28 th November 2005 JISC VRE Consultation Workshop What is happening, what are the likely outcomes, what is the likely impact, what does it all mean? John.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

EMBEDDING EMPLOYABILITY AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP WITHIN THE CURRICULUM Dr Julia Wolny Director of Fashion Business Resource Studio London College of Fashion.

Advertisements

EAC Education Committee Sage Cram ACCOLEDS Training December 10, 2003.

Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.

DeSILA Designing and Sharing Inquiry-based Learning Activities JISC Design for Learning Programme Dr Philippa Levy & Dr Sabine Little (CILASS) John Stratford,

4th VRE Programme meeting July 2006, Manchester User engagement: five key challenges and strategies for addressing them Chris Ramsden and Kerstin.

The success of the community is at least as important as the success of the projects. The evaluators are there to help us understand what we are doing.

1 e-Science for the arts and humanities Sheila Anderson Arts and Humanities Data Service Kings College London.

25-Aug-14 Planning to make a difference Success factors in the ANNIE Project Jay Dempster FDTL Conference, Manchester 31 st Oct – 1 st Nov 2002.

+ CDLI Learning Framework June 18, Today’s objectives People have an understanding of CDLI and their objectives Introduce the Learning Project.

WLI Regional Knowledge Exchange Workshop on Decision- support Tools and Models September, 2013, Djerba, Tunisia Projecting Impact on Water Balance.

The institute for employment studies What actions can line managers and organisations take?

AHSNs Patients and Patient Opinion NHS Commissioners workshop 24th September 2013.

Supporting continuous improvement in the replication process Getting to Grips with Replication Seminar 3: Monitoring, evaluation & continuous improvement.

Supplier Meeting regarding supply of Low Carbon Vending Services Steph Holmes Head of Procurement Jessica Osowski Category Manager – Business Services.

Worker Coop Friendly HR Practices Michelle Manary President Manary-Harcus Consulting

Opportunities for Education Scholarship in the Queen’s PGME Transition Designing Competency At Queen’s Workshop February Denise Stockley, PhD,

Appreciative Inquiry for evaluation and community development Rhona Sharpe Patsy Clarke Users and Innovation Programme Meeting 30 January 2009.

School of Education (Collaborative) Professional Enquiry: orientation and methodology Valerie Drew and Morag Redford A University of Stirling Cross-Departmental.

Year 1 School Based Training Have experience across all three key stages; Develop an understanding of the multiplicity of roles within the primary school;

Professional Ethics and Responsibilities

Research Institute for Health and Social Change “We don't believe you want a genuine partnership.” University work with communities Karen Duggan and Carolyn.

User Requirements Gathering for the Humanities: How do we establish best practice for the community? Ruth Kirkham – Project Manager John Pybus – Technical.

IVETTE:Implementation of virtual environments in training and in education Targeted Socio-Economic Research Programme Mario Barajas University of Barcelona.

Home Institutional context for embedding innovation from national projects.

Dr. Mairead Seymour, Dr. Ann Marie Halpenny, Cathy Kelleher School of Languages, Law and Social Sciences, DIT.

Workshop 3. Overview of Workshop 3 Today we will explore how the following processes can inform improvements in practice: Enabling the participation of.

Explaining the Difference: the impact of Community Based Adult Learning CLD Managers Conference 9 th November 2010 Edinburgh Susan Walls and Shirley Grieve.

School Innovation in Science Formerly Science in Schools An overview of the SIS Model & supporting research Russell Tytler Faculty of Education, Deakin.

Community Issues And Needs Associated With Microbicides Clinical Trials Presenter: John M. Mutsambi, Community Liaison Officer with University of Zimbabwe.

TEC 2013 Hyderabad The role of programme evaluation in curriculum development OR ‘How are we doing?’ Richard Kiely University of St Mark & St John, UK.

Dawne Gurbutt, Discipline Lead, Health Related Studies 11 th July 2013 Enhancing the student learning experience through Patient & Public Involvement Practice,

Developing a Culture for Care Jeanette Cookson – Locality Manager.

Welcome. First Year Assessment ReDesign – A Programme Approach Galvin, Á, O’Neill, G, Noonan, E, Jennings, D. University College Dublin.

Quantifying the Impact of Meeting Technology AMI Community of Interest Workshop Amsterdam, September 11/12, 2007.

#ShapeRMIT project update, developing strategy and next steps: 1 September 1.

By Bankole Ebisemiju At an Intensive & Interactive workshop on Techniques for Effective & Result Oriented Annual Operation Plan November 24th 2010 Annual.

Nef (the new economics foundation) Co-producing Lambeth what’s possible? Lucie Stephens and Julia Slay nef, October 2011.

What Follows Emerging? Lifecycles of Grassroots Groups Grassroots Grantmakers Topical Conference Call July 24, 2007.

The Brain Project – Building Research Background Part of JISC Virtual Research Environments (Phase 3) Programme Based at Coventry University with Leeds.

The Workforce Development Programme Claire Winfield Director of Consultancy 9 th June 2010.

CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM PARTNERSHIP MANAGEMENT BOARD MEETING MAY 9, 2012 ANNAPOLIS, MD Social Science Action Team: Incorporating Social Science into the.

