and relatively poorly trained Lags in miltiary tech development Aging population Lack of unified decisionmaking structures
Pros Huge population Surging economy and manufacturing capacity Large military Strong central government Desire to lead/have a presence on the global stage Cons Population strains and population aging Relative lack of tech innovation, esp. in military matters Fragile central government Economic development is subject to outside disruption External resource dependence Lack of military power projection capability
Pros Tech innovation Robust economy Access to military tech goodies Cons Tough neighborhood, not popular with neighbors Aging, declining population External resource dependence Inward-focused security culture
Pros Big military Huge resource base Continental footprint Strong central government Cons Aging, declining, drunken population Suspicious neighbors Internal factionalism
Pros Large number of well-educated persons Huge population (big army!) Cons Population pressures High rates of rural poverty Lack of wealth
Brazil Indonesia Iran Nigeria Pakistan