Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda, H. Sako, H. Suzuki,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2013 Apr.30-May.03 Shuei EPICS Collaboration Meeting 2013 Spring 1 Acquisition of Long Waveform using Yokogawa SL1000 Shuei YAMADA KEK / J-PARC.
Advertisements

ISIS Accelerator Division
Current Status of Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda,
Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
Masahito TOMIZAWA and Satoshi MIHARA Accelerator and proton beam.
Accelerators 2006 Roger Barlow 1: Wakefields 2: The NS-FFAG.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
 An h=4 (30 MHz) RF system will be used for electron operation. For protons, this would correspond to h=56, and the 1 kV maximum gap voltage would only.
Development of new power supplies for J-PARC MR upgrade Yoshi Kurimoto (KEK) for J-PARC accelerator group.
PAMELA Contact Author: CONFORM is an RCUK-funded Basic Technology Programme PAMELA: Concepts Particle Accelerator for MEdicaL Applications K.Peach(JAI,
FFAG Fixed Field Alternating Gradient synchrotrons, FFAGs, combine some of the main advantages of both cyclotrons and synchrotrons:  Fixed magnetic field.
Field and Phase Error Studies in Normal Conducting Structures LLRF and Beam Dynamics in Hadron Linacs – EuCARD2 Workshop Ciprian Plostinar
NON-SCALING FFAGs: questions needing answers Andy Wolski The Cockcroft Institute, and the University of Liverpool Department of Physics. BASROC-CONFORM.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
Beam diagnostics control for J-PARC LINAC Guobao SHEN J-PARC Center Japan Atomic Energy Agency Mar
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
The ISIS strong focusing synchrotron also at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. Note that ISIS occupies the same hall as NIMROD used to and re- uses some.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
1 Design of Proton Driver for a Neutrino Factory W. T. Weng Brookhaven National Laboratory NuFact Workshop 2006 Irvine, CA, Aug/25, 2006.
Development of the beam loss monitor for beam halo measurement in the J-PARC RCS Masahiro Yoshimoto *, Hiroyuki Harada, Shinidhi Kato, Kota Okabe, Michikazu.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
January 5, 2004S. A. Pande - CAT-KEK School on SNS MeV Injector Linac for Indian Spallation Neutron Source S. A. PANDE.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
 Advanced Accelerator Simulation Panagiotis Spentzouris Fermilab Computing Division (member of the SciDAC AST project)
Part IV Applications. Prototype of Cancer therapy machine with proton 150 MeV FFAG as a prototype Commissioning to accelerate up to ~15 MeV is done. Tune.
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
1 Current Status of The Control System for J-PARC Accelerator Complex Hiroshi YOSHIKAWA J-PARC Center at KEK/JAEA October 16, 2007 ICALEPCS2007 at Knoxville.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Using Online Single Particle Model for SNS Accelerator Tuning Andrei Shishlo, Alexander Aleksandrov.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs A.Farricker 1, R.M.Jones 1, R.Ainsworth 2 and S.Molloy 3 1 The University.
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
1 Virtual Accelerator plan and status at RCS Hiroshima University, Graduate School of Science Experimental Quark Physics Lab ( & JAEA Accelerator Development.
WG2 (Proton FFAG) Summary G.H. Rees. Proton Driver Working Group  Participants: M. Yashimoto, S. Ohnuma, C.R. Prior, G.H. Rees, A.G. Ruggiero  Topics:
J-PARC Accelerator and Beam Simulations Sep. 7th, SAD2006 Masahito Tomizawa J-PARC Main Ring G., KEK Outline of J-PARC Accelerator Characteristics of High.
Simplified Modeling of Space Charge Losses in Booster at Injection Alexander Valishev June 17, 2015.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
2/20/2016J-PARC1 Virtual Accelerator An Accelerator Simulator.
