Poverty measurement: experience of the Republic of Moldova UNECE, Measuring poverty, 4 May 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GDP by Income Approach and Accounts of Household Sector For Qatar Experience Prepared by : Aisha Al-Mansoori Statistical Researcher Population & Social.
Advertisements

Statistical Issues in Measuring Poverty from Non-Survey Sources NATIONAL ACCOUNTS UNSD/NA/MR1 UN STATISTICS DIVISION Economic Statistics Branch National.
Are current poverty measures sufficient during recessionary times? A Case Study for Ireland Pamela Lafferty Marion McCann Central Statistics Office.
1 Measurement and Analysis of Poverty in Jordan Joint Study by :  Ministry of Social Development  Department of Statistics  Department for Int’l Development.
N ational T ransfer A ccounts Data Review (Hands On) Amonthep Chawla East-West Center & Nihon University Population Research Institute.
Risk of Low Birth Weight Associated with Family Poverty in Korea Bong Joo Lee Se Hee Lim Department of Social Welfare, Seoul National University. A Paper.
Tanzania poverty update Poverty Monitoring Group (PMG) September 4, 2014.
UNECE Workshop on Consumer Price Indices Session 1: The Concept, Scope and Coverage of the CPI Presentation by Cengiz Erdoğan, TurkStat October Istanbul,
1 Poor or Poverty Generally, a person who is unable to satisfy his basic food and non- food(education,health,housing..etc.) requirements can be considered.
CE Overview Jay T. Ryan Chief, Division of Consumer Expenditure Survey December 8, 2010.
Poverty Measurement in Tajikistan
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS) Palestine Poverty Maps 2009 March
Measuring and Monitoring Poverty for the MDGs Johan A. Mistiaen Economist-Statistician Development Data Group The World Bank Overview of the Approach and.
Exploring Poverty Indicators 5th - 9th December 2011, Rome.
DATE: 26 TH AUGUST 2013 VENUE: LA PALM ROYALE BEACH HOTEL BACKGROUND OF GHANA LIVING STANDARDS SURVEY (GLSS 6) 1.
Gagik GevorgyanGagik Gevorgyan Member of State Council on Statistics of the Republic of ArmeniaMember of State Council on Statistics of the Republic of.
UNECE Workshop on Consumer Price Indices Session 3: Calculation Expenditure Weight Presentation by Cengiz Erdoğan, TurkStat October Istanbul, Turkey.
2000/2001 Household Budget Survey (HBS) Conducted by The National Bureau of Statistics.
Household Income and Expenditure 2012 Household Budget Survey By Sanjev Bhonoo 18 November
UGANDA NATIONAL PANEL SURVEY PROGRAM DECEMBER 2013 By James Muwonge, Uganda Bureau of Statistics Uganda Bureau of Statistics.
Measuring Consumption and Poverty in Zambia GSS methodology conference, 27 June 2012.
Constructing the Welfare Aggregate Part 2: Adjusting for Differences Across Individuals Bosnia and Herzegovina Poverty Analysis Workshop September 17-21,
1 Economy and Poverty Bratislava, May 2003 Jean-Etienne Chapron Statistical Division UNECE.
Measuring poverty and inequality in the Republic of Belarus Inna Konoshonok Head of the Living Standards Statistics and Household Survey Department NATIONAL.
Measurement of Poverty: a Case Study of Pakistan Ambar Narayan (World Bank) Regional Poverty Analysis and Monitoring Workshop Islamabad, Pakistan March.
Statistics Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan Department of Labour and Living Standards Statistics Poverty Measurement in Kazakhstan: Current Situation.
Sudan Experience on Poverty Survey Somaia K.E.Omer Date 7-8 Aug بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
TAJIKISTAN 2012/2013 POVERTY ESTIMATES USING THE TAJSTAT HOUSEHOLD BUDGET SURVEY TajStat –– World Bank.
The new HBS Chisinau, 26 October Outline 1.How the HBS changed 2.Assessment of data quality 3.Data comparability 4.Conclusions.
Presentation at the UNECE seminar – October 2003 Reducing poverty and MDG: some aspects for Moldova Dr Arcadie Barbarosie Institute for Public Policy,
The Improvement of HBS in the Republic of Moldova European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, Rome, Italy Lilian Galer,
Poverty Ms. C. Rughoobur Africa Statistics Day 18 November 2013.
