Towards Automatic Driving Xiaokai He – January 20 th, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proactive Traffic Merging Strategies for Sensor-Enabled Cars
Advertisements

Field Operational Tests in 7FP Fabrizio Minarini Head of Sector DG INFSO - ICT for transport.
Date: 1 October2013 Meeting: Concertation meeting VRA Speaker and organisation: Maarten Oonk, TNO [ Roadmap Automation in Road Transport.
Driver Behavior Models NSF DriveSense Workshop Norfolk, VA Oct Mario Gerla UCLA, Computer Science Dept.
Assessing and Managing Risk
© Ricardo plc 2012 Eric Chan, Ricardo UK Ltd 21 st October 2012 SARTRE Demonstration System The research leading to these results.
Yu Stephanie Sun 1, Lei Xie 1, Qi Alfred Chen 2, Sanglu Lu 1, Daoxu Chen 1 1 State Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, China.
1 Challenge the future The Dutch Automated Vehicle Initiative: Challenges for automated driving Dr. R.(Raymond) G. Hoogendoorn Assistant Professor Delft.
INNER CITY INVESTMENT SUMMIT TRANSPORT, INTEGRATED PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORK AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT Presenter: L N Mangcu SED: Transport and Roads Department.
AI and Autonomous Vehicles Daniel Landers COMP Intelligent and Interactive Systems 3/10/2007.
Distributed Reinforcement Learning for a Traffic Engineering Application Mark D. Pendrith DaimlerChrysler Research & Technology Center Presented by: Christina.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Issues and Challenges in Route Guidance: Mr. Tremaine Rawls, Mr. Timothy Hulitt, Dr. Fatma Mili Norfolk.
AUTOMOBILES Dimitris Milakis, Transport Institute, Delft University of Technology Envisioning Automated Vehicles within the Built Environment: 2020, 2035,
Adaptive Traffic Light Control with Wireless Sensor Networks Presented by Khaled Mohammed Ali Hassan.
The Vehicle Industry, Regulation and Safety Philip McKenzie Australia.
ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF
New technologies Cars. Car industry Car manufacturers and their suppliers form a big part in Germany’s economy In Oberberg we also have many suppliers,
Cooperative crash prevention using human behavior monitoring Susumu Ishihara*† and Mario Gerla† (*Shizuoka University / †UCLA) Danger ! ! !
Legal issues addressed in the EU funded AdaptIVe project
 Road Safety the European Union Policy Carla Hess European Commission, Directorate General for Mobility & Transport Road.
Applied Transportation Analysis ITS Application SCATS.
Geopositioning and Applications in Transportation GMAT9205 Students: Ellis Leung ( ) Terry Nham ( )
Ian Fraser Highways Agency Co-operative Vehicle - Highway Systems Research.
Odysa ® Experiences with an individual “green wave” Marcel Willekens / Arjan Bezemer / Kristiaan Langelaar.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
Maarten Oonk MSc.Joakim Svensson Sr. Market Manager TNO [ Automation in Road Transport Past, Present & Future Date: 7th of March 2013.
1 Development and Evaluation of Selected Mobility Applications for VII (a.k.a. IntelliDrive) Steven E. Shladover, Sc.D. California PATH Program Institute.
Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 1Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Hans-Martin Gerhard Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG Quiet.
Bringing intelligent systems to the market: the new European research challenge of Field Operational Tests Fabrizio Minarini Head of Sector ICT for Transport.
Safety support in the automotive industry Jacob Bangsgaard Director of External Affairs and Communications 1st Annual International Conference on ICTs.
The future of road safety Michael Meyer Robert Bosch GmbH.
The negative impact of certain technical aspects on safety in the right-hand traffic Andrzej Bogdanowicz – Ministry of Infrastructure.
Autonomous Vehicles By: Rotha Aing. What makes a vehicle autonomous ? “Driverless” Different from remote controlled 3 D’s –Detection –Delivery –Data-Gathering.
AHS – The Vision. The Automated Highway System (AHS) and The Intelligent Vehicle Initiative (IVI)
Capacity and Service to Road Users Task O1 Vision Paul van der Kroon, Copenhagen March 2006.
Trucks on Motorways in the Netherlands A survey of the role of trucks in traffic flow AVV Transport Research Centre Ministry of Transport Onno Tool
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Cars - the better drivers ?
The Fully Networked Car Geneva, 4-5 March Ubiquitous connectivity to improve urban mobility Hermann Meyer ERTICO.
Mobile Phone authorised Object Services Alternative: User Equipment initiated/authenticated/ realised Services Hans-Christian Haugli, Elin Melby, Josef.
Disseminating Traffic Data over Vehicles on Road  A Preliminary Proposal to the ITA Demo Project Presented by Bo Xu.
SAFENET The OSU SAFENET Project The Ohio State University Center for Automotive Research & Center for Intelligent Transportation Research.
© 2006 PSEN Unit - #4 Let’s Go Driving Identification Evaluation Control Monitor.
 Introduction  What is Driverless Car ?  History  Component  Action  Technology  Advantages  Disadvantages  Conclusion  Reference.
School of Systems, Engineering, University of Reading rkala.99k.org April, 2013 Motion Planning for Multiple Autonomous Vehicles Rahul Kala Congestion.
1. Overview of the past and future work of WP29 ITS Round Table 18/2/2004 Geneva Kenji Wani Co-chairman of ITS informal Group, ECE/WP29 Ministry of Land,
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
A Look into Autonomous Vehicles
ANASOFT VIATUS. Challenges Supply chain optimization is necessary for achieving competitive price of final products Synchronization and utilization of.
 ROAD SAFETY: the European Union Policy European Commission, Directorate General for Mobility & Transport «Road Safety.
Submitted To: Submitted By: Seminar On ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL.
PRESENTED BY:- P.SREENIVASULU ROLL NO:-12AT5A0420 IV-B.Tech ECE.
CRUISE CONTROL DEVICES Presented by Anju.J.S. CRUISE CONTROL DEVICES.
ESafety WG “Digital Maps” Ad Bastiaansen (Tele Atlas) - Chair Yiannis Moissidis (NAVTEQ) - Co-Chair The 4 th Plenary Session of eSafety Forum Thursday,
European Truck Platooning Conference Amsterdam, 07 April 2016 Liam Breslin Sustainable Surface Transport DG Research & Innovation European Commission Research.
MGM’S COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING NANDED. Presented By: ALEEMUDDIN K.M T.E MECH ROLL NO:72 Guided By: A.I.RAHMAN SIR.
Intelligent Transportation System
‘Adaptive Cruise Control’
ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS
Communication technologies for autonomous vehicles
Case Study Autonomous Cars 9/21/2018.
TOWARDS A DESIRED TRANSPORT FUTURE: SAFE, SUFFICIENT AND AFFORDABLE
Hur klarar infrastrukturen?
The Driving Task DRIVER EDUCATION.
TUGS Jason Higuchi && Julia Yefimenko && Raudel mayorga
Safety concept for automated driving systems
Communication technologies for autonomous vehicles
Erasmus Intensive Program
Tomorrow’s Mobility…Is Here Today!
Presentation transcript:

Towards Automatic Driving Xiaokai He – January 20 th, 2010

Outline Introduction for Automatic Vehicles from Technical Aspect Proposal of My Master Thesis – Optimized Lane Assignment in Urban environment

History Development of Driver Assistant Systems – Step by step introduction from driver assistance Requirement Technical feasibility Acceptance – ABS has already take over the driver’s control ABS 1978 ESP 1995 PRE-SAFE 2002

Current Driver Assistant Systems PRE-SAFE – two versions – From 2005, constituted in an S-Class (W221) – Combination with Distronic – Distance Keeping with Radar – Capture possible collision accidents through comparison between the speeds of each vehicles – Reaction in steps, timely depend on computed accident time points 1.(t-2.6s): acoustic/optic warning to the driver 2.(t-1.6s): automatic braking with 40% brake power 3.(t-0.6s): full brake power – driver can not take over the system 4.(t-0.1s): activate the safety belt, seat control, head support, windows…

Research Towards Total Automatic Vehicles Prometheus Project ( ) – The biggest European research project for automatic vehicles (till now) – Highway/freeway as goal area, human driver for safe concern – Up to 1700km distance, up to 180 km/h, longest distance without human control 158 km

Research Towards Total Automatic Vehicles DRAPA Grand Challenges – DARPA = Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency – Military applications from automatic vehicles (e.g. exploration, search and rescue, wardership) – Grand Challenge I – km Off-Road 10 Hours Total automatic navigation 1 Million $ Prize 15 participants – mostly US University No Team has reached the Goal The best team went 12 KM

Research Towards Total Automatic Vehicles DRAPA Grand Challenges – Grand Challenge II – km Off-Road 10 Hours Total automatic navigation 1 Million $ Prize 23 participants – mostly US University 5 Teams have reached the Goal 22 teams has surpassed best of the last year Winner (Stanford) has finished the 240km in 6 hours and 54 minutes (~34km/h)

Research Towards Total Automatic Vehicles DRAPA Grand Challenges – Grand Challenge III – km on a modified street system 6 hours Total automatic navigation Following the traffic rules 1 Million $ Prize 35 participants includes international competitors 6 Teams have reached the Goal