1 BEAM COMMISSIONING SOFTWARE AND DATABASE FOR J-PARC LINAC Hiroyuki Sako G. Shen, H. Sakaki, H. Takahashi, H. Yoshikawa, JAEA H. Ikeda, VIC C. K. Allen,
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
Study of the space charge effects for J-PARC Main Ring Alexander Molodozhentsev (KEK) SAD Workshop, September 5-7, 2006.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
1 Heavy-Ion Physics at J-PARC Shoji Nagamiya RIKEN / KEK / JAEA January 20, 2016 Tokai 1) Motivation 2) J-PARC vs. FAIR.
ICFA mini-Workshop on Beam Commissioning for High Intensity Accelerators Yasuhiro Watanabe (J-PARC / JAEA) Tracking between bending and quadrupole families.
Aaron Farricker 107/07/2014Aaron Farricker Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs.
Presenter : Yang Wu McMaster University Work conducted at IHEP.
PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Summary Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab, USA.
PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Introduction Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab,
BEAM COMMISSIONING SOFTWARE AND DATABASE FOR J-PARC LINAC Hiroyuki Sako G. Shen, H. Sakaki, H. Takahashi, H. Yoshikawa, JAEA H. Ikeda, VIC C. K. Allen,
Operations Machine Simulator.
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Development of new power supplies for J-PARC MR upgrade
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS/i-RCS
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
SLHC-PP kick-off meeting, CERN 9 April 2008
Presentation transcript:

Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda, H. Sako, H. Suzuki, Y. Irie (JAEA in Japan), K. Furukawa (KEK in Japan), S. Machida (CCLRC RAL in UK) * 1 st Author : Hiroyuki Harada, J-PARC Facility ☆ Accelerators at J-PARC ▼ 400 MeV (181 MeV at phase-1) LINAC ▼ 3 GeV 25 Hz Rapid Cycling Synchrotron (RCS) ▼ 50 GeV Main Ring Synchrotron (MR) ☆ Facility at J-PARC ▼ Materials and Life Science Facility (from 3 GeV RCS) ▼ Nuclear and Particle Physics Experimental Hall (from 50 GeV MR) ▼ Neutrino Facility (from 50 GeV MR) 3 GeV RCS ☆ 3 GeV RCS 6 times at ISIS as Neutron Source ☆ GeV MR 5 times at AGS as Proton/Second Particle Source Increasing attention to MR from region of Nuclear-Particle Physics J-PARC RCSJ-PARC MRBNL AGS Injection Energy [GeV] 0.4 (0.181) Extraction Energy [GeV] (30) 24 Particle per Pulse [10^13] 8.3 (5.0) 33 (20) 6.0 Repetition Rate [Hz] – Average Current [μA] 333 (200) 15 (9) 6 Beam Power [MW] 1.0 (0.6) 0.75 (0.27) 0.14 Table. Parameters of J-PARC Rings and BNL AGS Frontier of High Intensity Major Sources of beam loss Betatron tune shift from space charge effect Increasing nonlinear field components from large aperture magnets Interference of fringe fields between magnets The total acceptable beam loss rate at RCS is less than (1kW) and RCS has many sources of beam loss caused by high intensity. If total beam loss exceeds 1W/m except for the collimator region, it is impossible to do maintenance of activated elements in the ring. Therefore, we need to avoid excess beam loss with 1MW high intensity beam. However, we cannot justify a suitable parameter set of all elements with only experience because we must consider the sources of beam loss with nonlinear components. So, it is very important to have a tool with a complex calculation. The tool based on beam dynamics and simulation should be used to find inputting error of the setting value and to judge whether the setting value of magnets is justified or not. Abstract : We have developed a Virtual Accelerator at 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron (RCS) in J-PARC. It has a simulator of beam in the complicated accelerator and is put out under the control server as well as a real machine. It is possible to do a dry run without beam, and consequently gives a strong feedback for the RCS operation as a commissioning tool. Therefore, we can examine the control system for the real machine and practice the commissioning of the real machine by using the Virtual Accelerator. It is important to have the tool based on beam dynamics for the performance gain of an accelerator. Consequently, it will lead a physics run for experiments of the science at the J-PARC to success or a better run. We present the concept of the control system including the Virtual Accelerator and construction of itself. Presented by Nagamiya Director at ATAC’06 J-PARC Modeling of Virtual Accelerator We have implemented the elements into VA, for modeling of a real machine. * Magnets This is the element for deflecting, focusing, defocusing and correction etc. Beam is given