HQ Perspective on MODIS Science Team Paula Bontempi National Aeronautics and Space Administration Headquarters MODIS Science Team Meeting 7-9 May 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 GlobModel The GlobModel study, initial findings and objectives of the day Zofia Stott 13 September 2007.
Advertisements

CLIMATE MONITORING FROM SPACE -- challenges, actions & perspectives Yang Jun China Meteorological Administration WMO Cg-XVI Side Event An architecture.
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
Space-based Architecture for Climate Mary Kicza NOAA’s Assistant Administrator for Satellite and Information Services May 19, 2011.
Product Quality and Documentation – Recent Developments H. K. Ramapriyan Assistant Project Manager ESDIS Project, Code 423, NASA GFSC
Simon Pinnock ESA Technical Officer. GlobCOLOUR: Context and Motivation ESA Earth Observation Envelope Programme ESA EOEP-3 Declaration: Specific Objectives...[abridged]…
MODIS Program Science Paula Bontempi MODIS Program Scientist National Aeronautics and Space Administration HQ MODIS/VIIRS Science Team Meeting January.
Preliminary management plan for PACE SDT What are the Goals of PACE? The goals of the PACE mission are: 1-Extend key climate data records on ocean color.
February High Impact Weather Workshop 1 JCSDA-HFIP and -ECMWF Workshop Recommendations Lars Peter Riishojgaard and Sid Boukabara Joint Center for.
Meeting Expectations Gary Jedlovec Purpose of review SPoRT Mission and Vision Role of Science Advisory Committee Charge to Committee members transitioning.
1 WRF Development Test Center A NOAA Perspective WRF ExOB Meeting U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C. 28 April 2006 Fred Toepfer NOAA Environmental.
NASA AGENCY REPORT Dr. Eric J. Lindstrom Physical Oceanography Program Scientist Earth Science Division Science Mission Directorate MARCH 12, 2007.
1 January 17, 2007 NASA IPY Interest NASA has a strong interest in IPY themes Present environmental status of the polar regions Quantify and understand.
Iterative development and The Unified process
Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.
Design, Implementation and Maintenance
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
WGClimate Work Plan for John Bates, Chair WGClimate 4th Working Group on Climate Meeting.
1 NOAA’s Environmental Modeling Plan Stephen Lord Ants Leetmaa November 2004.
Update on the U.S. Climate Change Science Program UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Subsidiary Body Meeting June 21, 2004 Linda V. Moodie Senior.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Science Support for NASA-NOAA Research to Operations (R2O) and GPM Ralph.
Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Climate Monitoring Architecture: Status and way forward Presented to CGMS-41 plenary session.
MACC: Status and Plans. Over the past year Have continued running near-real-time and delayed-mode global streams and near-real-time ensemble regional.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Center for Satellite Applications.
Getting Ready for the Future Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters May 7, 2014 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting Sheraton.
Welcome to the MODIS Land Collection 5 / Long Term Data Record Workshop Chris Justice MODIS Land Discipline Lead.
HQ Perspective on MODIS Science Team Paula Bontempi National Aeronautics and Space Administration Headquarters MODIS Science Team Meeting April 2013.
Slide: 1 Osamu Ochiai Water SBA Coordinator The GEO Water Strategy Report – The CEOS Contribution Presentation to the 26 th CEOS Plenary at Bengaluru,
ExOB Discussions on Development Test Center WRF ExOB Meeting U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C. 28 April 2006.
NMP EO-1 TECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP Section 2 Meeting Objectives.
AN ENHANCED SST COMPOSITE FOR WEATHER FORECASTING AND REGIONAL CLIMATE STUDIES Gary Jedlovec 1, Jorge Vazquez 2, and Ed Armstrong 2 1NASA/MSFC Earth Science.
Draft GEO Framework, Chapter 6 “Architecture” Architecture Subgroup / Group on Earth Observations Presented by Ivan DeLoatch (US) Subgroup Co-Chair Earth.
