1 RBCA Tool Kit Exercise. 2 Groundwater protection : Tier 1 compliance point Point of compliance=Point of exposure (on site) compliance point (receptor)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Risk Model Comparison Study
Advertisements

Society for Risk Analysis Workshop 3: Application of Web-based Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) Leslie Galloway, University of Tennessee/Oak Ridge.
RECAP Addressing Exposure to Multiple Constituents that Elicit Noncarcinogenic Effects on the Same Target Organ/System.
Learning from the States… Commonwealth of Massachusetts
COMPARISONS OF SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS MEASUREMENTS TO MODELED EMISSIONS FROM SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION by John A. Menatti and Robin V. Davis Utah Department.
2014 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Amendments Discussion Points Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting May 22, 2014.
Understanding the MRBCA Program UST Program Implications Petroleum Storage Tank Insurance Fund May 2004.
Remediation Programs Update MSECA Quarterly Meeting March 13, 2012.
Claremore Medical Office Building From Landfill to Medical Office Building A Brownfield Success Story THE GREEN SIDE OF BROWNFIELD REMEDIATION.
21 st Annual Conference. Soil and Groundwater Screening Levels Developing Soil and Groundwater Screening Levels for International Service Station Sites.
Dale T Littlejohn Senior Geologist. What is fate and transport in the vadose zone? Vadose Zone Hydrocarbon release from buried pipeline Aquifer Surface.
LDEQ’s RECAP Domenico and Summer’s Models. DOMENICO MODEL.
LDEQ’s RECAP Soil Protective of Groundwater - Soil GW Soil Saturation - Soil sat.
Move Retinal Position: Allows you to view different regions of the retina. Location refers to the center of screen in arbitrary units Retinal region that.
Discussion Tool Grading Discussion. Step 1: Establish Discussion Topic as Gradable.
Vapor Intrusion Workgroup July 29,
Vapor Intrusion Guidance Proposed Updates
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
LABEL FUNCTION. Click on the “LABELS” button (it will be ‘highlighted’ Grey once selected) ** This Screen will NOT CHANGE ** You have selected the function.
Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Strategy and Modeling Developments
Models to predict metal leaching to ground- and surface water: from soil data to scenario studies Bert-Jan Groenenberg, Luc Bonten, Paul Römkens.
Risk Analysis of Contaminated Sites: Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment F. Quercia, ANPA Workshop ICS/UNIDO - Fundacion Mamonal Environmental.
Contaminated land: dealing with hydrocarbon contamination Assessing risks to human health.
Application of a Human Health Risk Assessment Software to Support Revitalisation Decisions at Post-industrial Sites E.Wcislo, J.Dlugosz, M.Korcz Institute.
Of Massachusetts Department ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Soil Vapor Intrusion... A Decade of Regulatory Requirements & Experiences Paul W. Locke MA DEP Bureau.
Introduction to Atlantic RBCA Version 3 Webinar May 4, 2013.
DTSC VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE California Industrial Hygiene Council 16 th Annual Conference Dan Gallagher Department of Toxic Substances Control California.
Vapor Intrusion and Environmental Liability Learning From Past Mistakes EDR Insight Webinar, February 12, 2013 Presented by: Joseph Maternowski Hessian.
Contaminated land: dealing with hydrocarbon contamination Assessing risks to other receptors.
Case Study 1 Application of different tools: RBCA Tool Kit and APIDSS.
Examples of Health Risk Assessment Applications for Contaminated Sites in the Upper Silesia, Poland Eleonora Wcislo Institute for Ecology of Industrial.
Workshop U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Pacific Northwest National Laboratory November 15-17, 2005 GENII Version 2.0 Overview and.
CRITICAL PATHWAY ANALYSIS FOR RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT CONTROL AND ASSESSMENT Riaz Akber
Comparable Property Search. A "comp" search enables you to search for and find properties similar to a selected property of your choice. This is accomplished.
Italy: the new legislation on the remediation of contaminated sites F. Quercia, APAT Tour de Table NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meeting 5-7th June 2006, Athens,
VI Draft Guidance: Overview of Comments to November, 2002 OSWER VI Guidance Michael Sowinski DPRA, Inc.
SITE STATUS UPDATE TOP STOP PETROLEUM RELEASE SITE GUNNISION, UTAH Morgan Atkinson – Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, Project Manager.
Carousel Tract Environmental Remediation Project Update by Expert Panel to Regional Board July 11, 2013.
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model. Typical Site Management Problems: Site complexities  Complicated hydrogeology  Multiple contaminants of concern (COCs)
INTRODUCTION TO RECAP WORKSHOP. Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Risk Evaluation/Corrective Action Program October 20, 2003.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
Editing Attributes in ArcGIS Attributes – the data in records. e.g A parcel of land might be zone 3A residential. The field = TAG The attribute = 3A In.
Toxicology Update - Implementation of Revised Impacts Review Procedures Mike Coldiron, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
VERSITET SOIL CONTAMINATTION APRIL 2014 UNI INDOOR CLIMATE RISK ASSESSMENT.
NFA Letter Template: Tips and Hints to Reduce Comments CP Annual Training October 27, 2015 Sydney Poole – DERR.
LDEQ RECAP.
RECAP GROUNDWATER. Groundwater Current Use: » DOTD Well Survey (1 mi radius/12 mo) » 500 foot walking receptor survey Potential Use: » sustainable yield.
FAIR Meeting April 6, Groundwater Results – Fall 2003 Benzene ND 1,000 ug/L Product.
Massachusetts Waste Site Cleanup Program _________________________________ Privatized program since 1993 Direct oversight of only the highest priority.
Environmental Risk Assessment and Risk Management Kevin L. Long ENVIRON International Corporation Academy Park High School May 12, 2010.
Brownfields 2004, “Light or Heavy Starch: Cleaning the Cleaners” September 2004 Presented by Matt Shurtliff Roosevelt Towne Apartments.
EPA Targeted Brownfields Assessment Applications for Culturally Sensitive Sites The TseWhitZen Village Cemetery Restoration Project Joanne LaBaw, EPA Matthew.
The Indoor Inhalation Exposure Route Heather Nifong Illinois EPA May 5, 2008.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
GSI ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Houston, Texas (713) Workshop 1: Assessment and Evaluation of Vapor Intrusion at Petroleum.
S-Risk® - Advanced demo
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
Example of the storage location of the sample folder
CLICK HERE TO BEGIN THE GAME!!
Sean Anderson, P.Eng., QPESA Steve Russell, B.Sc., QPRA
At facilities with subsurface contamination, what other chemicals may your workers be breathing? Matt Raithel.
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
European Risk Model Comparison Study
FAQs for Evaluating the Soil-to-Groundwater Pathway
Access: Reports Participation Project
A&WMA Regulatory Conference Symposium UST Risk Based Corrective Action
Grauer and Barber Series Microsoft Access Chapter One
Brownfield Corrective Action with Revised RRS
Gerald (Jerry) Wick, P.G. Project Manager, VCP-CA Section
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model
Presentation transcript:

1 RBCA Tool Kit Exercise

2 Groundwater protection : Tier 1 compliance point Point of compliance=Point of exposure (on site) compliance point (receptor) are located closed to the source

3

4 Note. All on site exposure pathways have been selected with residential land use. This scenario provides risk based cleanup standards, which are protective for unrestricted, land use.

5 4. Commands and Options: select Exposure factors and target Risks. Note that the default exposure parameters are already entered. Select return to exposure pathway, then main screen

6

7 Note. The Exposure Pathways button is now green. Select Constituent of Concern

8 Constituent of Concern Select COCs: Select Add/Insert. Highlight Xylene (mixed Isomers) from the list of chemicals and choose Select. Also select Toluene ecc. Rapresentative COC concentration: input directly the COC concentration data for GW and Soil or Click Claculate to enter Site Data.

9 Costituent of Concern: Enter Site Data, if there are different measure point. In this case RBCA can evaluate the mean, the maximum, or the UCL value, depending on wich is the best approximation.

10 1. Define Transport models 2. Define Soil, GW and Air Parameters Main Screen

11 1. Vertical Transport, Surface Soil Column. Select “Combination surface soil /Johnson & Ettinger models, for Outdoor air. Select Johnson & Ettinger model” for indoor air. Select “ASTM Model” for soil to GW leaching. 2. Command and Options: Select Main Screen. Transport Models

12 1. Select each parameter screen from the main screen and review the default parameters provided. Return to the main screen. Note: All the input buttons have green dots indication that all required model inputs have been entered Soil Parameters GW Parameters Air Parameters

13

14

15

16 Review Output Review the Exposure Flowchart, COC Chem Parameters, Input data Summary and User-Spec. COC data output screens to ensure that the model input parameters where entered correctly. Select Baseline Risks.

17 Baseline RisksSelect Risk by All Pathways. Record maximum individual COC risk levels on the table below

18 Which pathways controls the overall benzene RBSL for soil ? Cleanup Standards. RBSL Soil What is the pathway specific RBSL for benzene for the Soil to indoor air Pathway? mg/l Soil leaching to gw

19 What is the pathway specific RBSL for benzene and MTBE to groundwater ingestion ? (Benzene: 2.9E-3 mg/L; MTBE: 3.7E-1 mg/L). These are also the applicable RBSL for benzene and MTBE. RBSL Gw

20

21 Point of compliance (edge of site) compliance point (receptor) might be located at some distance from the source Groundwater protection : Tier 2 compliance point

22

23

24

25 Control the Exposure Pathway Flowchart to be sure the selected exposure pathways were correct.

26 Transport Model Gw parametrs now require additonal information

27

28 Gw parametrs now require additonal information

29

30

31 Review Output

32 SSTL for Groundwater and Soil

33

34

35

36

37 COC Chemical Parameters