DFID: STATISTICS TRAINING DAY LONDON, NOVEMBER 11, 2013 JONATHAN HAUGHTON Measuring.
Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods for Understanding Poverty Principles and Country Case Study.
Roundtable Meeting on Programme for the 2010 Round of Censuses of Agriculture Bangkok, Thailand 28 November-2 December, 2005 VILLAGE LEVEL SOCIO-ECONOMIC.
Statistics Committee of the Ministry of National Economy Republic of Kazakhstan PRACTICE OF KAZAKHSTAN IN GENERATING POVERTY INDICATORS Switzerland, Geneva,
Using the American Community Survey to Create a National Academy of Sciences-Style Poverty Measure Work by the New York City Center for Economic Opportunity.
PRBS Development Partners Presentation at the 2008 Annual Review of Budget Support Progress in poverty reduction in Tanzania 2000/ Assessment and.
HBS Results, Topics  HBS general characteristic  Indicators obtained based on HBS  The main characteristics of households under the survey 
Multidimensional Poverty Assessment: Experience of Ukraine Inna Ossipova Household Survey Department State Statistics Service of Ukraine.
Statistics Division Beijing, China 25 October, 2007 EC-FAO Food Security Information for Action Programme Side Event Food Security Statistics and Information.
Interstate Statistical Committee of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS STAT) Methodological approaches to measuring core inflation in the CIS.
Workshop on Price Index Compilation Issues February 23-27, 2015 Market Basket Items and Weights Gefinor Rotana Hotel, Beirut, Lebanon.
1. 2 Introduction Purpose of the ICP UN System of National Accounts calls for comparisons of GDP across countries be using PPPs The Approach Collection.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division UNECE Workshop on Consumer Price Indices Istanbul, Turkey,10-13 October 2011 Session.
ISI Satellite Conference on Agricultural Statistics, Maputo, August 2009 Integrated survey framework Using Household Expenditure Surveys for Food.
Household Economic Resources Discussant Comments UN EXPERT GROUP MEETING 9 September 2008 Garth Bode, Australian Bureau of Statistics.
POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION OF IDPs IN SERBIA Slobodan Cvejic Marija Babovic Belgrade University.
Collection of Data on Remittances Experience from the Ghana Living Standards Survey Grace Bediako Ghana Statistical Service.
Rio Group on Poverty Statistics 1 Background Information 2 Present Objectives and Work Program 3 Approaches to Poverty Measurement 4 Transversal topics.
Slide 1 Summary of responses on vulnerability measurement Vania Etropolska, UNECE 4 May 2015.
Ëëë.instat.gov.al 17 October 2012 MIGRATION STATISTICS “Albanian specific examples of migration surveys” Ruzhdie Bici.
Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods for Understanding Poverty Principles and Country Case Study.
Designing LSMS Questionnaires Kinnon Scott Gero Carletto DECRG.
Constructing the Welfare Aggregate Part 2: Adjusting for Differences Across Individuals Salman Zaidi Washington DC, January 19th,
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Agricultural statistics part 1A Demarcation and principles Business Statistics and Registers.
1 Outline  Introduction  Methodology for compiling CPI  Data Collection and Compilation.
Living standard indicators. Living standard material, cultural, social and moral utitity values which have inhabitants in the time and space utility values.
HBS 2000/01: March National Bureau of Statistics ANALYSIS OF THE HBS 2000/01 INCOME POVERTY.
AN ANALYSIS OF HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURE AND INCOME DATA
Interstate statistical committee
Module 1 Measuring Poverty
The effects of rotational design and attrition
INCIDENCE OF POVERTY IN MALAYSIA (1999, 2007)
INCIDENCE OF POVERTY IN MALAYSIA (1999, 2007)
Chapter 13 – Economic Performance
Lifecycle Deficit (Consumption & Labor Income)
HELLENIC STATISTICAL AUTHORITY
POVERTY MESUREMENT IN UGANDA
Rm per month per household (1)
Presentation transcript:

Poverty measurement: experience of the Republic of Moldova UNECE, Measuring poverty, 4 May 2015

The HBS is the important source of economic and social data, it provides data on: i) measures of living standards, ii) consumption and income structure, iii) weights for consumer price index and iv) various estimates for the National Accounts.  Data collection method: -paper based interview, face to face interview and self recording of diary  Survey tools: - Household roster: socio and demographic characteristics, education, employment, housing, land, etc. - Diary: income, expenditure (cash, in-kind) - Non-response sheet: reasons of non-responses and key variable on non-respondent Data collection (1)

 Sampling: -net sample size 9768 hhs, response rate is 62%. -rotation scheme: i) every second year 20% of PSUs are replaced; ii) 50% of hhs are part of four years panel sub sample.  Recording period: -one month: household roster during the 3 mandatory visits, diary is split into 2 parts (first and next fortnight).  Reference period: -Income: i) current month and ii) last 12 months for remittances, income from agriculture. -Expenditures: i) current month and ii) 2 weeks for purchased food and beverages, iii) last 6 moths for infrequent goods (clothes, footwear, etc.), iv) last 12 months for utilities, durable goods, expenditures for agriculture. Data collection (2)

Poverty line evolution Absolute poverty line:  – Minimal consumer budget  2000 up to now– Subsistence level  2004 – first absolute poverty line approved by Strategy of economic growth and poverty reduction (SCERS)  2006 up to now– revised absolute poverty line and approved by Government Decision: - food and non – food component (total) - food component – extreme poverty line  2009 up to now – national threshold used for mean tested social allocation for poor

International poverty line/MDG indicators:  starting with 2005: - $1, $2,15 - and $4,3 (PPP) Relative poverty line:  60% of median income (international comparison) Subjective poverty:  up to 2008: based on self estimation of minimum needs of households Background information

Basic need approach:  Food component: based on the need to meet certain minimum nutritional requirements (2282 calories per day) and actual consumption patterns observed in the data for a specified population group (the population of interest to be the lower part of the distribution, from the second to the fourth deciles). In fact focusing on the population located in the low end of the welfare distribution, we are more likely to reflect the preferences of the poor as well as the prices that they face.  Non-food component: is computed as a mean multiplier among households whose expenditure lies within a small interval around the food poverty line (+-10%). Computation of absolute poverty line

Computation of welfare indicator National absolute poverty line Adjusted consumption aggregate: some items are excluded, adjustment to recall period longer than 1 month, price correction, equivalent scale 1:0,7:0,5 International poverty line$2,15 - average income per capita $4,3 - consumption expenditure per capita Relative poverty lineMedian income, equivalent scale 1:0,5:0,3

Consumption expenditures are used as indicator of well-being. The following adjustment are made:  for items, whose purchase is infrequent, but still more frequent than once a year, expenditure are captured through appropriate recall periods (6 and 12 months);  items, which generally are purchased within intervals longer than one year (namely durable items) are excluded from consumption aggregate;  correction for price differences over time and across different areas of the country (namely urban and rural areas);  adjustment of expenditure measured at the household level to identify individual consumption levels (1:0,7:0,5).  no imputation. Computation of welfare aggregate

Computation of consumption expenditure TotalUrbanRural food 87,7%78,2%94,7% plus beverages 85,0%74,2%92,9% plus clothes 64,5%53,2%72,9% plus dwelling 34,6%20,3%45,1% plus equipment of dwellings 31,1%17,7%40,9% plus health 25,3%14,4%33,3% plus transport 22,7%12,1%30,5% plus communication 19,5%10,0%26,6% plus miscellaneous/Total poverty rate 16,6%8,2%22,8%  Poverty rate varies a lot depending on the items included in the consumption expenditure

Poverty rate

Poverty profile

Main factors which determines the vulnerability:  Migration: -children left without parental care -migrant women  Elderly people  Rural households which relies mainly on agricultural activity and social aid  Households with many children  Ethnic groups, such as roma population. Vulnerability to poverty

Data collection:  High non-response rate in urban area  Respondent burden and how to manage data quality  Treatment of outliers in consumption aggregate, such as out of pocket health expenditures, expenditures for utilities, etc.  Moving to mixed mode of data collection PAPI+CAPI  Use of census data and if relevant administrative data Poverty measurement:  Updating and revision of absolute poverty line, comparability issues  Moving from material measurement to multidimensional approach  Explore panel data as proxies of vulnerability  Development and approval of the national set of social inclusion indicators in accordance with EU requirements Main challenges

Thank you for attention!