Special assignment, OFES, USA 1 ITER, Cadarache, January 26, 2007 Clement Wong, General Atomics, USA Valery Chuyanov, Chang Shuk Kim, at this time the.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

ITER Tokamak Cooling Water System Fusion Power Symposium Washington, DC Tom Coleman AREVA Federal Services December 15, 2011.

Advertisements

TORE SUPRA Association EURATOM-CEA 1 TORE SUPRA Association EURATOM-CEA Julien WAGREZ EFDA GOTP - ITER PPE WP2 1 juin 2009 EFDA ITER - Goal Oriented Training.

1 PIE Needs and Relevant Facilities at Cadarache Coordinated and Presented by Alice Ying With contributions from J. Furlan, V. Massaut, Y. Poitevin, S.

Frame design Status TB-SWG May 2005 Presented by K. Ioki Prepared by M. Morimoto VV and Blanket Division, ITER Garching ITER.

September 15-16, 2005/ARR 1 Status of ARIES-CS Power Core and Divertor Design and Structural Analysis A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego.

US TBM Meeting INL, August 10-12, 2005 B. J. Merrill and D. A. Petti Fusion Safety Program Safety and Tritium R&D.

PbLi Thermofluid Analysis (Session 1 – ITER TBM and blanket design and analysis) Sergey Smolentsev, Siegfried Malang, and Clement Wong FNST MEETING August.

US ITER TBM DCLL TBM Design, Analysis and Development C. Wong, M. Dagher, S. Smolentsev and S. Malang FNS/TBM Meeting UCLA, September 19-20, 2007.

Suggested US Plans and Strategy for ITER Test Blanket Mohamed Abdou Presented at APEX/TBM Meeting, UCLA, November 3-5, 2003.

Summary of Current Test Plan for US DCLL TBM in ITER Neil Morley and the US TBM Participants INL, August

February 24-25, 2005/ARR 1 ARIES-CS Power Core Engineering: Status and Next Steps A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego ARIES Meeting GA.

Maintenance Schemes For ARIES-CS X.R. Wang a S. Malang b A.R. Raffray a and the ARIES Team a University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La.

ARIES Studies L.M. Waganer 18 Sept 00/Page 1 Power Core Maintenance Approach and Maintainability Analysis By L. M. Waganer The Boeing Company For the ARIES.

Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Review of NFMCC Studies 1 and 2: Target Support Facilities V.B. Graves Meeting on High Power Targets.

US ITER TBM Meeting Idaho Fall, Idaho, Aug M Dagher P Fogarty 1.TBM/ITER General Arrangement 2.Equatorial Test port Configuration 3.Test Port.

UCN Phase 2 Design Status September 10, Design Components Bulk Shielding Target Crypt Cryogenic Insert Target Insert UCN Port Beam Window Cooling.

Maintenance Schemes for a DEMO Power Plant and related DCLL Designs Siegfried Malang 2 nd EU-US DCLL Workshop2 nd EU-US DCLL Workshop University of California,University.

IDS-NF Mercury System Overview Van Graves IDS-NF 5 th Plenary Meeting April 9, 2010.

Lockout Tagout Tryout (LOTO). The purpose of the Lockout Tagout Program is to protect you. Rain for Rent incidents include employees being sprayed with.

Ottó Bede TBM Consortium Meeting, Brasimone WP5 - FEM analyses ITER PPE training session 7 December – 11 December 2009, Cadarache, France.

ITER Test Blanket Module and the Need for Coordination Outline What ITER means for the World Technology / Chamber / Blanket Community ITER Plans for TBM.

TORE SUPRA Association EURATOM-CEA 2 nd GOTA-PPE meeting Julien WAGREZ 1 06 December 2009 EFDA ITER - Goal Oriented Training Program Port Plug Engineering.

WBS activity and Cost Summary (Focus on Design) Clement Wong TBM Conference Call Oct. 27, 2005.

