FAIR Enough Sharing resources: ownership and protection issues within and outside institutions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEM21-02 ETSI Seminar 2010 « Legal Considerations » Erik Jansen, LL.M. ETSI Legal Director Copyright © ETSI All rights reserved. ETSI Seminar Sophia.
Advertisements

InterLibrary Loan & TexShare Russlene Waukechon TexShare Database Coordinator February 15, 2008.
Draft JORUM Depositor Licence By Emanuella Giavarra LLM Chambers of Prof. Mark Watson-Gandy Amsterdam and London
IPR FAQ Issues for JISC Projects Ralph Weedon, Director The JISC Legal Information Service London, May 29th 2003.
Intellectual Property and the Ownership of Research 6 June 2007 Professor Fiona Macmillan.
Data copyright, rights management and the use of existing data resources Managing research data well workshop London, 30 June 2009 Manchester, 1 July 2009.
Legal Issues: IPR and DRM Dr. Charlotte Waelde Co-director, AHRB Research Centre for Studies in Intellectual Property and Technology Law, School of Law,
+ Copyright Alan Rae Copyright Adviser – Colleges Scotland SLIC FE conference Edinburgh 28 November 2013 So many changes So much the same.
Copyright and Moodle Tony Simmonds Information Services June 2012.
Progress: State-Owned Journal Transfers Among Libraries in the Western Regional Storage Trust Print Archive Network Forum Center for Research Libraries.
1 Support for the coherent development of policies This document is purely provisional, and only reflects preliminary options from Commission services.
Outside Business Activities and Selling Away
Andrea Eastman-Mullins, Information & Technology Coordinator, UNC TLTC Dr. Ray Purdom, Director of the University Teaching and Learning Center, UNC Greensboro.
History 2002 – Director of research and sponsored program develops IP policy Fall 2002 – Referral to review the policy February 2003 – Faculty affairs.
Intellectual Property in the Digital Age Series “Don’t I Own My Own Work?” Negotiating to Keep Your Copyright Intellectual Property in the Digital Age:
Depositing and Disseminating Digital Resources Alan Morrison Collections Manager AHDS Subject Centre for Literature, Linguistics and Languages.
ER-0317/2/99 G R U P O S G A E Intellectual Property Rights in digitisation of education Part 1. Current problems in the face of digitisation. Massive.
Establishing Affiliate Church Ministries Stephen M. Clarke Stephen S. Kao Gammon & Grange, P.C. Legal Wake-Up Call January 14, 2004.
Ownership of Intellectual Property: Textbooks and Inventions Frank Lancaster UT Office of the General Counsel Presented at The University of Tennessee.
Intellectual Property Protocol and Assessment for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the.
Supporting further and higher education Digital Preservation: Legal Issues Chinese National Academy of Sciences July04 Neil Beagrie, BL/JISC Partnership.
Business Entity Formations
Intellectual Property IP: A Legal Perspective. Welcome Introduction – Benjamin Dredge & Napthens LLP Section 1 - Authorship & Ownership of IP –Overall.
Standards and Guidelines for Web Page Publishing December 9, 2009.
UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI Training Workshop on Intellectual Property Rights (Jun17-18,2013, Heads Dept, sonu, champs) Intellectual Property Management Office.
Copyright Licenses at VUW Copyright ©2004 Stephen Marshall distributed under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License (
CHOOSING THE RIGHT FORM OF OWNERSHIP ENT 12. WHAT ARE THE CHOICES? A new venture can be established as:  a sole proprietorship  a partnership  or a.
Copyright and Digitisation Alastair Dunning Arts and Humanities Data Service, King’s College London i am not a lawyer do not take any legal responsibility.
Research Week: Copyright, Commercialisation and IP Research Week: Copyright, Commercialisation and IP  opyright for postgraduate students and researchers.
G17: Recordkeeping for Business Activities Carried out by Contractors Patrick Power, Manager Government Recordkeeping Programme Archives New Zealand.
Managing Intellectual Property for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the University System.
Maximising the Value of Intellectual Property in Film and Media Saturday 27 October 2012 Presented by Tony Morris.
A Dual Role Principal (Rector) of Heriot-Watt University Chair of the regional economic development company.
Principal ® Select Reward Plan Date Name and title.
UARC Intellectual Property Management Burney Le Boeuf Director, Aligned Research Program of UARC Professor Emeritus UC Santa Cruz November 12, 2009.
November 15, :30-300pm. Blackboard Update Blackboard Update Combining of Tickets – Only for cross-listed classes this spring Combining of Tickets.
Electronic Copyright and Digitisation Unit Linda Swanson Resource Development Co ordinator University of Derby.
 What is conflict of interest and how can it be avoided  What factors should be considered when determining a “ fair wage “
Maximising the Value of Intellectual Property in Film and Media Saturday 27 October 2012 Presented by Tony Morris.
IPR related obligations DG Research & Innovation Research and Innovation.
THE ROLE OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND AGREEMENTS IN DETERMINING OWNERSHIP OF COPYRIGHT AND OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN FACULTY CREATED WORKS. Faculty Created.
Coping with Copyright IPR and Third-Party Copyright: the HumBox Perspective Dr Erika Corradini Subject Centre for LLAS University of Southampton IPR and.
ER-0317/2/99 G R U P O S G A E DIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT INTRODUCTION/ OPTIONS EdReNe Seminar March 2008 Paul Sire Sociedad Digital de Autores y Editores.
Copyright Law Summer Crider Loeffler University of Texas at Brownsville Summer II July 8-August 12th EDTC 6340 Ms. Evans and Dr. Sullivan.
Guide - Recordkeeping for business activities carried out by contractors Natalie Dewson Senior Advisor Government Recordkeeping Programme Archives New.
The Quest for Copyright Understanding Miguel Guhlin
Creation of Copyrighted Materials Policy (Revision of Current Policy) AUGUST 2015.
+ Educational Fair Use & Creative Commons Chris Taylor.
In the Distance Learning Environment Who Owns What ???
Copyright Grace, Ienash, Nick. Copyright - International  Instruments of copyright  World Intellectual Property Organisation and EU Convention on Cybercrime.
China IP’s Challenge Since joining the World Trade Organization (2001), China has strengthened its legal framework and amended its IPR laws and regulations.
Moscow, Russia, 10 September 2012 HSE Intellectual Property Policy Aliya Ermakova, Head of IP Department, Innovation and Enterprise Office, HSE
Copyright Law & Plagiarism Library 10 – Basic Information Competency.
Your rights to your published work: a workshop addressing these questions: 1. “Can I post my publications in full text on… my web site my departmental.
WIPO Guidance – Intellectual Property Policy for Universities and Research Institutions for Countries in Transitions Prague, April 21 and 22, 2016 Mr.
Principal ® Select Reward Plan Date Name and title.
Copyright and Fair Use. Copyright  Protects the creators from the unauthorized use of their works, to encourage creativity and innovation in society,
Technology Transfer Office
Intellectual Property and the Ownership of Research
IP, Invention Disclosures and Commercialization
Dr. Bill Vicars Lifeprint.com
Protecting Your Competitive Edge
Dr. Mindaugas Kiškis Mykolas Romeris university
Dr. Bill Vicars Lifeprint.com
IPR in FP7 Bart Janse DG Research A.2.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) IN FP7
Knowledge Transfer Office
Intellectual Property Rights, Creative Commons Licenses and OERs
Implications of openly licenced resources for librarians
Presentation transcript:

FAIR Enough Sharing resources: ownership and protection issues within and outside institutions

FAIR Enough James Clay Western Colleges Consortium westerncc.ac.uk Project Director – FAIR Enough

FAIR Enough Asset Disclosure Issues and Challenges Ownership and IPR –- who owns what? Protection –- why and how? Sharing –- why and how?

FAIR Enough Copyright - Ownership Who owns the copyright on a: handout created by a member of staff during the working day handout created by a member of staff, in their own time, using a college laptop handout created by a member of staff at home, in their own time, using their own PC website, used by students, hosted by staff on their own paid for website

FAIR Enough Copyright & IPR The underlying objective of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) is to protect the creators right to be appropriately acknowledged for his or her work.

FAIR Enough Copyright Act 1988 Copyright is effective upon creation of the work. One does not have to register their copyright in their work before it is protected.

FAIR Enough Who Owns What? (1) Who Owns The Copyright Subsisting In The Work? The Default Owner: The person who created the work, unless the work was completed in the course of employment.

FAIR Enough Who Owns What? (2) Who Owns The Copyright Subsisting In The Work? Employment and Ownership: Section 11 (2) of the 1988 Act provides that the copyright of works created during the course of employment will be owned by the employer unless an agreement to the contrary is in place.

FAIR Enough Contractual Obligations …...the copyright in all records and documents made by you in the course of your employment shall belong to the college...for the avoidance of doubt, the copyright in materials produced by you for the purposes of a course run by the college shall belong to the college

FAIR Enough FE and HE There are differences between FE and HE institutions especially in regard to contractual obligations. HE staff often have greater rights over copyright and IPR compared to staff within FE institutions.

FAIR Enough Reality Check There is a perception amongst staff within colleges (especially part-time staff) that they own the resources they create regardless of the law and their contract. Some staff perceive that they are not paid for their preparation.

FAIR Enough Protecting Copyright Reasons why an institution may wish to protect its IPR Support learners Support staff Unauthorised use (commercial) Licence agreements Potential income

FAIR Enough How? Considerations when protecting IPR: Access Flexibility Security Technical Costs No system can ever be 100% secure.

FAIR Enough Benefits of Sharing Sharing of effective practice amongst staff Use of best practice supports learners. Avoids duplication of effort. Specialisation possible. Sharing of resources, systems and procedures Costs of development can be split between curriculum areas (or colleges). Saves time

FAIR Enough What is a Resource? Learning Resources can be: Learning Objects Question Sets Word Files PowerPoint Presentations PDF Files URLs

FAIR Enough Categories of Resources Commercial (eg ECDL Package) Non-commercial (eg NLN Materials) Consortium College (Institution) Faculty (Curriculum Area) Individual

FAIR Enough Attitudes to Sharing Do not want to share Do not know what sharing is Do not know how to share Share ineffectively Would like to share better Happy to share and do so...

FAIR Enough Limitations to Sharing Licence agreements Cultural attitudes Fear of judgements Content classification (meta data) Plagiarism and copyright infringement Competitive fears

FAIR Enough Effective Sharing In order to share resources you need to consider Content classification Portal Delivery Repository Tools Repurposing content Digitisation

FAIR Enough Why Bother? Makes things better for the learner Student-centered Learning Raises standards Widen access More time for staff Part of Corporate Plan

FAIR Enough Questions ?