ECE 477 Design Review Team 01  Fall 2010 Jigar Gandhi Chandler Wall John-Taylor Smith Eric Zarowny.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Greg Beau SerajAnanya. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale  Packaging design.
Advertisements

TEAM 9 - MRAV DESIGN CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS by Nick Gentry.
Andrew Phillips, Ben Laskowski, Shannon Abrell, Rob Swanson.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 13  Spring 2006 Elmer Chao (not pictured), Matt Cozza (not pictured), Joe Waugh (not pictured), Evan Zelkowitz (not pictured)
ECE 477 Design Review Team 15  Spring 2013 Jackson McCormick, Andrew Batek, Carey Woolet, Justin Lindley.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 01  Fall 2012 Brennan Tran Jonah Ea Ben Pluckebaum Kevin Meyer.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 7  SPRING 2013 COST ROBOT CAROLINE TRIPPEL, ANDREW LOVELESS, ERIC OSBORNE, BRYAN DALLAS.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 13  Spring 2008 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Srichand Varun Madhu Anvesh.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 7  Spring 2011 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Stuart Pulliam Will Granger Linda.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 9  Spring 2005 Omar Shaikh - Nathan Smith - Jeff Huston - Ryan Koors.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 1  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
Critical Design Review 27 February 2007 Black Box Car System (BBCS) ctrl + z: Benjamin Baker, Lisa Furnish, Chris Klepac, Benjamin Mauser, Zachary Miers.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 10  Spring 2012 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Nathan Irvin Will Bouchonnet Allen.
Jordan Wagner Justin Spencer Mark Sears John Jachna.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 6  Spring 2011 Left to right: Kirk Iler, Brian Bentz, Stephen Wolf, Fuhe Xu.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 10  Spring 2008 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Paul Ng Daniel Bixby David Collins.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 8  Spring 2008 Mike Cianciarulo, Josh Wildey, Robert Toepfer, Trent Nelson.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 1  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 19  Spring 2013 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Calvin Mwesigwa John Marston Noah.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 01  Fall 2013 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Spring 2008 Zach Dicklin Amy Ritter Ian Bacon Eric Yee.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 11  Spring 2005 Paul Dulle Pat McLaughlin Randy Scheifele Chad Bjorklund David Meyer.
Xin Jin Zelun Tie Ranmin Chen Hang Xie. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Spring 2010 Digi-Brush Josh LongCaleb Ayew-ewKatie Schremser.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 14  Spring 2005 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Fall 2007 Wes Chris Josh Dave.
o Portable low-cost aerial drone that can be used for reconnaissance o Relay real-time video and data, like location, heading, battery life o Take high-resolution.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 2  FALL 2011 Members: Bo Yuan, Yimin Xiao, Yang Yang, Jintao Zhang.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 7  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE Grande ECE 477 Design Review Team 3 - Fall 2008.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 09  Spring 2010 Luke Ethan Andy Dhruv.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Fall 2010 (L to R) Andy Sydelko, Chris Cadawallader, Mike Wiliams, Craig Pilcher.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
Purdue  Airbus Software Design Jigar Gandhi - John-Taylor Smith - Chandler Wall - Eric Zarowny.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 2  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 11  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 9  Fall 2009 Josh Piron, Jacob Pfister Kevin Templar, Mike Phillips,
ECE 477 Design Review Team 7  Spring 2007 Joe Land Ben Fogle James O’Carroll Elizabeth Strehlow.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Spring 2006 Prashant Grimella Andy Brezinsky Tim Sendgikoski Clark Malmgren.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Fall 2006 Daryl Dave Will Ben.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 1  Fall 2006 Sumanth Peddamatham Alex Tucker Chris Arges Radhika Mulani.
Jigar Gandhi John-Taylor Smith Chandler Wall Eric Zarowny.
Team 6 DOODLE DRIVE Alexander Curtis Peachanok Lertkajornkitti | Jun Pan | Edward Kidarsa |
ECE 477 Design Review Team 3  Fall 2007 Steven Kingsley (Analog) Roy Scheck (Leader) Tony Liechty (Digital) Charles Lan (Software)
ECE 477 Design Review Team 8(SLOW)  Spring 2006.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 5  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW FEST – FALL OUTLINE  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 7  Spring 2008 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 3  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 12  Spring 2006 EricDaniel Atandra Sriharsha Aasenda Silva Burman Vengapaty.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 9  Spring 2011 Above (Left to Right): Nick Gentry, Oliver Staton, Vineet Ahuja, and Vinayak Gokhale.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Spring 2006 Justin Thacker, Matt Kocsis, Ian Snyder, Dustin Poe.
Eric Tarun Craig Dave ECE 477 Design Review Team 9  Spring 2006 Galamback Chawla Noble Kristof.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 3  SPRING 2015 Garrett Bernichon Bryan Marquet John Skubic Tim Trippel.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Spring 2010 Fred Grandlienard Andrew Gregor Kevin Mohr Ryan DeFord.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 9  Fall 2005 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Tim Miller Clif Barnes Drew Heinrich.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 10  Spring 2009 Scott Shaw Hussain Vasi Matt Sbai John Fawcett.
 The wireless module must sustain a transmission rate that allows for image data to be transferred in real-time.  The camera must be able to capture.
Team 3 Ashwin Shankar Upsham Dawra Samit Sura Joe Katz.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Fall 2006 Wirelessly Integrated Menu System (WIMS) Ryan Coppa Lee Bush Aaron Replogle Neil Bedwell.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 5  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 14  SPRING Project Overview  Target Audience: Amateur Musicians  Obtain a “Guitar Tab” format of music  View Tabs.
ECE 477 Design Review Team BOAR  Fall 2011 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Left to Right:
ECE 477 Design Review Team 1  Spring 2009 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 01  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Design challengesDesign challenges.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 3  Spring 2005 “VoIP Connect” Ankur TrushalAshish Dushyant.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 6  Fall 2005
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Fall 2006
Chandler Wall Jigar Gandhi John-Taylor Smith Eric Zarowny
ECE 477 Design Review Team ??  Fall 2012
Presentation transcript:

ECE 477 Design Review Team 01  Fall 2010 Jigar Gandhi Chandler Wall John-Taylor Smith Eric Zarowny

Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria Block diagramBlock diagram Component selection rationaleComponent selection rationale Packaging designPackaging design Schematic and theory of operationSchematic and theory of operation PCB layoutPCB layout Software design/development statusSoftware design/development status Project completion timelineProject completion timeline Questions / discussionQuestions / discussion

Project Overview Our project is an unmanned, autonomous flying aircraft.Our project is an unmanned, autonomous flying aircraft. The aircraft will be able to transmit image, telemetry, and battery data to a ground station.The aircraft will be able to transmit image, telemetry, and battery data to a ground station. The ground station will overlay the telemetry and battery data onto the image data to create a “digital cockpit”.The ground station will overlay the telemetry and battery data onto the image data to create a “digital cockpit”.

Project-Specific Success Criteria 1.An ability to overlay telemetry and battery data onto image data in real-time using the ground station. 2.An ability to transmit real-time telemetry, image and battery data from the aircraft to the ground station using wireless modules. 3.An ability to store encoded image data on a flash memory module interfaced with the micro controller for later viewing. 4.An ability to upload GPS coordinates from the ground station to the aircraft. 5.An ability to monitor battery status and enter into a power save mode that halts image capture and transmission in order to preserve remaining battery life for flight operation.

Block Diagram

Component Selection Rationale PIC32MX795F512HPIC32MX795F512H –64 pins –80 MHz max frequency –512K flash, 128K SRAM –Internal 8 MHz and 32 kHz oscillators –UART, I2C, SPI, PWM functionality to handle all of the peripheralsfunctionality to handle all of the peripherals Battery management system (DS2788)Battery management system (DS2788) –Handles up to 10 cells in series –Simplicity in external circuit design

Component Selection Rationale XBee PROXBee PRO –provides 2.4 GHz wireless transmission channel –capable of transferring camera and GPS data –1 mile range –speeds up to 250 kb/s CMOS JPEG CameraCMOS JPEG Camera –performs JPEG compression on the chip –will provide 15 fps SD CardSD Card –High speed data rates –Portable, simplistic implementation

Packaging Design Dimensions of the AirbusDimensions of the Airbus –Wingspan: 4’10” –Fuselage: 3’L x 5.5”W x 5”H Dimensions of the Internal HullDimensions of the Internal Hull –1’8”L x 3.5”W x 3”H MaterialsMaterials –Rigid foam design Mounting PCB and battery in planeMounting PCB and battery in plane Will have to balance weight distributionWill have to balance weight distribution

Schematic/Theory of Operation Lithium polymer batteryLithium polymer battery –11.1 volts –2200 mAh –1 switch mode DC-DC voltage regulators –2 LDO voltage regulators CMOS cameraCMOS camera –1.6V & 2.8V –I2C interface –JPEG compression –15 fps –Micro is master and camera is slave –External clock and 20 MHz frequency provided by micro

Schematic/Theory of Operation XBee ProXBee Pro –Wireless communication with ground station –Connected to micro with CMOS UART –Baud rates set to transfer data at 250 kb/s AutopilotAutopilot –Send telemetry data to micro –Receive GPS coordinates from micro

Schematic/Theory of Operation SD CardSD Card –store video data –SD bus mode allows for 12 Mb/s transfer Coulomb counterCoulomb counter –ability to monitor three lithium polymer cells in series –bidirectional open-drain serial port provides communication to micro –Electrical isolation circuit to protect micro

Schematic/Theory of Operation

Schematic - Camera

Schematic – Power Mgmt

Schematic - Microcontroller

PCB Layout - Camera

PCB Layout – Power Mgmt

PCB Layout – Micro controller

Software Design/Development Status AutopilotAutopilot –Tested and verified communication protocols. –We have to make customizations to ArduPilot Mega for our airframe and components. Need to finalize and test PWM input on channel 5.

Software Design/Development Status SD CardSD Card –Standard SD communication IIC and parallel data bus - CameraIIC and parallel data bus - Camera –Start condition –End condition –pre-stored in FIFO before being sent out

Software Design/Development Status IIC Battery ManagementIIC Battery Management –1 wire bus system –Micro controller is the master –Four protocols initialization sequence (reset pulse followed by presence pulse)initialization sequence (reset pulse followed by presence pulse) write-0write-0 write-1write-1 read dataread data

Software Design/Development Status Micro controllerMicro controller –PWM Micro controller PWM used to simulate 5 th RC channel input to planeMicro controller PWM used to simulate 5 th RC channel input to plane Micro generates different frequencies to switch flight modesMicro generates different frequencies to switch flight modes –UART Handle communication between the XBee and the micro controllerHandle communication between the XBee and the micro controller Micro controller will capture telemetry data from the autopilotMicro controller will capture telemetry data from the autopilot Pass data to the autopilot using ArduPilot Mega’s packet systemPass data to the autopilot using ArduPilot Mega’s packet system

Software Flow Chart

Software Flow Chart (contd)

Project Completion Timeline TaskTeam MemberDate Order all partsAll members10/18/10 Finalize PCBJigar/Chandler10/20/10 Prototype hardwareAll members10/29/10 Complete software for prototyped hardware JT/Eric11/05/10 Begin preparations for PCB construction All members11/12/10 Begin PCB constructionAll members11/22/10 Verify PCBAll members11/27/10 PackageAll members11/30/10 Prepare for demosAll members12/03/10

Questions / Discussion