a kick by main component field, higher order nonlinear fields and fringe field. * RF Cavity This is the element for increasing and decreasing energy. Beam is given an energy by gap voltage. * Exciter This is the element for excitation of the beam transverse oscillation. * Beam Position Monitor (BPM) This is the monitor for getting the transverse beam position and have a finite resolution σ. A dry run on Virtual Accelerator We have created the preliminary OPI to measure the basic parameters and have virtually measured the parameters on VA for the storage mode in the commissioning phase at 3 GeV RCS. We introduce the OPI and the result of measurement of betatron tune by a dry run, for example. OPI for measurement of betatron tune A common method to measure betatron tune 1.Excite transverse beam motion by exciter 2.Detect the transverse beam position 3.Do frequency analysis by FFT operate the Exciter To log the Tune X & Y plot the result FFT and search the tune peak Summary : We have developed a Virtual Accelerator based on EPICS at 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron (RCS) in J-PARC. This is expected as a tool to give a strong feedback to a real machine and avoid beam loss over the acceptable one. It is important to have the tool in high intensity proton machine such as RCS. The Virtual Accelerator built into the same control system with a real machine is possible to do a dry run without a beam and examine the operation or commissioning algorithm before it is actually executed in a real machine. We have implemented some elements into Virtual Accelerator, for modeling of a real machine. Additionally, we have been successful to build it into control system. We have had a virtually operation and measure basic parameters on Virtual Accelerator for the storage mode in the commissioning stage at the 3 GeV RCS. In the future, we have tasks to be improved in order to conform to a real machine and operate it in a real time. It is to add an space charge effect and acceleration process to Virtual Accelerator, and to speed up the calculation. The total acceptable beam loss rate < (1kW) → extremely lower than that of usual accelerators Operation Interface (OPI) Control server with runtime database (EPICS IOCs) Real Accelerator Magnets RF Monitors Errors Virtual Accelerator Magnets RF Monitors Errors OPI (Operation Interface) : The control terminal to control the elements, such as Magnets, RF cavity and Monitors EPICS (Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System) : A set of Open Source software tools, libraries and applications Creation of distributed soft real-time control systems for scientific instruments such as a particle accelerators etc Use of Client/Server and Publish/Subscribe techniques to communicate between various computers The control server called IOCs including runtime database Input and Output to IOCs using the Cannel Access (CA) network protocol. We develop the control system for an accelerator added Virtual Accelerator (VA) at 3 GeV RCS in J-PARC. The VA is a simulator of beam in the complicated accelerator based on beam dynamics, for simulation of the beam behavior in the ring. The targeted control system is shown in the flow chart. Flow chart of the control system for an accelerator based on Virtual Accelerator Concept of Virtual Accelerator We put VA modeled a real machine out under the IOCs based on EPICS and operate VA like a real machine. This is a originality control model. It is shown advantage of this model in the following below. Advantage of the control model with VA : * Give a strong online feedback based on beam dynamics * Judge whether setting parameters are justified or not * Examine the control system of the machine * Practice commissioning of the machine Construction of Control System including Virtual Accelerator OPI IOCs VA Input setting value to magnets etc Get beam position from monitors A basic control system for Virtual Accelerator We have constructed the control system of VA through control server. It is possible to operate VA like a real machine from OPI through IOCs. OPI → SAD TkInter developed by KEK IOCs → EPICS toolkit developed by collaboration VA → Virtual Accelerator Input setting value to magnets etc Get beam position from monitors The VA is input setting value of elements through IOCs and run a simulation with particles tracking calculation. As the result, OPI gets beam position on monitors through IOCs. ● : Existing ▲ : Under commissioning or construction ▲ ▲ ▲ SNS This Project 3GeV This Project 50GeV Power Materials-Life Sciences Nuclear-Particle Physics 1 MW 0.1 MW