Introduction to collimators Integration of BPM Mechanical design Electrical design Processing Simulations Results Conclusions & Outlook.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental set-up at E.S.R.F. L. Farvacque. 1/04/2004L. Farvacque - E.S.R.F.2 Experimental set-up Hardware Kickers Bpms Software Data acquisition processing.
Advertisements

WP 13 : Beam Diagnostics Conceptual Specifications Rhodri Jones (BE/BI)
SLAC rotating collimator for HiRadMat beam tests 14 March 2014 S. Redaelli, A. Bertarelli, CERN T. Markiewicz, SLAC US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.
Loss maps of RHIC Guillaume Robert-Demolaize, BNL CERN-GSI Meeting on Collective Effects, 2-3 October 2007 Beam losses, halo generation, and Collimation.
A. Bertarelli – A. DallocchioLHC Collimation Phase II – Specification Meeting – 7/11/2008 Phase II Collimators: design status, options and future outlook.
MECHANICAL DESIGN OF TCSP COLLIMATORS Secondary Collimators Embedding BPMs L. GENTINI, A. Dallocchio, A. Bertarelli, F. Carra, M. Garlasche.
Beam based calibration for beam position monitor 15-SEP-2015 IBIC2015 Melbourne M. Tejima, KEK TUBLA01.
M.Gasior, CERN-BE-BIBE-KT Innovation Day, 3 June Base Band Tune (BBQ) measurement systems - observing beam oscillations with sub-micrometre amplitudes.
Engineering Department ENEN Status of TCSP manufacturing Collimation Working Group (CWG) 24 June 2013 A. Dallocchio, A. Bertarelli, F. Carra, L. Gentini,
TCDI operation until LS2 LIU-SPS-to-LHC Transfer Line Protection Devices (TCDI) Review 1 Oliver Aberle 26/03/2014 O. Aberle (EN-STI-TCD)
V.Grishin, A.Koshelev, A.Larionov A.Pushkarev, V.Seleznev, M.Sleptsov A.Sytin.
Experimental equipment interacting with beam operation D. Macina TS/LEA Many thanks to my colleagues both from the experiments and the machine for their.
Ralph Assmann What Do We Want To Measure (in 2009) R. Assmann S. Redaelli, V. Previtali CERN/BE discussed with W. Scandale CERN/EN26/3/2009CC09  See also.
LHC Collimation Project Integration into the control system Michel Jonker External Review of the LHC Collimation Project 1 July 2004.
C. Fischer – LHC Instrumentation Review – 19-20/11/2001 Gas Monitors for Transverse Distribution Studies in the LHC LHC Instrumentation Review Workshop.
A. Bertarelli, A. DallocchioLHC Collimation Phase II – Conceptual Review 02/04/2009 Phase II Collimators at CERN: design status and proposals LHC Collimation.
G5 Beam Instrumentation D. Gassner, E. Pozdeyev 4-09.
M.Gasior, CERN-BE-BI8th DITANET Topical Workshop on Beam Position Monitors, January 2012, CERN 1 BPM Signal Processing with Diode Detectors Marek.
Background Simulations for the LHCb Beam Condition Monitor Overview: ● The LHCb Beam Condition Monitor (BCM) – Purpose, Design and Function – Implementation.
Collimator BPM electronics – Results from the lab, SPS and LHC
D. Still-FNAL/Tevatron HALO '03 Tevatron Collider II Halo Removal System Dean Still Fermilab Tevatron Department 5/21/2003 Motives for the Collider Run.
LHC Crystal MD 22/09/2015 – LSWG #7 R. Rossi for the LHC Collimation team and the UA9 Collaboration.
SLAC ESA T-474 ILC BPM energy spectrometer prototype Bino Maiheu University College London on behalf of T-474 Vancouver Linear Collider.
Injection and protection W.Bartmann, C.Bracco, B.Goddard, V.Kain, M.Meddahi, V.Mertens, A.Nord, J.Uythoven, J.Wenninger, OP, BI, CO, ABP, collimation,
Interface of FP420 to LHC FP420 meeting 28-Sep-2006.
Β*-dependence on collimation R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann C. Alabau Pons, F. Burkart, M. Cauchi, D. Deboy, M. Giovannozzi, W. Herr, L. Lari, G. Muller, S. Redaelli,
M.Gasior, CERN-BE-BILHC Optics Measurement and Corrections Review, June Diode ORbit and OScillation (DOROS) System Marek GASIOR Beam Instrumentation.
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