Digital Futures in Teacher Education: Briefing meeting for the core team 19 October 2011, SHU.

Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.

Further steps: How to make your initiative sustainable Discipline Change Programme –November 2012.

ELearning Socrates Minerva Concertation Meeting Helsinki 3 July 2006 « Dissemination and Exploitation of Results » Janette Sinclair European Commission.

Innovation Forum: some conclusions Sarah Porter Head of Innovation, JISC.

How to measure the impact of R&D on SD ? Laurence Esterle, MD, PhD Cermes and Ifris France Cyprus, 16 – 17 October L. ESTERLE Linking science and.

Accountability & Effectiveness Innovation Network, Inc. January 22, 2003.

1 e-Arts and Humanities Scoping an e-Science Agenda Sheila Anderson Arts and Humanities Data Service Arts and Humanities e-Science Support Centre King’s.

1 The Workbook Process The Workbook starts by building an understanding of the context of the school and the Prevent agenda. It then focuses on 4 aspects.

Joint Information Systems Committee 1st October 1007 | | Slide 1 Ms. Frederique M. van Till MSc Programme manager Collaborative Research Technologies JISC.

Being The Best We Can A self-evaluation & improvement process for libraries Key results for Victoria’s public library services.

Introduction Extensive Experience of ex-post evaluation of national support programmes for innovation; less experience at regional level; Paper aims to.

Professional Development of Teachers Lilian Katz, PhD dev-stages.html dev-stages.html.

+ Professional Development Characteristics Alternatives Stages Extending the Concept.

ELIXIR SAB Feedback December 2014.

Joint Information Systems Committee Bridging the gap between ICT support services and researchers challenges and opportunities Matthew J. Dovey JISC Programme.

22 nd February 2006 Virtual Research Environments Programme Presentation to JISC Committee for the Support of Research VRE Formative Evaluation: First.

4 th November 2005 JISC VRE Advisory Board Meeting Formative evaluation workshop: initial feedback and discussion John Kelleher and Kerstin Junge Tavistock.

Introduction to Constructive Technology Assessment

Chapter 18: Professional Development

Building the foundations for innovation

London Funders: Theory of change

Collaborative Inquiry and Professional Learning Communities

Pier Giorgio Marchetti, Philippe Mougnaud European Space Agency

A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase

Opportunity Nottingham in partnership with NCVS

Week 11: Professional Ethics and Responsibilities

Proposal for a workshop on monitoring EURO-INBO 2013

Follow up workshop on the Evaluation of AUT STEM Programme

Presentation transcript:

28 th November 2005 JISC VRE Consultation Workshop What is happening, what are the likely outcomes, what is the likely impact, what does it all mean? John Kelleher Tavistock Institute, London Programme formative evaluation team

Formative Evaluation of JISC VRE Nov Background Objectives of the programme Increased understanding to support decision making Exploration of research, learning & administration commonalities Production of tangible products/demonstrators of useable services & tools Begin moving technologies into wider community Change behaviours and cultures

Formative Evaluation of JISC VRE Nov Background Formative evaluation Learning from innovation Timely ongoing feedback to support steering and development Part of the Action Research cycle (plan – act – evaluate - plan - …)

Formative Evaluation of JISC VRE Nov Background This formative evaluation Phase I All projects now visited as of last week Now trying to make sense of it all … Interim report and initial feedback to projects and programme shortly (December, JCSR Feb.)

Formative Evaluation of JISC VRE Nov Background Phase II Project and programme support: individual projects; sets of projects; all projects; programme Particularly concerning user needs, self evaluation, institutional embedding, collaboration, …

Formative Evaluation of JISC VRE Nov What is happening? Some initial findings Project types – spectrums from: Technically orientated – user orientated Development – research Multiple institutions – single institutions Arts & humanities – natural sciences Single discipline – multiple disciplines Users imagined – users investigated

Formative Evaluation of JISC VRE Nov What is happening? Some initial findings Orientations and approaches Tools more than technologies Implicit rather than explicit user models Institutional settings assumed rather than addressed Revolutionaries versus evolutionists True believers (in VREs) v agnostics (believers in e-research)

Formative Evaluation of JISC VRE Nov What is happening? Some initial findings Memberships Presence of leading edge users in teams Absence of institutional decision makers in projects Sparse organisational and programme design and change expertise

Formative Evaluation of JISC VRE Nov What are the likely outcomes and impact? It seems to us even at this stage that … There is obviously a lot of very useful stuff going on … And there is some important socio- technical investigation, experimentation and innovation going on … And it is becoming clearer in practice what kinds of additional technical tools are needed …

Formative Evaluation of JISC VRE Nov What are the likely outcomes and impact? But project issues arising around … User engagement Environmental embedding Intra-programme exchange and learning Exit and exploitation In other words … What technologies and why

Formative Evaluation of JISC VRE Nov What does it all mean? We dont know but it certainly involves Social, organisational and institutional assumptions The definition of users (users, other machines, support staff, communities, …) The practical identification of technical needs / opportunities Emergent agendas for action

Formative Evaluation of JISC VRE Nov What does it all mean? And we have to ask what do WE mean by … VRE / eResearch? Users? Embedding? Products? Technology? And what better way to do so than looking at concrete real world scenarios …