Update on NASA’s Sensor Web Experiments Using Simulated Doppler Wind Lidar Data S. Wood, D. Emmitt, S. Greco Simpson Weather Associates, Inc. Working Group.
EUM/SAF/VWG/02/0010, Rev. 3, May 2003 Page 1 The SAF Network Concept and Status Juha-Pekka Luntama, EUMETSAT GRAS Mission Scientist
Diane E. Wickland NPP Program Scientist NPP Science: HQ Perspective on VIIRS May 18, 2011.
Discussion on VIIRS and Future Developments Paula Bontempi National Aeronautics and Space Administration HQ MODIS-VIIRS Science Team Meeting May.
NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.
Materials Innovation Platforms (MIP): A New NSF Mid-scale Instrumentation and User Program to Accelerate The Discovery of New Materials MRSEC Director’s.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
NASA Applied Sciences Program Update John A. Haynes Program Manager, Weather National Aeronautics and Space Administration Applied Sciences Program Earth.
Science Team Objectives K. Jezek and J. Richter-Menge Science Team Co-leads.
The future of Statistical Production CSPA. 50 task team members 7 task teams CSPA 2015 project.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TRB’s Vision for Transportation Research.
1 NSIDC DAAC Product Workshop Overview Martha Maiden Program Executive for Data Systems NASA Headquarters NSIDC DAAC Product Workshop January 11-12, 2006.
MODIS Science Team Meeting Paula S. Bontempi MODIS Program Scientist Earth-Sun System Division Science Mission Directorate National Aeronautics and Space.
4th IPWG Workshop Chinese Meteorological Agency, Beijing, China, October, 2008 MAINSTREAMING THE OPERATIONAL USE OF SATELLITE PRECIPITATION DATA.
ROSES 2009 A. 41 The Science of Terra and Aqua Paula Bontempi (& Lucia Tsaoussi) National Aeronautics and Space Administration HQ MODIS/VIIRS Science Team.
Applied Sciences Perspective Lawrence Friedl, Program Director NASA Earth Science Applied Sciences Program LANCE User Working Group Meeting  September.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
ROSES Selections and the MODIS and VIIRS Science Teams Paula Bontempi National Aeronautics and Space Administration HQ MODIS-VIIRS Science Team Meeting.
MODIS Science Team: Parting Thoughts Paula Bontempi National Aeronautics and Space Administration HQ MODIS/VIIRS Science Team Meeting January 2010.
Ken Jucks and Diane Wickland Carbon Monitoring System: Welcome from NASA HQ November 12, 2014.
What science questions address PACE goals? How would PACE address the science questions? Instrument requirements Mission requirements Strawman instrument.
NASA HQ Update Paula Bontempi National Aeronautics and Space Administration HQ MODIS Science Team Meeting 29 April -1 May 2014.
MODIS Science Team Meeting Diane E. Wickland MODIS Program Scientist Office of Earth Science National Aeronautics and Space Administration July 13, 2004.
Review of the 2012 Suomi NPP Applications Workshop: Outcomes, Results, Progress Forrest Melton November 18, 2014 Suomi NPP Applications.
NASA Earth Exchange (NEX) A collaborative supercomputing environment for global change science Earth Science Division/NASA Advanced Supercomputing (NAS)
1 Current Plans for Long Term Archiving of MODIS Data Martha Maiden Program Executive Earth Science Data Systems NASA Headquarters MODIS Meeting November.
References: 1)Ganguly, S., Samanta, A., Schull, M. A., Shabanov, N. V., Milesi, C., Nemani, R. R., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B., Generating vegetation.
The ESA call for the 9 th Earth Explorer mission (EE9)
The International Ocean Colour Coordinating Group International Network for Sensor Inter- comparison and Uncertainty assessment for Ocean Color Radiometry.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO A WMO perspective on GSICS Joint Meeting of the.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 STAR Enterprise Synthesis.
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
Future directions of CEOS WGCV: Incoming chair perspective
Associate Director for Research, Education and Marine Operations
User Preparation for new Satellite generations
Update on US Activities
Site classifications, definitions, and updates to Landnet
Presentation transcript:

HQ Perspective on MODIS Science Team Paula Bontempi National Aeronautics and Space Administration Headquarters MODIS Science Team Meeting 7-9 May 2012

The Science of Terra and Aqua Follow on from the 2009 ROSES Program Element A.41 should be coming in ROSES 2013 (TBD) use of data and derived products from two of the EOS satellites, Terra and Aqua, and their measurement sensors a continuation of the research using Terra and Aqua – in 2009 it emphasized new opportunities for scientists to analyze and exploit EOS data, develop new products by combining multi-sensor and multi-platform data or by developing an innovative approach to data retrievals with a focus on integrative research from these and other satellite (EOS) data to provide answers to NASA's Earth Science Research questions

Terra and Aqua – Overarching Objectives As Terra and Aqua continue to mature and move into the extended mission phase, less emphasis will be placed upon algorithm refinement, and more emphasis will be directed to multi-sensor product development, accompanied by active utilization of these data and products in scientific research, modeling, synthesis, and diagnostic analysis to answer Earth science questions

Terra and Aqua – Overarching Objectives As Terra and Aqua continue to mature and move into the extended mission phase, less emphasis will be placed upon algorithm refinement, and more emphasis will be directed to multi-sensor product development, accompanied by active utilization of these data and products in scientific research, modeling, synthesis, and diagnostic analysis to answer Earth science questions Suggestion was made in 2008 to port the algorithms over to MO&DA for the missions as part of mission extension proposals. –Missions say they have no money to support algorithms, even simple “crank turning” –Some algorithms were “orphaned” in 2009 competition – no proposals received –Complaint from panels in last review that algorithm refinement received bulk of funds, no funds for other science/research

Terra and Aqua – Proposals Solicited Five types of proposals were solicited: 2.1 Multi-Platform and Sensor Data Fusion 2.2 Science Data Analysis 2.3 Algorithms – New Data Products 2.4 Algorithms – Existing Data Product Refinement 2.5 Real- or Near-Real-Time Data Algorithms Plus requirement for uncertainty quantification (?) Did this work?

Terra and Aqua – Types of Proposals Solicited Multi-Platform and Sensor Data Fusion Studies utilizing Terra and Aqua data in conjunction with appropriate data from other sources and satellites for interdisciplinary studies of the Earth System. Multi-mission and multi-sensor innovative research that can be used to quantify change, characterize processes, and examine function within and among Earth’s terrestrial, aquatic, atmospheric, cryospheric, and solid Earth components over time. Issue: panel concluded that model output satisfied the requisite “mission” or “sensor” requirement

Terra and Aqua – Types of Proposals Solicited Science Data Analysis Analysis of Terra and/or Aqua data to answer disciplinary or interdisciplinary Earth science research questions using NASA EOS research sensors listed in announcement. Proposals addressing Terra and Aqua instrument-specific algorithm maintenance/refinement that require research efforts for maintenance and refinement. Straightforward?

Terra and Aqua - Types of Proposals Solicited Algorithms – New Data Products advance a new data product that has passed through an Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) review to implementation as either a core or experimental EOS data product, or b) introduce a new data product/algorithm development that will yield a new ATBD for peer- review. Calibration and validation activities – scientific justification compelling and focus of the proposed data product or algorithm, suite of algorithms or instrument(s).

Terra and Aqua - Types of Proposals Solicited Algorithms – Existing Data Product Refinement Maintain or modestly refine derived product for any of the currently- approved ATBD algorithms. Emphasize instrument-specific algorithms and necessary supporting calibration/validation activities. Proposed supporting calibration/validation activities were minor investments given the maturity of the existing algorithms, and may involve a single or multiple data products and/or instruments. The scientific justification for such improvements had to be compelling and the focus of the proposed data product or algorithm, suite of algorithms or instrument(s). Radiative transfer theory improvements, in the form of implementation of existing, newer, or faster radiative transfer codes to replace existing Look Up Tables.

