Open Access - Implications for research funding, management and assessment ARMA Conference 9 th June 2010 Bill Hubbard Centre for Research Communications.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Introduction to Open Access Scholarly Outputs in Public Health NECOBELAC in association with Irish Institute of Public Health Dublin, 9th May.
Advertisements

COMPLIANCE WITH FUNDERS MANDATES – FACT Peter Millington, Jane Smith, Azhar Hussain & Bill Hubbard SHERPA Services, Centre for Research Communications,
Open Access and National Adoption Scholarly Outputs in Public Health NECOBELAC in association with Irish Institute of Public Health Dublin, 9 th May 2012.
Support for Open Access in Nottingham Mary RobinsonAlison Johnson & Dinah Northall Centre for Faculty Team Librarians: Research Communications, Science.
Setting up an Institutional Fund Bill Hubbard Head of Centre for Research Communications University of Nottingham.
Institutional repositories and SHERPA Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.
Publisher Policies and RoMEO Bill Hubbard Head of Centre for Research Communications University of Nottingham.
Open Access and Public Benefit - fostering knowledge sharing - European Forum on Philanthropy and Research Funding Brussels, 4 th December 2007 Bill Hubbard.
Institutional Repositories and the SHERPA Project Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Putting Repositories in Their Place Bill Hubbard SHERPA and RSP Manager The Scholarly Communication Landscape: Perspectives from Manchester University.
Supporting Open Access: institutional OA funds Mary Robinson SHERPA, University of Nottingham 21 st January 2009.
SHERPA Jackie Wickham RSP Project Coordinator
Background to Open Access Open Access: the impact for libraries and librarians 10 th December 2010 Bill Hubbard.
Bill Hubbard SHERPA Manager
Institutional Policies and Processes for Mandate Compliance Bill Hubbard SHERPA and RSP Manager Research in the Open: How Mandates Work in Practice RSP-RIN.
Institutional Mandates and Compliance Bill Hubbard Director, RSP RSP Summer School: 2nd - 4th June 2010, Madingley Hall, Cambridge.
Practical Issues for Institutional Repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Repository Services Day 23 rd April 2008 Workshop Session.
Paying for Open Access? institutional funding streams and OA publication charges Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.
The Merit of Cream of Science: A Perspective from the UK on Scholarly Communication Stephen Pinfield Chief Information Officer and Director of the Nottingham.
Setting up an open access publication fund Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.
Information Services University of Nottingham Setting up central funds and processes for open-access publishing and dissemination Stephen Pinfield University.
The Cost of Open Access? RCS Workshop Conference Aston 23rd July 2010 Bill Hubbard Centre for Research Communications University of Nottingham.
RoMEO and JULIET: Past, Present and Future Stephen Pinfield Chief Information Officer and Director of the Centre for Research Communications, University.
1 NECOBELAC Project WORK PACKAGE 3 Cross-national advocacy infrastructure.
The ADMIRe Project - A Data Management Infrastructure for Research at the University of Nottingham DCC RoadShow 7th February 2012 Bill Hubbard Centre.
Open Access and Nottinghams Repository Computer Science Meeting 1 July 2010 Bill Hubbard Head of Centre for Research Communications.
Making Your Research Open Access: What you need to know National Biomedical Research Unit in Hearing 15 th November 2010 Willow Fuchs Centre for Research.
Open Access Dr Richard Masterman Director Research Innovation Services.
Open Access Choices and Funding The Researchers (Confusing) View Bill Hubbard SHERPA and RSP Manager Excerpts from presentation at: Research in the Open:
Open Access and the University Bill Hubbard SHERPA Manager Increasing Nottinghams Research Impact Through Open Access 11 th October 2007.
Advocacy and Nottinghams Repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA and RSP Manager Subject Services Group Meeting University of Nottingham, 14 May 2009.
The Repositories Support Project (RSP) JISC e-Science All Hands Meeting Sept 2007 Gareth J Johnson.
