Pilot in Lecture Capture (PiLC): a small web-based lecture capture project Denise Sweeney and Simon Kear Academic Practice Unit and Beyond Distance Research Alliance University of Leicester Funded by the Teaching Enhancement Programme, University of Leicester ALT-C 2012, Paper 262, University of Manchester
Background Adobe® Connect™
What do we know about lecture capture? nd Yr UG students - University of Toronto - 4 groups Single lecture Identical examination (understanding & retention of content) Experiment repeated with some modifications - 3 groups Which group got the top score on the examination? Heard and saw a lecture delivered in a television studio Heard and saw this same lecture on a television screen Heard it over the radio Read it in manuscript
What do we know about lecture capture? Learner control – self-directed learning; asynchronous access – empowering the learner with control of the lecture and convenience/flexibility (Simpson, 2006; Gosper, McNeil & Woo, 2010) Combination of f2f; video recorded lectures; uploaded course documents (Soong et al, 2006) Mis-match between staff and student views (positive views; on learning and achieving better results; made it easier to learn (ALTC project - Gosper et al 2008)
Participants 92 first-year undergraduates (Chemistry) 45 taught postgraduate students (Media and Communication) 2 lecturers Icons by Everaldo CoelhoEveraldo Coelho
Hardware Projector by PiotrusPiotrus Voice recorder by StilfehlerStilfehler
The recordings 6 lectures of 1 hour each (Chemistry) 6 lectures of 2 hours each (Media and Communication) All available in both Adobe Connect and MP3 formats. What do they sound like?
Research findings overview Blackboard analytics Student focus groups (in progress) Comprehensive online questionnaire (use of lecture capture - when, where, frequency of use, purposes) study patterns, demographics Extended ‘phenomenographic’ interviews with 2 university teachers on their experiences
Blackboard report Media and Communication
Students Students appreciate the flexibility of access & support for learning - staff have concerns contributes to a ‘blurring’ of the boundaries between internal and external students Change lecture attendance patterns, raises questions about the roles of lectures Demands changes in the way students learn and teachers teach Affects the design of the whole curriculum has professional and organisational development implications
Which format they preferred
How they listened
Why they listened
What they thought of lecture capture
Lecturers’ experience of being part of the project Case study 1 … helped refine my lectures ‘Reviewing the recordings takes it all to another level’ Case study 2 … helped me reflect on future planning ‘… part of the planning process certainly… improving the module…’ Lecturers
Those institutions using lecture capture technologies… Do you have a ‘pedagogy strategy’…or plan to have one? Which of the following do you provide? Mentoring Examples of best practice FAQs Guidelines Workshops Just-in-time technical support Student support
Thank you Denise Sweeney Educational Designer Academic Practice Unit Simon Kear Senior Learning Technologist Beyond Distance Research Alliance
References and links ‘Certain Media Biases’ (1954) New York Times, Gosper, M. V., McNeil, M. A. & Woo, K. (2010) Harnessing the Power of Technologies to Manage Collaborative e-Learning Projects in Dispersed Environments, Journal of Distance Education, vol. 24, No. 1 pp Simpson, N. (2006). Asynchronous access to conventional course delivery: a pilot project. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(4), 527–537. Soong, S. K. A., Chan, L. K., Cheers, C., Hu, C. (2006) Impact of video recorded lectures among students, proceedings of the 23rd annual ascilite conference, Who’s learning? Whose technology?, Sydney Australia, pp Open EYA