Research Repositories and the SHERPA Project Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SHERPA & the Nottingham experience
Advertisements

Open Access and Current Developments School of Law 16 th May 2012 Bill Hubbard Head of Centre for Research Communications.
Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
OpenDOAR The Directory of Open Access Repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA Manager University of Nottingham.
Institutional Repositories The work of SHERPA Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Repositories and RAE Submission Getting More Out Of Institutional Repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA Manager University of Nottingham.
Open Access Institutional Repositories in UK Universities Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Institutional Repositories and Virtual Research Environments Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
EASE Workshop "Two Roads to Open Access" Open Access Repositories in practice Bill Hubbard SHERPA Manager University of Nottingham.
Institutional repositories 'Opening access to the world's research' Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Briefing Session - UKSG 2005 Institutional repositories in practice - a view from SHERPA Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Open Access Repositories where we are now Bill Hubbard SHERPA Manager University of Nottingham.
Creating an institutional e-print repository Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.
Institutional Repositories and Self-Archiving Crisis? What Crisis? Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Open Access Repositories - in a Nutshell Bill Hubbard SHERPA Manager University of Nottingham.
Institutional Eprint Repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Open Access - Where are we so far? Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Institutional repositories and SHERPA Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.
Creating an institutional e-print repository Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.
Institutional Repositories and Research Support Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Creating an institutional e-print repository Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.
Publisher Policies and RoMEO Bill Hubbard Head of Centre for Research Communications University of Nottingham.
Consortium within a consortium: the basis for the York service model Elizabeth Heaps (University Librarian) Elizabeth Harbord (Head of Collection Management)
The library as a virtual research environment Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Electronic Theses - The Next Stage Institutional Repositories: A view from SHERPA Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Institutional Repositories and the SHERPA Project Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Putting Repositories in Their Place Bill Hubbard SHERPA and RSP Manager The Scholarly Communication Landscape: Perspectives from Manchester University.
The SOAS Repository Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
CPD25 Building Open Access Institutional Repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Scientific publications: Free for all? A summary of implications for institutional repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Why self-archive? Elizabeth Harbord Head of Collection Management.
E-Publishing School of Modern Languages AwayDay May 2005 Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
SHERPA Jackie Wickham RSP Project Coordinator
Daedalus The Glasgow eprints Service Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Creating Institutional Repositories Stephen Pinfield.
IBERs and eTheses eTheses in the wider research context - National level - Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Institutional Policies and Processes for Mandate Compliance Bill Hubbard SHERPA and RSP Manager Research in the Open: How Mandates Work in Practice RSP-RIN.
Institutional e-print Repositories and IPR experience from the SHERPA Project Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
The Repositories Landscape and the RSP MIMAS Open Forum Bill Hubbard 9 th July 2008.
Practical Issues for Institutional Repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
ALPSP Seminar Preprint and Postprint Repositories Institutional Repositories: The Repository Landscape Bill Hubbard SHERPA Manager University of Nottingham.
NoWAL Board Meeting 8 th November Institutional Repositories: The Emerging Picture Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
SHERPAs work on Institutional Repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Are Institutional Repositories Taking Over The World? Institutional Repositories: The National Picture (So Far) Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University.
1 SHERPA Securing a hybrid environment for research preservation and access.
INORMS Congress Liverpool June 2008 Open Access Publishing, Putting it into Practice Session 607 Bill Hubbard SHERPA Manager University of Nottingham Building.
Institutional Research Repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
The SHERPA Project Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Nottingham ePrints School of Biosciences School Board Meeting Nov 2005 Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Open Access Repositories & Scholarly Publication Birkbeck, May 2006 Gareth J Johnson SHERPA Repository Development Officer SHERPA,
Opening Access to Research or what the institutional repository can do for you Centre for Geospatial Science Sir Clive Granger Building Monday, 24 th September.
Managing Research Outputs - embedding repositories into institutional research processes - Bill Hubbard SHERPA Manager UKSG 31 st Annual Conference April.
Institutional Repositories - Policy and Risk Management OAI5, Geneva, 19 th April 2007 Bill Hubbard SHERPA Manager University of Nottingham.
Open Access and Nottinghams Repository Computer Science Meeting 1 July 2010 Bill Hubbard Head of Centre for Research Communications.
Using the University's repository Bill Hubbard SHERPA Manager.
Using the University's repository Bill Hubbard SHERPA Manager.
Opening Access to Research or what the institutional repository can do for you Bill Hubbard SHERPA Manager University of Nottingham.
Advocacy and Nottinghams Repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA and RSP Manager Subject Services Group Meeting University of Nottingham, 14 May 2009.
FAIR – Focus on Access to Institutional Resources William J Nixon DAEDALUS Project, University of Glasgow e-libraries for e-learning.
Building Repositories of eprints in UK Research Universities Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Royal Holloway Information Services Welcomes the ICT4D partners December 2007.
Open Access: What does it mean? Discussion facilitated by David Worlock David Worlock Chairman Electronic Publishing Services Ltd London.
Electronic publishing: issues and future trends Anne Bell.
OAI3 - CERN The Breakout Sessions - “ Implementation: the FAIR and DARE Experience” The SHERPA Project Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of.
SHERPA: institutional repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
DAEDALUS Project William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
Supporting further and higher education The UK FAIR Programme: OAI in context Chris Awre OAI3, CERN, February 2004.
OAI3 - CERN Institutional Repositories and Practical Advocacy Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
DAEDALUS - An ePrints Case Study William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
DAEDALUS Project William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
Presentation transcript:

Research Repositories and the SHERPA Project Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham

Open Access solutions... in Scholarly Communication... Open Access Journals Open Access Repositories... needs a shared and embedded structure/process

Open Access Journals publication charges fund production not author-pays - same source of money as before DOAJ - now 1415 journals BioMED Central, PLoS much discussion over economic viability

Open Access Repositories document service –storage, search, access, preservation duplicates of journal articles – eprints post-prints, pre-prints, working papers supplementary to current publishing practice no access barriers institutionally based cross-searchable - OAI-PMH

Benefits for the researcher wide dissemination –papers more visible –cited more rapid dissemination ease of access cross-searchable value added services –hit counts on papers –personalised publications lists –citation analyses

SHERPA - Securing a Hybrid Environment for Research Preservation and Access Partner institutions –Birkbeck College, Birmingham, Bristol, Cambridge, Durham, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Imperial College, Kings College, Leeds, LSE, Newcastle, Nottingham, Oxford, Royal Holloway, School of Oriental and African Studies, Sheffield, University College London,York; the British Library and AHDS

Practical issues establishing an archive populating an archive copyright, IPR and legal advocacy & changing working habits mounting material maintenance preservation academic concerns

Administrator concerns raising the issue –different drivers for different stakeholders setting up the repository –technical solutions populating the repository maintenance costs service models and costs –author-deposition –mediated deposition –mixed economies

Academic concerns subject base more natural ? –institutional infrastructure, view by subject quality control ? –peer-review clearly labelled plagiarism –old problem - and easier to detect version control –which is definitive version - will repositories fill this role? threat to journals? –evidence shows co-existence possible - but in the future... ?

Practical issues - reviewed establishing an archive populating an archive copyright, IPR and legal advocacy & changing working habits mounting material maintenance preservation

A selection of recent progress Scottish Declaration of Open Access 32 Italian Rectors and the Messina Declaration Austrian Rectors sign the Berlin Declaration Russian Libraries launch the St Petersburg Declaration Wellcome Trusts repository National Institutes for Health proposal widespread publicity and support...and India, Africa, Australia... Parliamentary Inquiry (revisited)

Select Committee Inquiry House of Commons Science and Technology Committee: –to examine expenditure, administration, and policy of OST –to examine science and technology policy across government Inquiry into scientific publications - 10 December 2003 written evidence: 127 submissions (February 2004) oral evidence (March – May 2004) –Commercial publishers, Society publishers, Open access publishers, Librarians, Authors, Government officials Report published, 20 July 2004 Government response November 2004

Report - Problems Impact and Access barriers Price rises, Big Deal, VAT Competition Digital Preservation Disengagement of academics from process

Recent information Journal costs soar by up to 94% (THES, 15 October, 2004, p. 2) Quoting Loughborough study of –price increases range from 27% (CUP) to 94% (Sage) –median journal prices range from £124 (CUP) to £781 (Elsevier) –Elsevier highest median price in every subject –price per page ranged from 31p (OUP) to 98p (Taylor and Francis) –little relationship between impact factor and price In 2002, Reed Elsevier made adjusted profit before taxation of £927 million (1,474 million) on turnover of £5,020 million (7,982 million).

Report - Solutions 82 recommendations in three main areas - Improving the current system Author-pays publishing model Institutional repositories

Improving the existing system JISC to develop independent price monitoring JISC to press for transparency on publishers costs Office of Fair Trading to monitor market trends Funding bodies to review library budgets VAT problem to be addressed JISC, NHS and HE purchasing consortia JISC to improve licences negotiated with publishers BL to be supported to provide digital preservation

Changing the system Principle: Publicly-funded research should be publicly available

Author-pays - Recommendations Authors should be able to use this method if they choose Funds should be made available if required Experimentation to see if feasible Level playing field to allow market to decide

IBERs - Recommendations UK HEIs to set up IBERs Research Councils mandate self archiving Central body (JISC) to oversee IBERs IBER implementation government funded –identified as good value for money Definite timetable to be agreed IBERs should clearly label peer-reviewed content RCs mandate author-retention of copyright

Responses Government response Everyone else... International progress... JISC call... The review and findings still stand

Progress to a national network 19 of 20 repositories in SHERPA are now live: –Birkbeck, Birmingham, Bristol, Cambridge, Durham, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Kings, Leeds, LSE, Newcastle upon Tyne, Nottingham, Oxford, Royal Holloway, SOAS, Sheffield, UCL,York and the British Library other institutions are also live: –Bath, Cranfield, Open University, Southampton, St Andrews other institutions are planning and installing IBERs approx. 93% (of Nottinghams) journals allow their authors to archive

SHERPA advocating repository establishment project outputs - –collection policies, –metadata standards, –deposit and user licences, –copyright assistance (SHERPA/RoMEO list), –service models –preservation principles and models, –discussions with publishers advocating policy support

Repository futures real momentum funded opportunities growing academic enthusiasm repositories compliment other models –traditional journals - OA journals - overlay journals - peer- review boards possibilities to enhance research outputs –multimedia outputs - data sets - developing papers

Questions Adoption - what can realistically drive adoption? Population - how can administrators amass content? Search - what are the future search facilities? Services - what are the future possibilities? Economics - what are the consequences of free eprints?