Research Towards Total Automatic Vehicles PATH – The California Program on Advanced Technology for the Highway ( Now) – Traffic Operations Research Traffic management Traveler information – Transportation Safety Research – Modal Applications Research

Used Driving Areas Highway (Prometheus) Desert/Off-Road (DARPA I&II) Modified City-Scenario (DARPA III) – Clear defined environment – Countable situations – Clearly recognizable environment Other situations also imaginable, e.g. car park

Expected Driving Areas Where the drivers want: – Boredom – Overextension Where the lives can be protected: – In serious dangerous situation – Seconds before a accident Where human is in continuing danger – Crisis area – Catastrophic area Earthquake Radiate area

Definition A Vehicle, which automatic drives and – Goes after the Goal complying the rules – Perceives, interprets the environment and reaction in an appropriable way

Definition Communication is the Key of effective automatic driving

Sensors Input for Situation Analyze Transfer raw data Generally: – Radar (near/far) – Infra – Ultrasound – Image level Camera IR-Camera (night sight) Stereo-Camera (for 3D information) – GPS We also have: – LIDAR (Laser scanner) Punctual environment information

Sensor Evaluation Sensors collect only raw data – Pixel from Cameras – Voltage from IR/Ultrasound – Distance from Radar – 3D Pixel from LIDAR These Data must be evaluated – Pixel-Clustering – Object recognition/identification – Muster recognition

World Model Combination and Summary of the evaluated Sensor data Situation Analyze Compare with the previous data Translate as real word Categorizing in related concepts

Strategy Long-term plan of the route Similar to navigation system Updates in real time Translate e.g. through Rule-Engine

Tactic Short-term plan Transfer the Strategy to effective route plan Change the lane plan according to situations – Normal driving – Overtaking control – Avoidance control – Turn off procedure Control and correction through actuators according to new sensor condition (loop control)

Goals Pretended Goals of the Vechicle For example – Drive a circuit – Drive to Peking – Optimize the fuel consumption – Avoid traffic jam Impact on strategy and sometime also on tactic decisions

Rule Rules, which the vehicle must follow Street traffic rules Test restrictions Can be overrode: avoiding accident with human is more important than stay in the lane Impact on tactic and sometime also on strategy decisions

Actuators Control the vehicle Gas/Brake Steering Blinker Cockpit-Electronic Drive-by-Wire Additional actuators (e.g. warn siren)

Communication (Evaluated) Sensor data share with other vehicles in the environment – position, speed and direction Cooperatively route plan – avoiding traffic congestion, environment pressure, shorten the drive time Broadened sensor sharing – part of the reconstructed information All the vehicles in a specific area share a local map with dynamic information Cooperatively lane plan to avoid accidents and increase the traffic efficiency

Outlook Research has solved part of the full automatic driving problem Further work needed for sensor evaluation and lane planning Extend the communication between full automatic and human controlled vehicles Deploy the automatic vehicles in restricted areas – Highway – Garage – In dangerous situations For “real” full automatic vehicles, we need not only research, but also impulse from politic, the vehicle manufactures and making dedicated laws

Proposal of Master Thesis Optimized Lane Assignment in Urban Environment – Goal – Scope – State of the art – Assumptions – Challenges

Goal Build a centralized control system that assign an appropriate lane for each vehicle on each road Provide a navigation algorithm to cooperate with the lane allocation to achieve a maximal throughput using the existent facilities

Scope Construct a centralized control system to provide the lane assignment for each vehicle Provide lane assignment algorithms in dynamic urban area and evaluate with simulation Provide advanced navigation/routing algorithms to utilize the benefits from the lane assignment Evaluate the system with certain metrics to prove the improvement of the global traffic efficiency Out of Scope – Vehicle Maneuver (lane change/keeping) – Coordination between vehicles

State of the art Lane assignment is well studied under highway/freeway scenario – Platooning – Economic methods Comprehensive Vehicle Models Dynamic routing algorithms

Main Assumptions One general vehicle model – Different vehicle model for different vehicle types: car, bus, truck… 100% penetrate rate – System behavior under different penetrate rate is important Controller knows all the necessary information: – For each vehicle: destination… – For each road: capacity, traffic… Unrestricted communication capability – Latency, capacity, overhead need to be take in consideration – Thus different communication technologies need to be utilized One central Controller – Using the intelligence of the vehicles

Challenges Modulation of the complex urban area – Different scenarios (single road, intersection, elevator…) – Micro & Macro scope Cooperate with other road facilities (traffic lights) Metric of Efficiency Fairness (who want to join the slow lane?) Safety

Idea Collection Thank you for your attention! ? ? || /* */