We provide and maintain all utilities such as Electricity, Water, Waste Water, Heating and Cooling Services, Refuse Collection, and the Garrison Recycling.

Ottó Bede TBM Consortium Meeting, Brasimone ITER PPE Goal Oriented training program RST meeting 17th January 2011, Cadarache, France József.

1 U.S. Presentation in TBWG-16 Beijing, China November 15 – 17, Overview of R&D, Time Schedule, and Cost Estimation M. Abdou (25 min.) 2.Possible.

WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )

NB Cell Changes Kick-off meeting ORE Garching 10/10/2006 A.Tanga.

ITER test plan for the solid breeder TBM Presented by P. Calderoni March 3, 2004 UCLA.

Tritium Extraction from a DCLL Blanket Prepared by: Scott Willms (LANL) Collaborators: Brad Merrill (INL), Siegfried Malang (Consultant), Clement Wong.

Conference Call, June 23, 2005 Remarks on US Costing Activities for the US ITER-TBM Mohamed Abdou.

Beam Dump Upgrade Planning Keith Welch 2/5/13. Drivers for Upgrade Historical Problems – Hardware failures Helium system Windows, diffusers Dehumidifiers.

B. J. Merrill 1, L.C. Cadwallader 1, C. Wong 2 Presented at: FNST Meeting UCLA, August 18 th -20 th Status of DCLL TBM Safety Documentation Containing.

IMPACT OF FRAME DESIGN AND FRAME REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON DCLL TBM By Mo Dagher Presented by Clement Wong TBWG-16 meeting, November, 15-17, 2005, Beijing,

Revision of the ORE assessment for the Port-Interfacing Systems Garching – 25th April 2006 Comment on the main received comments EFDA Task TW4 TSS SEA2.1.

Conceptual Design Requirements for FIRE John A. Schmidt FIRE PVR March 31, 2004.

1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EuroNu Annual Meeting 2012.

DCLL TBM R&D Summary Compiled by Neil Morley for the TBM Conference Call Oct 27, 2005.

REMOTE-HANDLING OVERVIEW I. Bailey Cockcroft Institute / University of Liverpool.

ITER- TBM Planning and Costing Activity DCLL TBM Mechanical Design ( ) & TBM-Port Interface ( ) Presented by Mo Dagher December

1 -TBWG next meeting 8 - Presentation of Parties, in particular on action 17 and action 19 (TBWG-15), including: Progress of work Impact on TBMs of frame.

Background information of Party(EU)’s R&D on TBM and breeding blankets Compiled and Presented by Alice Ying TBM Costing Kickoff Meeting INL August 10-12,

TBWG and Solid Breeder TBM DDD Report including R&D Alice Ying March 4, 2005 US ITER-TBM Meeting, UCLA.

1 Target Station Design for Neutrino Superbeams Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory NBI 2012, CERN.

Various Strategies for DCLL in the US Technology Program Poor ITER utilization (Lowest Cost Scenario) - Support EU HCLL effort, no independent DCLL TBM.

October 9th, 2007 Daresbury – Positron Kick-Off Meeting Slide 1 Remote Handling Vinod K. Bharadwaj SLAC October 9th, 2007.

1 Discussion with Drs. Kwon and Cho UCLA-NFRC Collaboration Mohamed Abdou March 27, 2006.

Optimization & Fleshing Out the Design Optimizing for capital and/or operating costs More detailed look at specific equipment.

Highlights of US ITER TBM Technical Plan and Cost Estimates (and Impact of International Collaboration) Mohamed Abdou and the U.S. Team TBWG-17 Presented.

Remote Maintenance for Large Scale Physics Experiments Alan Rolfe 13 th April 2010.

DCLL He Thermal Hydraulics Edward Marriott UW – Madison Mo Dagher UCLA Clement Wong General Atomics Presented at the FNST Meeting August 12-14, 2008, UCLA.

LBNE Remote Handling Layout Options Adam Carroll Van Graves Tom Burgess FNAL/ORNL Videoconference March 11, 2010.

US Participation in the

Updates of the ARIES-CS Power Core Configuration and Maintenance

Assessment of radioactive waste within the ITER hot-cell facility

Some General Guidelines for the US TBM Costing

Introductory Remarks and Meeting Goals

DCLL TBM Reference Design

the first card insert text here.

Tritium Research in TITA Information Required

TBM Mockup testing at SNL

DCLL TBM Safety Status Brad Merrill, Fusion Safety Program

VLT Meeting, Washington DC, August 25, 2005

Notes on Assignment 2 Object Delegation.

Remarks on US Costing Activities for the US ITER-TBM

Mohamed A. Abdou Summary, Approach and Strategy (M. Abdou)

DCLL TBM Design Status FNST Meeting, August 12-14, 2008, UCLA

MET workshop Eldin Mukovic

ARIES-CS Power Core Engineering: Status and Next Steps

University of California, San Diego

Presentation transcript:

Special assignment, OFES, USA 1 ITER, Cadarache, January 26, 2007 Clement Wong, General Atomics, USA Valery Chuyanov, Chang Shuk Kim, at this time the only TBM engineer Alessandro Tesini, the remote handling manager Markus Iseli, Kimihiro Ioki, replaced by Michael Pick Manfred Glugla, Jerry Sovka, ITER Otto Bede, KFKI-RMKI, Hungary, generated the AEU drawings most likely has left Cadarache ITER, Cadarache, January 26, 2007 Clement Wong, General Atomics, USA Valery Chuyanov, Chang Shuk Kim, at this time the only TBM engineer Alessandro Tesini, the remote handling manager Markus Iseli, Kimihiro Ioki, replaced by Michael Pick Manfred Glugla, Jerry Sovka, ITER Otto Bede, KFKI-RMKI, Hungary, generated the AEU drawings most likely has left Cadarache TBM Facility Requirements in ITER and Estimated Cost ‘A very preliminary assessment’ September 07 IO action items background, by C. Wong

footer text, location, date 2 Three Interface Areas +tritium area a total of 4 areas Ancillary Equipment 1. Port Cell Area 2. Hot Cell Area 3. TCWS Area EU HCPB helium system TBM Port Plug Cooling lines

footer text, location, date 3 1. Port Cell Area: replacement of TBM TBM Removal: Step 1: Disconnect port plug and ancillary equipment, move AEU away Step 2: Bring in transfer cask and extract port plug and move it to hot cell Step 3: Move and insert port plug into the hot cell “red zone” TBM Return: Step 4: Test of TBM and ancillary equipment at the hot cell area Step 5: Disconnect utilities and put port plug on the transfer cask and move it to the port cell Step 6: Insert TBM, take transfer cask away and reconnect TBM with the ancillary equipment AEU & transportTBM transfer cask Cutting and re-welding of PbLi pipes on the AE will be done in a tent Hot cell area Mainly for the purpose of cost estimate, transfer cask to be supplied by IO

footer text, location, date 4 2. Hot Cell Area Utilities: e.g. AC/DC, water, high pressure helium, diagnostics…etc., for the testing of TBM and ancillary equipment Needs additional Hot cell “red zone” windows and services RH equipment Hot cell area for ancillary equipment maintenance Utilities for TBM and ancillary equipment tests To be parked and Maintained here AEU

footer text, location, date 5 TBM Exchange Since then at the TBWG-18 meeting, remote handling area presented the transport cask carrrying the tubes area and AEU EU group coordinated presentation with in-situ remote cutting and re-weld of tubes US presented a mostly hands-on port plug removal approach These are not only approaches and should be analyzed by parties

footer text, location, date 6

7

8

9

10 US suggestion: Moving the bioshield inward and re-locate the interface 2 to next to the AEU between 11 and 9

footer text, location, date 11 Next Action items from CS Kim