Engineering Department ENEN Consequences and Possible Cause of Elevated Collimator Temperatures Collimation Working Group L. Mettler, F. Carra,
A. Bertarelli – A. DallocchioWorkshop on Materials for Collimators and Beam absorbers, 4 th Sept 2007 LHC Collimators (Phase II): What is an ideal material.
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
A. Bertarelli – A. DallocchioLHC Collimation Phase II – Design Meeting – 19/09/2008 Phase II Collimators: design status, options and future outlook LHC.
BI MD# BSRT Measurements Beam 1 and 3.5 TeV 2 bunches with different emittances Bumps: -4, -2,0,2,4 mm Results: 3.5TeV.
Stripline Beam Position Monitors for the High Luminosity LHC D. Draskovic, T Lefevre CERN, BE-BI-QP.
1 CAN WE KEEP THE CURRENT SYSTEM FOR LIU BEAMS ? Francesco Cerutti, Alessio Mereghetti, Joao Saraiva LIU-SPS Beam Scraping System Review 2013 Jan 22 contributions.
PXIE Beam Instrumentation Status Update – Preparing for MEBT 1.1 Beam Vic Scarpine Feb. 9, 2016.
Collimation design considerations at CERN (with some applications to LHC) R. Bruce on behalf of the CERN LHC collimation project R. Bruce,
Sergio Calatroni TS/MMETS Workshop, Archamps RF Fingers for Secondary Collimators What is that? Constraints for design Choice of materials:
Collimation Aspects for Crab Cavities? R. Assmann, CERN Thanks to Daniel Wollmann for presenting this talk on my behalf (criticism and complaints please.
2008/12/10 INFN R&D on Low Impedance Beam Chamber and Components Y. Suetsugu, for KEKB Vacuum Group Contents Introduction Beam Chamber Components Connection.
Beam Instrumentation of CEPC Yue Junhui (岳军会) for the BI Group Accelerator Center, IHEP HF2014.
HB2008 – WG F: 27 Aug. S. Childress – Diagnostics_2MW 1 NuMI Beam Diagnostics and Control Steps to 2 MW S. Childress Fermilab.
High Energy Dump of the Super Proton Synchrotron at CERN – Present and Future designs A. Perillo-Marcone (EN-STI) Contributions from several colleagues.
Comparison of simulated collimator BPM data to measured data, obtained during SPS collimator MD (8 June, 2011) A. Nosych Fellow, BE-BI-QP Collimator prototype.
LHC Collimation Working Group Monday, 21 March 2016 Analysis of collimator BPMs in the 2015 run A.Valloni, G. Valentino with input from R. Bruce, A. Mereghetti,
Feasibility of impedance measurements with beam N. Biancacci, N. Wang, E. Métral and B.Salvant COLUSM meeting 27/05/2016 Acknowledgements: A. Lafuente.
CRYSTALS AS LONG-TERM IMPROVEMENT FOR LHC COLLIMATION
Collimation Activities during EYETS
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Cryo Problem MD Planning Tue (1.11.) C B Day Time MD MP Tue 01:00
A. Rossi on behalf of the whole team:
Joint Meeting SPS Upgrade Study Group and SPS Task Force
TCTW Collimator Design F. Carra1,2 A. Bertarelli, M. Garlasche, L
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
    BEAM POSITION MONITORS USING A RE-ENTRANT CAVITY C. Simon1, S. Chel1, M. Luong1, P. Contrepois1, P. Girardot1, N. Baboi2 and N. Rouvière3.
Initial Experience with the Machine Protection System for LHC
Beam collimation for SPPC
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland PAC 2003 – Portland, Oregon, USA
LHC Injection and Dump Protection
Phase II Collimators : design status
Collimation margins and *
Machine Tolerances in Cleaning Insertions
Introduction and Requirements
Collimators: Operations - Baseline Assumptions
Thursday 22nd March 00:20 – 02:40 on longer squeeze function, orbit and chroma correction at 4 TeV 2:40 – 5:30 second cycle with long squeeze 5:46 – 7:00.
Fri :52 Stable beams fill #2536
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Operational Results of LHC Collimator Alignment using Machine Learning
Operational Results of LHC Collimator Alignment using Machine Learning
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to collimators Integration of BPM Mechanical design Electrical design Processing Simulations Results Conclusions & Outlook

0.2 mm Left jaw (Carbon example) Graphite or Tungsten Material jaw The LHC Beam Collimator 66 LHC Collimators must clean the beam halo at given positions so that the rest of the machine is protected. To this purpose collimators insert absorbing materials into the vacuum pipe. Absorbing jaws are movable and can be placed as close as 0.25 mm to the circulating beam ! Nominal distance at 7 TeV: ≥ 1 mm. 80 kg TNT High stored energy : 360 MJ at 7TeV !

The LHC collimation was conceived as a staged system: Phase I collimators: Designed to ensure maximum robustness against abnormal beam losses in operating conditions. Phase II collimators: Complement phase I and able to reach nominal intensity and energy. Constraints: Improve collimation efficiency. Keep low longitudinal impedance gain factor ≥10 in set-up time Phase I jaw Phase II jaw

Standard setup method relies on centering collimator jaws by detecting beam loss. Procedure is lengthy and can only be performed with pilot fill. Big worries about risks, reproducibility, systematic effects and time lost for physics. The integration of pick-ups into jaws will allow: deterministic centering of jaws around circulating beam. Improvement in set-up time. Continuously follow orbit drifts, Allow tighter collimator settings, … High precision (<10 um) and stability (averaged, not bunch by bunch) And: Protect components from accident cases. Withstand a bakeout temperature of 250 º C during 48H. Operate under strong radiation (200 Mgy/y). Maintain Ultra High Vacuum. Very accurate geometric stability. Low-Z material.

Center pair of buttons (in case..) button in the tapering Prototype-> Implementation of 4 buttons in Jaws Graphite Cu jaw support Ineffectiveness of center pair of buttons on closed jaw operation

Based on experience gained with demonstrator -> Implementation of 2 BPMs Cross-section of jaw tapering. fine positioning system BPM housing cooling circuits molybdenum back-stiffener Embedded BPM GlidCop® absorbing material

Flat surface for housing the button in recess of the beam Less smooth transition. longitudinal trapped modes are mainly generated by the transition region. Phase I jaw tapering Tapering with button Phase II

Key component: the RF cables The coaxial cables needed should: Be small, robust and flexible enough to follow the jaw motion during the thousand of cycles expected. Be vacuum compatible (choice of materials, reliability, cleanliness and outgasing rate) Only SiO2 Cables meet the specification ! They also provide exceptionally low hysteresis vs temperature and motion, with phase and loss values returning to the same values. But: SiO2 dielectric is Hydrophilic and cables are backfilled with Neon gas (chosen for low molecular mass). cable routing up to the button fixture. -> Issue in case of leak in the beam vacuum !

BPM Cables But if vacuum degrades we stop LHC ! Simulations show that they should survive at least cycles. BPM cable failure = No BPM anymore (welded cover)

Finding non-linearities of the first variable & moving aperture BPM ! A B AB Typical up and downstream time signals with beam offset

Signal of each pick-up electrode is processed separately The conversion of the fast beam pulses into slowly varying signals is done by compensated diode detectors These slow signals can be digitized with high resolution, averaged (~11 turns) and transmitted at slow rate All further processing and calculations are done in the digital domain Simple and robust hardware, high resolution, no BST required, low data rates A B

left downstream button left upstream button right upstream button right downstream button An example of raw diode orbit signals from the SPS collimator prototype A B D C

Agreement of measured non linearities with simulations results. real signal No noise seen due to upstream scraping. correlation between the centres measured with the in-jaw BPMs and the BLM dependent method.

calculated upstream (U) and downstrream (D) positions, normalised to the button distance calculated left (L) and right (R) jaw normalised tilts position and tilt changes, normalised to 80 mm button distance difference of the downstream and upstream readings from the above plot Local Time in Hours

-Test installation on BPMC.8L4.B1 (4 channels) as the only user. -Test installation on BPMSW.A1L5.B1+B2 (8 channels), sharing the signals with the regular BPMs - lab, the same signal on all inputs; - drifts projected to a 49 mm aperture precision and stability Time [h]

BPM design based on experience and good results gained with demonstrator installed in the SPS. BPM design based on experience and good results gained with demonstrator installed in the SPS. Based on Phase II concept. Based on Phase II concept. Should achieve precision and stability performance. Should achieve precision and stability performance. From demonstrator installed in the SPS to… Tertiary Collimators with Embedded BPMs:

Adjustable Stand Collimator assembly : Embedded BPMs Collimators: Mission to replace all moveable collimators in the Ring with new collimators equipped with BPM Mission to replace all moveable collimators in the Ring with new collimators equipped with BPM Start production in 2012 of 20 tertiary collimators (TCTP) with installation of 8 of them during LS1. Start production in 2012 of 20 tertiary collimators (TCTP) with installation of 8 of them during LS1. Production of 2 Secondary collimators (TCSP) for point 6. Production of 2 Secondary collimators (TCSP) for point 6. Baseline for other collimators, and ideas for Beam Beam Long Range Compensator. Baseline for other collimators, and ideas for Beam Beam Long Range Compensator. Development of calibration system. Development of calibration system. Development of a blind Plug-in system for collimators located in IR3 and IR7 allowing to quickly connect the BPM collimator to the base support. Development of a blind Plug-in system for collimators located in IR3 and IR7 allowing to quickly connect the BPM collimator to the base support. THE END