An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mercury and Methylmercury Processes in North SF Bay Tidal Wetland Ecosystems San Francisco Estuary Institute USGS BRD WERC Vallejo, CA USGS WRD Menlo Park,
Advertisements

Estimation of Mercury Bioavailability in Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluents J. David Dean San Francisco Estuary Institute Mercury Coordination Conference.
Mercury in SF Bay The 8-Minute Conceptual Model California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region RMP Annual Meeting May 4, 2004.
Regulatory Update Carrie Austin, SF Bay Water Board Michelle Wood, CV Water Board.
North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.
Nitrogen Mineralization Across an Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition Gradient in Southern California Deserts Leela E. Rao 1, David R. Parker 1, Andrzej Bytnerowicz.
Mercury bioaccumulation in stream ecosystems—Detailed studies, spatial assessments, and trend monitoring Mark E. Brigham U.S. Department of the Interior.
Progress report: Biological mechanisms for Hg accumulation in largemouth bass Ben Greenfield San Francisco Estuary Institute Fish Mercury Project 2007.
Tributary Workgroup Case Study. Outline for presentation Why Coordinate? Approach of SW Tributary workgroup SW Tributary Workgroup progress and next steps.
Hyojin Kim May 9 th 2008 California Water Symposium.
The Aqutic Cycling of Mercury in the Everglades (ACME) Project: Challenges of Linking Field Data to Conceptual Models David Krabbenhoft, William Orem,
The Aquatic Cycling of Mercury in the Everglades (ACME) Project: Integrated Research Providing Information for Management and Science Authors: William.
Impacts of Forest Fire on Boreal Lakes
EVALUATING MERCURY EXPOSURE AND SOURCE ATTRIBUTION USING GEOS-CHEM Noelle Eckley Selin Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Center.
Mercury in the Environment. What is Mercury (Hg) Hg is a silvery, liquid metal at room temperature "heavy metals." Like water, Hg can evaporate and become.
HYDRUS_1D Sensitivity Analysis Limin Yang Department of Biological Engineering Sciences Washington State University.
A Case Study Examining Mercury Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification
3 rd GEOS-Chem Users’ Meeting April 12, 2007 Elsie Sunderland U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research & Development National Center for.
SOURCE ATTRIBUTION OF MERCURY EXPOSURE FOR U.S. SEAFOOD CONSUMERS: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY Noelle Eckley Selin Joint Program on the Science and Policy.
Convection Convection: transfer of heat by a flowing liquid or gas
Impact of Soil Health on Crop Production Francisco J. Arriaga Soil Science Specialist Dept. of Soil Science & UW-Extension.
D. Gay, Schmeltz, Sharac, Nat. Tribal Conf. for Env. Management, Billings, MT, June 26, 2008, Slide 1 Current Mercury Monitoring Approaches in Tribal Country.
NOAA Fisheries, Southwest Region Protected Resources Division Santa Rosa, California Science, Service, Stewardship Melanie D. Harrison, Ph.D Technical.
Open Oceans: Pelagic Ecosystems II
Adrienne Ethier*, Joseph Atkinson, Joseph DePinto and David Lean.
Only the good die young: bottom water hypoxia as a mortality source for copepod eggs and nauplii in Chesapeake Bay Michael Roman, David Elliot and Jamie.
Mercury Sources to Water and Associated Impacts Chris Piehler.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
Environmental Controls on Methylmercury Production and Degradation in Everglades Sediments Environmental Controls on Methylmercury Production and Degradation.
Upal Ghosh and James Sanders,
CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY
COASTAL MARINE SCIENCES (CMARS) WORKSHOP Impact of Land Use on Water Quality and Aquatic Life In Maryland’s Chesapeake and Coastal BaysOVERVIEW Land Use.
Quantifying the Role of Ecological Uncertainty in a Public Health Policy Decision Annual Meeting American Association for the Advancement of Science Seattle,
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
Slide 1 Mercury Control Program for the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta Estuary San Francisco Bay RMP Annual Meeting October 7, 2008 Michelle Wood.
From Micro to Macro: A view from downstream A synthesis of MeHg science from the Yolo Bypass and SFB-Delta Lisa Windham-Myers 9/26/13 EPA Workshop, San.
Geologic controls on the chemical stream water response to atmospheric pollution (acid and Hg deposition) in Shenandoah National Park Ami Riscassi Drew.
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
Physical and chemical factors controlling mercury and methylmercury concentrations in stream water Mark E. Brigham and Dennis A. Wentz 5 th National Monitoring.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Dynamic PCB Partitioning in Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio Sediments Andrew Lenox Environmental Engineer US Army Corps.
D. Gay, Schmeltz, Sharac, Nat. Tribal Conf. for Env. Management, Billings, MT, June 26, 2008, Slide 1 Current Mercury Monitoring Approaches in Tribal Country.
South River Mercury TMDL – June 2005 Jack Eggleston Monitoring Stations Stream Flow Water Sampling Next Steps Plans.
Methylmercury Production in Groundwater Watershed Hg Research Program at SERC Deposition Transport Watershed retention Methylation MDN site MD00 Stream.
Mercury Flux in an Urban Watershed System Joseph T. Bushey 1, Peter M. Groffman 2, Charles T. Driscoll 1, Gary T. Fisher 3 1 Syracuse University Dept.
Mercury cycling and bioaccumulation in streams in Oregon, Wisconsin, and Florida Mark E. Brigham 5 th National Monitoring Conference San José, California.
A Case Study Examining Mercury Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification
Completing the SF Bay Mercury TMDL Carrie Austin SF Bay Water Board.
Abstract Man-made dams influence more than just the flow of water in a river. The build up of sediments and organic matter, increased residence times,
Localized Mercury Bioaccumulation Study Presented to the SFEI 20 February 2008.
Speciation and Bioavailability of Mercury in Ambient and Wastewater-Influenced Water Samples: A Preliminary Study Rob Reash American Electric Power, Columbus,
Using Regional Models to Assess the Relative Effects of Stressors Lester L. Yuan National Center for Environmental Assessment U.S. Environmental Protection.
Mercury: What’s going on? Michelle Woolfolk, Modeling Unit Discharger meetings:December 18, 2002 and January 15, 2003.
Unexpected Relationships between Methylmercury Enrichment in Fresh Waterbodies and Food-Web Uptake Steve Dent PhD, Eric Blischke, Andy Greazel PG- CDM.
Near-surface Geologic Environments
Figure 1. (a) Distribution of biotic mercury (Hg) observations across the northeastern United States and southeastern Canada, and specific distribution.
A Case Study Examining Mercury Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification
Mercury Dissolution Studies in Soil Columns as a Function of pe
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Conclusions & Future Work
Water Quality Control Commission Hearing June 8, 2015
Department Civil and Environmental Engineering
Contaminated Fish: The Mercury Connection
Methylmercury and Mercury in SF Bay & Wetlands
A Case Study Examining Mercury Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification
A Case Study Examining Mercury Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification
Chapter 13 The Global Cycles of Sulfur and Mercury
A Case Study Examining Mercury Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification
Mercury Methylation and Climate Change in Lake Champlain
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Presentation transcript:

An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C. Gilmour Smithsonian Environmental Research Center Edgewater, MD Robert P. Mason Dept. Marine Sciences University of Connecticut Groton, CT Andrew Heyes Chesapeake Biological Laboratory University of Maryland, Center for Environmental Science Solomons, MD, Mark Castro Appalachian Laboratory University of Maryland, Center for Environmental Science Frostburg, MD 21532

Mercury concentrations in largemouth bass in Maryland reservoirs, size-normalized to a 370 mm fish (data from Gilmour et al. “An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs” MD DNR in review). What drives the differences in MeHg in fish among Maryland reservoirs? What can be done to limit MeHg bioaccumulation in Maryland? EPA’s Ambient Water Quality Criterion (AWQC) for Hg in fish tissue is 235 ug/kg

Parameters used to examine controls on Hg in Maryland fish Factors that affect Hg deposition and transport: Watershed size Watershed:lake area Landuse Physiographic province Reservoir capacity Hydraulic residence time Water chemistry Sediment Factors that affect net methylation: Water chemistry Hg, pH, sulfate, DOC, conductivity, DO, TSS, nutrients Sediment chemistry Pore waters: Hg, pH, sulfate, sulfide, Fe, Mn, DOC Bulk phase: Hg, density, organic matter, reduced sulfur (AVS/CRS) Sediment water partitioning Factors that influence MeHg bioaccumulation: Water chemistry MeHg, pH, DOC, TSS, nutrients Deposition Transport Watershed retention Deposition Methylation Bioaccumulation

Statistical Analysis Three separate models: Factors that affect Hg deposition and transport: –Dependant variable: Hg in water and sediments Factors that affect net methylation: –Dependant variable: MeHg in water and sediments Factors that influence MeHg bioaccumulation: –Dependant variable: BAF (MeHg in Largemouth bass: MeHg in water) Stepwise multiple regression

Significant parameters in each model component Factors that affect Hg deposition and transport: Dependant variable: Hg in water and sediments Hg deposition (+) Landuse: % developed (+) Water chemistry: Cl, DOC (+) Sediment: organic content (+) Reservoir flow (-), water depth (-) Factors that affect net methylation: Dependant variable: MeHg in water and sediments Water chemistry Hg (+), pH (-), sulfate (+), DO (-) Sediment chemistry Hg (+), sulfide (-), organic matter (+) Factors that influence MeHg bioaccumulation: Dependant variable: BAF DO (-), pH (+), surface:volume ratio (+) Deposition Transport Watershed retention Deposition Methylation Bioaccumulation

Watershed factors: Hg deposition

From MD DNR (Sherwell) 2006 Watershed factors: Hg deposition

Watershed factors: Landuse

Methylation: %MeHg as the dependant variable Varies strongly among reservoirs

Controls on methylation: bottom water anoxia

Controls on methylation: pH Sulfate

Significant parameters in each model component Factors that affect Hg deposition and transport: Dependant variable: Hg in water and sediments Hg deposition (+) Landuse: % developed (+) Water chemistry: Cl, DOC (+) Sediment: organic content (+) Reservoir flow (-), water depth (-) Factors that affect net methylation: Dependant variable: MeHg in water and sediments Water chemistry Hg (+), pH (-), sulfate (+), DO (-) Sediment chemistry Hg (+), sulfide (-), organic matter (+) Factors that influence MeHg bioaccumulation: Dependant variable: BAF DO (-), pH (+), surface:volume ratio (+) Deposition Transport Watershed retention Deposition Methylation Bioaccumulation