UC Enterprise Architecture Framework (EAF): The Business Value UC-ITAG.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Connected Health Framework
Advertisements

Presentation Title | Date | Page 1 Extracting Value from SOA.
Supporting New Business Imperatives Creating a Framework for Interoperable Media Services (FIMS)
Test Automation Success: Choosing the Right People & Process
Enterprise Architecture 2013 ITLC & ITAG Leadership Meeting Discussion Points April 9, 2013.
Building an Operational Enterprise Architecture and Service Oriented Architecture Best Practices Presented by: Ajay Budhraja Copyright 2006 Ajay Budhraja,
EIM Framework EIM Vision & Strategy EIM Governance EIM Core Processes
6th MSDI Working Group Meeting
Enterprise Integration Architecture IPMA Professional Development Seminar June 29, 2006 Scott Came Director, Enterprise Architecture Program Washington.
© 2004 Visible Systems Corporation. All rights reserved. 1 (800) 6VISIBLE Holistic View of the Enterprise Business Development Operations.
Federal Student Aid Technical Architecture Initiatives Sandy England
Capital Planning Update 1 Senate Fiscal Committee/COPE Presentation January 3, 2012.
UC San Diego EH&S Staff Meeting Project 2010 Jan00 meeting notes.doc May 5, 2004 Update on the New Business Architecture EH&S Staff Meeting.
University of California New Business Architecture Project 2010 Jan00 meeting notes.doc April 15, 2004 Accelerating the New Business Architecture UC Employment.
Enterprise Architecture 2013 University of California Enterprise Architecture: A Case Study ITANA Face2Face - October, 2013 Mojgan Amini, UC San Diego.
LEVERAGING THE ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT Louise Edmonds Senior Manager Information Management ACT Health.
ITAG and EA Update ITLC – Oct. 23
Enterprise Architecture
Project Management COE Helen Schmitz, Chief IT Architect (Acting)
a Service Oriented Architecture
Information Technology Architecture Group ITAG, Version 2.0 Or, how our role supports the evolution of interoperable systems February ITLC.
UC-ITAG ANNUAL UPDATE Oct. 22, 2014 ITLC Meeting, UC Irvine.
TECHNICAL. The iMDHT technical team Shared Technical Objective: Toolkit that lowers the bar and accelerates development of innovative applications Shared.
Enterprise Architecture 2013 ITAG Data Governance – Metadata Repository EAAF - Update.
PROJECT NAME: DHS Watch List Integration (WLI) Information Sharing Environment (ISE) MANAGER: Michael Borden PHONE: (703) extension 105.
Information Technology Architecture Group ITAG, version 2.0 We need resource commitments! February ITLC.
Geospatial Platform Update Migration of GOS to Data.gov Rob Dollison GOS Project Manager FGDC Metadata Summit 10/26/11.
An Enterprise Platform Copyright © Impact Technologies Group, Inc. | All Rights Reserved | | Ph:
Enterprise Architecture 2013 ITAG and EA Update ITLC – Oct. 23.
© 2013 Visible Systems Corporation. All rights reserved. 1 (800) 6VISIBLE Achievement of an Integrated Applications Environment Enterprise.
E-Learning, a Summary  VLE/ MLE ’ s  Learning Platforms  SCORM  e-portfolio ’ s.
UC E NTERPRISE A RCHITECTURE F RAMEWORK (EAF): T HE B USINESS V ALUE UC-ITAG.
Save time. Reduce costs. Find and reuse interoperability solutions on Joinup for developing European public services Nikolaos Loutas
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) at NIH Bill Jones
Creating Business Impact | Providing Expert Solutions | Delivering Quality Consistently | Building Partnerships Globally Large-Scale Enterprise GIS Systems.
The ESS.VIP Programme: a response to the challenges facing the ESS Mariana Kotzeva, ESS VIP Programme Coordinator Advisor Hors Classe ESTAT.
1 The Benefits of an SOA in the Contact Center Brian Garr Program Director, IBM Speech Solutions.
Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Data Management, and Data Standardization Efforts at the U.S. Department of Education May 2006 Joe Rose, Chief Architect.
Landstar Application Case Study: Development Of Content-rich Solutions For The Mobile Employee Bob Leo Director of Professional Services October 15, 2000.
Catawba County Board of Commissioners Retreat June 11, 2007 It is a great time to be an innovator 2007 Technology Strategic Plan *
United States Department of Justice Achieving Information Interoperability and Business Agility The Justice Reference Architecture:
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
Enterprise Architecture HOW COMPANIES ARE EXPLOITING INFORMATION TO THROUGH IT.
Service-Oriented Architecture: An Approach to Information Sharing Regional Information Sharing Conference San Diego, CA November 28, 2006 Scott Came SEARCH.
11 ITLC – Middleware Report May 27, 2010 The work of a subgroup of ITAG.
Student Technology Services June Student Technology Services Team Dedicated to creating a holistic strategy to improve the technological services.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program January 17, 2002 eGovernment Executive Council Chris Niedermayer, USDA eGovernment Executive Barbara.
UC E NTERPRISE A RCHITECTURE F RAMEWORK (EAF): T HE B USINESS V ALUE UC-ITAG.
CHINA E-GOVERNMENT FRAMEWORK Taiji Computer Corp. ChangFeng Alliance Foundational Sponsors YU YUE.
National Geospatial Enterprise Architecture N S D I National Spatial Data Infrastructure An Architectural Process Overview Presented by Eliot Christian.
Enterprise Architecture Reference Framework Generalities
Knowledge Management and sharing of best practices A & NZ Public Administration The Openray Platform EU Technical Workshop Brussels
Basic Concepts Key Learning Points : The objectives of this chapter are as follows:  To provide an introduction to the basic Concepts of enterprise architectures,
By Jeremy Burdette & Daniel Gottlieb. It is an architecture It is not a technology May not fit all businesses “Service” doesn’t mean Web Service It is.
Managing Enterprise Architecture
Data Management Program Introduction
eHealth Standards and Profiles in Action for Europe and Beyond
Data Management Program Overview
CIM Modeling for E&U - (Short Version)
IT Governance at the SCO
8/3/16 Prepared for ITLC by ITAC
Unit 5 Systems Integration and Interoperability
Interoperability of Data Systems Administration for Children & Families Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation Robert (Bob) Garcia Regional Administrator,
A Campus-Based Shared IT Services Framework for the UC
Towards an ESS architecture ITDG Item 3.4
A Campus-Based Shared IT Services Framework for the UC
Minnesota State University, Mankato
專題進度報告 第一組 指導教授:林則孟.張瑞芬.江.
IEEE Architecture Council Overview
AB 1755 The Open and Transparent Water Data Act
Presentation transcript:

UC Enterprise Architecture Framework (EAF): The Business Value UC-ITAG

EAF Vision Support the ITLC vision to invest and deploy technology- based solutions that support the University's missions of teaching, research, public service, and patient care, and to address common Information Technology (IT) opportunities that advance the collective priorities of Locations and the system as a whole.

What do we want to do? 1.Increase responsiveness to business 2.Provide easy access to data 3.Reduce time to integrate with partners 4.Promote re-use of existing assets 5.Reduce implementation time (coding, testing and rollout) 6.Architect and promote technology-neutral solutions 7.Promote architecture modernization 8.Allow students and departments to provide innovative solutions

How will we do this? EAF to provide: Standards and models to increase the consistency, interoperability, and reuse of technology, data and processes across the UC. Technology infrastructure necessary to promote and support interoperability and sharing of IT solutions among and between campuses. Shared services reference architecture. Initial catalog of shared technology services to support common administrative systems.

How do we know we are successful? Multiple campus or business units are able to fast-track service delivery by leveraging a shared service Cost, resource, or time savings in implementation effort are noted by leveraging EAF guidelines, resources.

How will we measure the success? What are the KPIs and the measurement process? Document number of artifacts used and how often, per campus Document how fast services can get rolled out, start to finish Document efficiency of system integration efforts Document reduction of “one-off” point-to-point links Document total cost of rollout What will the format of the metrics look like?

Business DriversIT DriversKPIs to Measure Shareable upon deploy – Support a standard way to integrate with and leverage existing systems/services across the UC system Faster response: Reuse services rather than reinvent Compatible and standard interfaces Cycle-time: measure start to finish Dev time: measure new app/service delivery Total cost of rollout Cost reduction – need new ways to lower costs Easy information/data distribution/access Reduce integration headaches and reduce point-to-point exchange Time to integrate w/ partners/customers Efficiency of system integration; SOA rather than point-to-point Support common administrative systems, i.e. the new payroll/HR system (UCPath) Strive for one solution for the same business need, not multiple solutions Document number of artifacts used and how often, per campus Document how fast services can get rolled out, start to finish Increase the consistency, interoperability, and reuse of technology, data and processes across the UC Easy and safe access to common data Re-use assets: Get more value by re- use, spend less time on maintenance Document efficiency of system integration efforts Document reduction of “one-off” point-to-point links