Monte-Carlo simulations of shock acceleration of solar energetic particles in self-generated turbulence Rami Vainio Dept of Physical Sciences, University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Acceleration of Solar Energetic Particles Rami Vainio University of Helsinki, Department of Physics, Finland University of Turku, Department of Physics.
Advertisements

Investigating the Origin of the Long-Duration High- Energy Gamma-Ray Flares Gerry Share, Jim Ryan and Ron Murphy (in absentia) Steering Committee Overseer.
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory SHINE 2005, July 11-15, 2005 Transient Shocks and Associated Energetic Particle Events Observed.
THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC TRANSPORT OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLES IN THE INNER HELIOSPHERE CRISM- 2011, Montpellier, 27 June – 1 July, Collaborators:
R. P. Lin Physics Dept & Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley The Solar System: A Laboratory for the Study of the Physics of Particle.
THE ORIGIN OF COSMIC RAYS Implications from and for X and γ-Ray Astronomy Pasquale Blasi INAF/Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Firenze.
Solar Energetic Particles and Shocks. What are Solar Energetic Particles? Electrons, protons, and heavier ions Energies – Generally KeV – MeV – Much less.
January 22, Protons (85 %) Nuclei (13%) Electrons/Positrons (2%) Galactic Origin α=2.7.
The Acceleration of Anomalous Cosmic Rays by the Heliospheric Termination Shock J. A. le Roux, V. Florinski, N. V. Pogorelov, & G. P. Zank Dept. of Physics.
CME Workshop Elmau, Feb , WORKING GROUP C: ENERGETIC PARTICLE OBSERVATIONS Co-Chairs: Klecker, Kunow SUMMARY FROM WORKSHOP 1 Observations Questions.
Relativistic Particle Acceleration in a Developing Turbulence Relativistic Particle Acceleration in a Developing Turbulence Shuichi M ATSUKIYO ESST Kyushu.
Modeling Generation and Nonlinear Evolution of Plasma Turbulence for Radiation Belt Remediation Center for Space Science & Engineering Research Virginia.
Shock Source Description: Large-Scale Hybrid Simulations Dietmar Krauss-Varban Janet Luhmann Ilan Roth Yan Li Steve Ledvina Space Sciences Laboratory,
Theory of Shock Acceleration of Hot Ion Populations Marty Lee Durham, New Hampshire USA.
NESSC 5 April 2006 Suprathermal Tails in Coronal Proton Velocity Distributions Suprathermal Tails in Coronal Proton Velocity Distributions J. L. Kohl,
Joe Giacalone and Randy Jokipii University of Arizona
Strong nonresonant amplification of magnetic fields in particle accelerating shocks A. E. Vladimirov, D. C. Ellison, A. M. Bykov Submitted to ApJL.
Shock Wave Related Plasma Processes
SSL UC Berkeley 2010 June ACE/SOHO/STEREO/Wind Workshop Interplanetary Propagation of Solar Impulsive Energetic Electrons Linghua Wang, Bob Lin and S ä.
Shock Acceleration at an Interplanetary Shock: A Focused Transport Approach J. A. le Roux Institute of Geophysics & Planetary Physics University of California.
Practical Models of Solar Energetic Particle Transport Leon Kocharov Space Research Laboratory University of Turku, Finland Requirements.
Spectral analysis of non-thermal filaments in Cas A Miguel Araya D. Lomiashvili, C. Chang, M. Lyutikov, W. Cui Department of Physics, Purdue University.
Incorporating Kinetic Effects into Global Models of the Solar Wind Steven R. Cranmer Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
The Injection Problem in Shock Acceleration The origin of the high-energy cosmic rays remains one of the most-important unsolved problems in astrophysics.
Particle Acceleration at Ultrarelativistic Shocks Jacek Niemiec Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, USA J. Niemiec, M. Ostrowski.
CME Workshop Elmau, Feb , WORKING GROUP C: ENERGETIC PARTICLE OBSERVATIONS Co-Chairs: Klecker, Kunow SUMMARY FROM SESSION 1B Discussion of.
Injection of κ-like suprathermal particles into DSA Kang, Hyesung et al. arXiv: by Zhang Xiao,
Modeling Coronal Acceleration of Solar Energetic Protons K. A. Kozarev, R. M. Evans, N. A. Schwadron, M. A. Dayeh, M. Opher, K. E. Korreck NESSC Meeting,
Interaction among cosmic Rays, waves and large scale turbulence Interaction among cosmic Rays, waves and large scale turbulence Huirong Yan Kavli Institute.
R. Oran csem.engin.umich.edu SHINE 09 May 2005 Campaign Event: Introducing Turbulence Rona Oran Igor V. Sokolov Richard Frazin Ward Manchester Tamas I.
Nov. 1-3, 2006 Self-Similar Evolution of Cosmic Ray Modified Shocks Hyesung Kang Pusan National University, KOREA.
Elemental Abundance variations of the Suprathermal Heavy Ion Population over solar cycle 23 M. Al Dayeh, J.R. Dwyer, H.K. Rassoul Florida Institute of.
Diffusive shock acceleration: an introduction
Ion Acceleration Near CME-driven shocks Paper No. 84, SH1.3 ICRC 2011, Beijing, China Ion Acceleration Near CME-driven shocks Paper No. 84, SH1.3 ICRC.
The SEP Acceleration and Transport Link of the Chain
SEP Acceleration C.M.S. Cohen Caltech. Outline Shock acceleration in the IPM –ESP events –Observations vs theory –Observations driving theory Flare acceleration.
1 20 January 2005: Session Summary SHINE 2006 Zermatt, Utah, 31 July - 4 August Invited Talks Riley: what was the Alfven speed in the corona at.
1 SPD Meeting, July 8, 2013 Coronal Mass Ejection Plasma Heating by Alfvén Wave Dissipation Rebekah M. Evans 1,2, Merav Opher 3, and Bart van der Holst.
DSA in the non-linear regime Hui Li Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University.
Particle Acceleration by Shocks Brian Reville, Klara Schure,
Courtesy of John Kirk Particle Acceleration. Basic particle motion No current.
Modeling particle acceleration at CME-driven shock and transport in the inner heliosphere, A case study SHINE 2004 Bozeman, June 28, 2004 Gang Li IGPP,
End-to-End Overview of Hazardous Radiation Len Fisk University of Michigan.
Tasks: Pasadena, 9/18/08. Exponential Rollovers Origin of double power laws? Need analysis and simulation. Correlating E and Q/A dependence; explore different.
Solar Energetic Particles (SEP’s) J. R. Jokipii LPL, University of Arizona Lecture 2.
Simulations of turbulent plasma heating by powerful electron beams Timofeev I.V., Terekhov A.V.
Probing Turbulence At and Near CME-driven shocks Using Energetic Particle Spectra Living with a Star Team meeting Sep 18th, 2008 Pasadena, CA Gang Li From.
The impact of magnetic turbulence spectrum on particle acceleration in SNR IC443 I.Telezhinsky 1,2, A.Wilhelm 1,2, R.Brose 1,3, M.Pohl 1,2, B.Humensky.
08/4/2009NAS - SHINE-Suprathermal Radial Evolution (1-11 AU) of Pickup Ions and Suprathermal Ions in the Heliosphere N. A. Schwadron Boston University,
Solar energetic particle simulations in SEPServer How to deal with scale separation of thirteen orders of magnitude R. Vainio, A. Afanasiev, J. Pomoell.
What is the Origin of the Frequently Observed v -5 Suprathermal Charged-Particle Spectrum? J. R. Jokipii University of Arizona Presented at SHINE, Zermatt,
1 Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particle Propagation for Space Weather Mike Marsh, S. Dalla, J. Kelly & T. Laitinen University of Central.
Observations of spectral shapes of suprathermal H +, He + and He ++ G. Gloeckler Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences University of Michigan,
Particle spectra at CME-driven shocks and upstream turbulence SHINE 2006 Zermatt, Utah August 3rd Gang Li, G. P. Zank and Qiang Hu Institute of Geophysics.
Hybrid model of solar energetic particle acceleration and transport Hybrid model of solar energetic particle acceleration and transport Leon Kocharov,
Diffusive shock acceleration: an introduction
Cosmic-ray acceleration by compressive plasma fluctuations in supernova shells Ming Zhang Department of Physics and Space Sciences, Florida Institute.
Elemental Abundance variations of the Suprathermal Heavy Ion Population over solar cycle 23 M. Al Dayeh, J.R. Dwyer, H.K. Rassoul Florida Institute of.
T. Laitinen, S. Dalla Jeremiah Horrocks Institute, UCLan, UK
George C. Ho1, David Lario1, Robert B. Decker1, Mihir I. Desai2,
Progress Toward Measurements of Suprathermal Proton Seed Particle Populations J. Raymond, J. Kohl, A. Panasyuk, L. Gardner, and S. Cranmer Harvard-Smithsonian.
Coupled ion acceleration and
3D Modelling of Heavy Ion SEP Propagation
Particle Acceleration at Coronal Shocks: the Effect of Large-scale Streamer-like Magnetic Field Structures Fan Guo (Los Alamos National Lab), Xiangliang.
Modeling the SEP/ESP Event of December 13, 2006
Solar Flare Energy Partition into Energetic Particle Acceleration
Karl-Ludwig Klein & Rositsa Miteva
SMALL SEP EVENTS WITH METRIC TYPE II RADIO BURSTS
Diffusive shock acceleration: an introduction – cont.
Heavy-Ion Acceleration and Self-Generated Waves in Coronal Shocks
Presentation transcript:

Monte-Carlo simulations of shock acceleration of solar energetic particles in self-generated turbulence Rami Vainio Dept of Physical Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland Timo Laitinen Dept of Physics, University of Turku, Finland COST Action 724 is thanked for financial support

Large Solar Particle Events Reames & Ng 1998

Reames (2003) Fraction of time (%) GOES Proton flux Hourly fluence (protons/cm 2 sr) Most of the IP proton fluence comes from large events N ~ F -0.41

Streaming instability and proton transport Outward propagating AWs amplified by outward streaming SEPs → stronger scattering v || VAVA v' = const. v dv/dt < 0 → wave growth dv/dt > 0 → wave damping vv v = velocity in solar-wind frame

Particle acceleration at shocks Particles crossing the shock many times (because of strong scattering) get accelerated V sh W 1 = u 1 +v A1 W2W2 v || ΔW = W 2 - W 1 v' = const. v 2 > v 1 dv/dt > 0 → particle acceleration v = particle velocity in the ambient AW frame v1v1 upstream → downstream downstream → upstream V sh vv

Self-generated Alfvén waves Alfvén-wave growth rate Γ = ½π ω cp · p r S p (r,p r,t)/nv A p r = m ω cp /|k| S p = 4π p 2 ∫ dμ vμ f(r,p, μ,t) = proton streaming per unit momentum Efficient wave growth (at fixed r,k) during the SEP event requires 1 > (2/π) nAv A /ω cp = sr -1 (v A  /v A ) (n   /2·10 8 cm -3 ) ½ where A = cross-sectional area of the flux tube dN/dp = momentum distr. of protons injected to the flux tube Vainio (2003) sr

Self-generated waves (cont'd) Threshold spectrum for wave-growth p dN/dp| thr = sr -1 (n   /2·10 8 cm -3 ) ½ (v A  /v A (r)) lowest in corona Apply a simple IP transport model: radial diffusion 1 AU, dJ/dE| max = 15·(MeV/E) ½ /cm 2 ·sr·s·MeV for p dN/dp = sr -1. Thus, wave-growth unimportant  for small SEP events  at relativistic energies Only threshold spectrum released “impulsively”, waves trap the rest → streaming limited intensities p dN/dp [sr -1 ] r [R sun ] Vainio (2003) solar-wind model with a maximum of v A in outer corona most efficient wave growth

r r p dN p /dr r log P(r) r p S p (r) Γ(r) t = t 1 t = t 2 > t 1 Γ(r) p S p (r) Coupled evolution of particles and waves weak scattering (Λ > L B ) weak scattering turbulent trapping with gradual leakage p dN p /dr impulsive release of escaping protons ProtonsAlfvén waves weak scattering log P(r)

Numerical modeling of coronal DSA Large events exceeding the threshold for wave-growth require self-consistent modeling  particles affect their own scattering conditions Monte Carlo simulations with wave growth  SW: radial field, W = u + v A = 400 km/s  parallel shock with constant speed V s and sc-compression ratio r sc  WKB Alfvén waves modified by wave growth  Suprathermal (~ 10 keV) particles injected to the considered flux tube at the shock at a constant rate  waves P(r,f,t) and particles f(r,p,μ,t) traced simultaneously Γ = π 2 f cp · p r S p (r,p r,t)/nv A /Δt = π 2 f cp · f r P(r,f r,t)/B 2 p r = f cp m p V/f f r = f cp m p V/p u B VsVs

Examples of simulation results Shock launched at R = 1.5 R sun at speed V s = 1500 km/s in all examples. Varied parameters:  Ambient scattering mean free r = 1.5 R sun and E = 100 keV Λ 0 = 1, 5, 30 R sun  Injection rate q = N inj /t max << q sw where q sw = ∫ n(r)A(r) dr /t max = 2.2·10 37 s -1  Scattering center compression ratio of the shock, r sc = 2, 4

r sc = 2, q ~ 4.7·10 32 s -1, Λ 0 = 1 R sun - Proton acceleration up to 1 MeV in 10 min - Hard escaping proton spectrum (~ p –1 ) - Very soft (~ p –4 ) spectrum at the shock - Wave power spectrum increased by 2 orders of magnitude at the shock at resonant frequencies

r sc = 4, q ~ 4.7·10 32 s -1, Λ 0 = 1 R sun - Proton acceleration up to ~20 MeV in 10 min - Hard escaping proton spectrum (~ p –1 ) - Softer (~ p –2 ) spectrum at the shock - Wave power spectrum increased by > 3 orders of magnitude at the shock at resonant frequencies

r sc = 4, q ~ 1.9·10 33 s -1, Λ 0 = 5 R sun - Proton acceleration up to ~20 MeV in < 3 min - Hard escaping proton spectrum (~ p –1 ) - Softer (~ p –2 ) spectrum at the shock - Wave power spectrum increased by ~ 4 orders of magnitude at the shock at resonant frequencies

r sc = 4, q ~ 3.9·10 32 s -1, Λ 0 = 30 R sun - Proton acceleration up to ~100 MeV - Hard escaping proton spectrum (~ p –1 ) - Softer (~ p –2 ) spectrum at the shock - Wave power spectrum increased by > 5 orders of magnitude at the shock at resonant frequencies

Comparison with the theory of Bell (1978) Qualitative agreement at the shock below cut-off Good agreement upstream behind escaping particles

Escaping particles (Λ 0 = 1 R sun ) threshold for wave-growth NOTE: Observational streaming- limited spectrum somewhat softer than the simulated one (~ E -1/2 ).

Cut-off energy Simulations consistent with analytical modeling:  proton spectrum at the shock a power law consistent with Bell (1978)  escaping particle spectrum a hard power law consistent with Vainio (2003): p dN/dp| esc ~ 4·10 33 sr –1 Power-laws cut off at an energy, which depends strongly on the injection rate q = N inj /t max E c ~ q a with a ~ 0.5 – 2 High injection rate leads to very turbulent environment → challenge for modeling ! N inj [sr –1 ] – E c [MeV] simulation time = 640 s log E log shock Bell (1978) Bell/10 EcEc

Summary and outlook Large SEP events excite large amounts of Alfvén waves  need for self-consistent transport and acceleration modeling  quantitatively correct results require numerical simulations Monte Carlo simulation modeling of SEP events:  qualitative agreement with analytical models of particle acceleration (Bell 1978) and escape (Vainio 2003)  modest injection strength (q 100 MeV protons and non-linear Alfvén-wave amplitudes  streaming-limited intensities; spectrum of escaping protons still too hard in simulations The present model needs improvements in near future:  more realistic model of the SW and shock evolution  implementation of the full wave-particle resonance condition

V s = 2200 km/s, r sc = 4, t = 640 s, q ~ 4.7·10 32 s -1, Λ 0 = 1 R sun protonswaves