Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agricultural and Biological Engineering SWFREC, UF/IFAS Immokalee.
Advertisements

Phosphorus Indices: an Understanding of Upper Mississippi Strategies John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences University of Missouri.
Daily Manure Production Per Animal We have estimates of manure production –4.5 kg/day/hd for swine (liquid manure) –45-50 kg/day/hd for dairy cow (liquid)
Project collaborators: Laura Ward Good, Katie Songer, Matt Diebel, John Panuska, Jeff Maxted, Pete Nowak, John Norman, K.G. Karthikeyan, Tom Cox, Water.
An open source version of the Nonpoint-Source Pollution and Erosion Comparison Tool Climate Tools Café Webinar Dave Eslinger, Ph.D. 3 May, 2012.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Nutrient Management Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Chapter 15/14 Soil Resources. Soil  Uppermost layer of Earth’s crust that supports plants, animals and microbes  Soil Forming Factors  Parent Material.
Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Adam Freihoefer Wisconsin Department of Natural.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Conservation Managing the Agricultural Landscape for Environmental.
Water Pollution. Watershed A watershed is an area of land from which all the water drains to the same location, such as a stream, pond, lake, river, wetland.
Surface Water Simulation Group. Comprehensive watershed scale model developed and supported by the USDA-ARS capable of simulating surface and groundwater.
Using the Missouri P index John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences Commercial Agriculture Program University of Missouri.
Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model Input
Point Source POLLUTION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
Soil Conservation: Soil Conservation: towards sustainable agriculture.
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution and Water Quality as a function of Land Management Practices on Four Kansas Farms William W. Spotts Dr. Donald Huggins.
Economic and Biophysical Models to Support Conservation Policy: Hypoxia and Water Quality in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CARD Resources and Environmental.
AGRICULTURE BMP QUESTION 2 Name the BMP.. AGRICULTURE BMP ANSWER 2 Name the BMP. Windbreak Row of trees Trees or shrubs that slow the wind.
Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits of Agricultural Conservation Policies: In-stream vs. Edge-of-Field Assessments of Water Quality. Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
Agricultural Best Management Practices For Protecting Water Quality Recommended by Georgia Soil and Water Conservation Commission and approved by the EPD.
Agriculture and its effects in Scotland, Belgium and Iceland
Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Delivery with a Geographic Information System and a Computer Model M.S. Richardson and A. Roa-Espinosa; Dane County.
Sediment Retention model
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell March 11,
Co-Benefits from Conservation Policies that Promote Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: The Corn Belt CARD, Iowa State University Presented at the Forestry.
Consideration of Drainage Ditches and Sediment Rating Curve on SWAT Model Performance A.M. Sadeghi *1, A.M. Sexton 1, G.W. McCarty 1, M.W. Lang 3,1, W.D.
The Importance of Watershed Modeling for Conservation Policy Or What is an Economist Doing at a SWAT Workshop?
2 -1 Lesson 2 Whole Farm Nutrient Planning By Rick Koelsch, University of Nebraska.
Assessing Alternative Policies for the Control of Nutrients in the Upper Mississippi River Basin Catherine L. Kling, Silvia Secchi, Hongli Feng, Philip.
USDA Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) USDA Agricultural Research Service E. John Sadler, Coordinator M. A. Weltz, National Program Leader.
BROUGHT TO YOU BY: BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERS IN ANIMAL AGRICULTURE WELCOME TO MANURE MANAGEMENT JEOPARDY! Section 1 Nutrient Management Building Environmental.
Modeling experience of non- point pollution: CREAMS (R. Tumas) EPIC (A. Povilaitis and R.Tumas SWRRBWQ (A. Dumbrauskas and R. Tumas) AGNPS (Sileika and.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan Scott Sturgul Nutrient & Pest Management Program Soil & Water Management Farm & Industry Short Course Feb. 16,
1 Evaluating and Estimating the Effect of Land use Changed on Water Quality at Selorejo Reservoir, Indonesia Mohammad Sholichin Faridah Othman Shatira.
LOWER L’ANGUILLE WATERSHED COST SHARE PATRICIA PERRY ST. FRANCIS COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT.
Field Specific Decisions: N vs P CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Estimating Soil Erosion From Water Using RUSLE By: Andrea King USDA-Natural Resource Conservation Service.
How Breakthroughs in Information Systems Can Impact Local Decisions Bruce Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University.
Assessment of Runoff, Sediment Yield and Nutrient Load on Watershed Using Watershed Modeling Mohammad Sholichin Mohammad Sholichin 1) Faridah Othman 2)
Introduction Conservation of water is essential to successful dryland farming in the Palouse region. The Palouse is under the combined stresses of scarcity.
Virtual Academy for the Semi Arid Tropics Course on Coping with Drought About Drought After completing this lesson you have learned to answer: 1.How drought.
™ Nutrient Management Planning ¨ Will these be mandated in your state?  An emerging national issue is how to account for agricultural non-point source.
Farming methods  4.3. Farming Methods  All agriculture depends on soil.  Therefore, soil erosion is a major problem in agriculture.  Erosion happens.
1 GEORGIAN EXPERIENCE – and Strategy for Future DAVID NAKANI Environmental Pollution Control Program DAREJAN KAPANADZE World Bank Office Tbilisi Georgia.
Waste Management Systems Objective: Analyze waste management systems used in the livestock and poultry industry.
Estimating future scenarios for farm-watershed nutrient fluxes using dynamic simulation modelling – Can on-farm BMPs really do the job at the watershed.
Nutrient Issues Review of Nutrient Management Issues Addressed by EPA NODA for Proposed CAFO Regulations.
April 8, 2009Forestry and Agriculture GHG Modeling Forum Land Use Change in Agriculture: Yield Growth as a Potential Driver Scott Malcolm USDA/ERS.
Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Presented by Divya Sharon.
Effect of Potential Future Climate Change on Cost-Effective Nonpoint Source Pollution Reduction Strategies in the UMRB Manoj Jha, Philip Gassman, Gene.
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources By Joan Schumaker Chadde, Western U.P. Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education. All photos by Chadde,
National Assessment for Cropland. Analytical Approach Sampling and modeling approach based on a subset of NRI sample points. Farmer survey conducted to.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan The How, Where, When, and Why.
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
Manure Management and Water Quality By Jeff Lorimor, Iowa State University, Ames 32-1.
P Index Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training Course December 15, 2005 Isaac Wolford, West Virginia NRCS State Agronomist.
Taking on the Challenge Addressing Sustainability and Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Goals Caroline Wade, Nutrient Watershed Manager Illinois Corn Growers.
Slide 1 Achieving Effective Conservation in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CEAP —Conservation Effects Assessment Project.
Integrated Nutrient Management (Nutrient Management Plan ) A Series of Lecture By Mr. Allah Dad Khan.
Andrew Lyon and Daniel Storm Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center University of Arkansas
Agricultural Best Management Practices For Protecting Water Quality
Soil Loss Estimation. USLE – Universal Soil Loss Equation SLEMSA – Soil Loss Estimation Model for Southern Africa.
Sustainable Agriculture
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan
Presentation transcript:

Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007

Watershed Assessment Inventory potential sources of pollution Determine pollution pathways Link the characteristics of the watershed with the water quality in its streams, lakes, and groundwater. Predict water quality when land use or land management change in the watershed.

Water Quality Data Why don’t we just use measured data? Data are limited in frequency and duration. Pollutant concentrations are first and foremost dependent on weather. Measured concentrations or flow can be the result of several factors.

Example: Atrazine in Goodwater Creek

Possible Reasons Percent Crop Area in No-Till and Conservation Tillage Percent Area Protected by Waterways Estimated average corn planting dates from 1992 to 2004.

Modeling can help find what is responsible for measured flows or concentrations.

What is a Model? A mathematical equation is a model –The USLE equation (for soil loss estimation) Computer simulation model for watershed assessment: –A combination of equations that represent the different processes in the watershed. –These equations link the topography, the soil characteristics, the management, and the weather to flow and water quality.

Field Level: EPIC Environmental Policy Integrated Climate model

Watershed Level: APEX or SWAT Ponds and reservoirs Streams and waterways Subsurface and groundwater flow

What can we do with modeling? Watershed scale Farm scale Field scale

Stream and river issues How dirty is it ? Where do water and pollutants come from ? How much water is there ? What is affecting flow and pollutant concentrations ?

Farm issues What is the best way to distribute the manure between different fields to minimize environmental impacts? How can we maximize profits while minimizing environmental impacts?

Field problems How much soil is lost from the field? How long will it take to loose productivity? How much phosphorus is leaving the field? How much carbon can the soil sequester? How much nutrient is lost to percolation?

What if scenarios What happens if… –a toxic substance leeks out of an industrial site. –the number of CAFO’s in an area increases. –agricultural land becomes residential or industrial. –better management practices are implemented.

Data requirements USER INPUT Topographic data (GIS) Weather data (National Weather Service) Soil and Land use data (GIS) Management data (??) DATABASES Weather database Fertilizer database Tillage database Crop database

Management Data Census data. – Some data on total fertilizer amounts, or crops being grown. Usually on a county basis. – Little information on tillage practices, timing of operations, rotations implemented … Panel consensus. –Form of interview where the panel members have to agree that a practice is representative.

Garbage in  Garbage out MODEL Garbage

In Color, still MODEL Garbage

Even if animated, it is still MODEL Garbage in Garbage out

Model Calibration To be accepted, a model needs to be calibrated Calibration: Adjusting the parameters of the model to have good agreement between model predictions and measured data over a period of time. Validation: Verifying that the model results and the measured data match over a different period of time.

Examples of answers provided by models

6 Selected AgNPS-SALT Projects Long Branch Upper and Lower Maries River Jenkins Basin Flat Creek Miami Creek

BMPs Fully Simulated With SWAT Erosion control through tillage and terraces Erosion control through grade stabilization structures (ponds) Woodland protection (livestock exclusion) Grassland establishment / improvement Pasture management Poultry litter export

Predicted Change in Stream Loads after Implementation of the Project WatershedSediment Total Nitrogen Total Phosphorus Miami Creek-8 %-11 %-29 % Long Branch-2 %-8 %-11 % Flat Creek-17 %-7 %-14 % Maries River-22 %-20 %-19 % Jenkins Basin-11 %-8 %-17 %

Conclusion: Why Model? Link watershed characteristics, watershed management, and water quality. That allows to: –Understand the link. –Focus the action where it is most useful. Predict the consequences of “what if” scenarios without having to try them. BUT because garbage in causes garbage out, there is a need to understand the model and calibration process: –Development of specific databases for Missouri. –Training.