Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 by David Reichle 1 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
Advertisements

UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and.
Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
1 Response to the Employee Survey Recommendations.
Robert Gropp, Ph.D. Director of Public Policy Richard O’Grady, Ph.D. Executive Director.
Phil Bass Gulf of Mexico Alliance February, 2011.
SEM Planning Model.
Connecting People With Information DoD Net-Centric Services Strategy Frank Petroski October 31, 2006.
Environmental Remediation Sciences (SC – 23.4) Spring 2005.
Research Issues & Projects On behalf of the Research Team 17 March 2005.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
USGS Realignment, Science Planning, and FY 2012 Budget Matthew C. Larsen Associate Director Climate and Land Use Change U.S. Department of the Interior.
Research Integrity: Collaborative Research Michelle Stickler, DEd Office for Research Protections
Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research J Michael Kuperberg, Ph.D. Dan Stover, Ph.D. Terrestrial Ecosystem Science AmeriFlux.
Human Resource Auditing
The U.S. Climate Change Science Program Dr. James R. Mahoney Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere Director, Climate Change Science Program.
Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Meeting March 3, 2010 Overview of the DOE Office of Science Graduate Fellowship Program Julie Carruthers, Ph.D.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Office of Biological & Environmental Research Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee Roland.
ERASMUS MUNDUS ACTION 1B – Joint Doctorate Programme Marine Ecosystem Health & Conservation Dr Ian O’Connor GMIT
Environmental Modeling Center 2002 Models-3 Users’ Workshop MCNC An Overview of the Community Modeling and Analysis System Bob Imhoff, CMAS Director Models-3.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy EMSL Operating Hours EMSL users have access to a wide range of experimental instrumentation for molecular-level.
California Statewide Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Projects Overview May 20, 2010.
Animal Care Committee responsibilities CCAC ACC CCAC National Workshop, May 13, 2010.
January – March PERSONNEL SERVICES DIVISION KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FY11 Supporting DOP FY11 Key Strategies Unless indicated, all measures are.
Sophie Sergent Ifremer European Affairs Department / MariFish WP7 ERANET MariFish COORDINATION OF EUROPEAN MARINE FISHERIES RESEARCH Presentation of MariFish.
October 21, 2015 XSEDE Technology Insertion Service Identifying and Evaluating the Next Generation of Cyberinfrastructure Software for Science Tim Cockerill.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
Strengthening Science Supporting Fishery Management  Standards for Best Available Science  Implementation of OMB’s Peer Review Bulletin  Separation.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Belinda Seto, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Director for Extramural Research National Institutes of Health Human Subjects Research Enhancements Awards Renaissance.
Session 8: Statistical Infrastructure Joseph Ilboudo UNECA/ACS Workshop Review of RRSF Implementation.
Geosciences - Observations (Bob Wilhelmson) The geosciences in NSF’s world consists of atmospheric science, ocean science, and earth science Many of the.
Environmental Remediation Science Division PART Review Long-term measure: by 2015 ERSD will “provide sufficient scientific understanding to allow a significant.
Light Source Reviews The BES Perspective July 23, 2002 Pedro A. Montano Materials Sciences and Engineering Basic Energy Sciences BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES.
Understanding ARC Future Fellowships ANU College of Medicine, Biology and the Environment and ANU College of Physical Sciences 20 th October
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Marvin Frazier Director, Life Sciences Division Office of Biological and Environmental Research April 30, 2004.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
3/30/04 16:14 1 Lessons Learned CERES Data Management Presented to GIST 21 “If the 3 laws of climate are calibrate, calibrate, calibrate, then the 3 laws.
CHAPTER V Health Information. Updates on new legislation (1)  Decision No.1605/2010/QĐ-TTg approving the National Program for Application of information.
The OCIO/PSCD, in collaboration with the Advisory Board’s Long Range Planning Committee, developed this Strategic Plan to foster the leadership and.
NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
International Diabetes Federation Centres of Education Helen McGuire Global Education Manager IDF Centres of Education _SiteVisits_2009.
DOE Data Management Plan Requirements
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
PRESENTED TO: ENERGY FACILITY CONTRACTORS GROUP SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKING GROUP SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKSHOP BY: CHRIS CHAVES NSR&D PROGRAM OFFICE OF NUCLEAR.
Update on the NADP Atmospheric Mercury Initiative Developing a new coordinated and collaborative approach to atmospheric mercury monitoring A Briefing.
Report of the Committee of Visitors of the Division of Materials Science and Engineering (DMSE) to the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Review.
Multistate Research Program Roles & Responsibilities Eric Young SAAESD Meeting Corpus Christi, TX April 3-6, 2005.
Office of Science Statement on Digital Data Management Laura Biven, PhD Senior Science and Technology Advisor Office of the Deputy Director for Science.
Presented by Eliot Christian, USGS Accessibility, usability, and preservation of government information (Section 207 of the E-Government Act) April 28,
Providing access to your data: Determining your audience Robert R. Downs, PhD NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Center for International.
Regional Planning CCRPC Board Training March 21, 2012.
Napa Valley Watershed Information Center Presentation to the Napa River Watershed Conservancy and WIC Board December 18, 2002.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy EMSL Update: Reviews, Action Plan & Progress BER Advisory Committee Fall 2005.
Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop.
Ethiopian Meteorological Society (ETMS ). Outline About ETMS Aim ETMS Functional Bodies ETMS Membership Major events /activities ETMS documents / publications.
ELIXIR SAB Feedback December 2014.
Data Coordinating Center University of Washington Department of Biostatistics Elizabeth Brown, ScD Siiri Bennett, MD.
QAA COLLABORATIVE PROVISION AUDIT DRAFT REPORT. QAA CPA Process Submission by the University of Self Evaluation Document (SED) (December 2005) Selection.
TeraGrid’s Process for Meeting User Needs. Jay Boisseau, Texas Advanced Computing Center Dennis Gannon, Indiana University Ralph Roskies, University of.
Theme : Information, monitoring & research NWRS Workshops October - December
User Representation in TeraGrid Management Jay Boisseau Director, Texas Advanced Computing Center The University of Texas at Austin.
NSDL: A New Tool for Teaching and Learning.
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Presenter: Diana Castillo
Research Issues & Projects Sadiq M. Sait
Presentation transcript:

Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 by David Reichle 1 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) Experiments as Scientific User Facilities

Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) Experiments as Scientific User Facilities 2 What are FACE Facilities? Environmental research facilities to conduct controlled CO 2 enrichment, and other manipulative experiments on intact ecosystems under natural environmental conditions.

Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) Experiments as Scientific User Facilities 3 FACE – Environmental Research User Facilities FACE evolved from experimental projects to user facilities Enable research on intact ecosystems under natural environmental conditions Consist of controlled CO 2, O 3 fumigation experiments Collectively constitute a distributed user facility across different geographic ecosystems Allow long-term, continuous measurements on ecological processes and responses Purpose: To study the response of ecosystems and ecological processes to environmental change

Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) Experiments as Scientific User Facilities 4 Questions Asked by BER in the FACE Review Are the BER-funded FACE facilities considered to be and recognized as scientific user facilities? Are the BER-funded FACE facilities effectively operated? Does a distributed FACE network offer significant opportunities for scientists? Can the FACE facilities be enhanced to attract more users? Can FACE sites be enhanced as a distributed user network?

Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) Experiments as Scientific User Facilities 5 FACE User Facilities SiteEcosystem TypeNo. RingsExperimental Variables DukeLoblolly pine 7 CO 2 – ambient +200 umol mol-1, daytime fumigation Oak RidgeSweetgum 6 CO 2 – 560 ppm, daytime fumigation NevadaDesert 9 CO 2 – 550 ppm, 24- hr. fumigation RhinelanderAspen, birch 12 CO 2 – 560 ppm, daytime fumigation, variable O 3

Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) Experiments as Scientific User Facilities 6 Rhinelander USDA USFS Research Station

Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) Experiments as Scientific User Facilities 7 Research Measurement at a Duke FACE Ring

Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) Experiments as Scientific User Facilities 8 FACE Review Process Briefing by DOE/BER Program Managers Site letter and questionnaires Reading of documents and websites Site visits with managers and operators Discussions with PIs Review of operations and user interactions

Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) Experiments as Scientific User Facilities 9 Advance Information Requested from Each Site 1.Names and institutional affiliations of users, dates of involvement, and nature of the collaboration 2.Information on user satisfaction and user feedback 3.Statistics on proposals approved and/or declined; description of user policy and proposal review/ approval procedure 4.Listings of publications with user coauthors identified with work funded by DOE and work funded by other sources indicated 5.Summary to date of DOE core funding and extramural funding that supported users

Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) Experiments as Scientific User Facilities 10 Evaluation of the FACE Sites as User Facilities ○ ●● ●● ●●● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ ● ◐ ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ● ● ● ●

Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) Experiments as Scientific User Facilities 11 Evaluation of the FACE Sites as User Facilities (cont.)

Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) Experiments as Scientific User Facilities 12 Key Findings FACE user facilities Are highly instrumented and calibrated ecosystems Are accessible and valuable to the user community Provide facility and infrastructure support Provide long-term continuity in measurements and data availability Could attract and accommodate more users Should better track users and user satisfaction Should better coordinate operational and experimental protocols Would improve performance as a network with a coordinating committee

Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) Experiments as Scientific User Facilities 13 Scientific Users at the FACE Facilities Scientific users are those doing research and excludes those responsible for core operations. (a) 1994 – June 2002, (b) April 1996 – May 2002, (c) 1997 – May 2002, and (d) data for 1997 – October Site Scientist PIs Tech. & RAs Postdoc- torals Grad Stud. Total Research Users Duke a Nevada b Oak Ridge c Rhinelander d

Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) Experiments as Scientific User Facilities 14 Publication Productivity from the FACE Facilities (a) published and in press, (b) 1994 – June 2002, (c) April 1996 – May 2002, (d) 1997 – May 2002, and (e) 1997 – October 2002 Site Peer- Reviewed Publications a Symposia/ Book Chap. Books Technical Reports ThesesTOTALPresentations Duke ( ) 125 b Nevada ( ) 32 c Oak Ridge ( ) 20 d Rhinelande r ( ) 42 e

Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) Experiments as Scientific User Facilities 15 Recommendations to DOE/BER Establish Cross-Site FACE Coordinating Committee Separate operational and research funding Ensure adequate and appropriate support staff Coordinate and promote FACE with other federal bodies

Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) Experiments as Scientific User Facilities 16 Recommendations to the FACE Facility Coordinating Committee Provide program integration and coordination Ensure formal user groups for each facility Track users and monitor user satisfaction Standardize core operations and measurements Measure science productivity and impact Contribute to strategic planning