Open Access in the UK Developments since the Finch Report Michael Jubb Research Information Network 5th Conference on Open Access Scholarly Publishing.
RoMEO, JULIET and OpenDOAR: A Tale with a Happy Ending!
Open Access (OA) Repositories Laurian Williamson, Open Access Adviser, Centre for Research Communications,
Mark Toole 25 March “the principle that the results of research that has been publicly funded should be freely accessible in the open domain is.
A research institution's view of their role in OA mandates and policies: Using the institutional repository William J Nixon (Enlighten Repository Manager)
Open Access, Research Funders and the REF Open Access Team, Library.
Title of presentation - Your name Audience – Date.
The Finch Report and RCUK policies Michael Jubb Research Information Network 5 th Couperin Open Access Meeting 24 January 2013.
Process and Compliance and the RCUK Policy: Funders’ Author Support Pages RLUK Workshop on Implementation of the RLUK Policy 28 th January 2013 Bill Hubbard.
Open Access to Research in the United Kingdom Organic.Edunet Conference, Budapest Jackie Wickham Open Access Adviser Centre for Research Communications.
EuroCRIS Conference Brussels Legal Issues Heather Weaver Business & Information Technology Department Open Access – disentangling the legal conundrum Heather.
Getting the Rights Right - or, When Policies Collide! Bill Hubbard Director, Centre for Research Communications University of Nottingham UKSG Webinar 19.
USING SHERPA SERVICES Bournemouth University 26 th October 2011 Making Your Research Open Access: Willow Fuchs Centre for Research Communications University.
Open Access Problem Solving Workshop ARMA Conference 11 June 2014 Bill Hubbard Director, Centre for Research Communications, University of Nottingham Valerie.
Preparing for the next REF: only 12 months away! Bill Hubbard Director, Centre for Research Communications University of Nottingham ARMA Open Access Good.
Open Access The Basic Terms Ozden Sahin Repository Coordinator Goldsmiths Research Online.
Publishing Trends: Open the University of Florida Presentation to IDS 3931: Discovering Research and Communicating Science October 21, 2010.
The access to information divide: Breaking down barriers Bas Savenije Director General KB, National Library of the Netherlands Stellenbosch Symposium /
Open Access: Institutional Response and Responsibilities Open Access ‘Good Practice Exchange’ The George Hotel, Edinburgh 8th October 2013 Bill Hubbard.
Encouraging Openness - and how stakeholder policies can support or block it! CIARD webinar 5 th June 2014 Bill Hubbard Director, Centre for Research Communications.
Process and Compliance and the RCUK Policy: Funders’ Author Support Pages Bill Hubbard Director, Centre for Research Communications University of Nottingham.
A year in the life of Open Access support: choosing LEAN and continuous improvement Jackie Proven Repository & Open Access Services Manager
Using services and compliance with RCUK and HEFCE policies: RoMEO, JULIET, and FACT SCOUNUL Conference Fringe 27th June 2014 Bill Hubbard Director, Centre.
Date, location Open Access policy guidelines for research funders Name Logo area.
Open Access Opportunities, Policies & Rights IAS ACE Programme 19 November 2015.
Open access- a funders perspective (or “What we want from institutions”) CRC/RLUK/ARMA/SCONUL meeting 27 th January 2011 Robert Kiley, Head Digital Services,
Open Access & REF202*.  Green OA  Deposit of pre-print or post-print of accepted paper for publishing within a repository.  Gold OA  Published version.
RCUK Policy on Open Access Name Job title Research Councils UK.
Copyright and RoMEO RSP Summer School Jane H Smith Services Development Officer, SHERPA
Open Access: what you need to know This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.This work is licensed under a Creative.
Jisc Open Access Dashboard
A strategic conversation with Tim Jewell and Thom Deardorff
Institutional Mandates and Compliance
An Introduction to Open Access and Research Data Management
Towards Excellence in Research: Achievements and Visions of
OPEN ACCESS POLICY Larshan Naicker Rhodes University Library
Why Open Access is important: rationale and background to RCUK policy
Presentation transcript:

Open Access - Implications for research funding, management and assessment ARMA Conference 9 th June 2010 Bill Hubbard Centre for Research Communications University of Nottingham

Bill Hubbard Head of the Centre for Research Communications, Dominic Tate Coordinator, Repositories Support Project (RSP), University of Nottingham

Overview What is Open Access? Why are funders requesting this from researchers? What impact does it have on research support? What responses are called for from institutions? How can we deal with the issues? What benefits will this bring?

Open Access What is Open Access? Why is it needed? –difficulties –opportunities Benefits –academic –institutional –funders Two complementary routes –Green –Gold

The Open Access Rainbow For open access archiving - RoMEO colours –White - no archiving –Yellow - archive pre-print only –Blue - archive post-print only –Green - archive pre- and post-print Authors and others have clear guidance The alternative of Open Access publishing is termed Gold

Sectoral savings from large-scale OA Houghton Report (Jan 2009) Efficiency savings for the sector of over £100m p.a. Benefits of up to £170m p.a. June 15 th - UUK/JISC event July - 5 regional financial workshops

Individual institutional impact Development of Houghton model Modelling 3 scenarios –Archiving in repositories (Green Open Access) –In parallel with subscription journals –Instead of subscription journals Open Access journals (Gold Open Access) Consultants applied model to 4 UK HEIs

Open Access - issues Initial - clarification and reassurance –not a replacement for journals –does more access=more plagiarism? –cost of repositories –sustainability of OA journals Practical - issues around support for researchers –Support processes for deposit in repository –Financial processes for OA Journal fees –Some publishers have restrictions

Some publishers have restrictions Institutions are primary owners of the copyright but waived to academics through custom and practice Publishers often insist on copyright transfer or exclusive licensing as a condition of publication Academics sign contracts that give away copyright; rights to re-use and exploit their research Intellectual and economic properties leave the institution Publishers then control the exploitation of funded research articles

Scale of investment Public investment e.g. £300,000 over 24 months 12 Publishers income e.g. charge of £1,800, over 3 month publication process time - months 8 direct money into system - £ thousands direct money out of system

Why are research funders involved? Research is funded for social benefit Wider and less-restricted circulation means more readers, more use, better take-up and benefit Wellcome Trust, NIH, Cancer Research UK, etc Virtually all biomedical funded research in the UK now has a mandate All RCUK councils have policies See JULIET -

JULIET JULIET introduced in 2006 Lists and analyses Funder mandates Summarises the mandates and assists support 52 funders listed at present –51 publication policies –21 data archiving policies –19 open access publishing policies

Juliet Home Page

Juliet Detail 1

Juliet Detail 2

What do funders require? Open Access to research results as a condition of funding Deposit in a particular repository and/or Deposit in the institutional repository and/or Publication in an Open Access Journal

Impact for research support Response necessary as a requirement of grant Competitive advantage for compliance Strategic alignment with global changes Requires different service divisions to work together Incentive for more closely integrated knowledge management

How to respond Who is currently aware of these requirements? What current structures and processes are in place? What level of compliance is currently attained?

Process and support Compliance process and work-flows Support for researchers Financial processes when required Compliance checking

Compliance process and work-flows Publication generally takes place after the close of a research grant - after the final report - what connections are there between research support and researchers some months after the close of a grant? What do these processes look like? Are researchers aware of their responsibilities? How will compliance processes fit into current work flows?

Support for researchers Funding policy requirements Different types of OA and options Funding streams for Open Access publishing Copyright and related support for REF-like requirements Information reporting for the institution Where does this service come from?

Financial processes when required Publication normally takes place after a grant has closed - so where does the money for OA publication come from? Direct grant Indirect grant Publication fund Changes to grant period

Compliance checking As contractual conditions, there is a need for signing off completion Compliance will be completed after the research period, after grant closure, after publication What is the process by which compliance is checked? Who checks?

Discussion session Compliance - –identify stakeholders –identify actors –identify structures –identify processes Who needs to do what?

External support Research Communication Strategy (RCS) Repository Support Project (RSP) RoMEO JULIET What joint action is required? What individual institutional action is required?

Open Access - Benefits for institutions Get a more complete picture of research output from the institution Ensure compliance with funders requirements as competitive advantage for future funding Raise citations and enhance intellectual reputation Enhance REF and other reporting Enhance institutions public image and reputation Enhance knowledge transfer functions Support authors in their work within the institution

What do we need to do? Get clarity on financial implications Collaborate on support given to authors –Compliance and support are complimentary Put in place system to provide consistent, authoritative information from all stakeholders at point of need Leverage infrastructure of repositories to benefit authors, researchers, institutions and funders

Questions? Bill Hubbard Head of Centre for Research Communications JISC Research Communication Strategist