Size Standards Analysis: SBA Methodology Presented to: The Council on Federal Procurement of Architectural & Engineering Services (COFPAES) By: Khem R.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By Albert Williams, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Finance and Economics Huizenga School of Business by Albert Williams, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Finance.
Advertisements

Spring Update of December 2013 Forecast for 2014 Manufacturing and Non-Manufacturing Sectors Compare 2014 Forecasts with 2013 Reported Results Broad Sector.
Workforce Profile. Industry Breakdown – Top 10 Industry Breakdown.
SOIC Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting Sector Employment Momentum Track (NAICS 11) ImprovingLeading LaggingSlipping Source: Oklahoma.
The Industry Sources of Australia’s Productivity Slowdown Hui Wei Pengfei Zhao Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Region 4 Region 4 Workforce Profile. Industry Breakdown – Top 10.
Medical Development as a Catalyst for Economic Development Keith Dines, Executive Vice President, Strategic Development.
- (302) L. Jay Burks What is a NAICS Code The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)
Updated Louisiana 2018 Employment Occupational Forecast Louisiana Workforce Commission Division of Economic Development Louisiana State University.
June 23, 2011 SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce.
“In business-to-business marketing, segments are clusters of firms that are distinct from others in terms of what they need and buy as well as how they.
FIN432 Vicentiu Covrig 1 Business Environment (chapter 9)
Employment, Income and Population Change in Curry County May 6, 2009 Mallory Rahe Extension Community Economist Oregon State University.
SHRM Poll: 2012 Holiday Schedules ©SHRM 2011 November 30, 2011 SHRM Poll: 2012 Holiday Schedules.
1 For: Greater Yakima Chamber of Commerce Donald W. Meseck Regional Labor Economist February 9, 2015 Yakima County Economy – 2014 in Review.
The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)
The Use of Criminal Background Checks in Hiring Decisions ©SHRM 2012 July 19, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Background Checking—The Use of Criminal Background.
Beyond Health Care: The Economic Contribution of Hospitals July 2006.
June 13, 2011 SHRM Poll: Relief Efforts for Victims of the Japan Earthquake and Tsunami.
In-Demand Occupations 1. 2 JobsOhio Network - Cincinnati (Southwest Ohio) Industry Employment Projection Report: EmploymentProjected Change.
Chapter Seven: The Structure of the United States Economy.
2012 Economic Census Reference Webinar Series What’s New for the 2012 Economic Census (Industries) Webinar # 2 of 4 February 12 th, 2014 Andrew W. Hait.
The implementation of tools to support the data quality of the survey frame Mario Ménard November 2008.
Measuring and Enhancing Services Trade Data and Information Conference September 14, 2010 U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC Service Statistics.
United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Community College Alliance September 25, 2014.
Economy-Wide Statistics Division Erika Becker-Medina Data User Outreach and Education April 14, 2015 Disclaimer: This report is released to inform interested.
 Matt Gates. 
SBA’s Size Standards Analysis An Overview on Methodology and Comprehensive Size Standards Review SBA’s Size Standards Analysis An Overview on Methodology.
© Thomson/South-WesternSlideCHAPTER 141 CAREER INFORMATION The World of Work Exploring Occupations Chapter 14.
May 9, 2011 SHRM Poll: Staff Levels and the Use of Contingent and Part-time Workers.
Yavapai College Regional Economic Development Center.
