Orange County Concurrency Management Ordinance Board Of County Commissioners Public Hearing May 21, 2013 Orange County Concurrency Management Ordinance Board Of County Commissioners Public Hearing May 21, 2013

Presentation Outline  Purpose  Background  Ordinance Amendments  Consistency Determination  Requested Action

Presentation Outline  Purpose  Background  Ordinance Amendments  Consistency Determination  Requested Action  Request

Public Hearing For Amendments To The Concurrency Management Ordinance Purpose

Presentation Outline  Purpose  Background  Ordinance Amendments  Consistency Determination  Requested Action  Request

BackgroundBackground 2011 Amendment – HB 7207   Removed Financial Feasibility Requirements   Made Transportation Concurrency Optional Orange County Retained Concurrency   Changed application of Proportionate Share Formula Revision 2011 Amendment – HB 7207   Removed Financial Feasibility Requirements   Made Transportation Concurrency Optional Orange County Retained Concurrency   Changed application of Proportionate Share Formula Revision

BackgroundBackground Proposed Changes Are Intended to Achieve The Following: Promote Development Of A Multi-Modal Transportation InfrastructurePromote Development Of A Multi-Modal Transportation Infrastructure Support Urban Infill RedevelopmentSupport Urban Infill Redevelopment Streamline Concurrency ProcessStreamline Concurrency Process Streamline School Mitigation Agreement ProcessStreamline School Mitigation Agreement Process Proposed Changes Are Intended to Achieve The Following: Promote Development Of A Multi-Modal Transportation InfrastructurePromote Development Of A Multi-Modal Transportation Infrastructure Support Urban Infill RedevelopmentSupport Urban Infill Redevelopment Streamline Concurrency ProcessStreamline Concurrency Process Streamline School Mitigation Agreement ProcessStreamline School Mitigation Agreement Process

Presentation Outline  Purpose  Background  Ordinance Amendments  Consistency Determination  Requested Action

Ordinance Amendments Revisions Include  Sec Definitions Alternative Mobility AreaAlternative Mobility Area Pedestrian Connectivity IndexPedestrian Connectivity Index Projects That Promote Public Transportation Projects That Promote Public Transportation Deleted Concurrency Review CommitteeDeleted Concurrency Review Committee  Sec Defines Transportation Concurrency Exception AreaDefines Transportation Concurrency Exception Area  Sec Defines Criteria And Process For Projects That Promote Public TransportationDefines Criteria And Process For Projects That Promote Public Transportation Revisions Include  Sec Definitions Alternative Mobility AreaAlternative Mobility Area Pedestrian Connectivity IndexPedestrian Connectivity Index Projects That Promote Public Transportation Projects That Promote Public Transportation Deleted Concurrency Review CommitteeDeleted Concurrency Review Committee  Sec Defines Transportation Concurrency Exception AreaDefines Transportation Concurrency Exception Area  Sec Defines Criteria And Process For Projects That Promote Public TransportationDefines Criteria And Process For Projects That Promote Public Transportation

Ordinance Amendments Revisions Include  Page 23, Line 978 Concurrency Review Committee (CRC) Eliminated (RAC to Review and Recommend To BCC)Concurrency Review Committee (CRC) Eliminated (RAC to Review and Recommend To BCC)  Page 24, Section Transportation Concurrency Procedure Flow Chart RevisedTransportation Concurrency Procedure Flow Chart Revised  Page 39 (4) and Page 47 (m) Expedited Prop. Share Approval Process DeletedExpedited Prop. Share Approval Process Deleted Revisions Include  Page 23, Line 978 Concurrency Review Committee (CRC) Eliminated (RAC to Review and Recommend To BCC)Concurrency Review Committee (CRC) Eliminated (RAC to Review and Recommend To BCC)  Page 24, Section Transportation Concurrency Procedure Flow Chart RevisedTransportation Concurrency Procedure Flow Chart Revised  Page 39 (4) and Page 47 (m) Expedited Prop. Share Approval Process DeletedExpedited Prop. Share Approval Process Deleted

Ordinance Amendments Revisions Include  Sec Process For Denials, Mitigation, Proportionate Share Contribution Prop. Share Contribution = Proportionate Share Of CostOF Improvement Funded For Construction In CIP, CIS or LTTCMSProp. Share Contribution = Proportionate Share Of CostOF Improvement Funded For Construction In CIP, CIS or LTTCMS If No Improvement Available, Applicant May Propose And Contribute To A Mobility ImprovementIf No Improvement Available, Applicant May Propose And Contribute To A Mobility Improvement Sec Proportionate Share Formula RevisedSec Proportionate Share Formula Revised Revisions Include  Sec Process For Denials, Mitigation, Proportionate Share Contribution Prop. Share Contribution = Proportionate Share Of CostOF Improvement Funded For Construction In CIP, CIS or LTTCMSProp. Share Contribution = Proportionate Share Of CostOF Improvement Funded For Construction In CIP, CIS or LTTCMS If No Improvement Available, Applicant May Propose And Contribute To A Mobility ImprovementIf No Improvement Available, Applicant May Propose And Contribute To A Mobility Improvement Sec Proportionate Share Formula RevisedSec Proportionate Share Formula Revised

Ordinance Amendments Revisions Include  Page 46 (f) Impact Fee Credits Now Disbursed On A Dollar For Dollar BasisImpact Fee Credits Now Disbursed On A Dollar For Dollar Basis CMO to recommend School Mitigation Agreement to BCC for approvalCMO to recommend School Mitigation Agreement to BCC for approval Revisions Include  Page 46 (f) Impact Fee Credits Now Disbursed On A Dollar For Dollar BasisImpact Fee Credits Now Disbursed On A Dollar For Dollar Basis CMO to recommend School Mitigation Agreement to BCC for approvalCMO to recommend School Mitigation Agreement to BCC for approval

Presentation Outline  Purpose  Background  Ordinance Amendments  Consistency Determination  Requested Action

Consistency Determination Consistency of Proposed Ordinance T2.2.1 : Maintain Level Of Service And Ensure Roadway Projects Are Financially FeasibleT2.2.1 : Maintain Level Of Service And Ensure Roadway Projects Are Financially Feasible T2.2.3: The County shall enforce applicable concurrency regulations on new development permits for non-vested development that adversely impact constrained or backlogged facilities.T2.2.3: The County shall enforce applicable concurrency regulations on new development permits for non-vested development that adversely impact constrained or backlogged facilities. Consistency of Proposed Ordinance T2.2.1 : Maintain Level Of Service And Ensure Roadway Projects Are Financially FeasibleT2.2.1 : Maintain Level Of Service And Ensure Roadway Projects Are Financially Feasible T2.2.3: The County shall enforce applicable concurrency regulations on new development permits for non-vested development that adversely impact constrained or backlogged facilities.T2.2.3: The County shall enforce applicable concurrency regulations on new development permits for non-vested development that adversely impact constrained or backlogged facilities.

Presentation Outline  Purpose  Background  Ordinance Amendments  Consistency Determination  Requested Action

Staff Recommendation:Adopt LPA Recommendation:Adopt Make A Finding Of Consistency With The Comprehensive Plan And Adopt The Proposed Ordinance As Amended Requested Action