Terra and Aqua - Types of Proposals Solicited Real- or Near-Real-Time Data Algorithms Some of the Terra and Aqua observations have been utilized for operational purposes such as emergency response and/or weather forecasting (e.g., Direct Broadcast and Land, Atmosphere Near-real-time Capability for EOS (LANCE) ( Proposals to enhance, refine, or develop near real time algorithms for application and operational usage will be considered.

Terra and Aqua - Types of Proposals Solicited Requirements - Error and Uncertainty Analysis All proposals submitted in response must quantify errors and uncertainties associated with the proposed efforts (e.g., data products, scientific data analysis, etc.). The error and uncertainty discussion must be clearly identifiable in a separate section within the proposal body. Proposals to conduct rigorous estimation of error in Earth System Data Records used by NASA communities were solicited in 2010 through the Earth System Data Records Uncertainty Analysis targeted program element –Is this the best model, apart from the records themselves?

ATBD/Data Product Review Review of algorithms for the new and alternative MODIS algorithms –Current algorithms/products – Algorithm refinement PIs to provide compelling justification for the importance/utility of the algorithm and (as needed) improvements; plan for transition to core production (recognizing infusion of new knowledge) data product documentation broadly reviewed by user communities (web-based posting for review/comments?) regular data product/algorithm reviews – maintain, refine, review as needed –New algorithms/data products – draft new proposal, documentation and requirements, follow with review and endorsement by user communities –Three new algorithms reviewed in 2009 – Ustin (Canopy Water Content), Liang (Surface Radiative Flux), Lyapustin (Multi-angle atmospheric correction) –Is there a need for periodic review of ATBDs/Algorithms off-cycle of the competition? –Would this help a potential “transition to operational status”

Terra and Aqua – Instrument or Measurement Teams Additional detailed guidance for the Instrument and Science Measurement Teams are provided in program element. Proposed studies may be relevant to more than one team. Proposals should request membership on the team that, to the best of their knowledge, is most relevant to their research (No exclusion). Measurement Teams Solicited: 3.1 Land Measurements Team (LCLUC) 3.2. Ocean Biology & Biogeochemistry Measurements Team (aka OCRT) 3.3 Cryospheric Sciences Measurement Team 3.4 Atmospheric Science Measurement Team 3.5 Geodynamics and Geohazards Research Team 3.6 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team 3.7 Sea Surface Temperature Science Team

Measurement Teams Historical Philosophy: Continuing/evolving measurement streams, there will be one science team, competed periodically, that provides scientific guidance to present and future missions and for the utilization of past data sets Support and focus on Earth System Data Records One data system to ensure a “seamless” time series Scientific guidance and priorities must represent broad user community Future MODIS Team Meetings – structure and function given advertised dollars, change in size and issues NPP VIIRS continuity, DS missions, CI missions, international missions

Issues for MODIS Team More interdisciplinary algorithm development approaches, Terra/Aqua intersensor science Certain algorithm developers and validation investigators should address important deficiencies in key data products (uncertainties) Algorithm developers represent broader community needs by working with them Algorithm refinement PIs need to provide compelling justification for the importance/utility of the algorithm improvements and/or new data products + plan for transition to core production (recognizing infusion of new knowledge) – move to MO&DA in mission extension proposals Established process for regular data product and algorithm reviews – done for three new ATBDs, but is a cycle needed off the recompete cycle? Need to maintain, evolve, refine, review as needed – would this help transition to mission extension? MODIS website – updates needed? Sync of program element competition with Senior Review Future MODIS team meetings – frequency, format? Transition of few/some/many team members and scientific interest to NPP sensors and data? Science of Terra and Aqua/NPP Science Team in ROSES 2013