August 31, 2011 SHRM Poll: Disaster Planning in Organizations 10 Years After the Sept. 11 Terrorist Attacks.
In-Demand Occupations 1. 2 JobsOhio Network - Dayton (Western Ohio) Industry Employment Projection Report: EmploymentProjected Change NAICS.
Developing the Cayman Islands’ Official Statistics ESO Strategic Plan : An Overview.
Census Bureau Economic Data for New Mexico Business / Industry Data Sets New Mexico SDC/BIDC Affiliates Workshop November 12, 2014 Presented by: Andy Hait.
Using Census Bureau Data to Promote Economic Development Business / Industry Data Sets Tennessee SDC Data User Conference November 19, 2014 Presented by:
Employment, Income and Population Change in Curry County May 6, 2009 Mallory Rahe Extension Community Economist Oregon State University.
Small Area Economic Data from the 2007 Economic Census and Economic Surveys Presented by: Andrew W Hait and Patrice C. Norman U.S. Census Bureau Economic.
Sponsored by AETNA June 29, 2011 SHRM Poll: The State of Consumer-Directed Health Plans in the Workplace.
Can We Continue to Exclude Small Single-Establishment Businesses from Data Collection in the Annual Retail Trade Survey and the Service Annual Survey?
August 16, 2011 SHRM Poll: Managing Employee Absences.
2011 Sales Tax Collections Final Activity (Unaudited) Nicola Sapp County Budget Officer April 5, 2012 Attachment A.
Employment Trends in Florida Prepared by: Darryl Crawford, MPA Center for Demography and Population Health Florida State university May 6, 2009 LeRoy Collins.
June 6, 2011 SHRM Poll: Succession Planning. Succession Planning ©SHRM 2011 Key Findings 2  What percentage of organizations currently have succession.
Florida’s Sensitivity to Monetary Policy Changes Marisela Guillen.
1 For: South Central WDC – Full Board Meeting Donald W. Meseck Regional Labor Economist February 9, 2016 Yakima County Economy – 2015 in Review.
Chartbook 2005 Trends in the Overall Health Care Market Chapter 6: The Economic Contribution of Hospitals.
© Prentice-Hall, Inc., 2001 Chapter Two Strategic Compensation in Action: Strategic Analysis and Contextual Factors.
Table 8.1 Value Added by Sectors, 2004, billions of dollars (to be continued) IndustryValue Added Percent of GDP Primary Sector Agriculture, forestry,
Understanding Canada’s ICT Investment Shortfall Andrew Sharpe Executive Director, Centre for the Study of Living Standards One-Day Workshop: “Firms and.
1 For: Leadership Kittitas County Donald W. Meseck Regional Labor Economist April 18, 2014 Kittitas County Economic Update.
December 1, 2011 SHRM Poll: 2011Holiday Parties Holiday Parties ©SHRM 2011 Key Findings 2  Do organizations plan to have a 2011 end-of-year or.
Sectors of Industry BDI3C. Industry Sector Make-up  Canada’s system of sectioning industry is production-oriented.  Establishments using similar production.
The Economic Contribution of Hospitals CHAPTER 6.
SHRM Poll: Performance Management and Other Workplace Practices
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Winter 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce April 12, 2012.
SHRM Poll: Disaster Planning in Organizations 10 Years After the Sept
SHRM Survey Findings: Background Checking—The Use of Criminal Background Checks in Hiring Decisions July 19, 2012.
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing
NAICS Business Implications
The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)
THE GREATER ROCHESTER, NEW YORK REGION
Data Report: Orillia January 2018.
THE GREATER ROCHESTER, NEW YORK REGION
Region 8 Workforce Profile
Workforce Profile.
Longview 2020 Forum by the Hibbs Institute Wednesday, March 6, 2019
Region 5 Workforce Profile
Presentation transcript:

Size Standards Analysis: SBA Methodology Presented to: The Council on Federal Procurement of Architectural & Engineering Services (COFPAES) By: Khem R. Sharma SBA Office of Size Standards December 15, 2009

Size Standards Analysis: General Approach  Assess industry characteristics & structure  Examine Federal contracting trends  Evaluate impacts on Federal small business assistance programs  Ensure supportability & consistency

An Overview of Size Standards Methodology Legislative definitions/requirements (15 U.S.C. § 632) Independently owned & operated Not dominant in field of operation U.S. based – make significant contributions to the economy “Smallness” shall vary by industry to reflect differing industry characteristics Primary factors 1. Industry structure 1.1. Average firm size 1.2. Average assets size 1.3. Industry concentration 1.4. Size distribution of firms 2. Federal procurement - small business share in federal contracts Proposed size standards Secondary factors 1.Technological change 2. Competing products from other industries 3. Industry growth trends 4. History of activity in the industry 5. Impacts on SBA programs Weighting method Public input Input from industry groups Public comments on proposed rule Input from other Federal agencies Industry structure and Federal procurement trends Adjustment of monetary size standards for inflation Final size standards

What Triggers A Size Standards Review?  Changes in industry structure  Inflation  Changes in the industry classification system  Changes in Federal contracting market place and other small business assistance programs  Requests from industry groups and other Federal agencies  Economic events and disasters

Industry Analysis  Average firm size  Receipts  Number of employees  Average assets size (startup costs)  Industry concentration  4-firm concentration ratio  Distribution of firms’ market share by size  Gini coefficient

Program Considerations and Other Factors  Federal contracting programs  Small business share of total Federal contracting dollars  Small business share of total industry’s receipts  SBA loan programs (secondary factor)  Technological change (secondary)  Industry growth trends (secondary)  Historical experience in the industry (secondary)

Development of Size Standards: Industry Analysis  Establish comparison industry groups  Establish a set of fixed size standard levels  Compare characteristics of each industry with those of the anchor size group  Establish a separate size standard for each characteristic  If specific industry’s characteristics are similar to those of the anchor group, the anchor standard is adopted  Significant differences from the anchor group would support a size standard above or below the anchor size standard

Comparison Groups Receipts-based size standards: I. Anchor group Industries with $7 million size standard II. Higher-level size standard group Industries with size standards of $23 million or higher (group average $29 million)

Employee-based Size Standards: I. Anchor Group Industries with 500-employee Size Standard (100 employees for wholesale industries) II. Higher-level size standards group Industries with size standards of 1,000 employees Comparison Groups Contd.

Receipts-based Size Standards (8 fixed levels) $5.0 million $7.0 million (anchor size) $10.0 million $14.0 million $19.0 million $25.5 million $30.0 million $35.5 million

Employee-based Size Standards (8 fixed levels) 50 employees 100 employees (anchor size for Wholesale Trade) 150 employees 200 employees 250 employees 500 employees (anchor size for Manufacturing) 750 employees 1,000 employees

Example: Size Standard Based on Average Firm Size Industry Data About 50% Between Anchor & Higher Level Group

Size Standard About 50% Between Anchor & Higher Level Group Example – Contd. Size Standard Based on Average Firm Size

Development of Size Standard: Analysis of Federal Contracting Data  Review industries with ≥ $100 million in Federal contracts annually  Compare small business share of Federal contract dollars to small business share of industry’s total sales  If Federal procurement small business share is significantly less than industry’s small business share, apply a fixed size standard above current size standard, as follows:  10% to 30% discrepancy, one fixed size standard level  > 30% discrepancy, two fixed size standard levels

Average Size Standard - Example Factor Value Average firm size $19 million (Rounded from $17.71 million) Average assets size $10.0 million Industry concentration $35.5 million Size distribution $35.5 million Federal contracting $25.5 million Average of factors $25.5 million (Rounded from $25.1 million)

Steps in Size Standards Analysis Steps in Size Standards Analysis 1.Compare specific industry with comparison group averages 2.Estimate size standard for each industry and Federal procurement factor 3.Round estimated size standard to a fixed size standard level 4.Calculate average size standard from all factors 5.Select size standard 6.Prepare proposed rule and seek public comments 7.Evaluate public comments and prepare final rule

Challenges  Lack of documentation of a detailed analysis for historical development of some size standards  Lack of up-to-date data on industry structure, especially at a sub-industry level (e.g., exceptions under NAICS , or separating surveying and mapping services)  Economic Census (industry data)- 4 to 5 years old  Risk Management Association (average assets data) – some industries are not covered  FPDS (Federal procurement data) – lacks specific size of individual contractors  Rule making process

NAICSTitle 44-45Retail Trade (completed and proposed rule issued) 72Accommodations & Food Services (completed and proposed rule issued) 81Other Services (completed and proposed rule issued) 54Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 48Transportation & Warehousing 22Utilities 56Administrative & Support and Waste Management & Remediation Services 11Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 52Finance & Investment 61Educational Services 21Mining 23Construction 33Manufacturing 42Wholesale Trade 55Management of Companies 62Health Care & Social Assistance 51Information 71Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 53Real Estate and Rental & Leasing Comprehensive Size Review Schedule (tentative)

Our Contact Information  Mail Small Business Administration Office of Size Standards rd Street, SW., 8 th Floor Washington, DC   Telephone:  Website: