Kidney Kidney-Pancreas Pancreas Liver Heart Lung Intestine 521 173 118 236 206 99 16 28,953 1,014 477 10,306 3,069 2,152 78 843,318 24,175 8,083 186,642.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PRA = 36% (21/58) Anti-A11 and B44.
Advertisements

Acceptable mismatches based on structural epitopes on HLA molecules Toulouse, April 2, 2008.
Complement in Heart Allograft Biopsies E. Rene Rodriguez W. M. Baldwin, III.
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine New Trends in organ donation and Transplantation Juan Carlos Caicedo, MD FACS Director, Hispanic Transplant.
Transplantation Immunology1 Transplantation: Chapter 17 You are not responsible for: Immunosuppressive therapies Clinical aspects of specific organ transplants.
Objectives Overview of HLA genes and their function
Desensibilização em transplante renal – experiência da PUCRS (relato de caso) HOSPITAL SÃO LUCAS DA PUCRS SERVIÇO DE NEFROLOGIA 2012 David Saitovitch.
Transplantation Autologous Syngeneic Allogeneic Xenogeneic.
Medical Interventions
TRANSPLANTATION TODAY LILLY BARBA, M.D. MEDICAL DIRECTOR RENAL TRANSPLANT PROGRAM HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER APRIL 12, 2010.
Epitope analysis with MatchIt software Ivan Balazs, Ph.D. HLA Epitopes in Clinical Transplantation Pittsburgh, PA June 15-16, 2011.
Table SA-1: Number of Kidney Transplants by Donor Type and Re-Transplant Status Source: Canadian Organ Replacement Register, 2014, CIHI *Missing data for.
© ANZOD Registry International Donor Statistics 1997 % of Multiple Organ Donors Donors PMP % Mult. Donors Eurotransplant:Germany, Austria, Belgium, Luxembourg,
Australian States Number of Donors Per Million Population Aust * NSW population excludes residents of the NSW Southern Area.
© ANZOD Registry Australian States Number of Donors Per Million Population Aust * NSW population excludes residents of the.
Patient Survival USA Primary DD Pancreas Transplants 1/1/2004 – 12/31/2008 Categoryn 1Yr Surv. PTA % PAK1, % SPK4, % 2/09.
Living Donor Kidneys in PAK 2/11 USA Primary DD Pancreas Transplants 1/1/1988 – 12/31/2010.
International Pancreas Transplant Registry. Pancreas Transplants Pancreas Transplants 12/16/1966 – 12/31/2009 nUSA: n = 23,850 nNon USn = 11,365 1/10.
The History of Transplantation
SOLID PHASE IMMUNOASSAYS: INTERPRETING PATTERNS Julie Houp, CHS Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Division of Immunogenetics and Transplantation.
David C. Mulligan, MD, FACS
CORR Report, 2012: CST Annual General Meeting S. Joseph Kim, MD, PhD, FRCPC Vice President, CORR Board of Directors Friday, February 24,
Short and Long term function and survival of other graft harvested as part of a multiorgan procurement including the intestine Farinelli P, Troncoso J,
Monitoring HLA-specific antibodies
INFLUENCE OF HLA MISMATCH ON GRAFT SURVIVAL IN RENAL TRASPLANTATION IN ADULTS IN ARGENTINA Bisigniano Liliana MD., López-Rivera Arturo MD., Tagliafichi.
ORGAN DONATION You can save a life Prepared by:. A national shortage Every 13 minutes…Every hour…Everyday… A person is added to the list 4 more are added.
Tissue Typing. E VERYONE HAS SEVERAL ANTIGENS LOCATED ON THE SURFACE OF HIS / HER LEUKOCYTES : One particular group of these antigens is called the HLA.
Greater Consistency in Candidate and Deceased Donor HLA Typing Requirements Across Organ Types Histocompatibility Committee Spring 2014.
Transplantation immunology Dr Adel Almogren.. Transfusion vs. Transplantation  Transfusion  transfer of blood  Ab-mediated reactions  Transplantation.
Israel David and Michal Moatty-Assa The Search for Compatible Organs – A Handy Aid.
When Using SRTR Slides. SRTR Slide Use Guidelines.
IMMUNOGENETIC TESTS.
Major Histocompatibility Complex and Transplantation Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins were discovered for the first time with the advent.
Immunology of transplantation. Types of transplantation Autotransplantation –within one organism Allotransplantation- between one species Xenotransplantation-
 Kidney  Pancreas  Liver  Heart 1954 by Murray/Harrison 1966 by Lillehei 1967 by Starzl 1968 by Barnard.
Single HLA Antigen Bead Data Interpretation: Normalized Ratios Peter Stastny Transplantation Immunology Division Departments of Internal Medicine and Pathology.
C4d in pancreas transplant biopsies: the Leiden experience Ingeborg Bajema Ingeborg Bajema Ingeborg Bajema.
Transplantation Immunology Unit College of Medicine
Transplantation Prof. Zahid Shakoor College of Medicine King Saud University.
Am. J. Transpl : Immediate failure Kidney recipients Patel, Terasaki, N Engl J Med 280:735, 1969 with antibodies, pos XM 24/30.
Transplantation in HIV+ Recipients Ron Shapiro, M.D. THOMAS E. STARZL TRANSPLANTATION INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH.
When Using SRTR Slides. SRTR Slide Use Guidelines.
HLA - Tissue Typing Laboratory HLA - Tissue Typing Laboratory Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) complex allows.
United States Organ Transplantation SRTR & OPTN Annual Data Report, 2011 Kidney.
Donor Matching of Kidney Transplantation
Important for Sensitized Patients
THE AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND CARDIOTHORACIC ORGAN TRANSPLANT REGISTRY
Hong Kong Workshop Lecture 3 Antigenicity of HLA-DRDQDP Epitopes
2 Renal Unit, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, BT9 7AB
Hong Kong Workshop Lecture 8 HLA Epitopes and Acceptable Mismatches for Sensitized Transplant Patients.
Living unrelated donor kidney transplantation
2015 Kidney Allocation Task Force HLA Working Group
Transplantation Pathology
Liver only transplants in the UK Question 2: In terms of survival benefit.
Kidney allocation to highly sensitized patients
Kidney allocation in the UK
Volume 2: End-Stage Renal Disease Chapter 6: Transplantation
Interesting Case Conference
Towards epitope matching in kidney allocation
Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
THE AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND CARDIOTHORACIC ORGAN TRANSPLANT REGISTRY
Organ transplantation: historical perspective and current practice
Living unrelated donor kidney transplantation
Eluate from B4403 Antigen Reaction Strength (MFI)
Number of Donors in Australia
Number of Donors in Australia
Reaction strength (MFI)
Presentation transcript:

Kidney Kidney-Pancreas Pancreas Liver Heart Lung Intestine ,953 1, ,306 3,069 2, ,318 24,175 8, ,642 90,976 28, Organ Centers2008Total Worldwide Transplant Directory Clinical Transplants 2008

KIDNEY Related donor Deceased donor Unrelated live donor LIVER HEART PANCREAS-KIDNEY PANCREAS LUNG BONE MARROW University of Colorado Royal North Shore Hosp Univ de Sao Paulo University of Colorado Stanford University Univ of Cincinnati College Thomas E Starzl Inst The Toronto Hospital Univ Hosp, Leiden Surv yrs Hospital Longest Surviving Transplants-2008 Clinical Transplants 2008

N 37,327 38,377 42,070 T 1/ P<0.001 Deceased donor Kidney Graft Survival by Era Cecka, Clinical Transplants 2008, p. 2

Age demographics of DD recipients with time >65 <19

N 13,992 21,631 30,231 T 1/ Cecka, Clinical Transplants 2008, p. 3 Living donor Kidney Graft Survival by Era

Cecka, Clinical Transplants 2008, p. 4 Sibling Offspring Parent Spouse Unrelated Living Donor Relationships

HLA-ID 1-haplo 2-haplo N 4,665 25,756 16,656 T 1/ Cecka, Clinical Transplants 2008, p. 7 HLA compatibility effect on Living donor GS

0MM 1-4MM 5-6MM N 11,832 41,327 23,609 T 1/ HLA-ABDR P<0.001 Cecka, Clinical Transplants 2008, p

Living donor Deceased donor N 2,375 71,686 Number of Liver Transplants in Adult donor Goh, Clinical Transplants 2008, p. 20

Number of Liver Transplants in Pediatric donor Goh, Clinical Transplants 2008, p. 20 Living donor Deceased donor N 1,145 8,844

Liver graft survival by MELD/PELD scores Goh, Clinical Transplants 2008, p % 84% 70% 59% Percent Graft Survival Months after Transplant 1-year Years after Transplant 5-year p < p < MELD/PELD score <15 (n = 3,855) 15 – 22 (n = 11,294) 23 – 30 (n = 10,305) >30 (n = 5,084)

Graft survival in recipients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Goh, Clinical Transplants 2008, p. 29 Years after Transplantation 49% 54% Percent Graft Survival HCC T2 (n = 3,457) M/P score (n = 11,294) HCC (n = 4,817) Other cancers (n = 1,048) p < p <

p< Percent Allograft Survival Years after Transplantation N 17,414 11,732 14,760 Everly, Clinical Transplants 2008, p. 38 Heart Allograft survival by transplant Era

Infant, 0-1 yr (n=1,636) Pediatric, 1-18 yr (n=3,959) Elderly, 65+ yr (n=3,100) Adult, yr (n=35,211) Percent Allograft Survival Years after Transplantation Everly, Clinical Transplants 2008, p. 39 Heart Allograft survival by Recip AGE group

Everly, Clinical Transplants 2008, p. 40 PRA<50% (n=8,273) PRA>50% (n=9,141) Log-rank p=NS Percent Allograft Survival Years after Transplantation Heart Allograft survival by PRA

Patient survival for primary deceased donor PAK Living Deceased N yr (%) Gruessner & Sutherland, Clinical Transplants 2008, p.52

SPK PAK PTA N yr (%) Pancreas graft function primary deceased donor Gruessner & Sutherland, Clinical Transplants 2008, p.52

Number of Repeat Transplants, by Organ 1990–2007* Source: SRTR analysis, Jan 2009 *Includes living and deceased donors Kidney Liver Heart Lung Rao & Ojo, Clinical Transplants 2008, p.60

Unadjusted Living and Deceased Donor Graft Survival for First and Second Kidney Transplants, 2002–2007 Source: SRTR analysis, Jan 2009 Rao & Ojo, Clinical Transplants 2008, p.64

Unadjusted Deceased Donor Graft Survival for First and Second Liver Transplants, 2002–2007 Source: SRTR analysis, Jan 2009 Rao & Ojo, Clinical Transplants 2008, p.65

Unadjusted Deceased Donor Graft Survival for First and Second Heart Transplants, 2002–2007 Source: SRTR analysis, Jan 2009 Rao & Ojo, Clinical Transplants 2008, p.65

Unadjusted Deceased Donor Graft Survival for First and Second Lung Transplants, 2002–2007 Source: SRTR analysis, Jan 2009 Rao & Ojo, Clinical Transplants 2008, p.65

Survival (95% CI) N % Live 89.3 (88.1 – 90.4) 4502 DBD 82.1 (81.3 – 82.9) DCD 81.5 (78.1 – 84.4) 1281 Graft survival for kidney only transplants in the UK, 1998 to 2007 P<0.001 % Graft Survival Years Posttransplant Johnson, et al. Clinical Transplants 2008, p.85

Pregnancies in female transplant recipients reported to the NTPR OrganRecipientsPregnanciesOutcomes* Kidney Liver Liver-Kidney467 Pancreas-Kidney Pancreas alone145 Heart Heart-Lung444 Lung Totals * Includes twins and triplets As of January 2009 Coscia, Armenti, et al. Clinical Transplants 2008, p.89

Pregnancies fathered by male transplant recipients reported to the NTPR OrganRecipientsFathered Pregnancies Outcomes* Kidney Liver Liver-Kidney244 Pancreas-Kidney Heart Heart-Lung122 Heart-Lung-Kidney122 Lung333 Totals * Includes twins and triplets As of Jan 2009 Coscia, Armenti, et al. Clinical Transplants 2008, p.90

DQ2 SCr Zhu, Terasaki, et al. Clinical Transplants 2008, p.175 Ascending strength of antibodies in graft-failure patients

DQ7 DQ2 B8 DR7 SCr Donor : A11,-, B8,49, DR7,17, DQ2,7 Recipient: 2,A11,B38,60, DR4,14,DQ5,8 DSA: B8, DR7, DQ2, DQ7 Zhu, Terasaki, et al. Clinical Transplants 2008, p.179 Combined strength of antibodies in graft-failure patients

Zhu, Terasaki, et al. Clinical Transplants 2008, p.184 Time to de novo antibody among all patients

ABCDRB1DRB345DQ PT DN CD52, 27/M, Tx: 5/12/08 Kaneku, Terasaki, et al. Clinical Transplants 2008, p.193 Clonal deletion with no post-tx maintenance for 2 months

ABCDRB1DRB345DQ PT DN CD15, 35/M, Tx: 4/16/08 Kaneku, Terasaki, et al. Clinical Transplants 2008, p.194 Clonal deletion with no post-tx maintenance For 3.5 months

A3101A3303A3301B5801 Reaction strength Single Antigen Beads Specificities Intact antigensDissociated antigens 73I Heavy chain β2β2 Peptide Intact class I antigen Dissociated class I antigen Hundreds Serum A*01011STD A*31012S I D A*3301S I D A*3303S I D B*5801ATY aa & position El-Awar, Terasaki, et al. Clinical Transplants 2008, p.206 Reactivity of anti HLA A-locus alloantibody with intact and dissociated antigens on the SA beads

B5501B8101B8201B4201B0702B6701B5601B5401B0801 Reaction strength Hundreds Single Antigen Beads Specificities Serum 96 Intact antigensDissociated antigens 70Q 66I Peptide Intact class I antigen Dissociated class I antigen Heavy chain β2β B*07021IQ IQ B*4201 I Q B*5401IQ B*5502 I Q B*5501 I Q B*5601IQ B*67011 I Q B*8101IQ B*8201IQ B*0801 I N aa & position El-Awar, Terasaki, et al. Clinical Transplants 2008, p.208 Reactivity of anti HLA B-locus alloantibody with intact and dissociated antigens on the SA beads

CW*1701CW*0602CW*0403CW*1802CW*0702 Hundreds Intact antigensDissociated antigens Single Antigen Beads Specificities Intact class I antigen Dissociated class I antigen 77N 73A Peptide Heavy chain β2β2 Reaction strength MI-CB Cw*010201TS Cw*040101AN Cw*060201AN Cw*1701AN Cw*1802AN Cw*070201AS aa & position El-Awar, Terasaki, et al. Clinical Transplants 2008, p.209 Reactivity of anti HLA C-locus alloantibody with intact and dissociated antigens on the SA beads

B*5401 Epitopes (detected number) Distance ( angstrom ) Amino acid positionAmino Acid # of aa minmax 0204PA PA 0205PAE PAE 0302QIA QIA 0303QIAQ(3) QIAQ Immunogen Number of mismatched pairs Number of allo-sera Antibody production rate (%) Total number of epitopes Kind of epitopes B* %64 Immunogenic amino acids positions for B*54 antibody production PQIAQE B*54 Immunogenic aa position for Ab. production Amino acid position of HLA-B*54 putative epitopes Putative epitopes of anti sera produced by HLA-B54 mismatched mothers Immunogenic aa position for HLA-B*54 mismatched pair Maruya, Terasaki, et al. Clinical Transplants 2008, p.221

Immunogen Number of mismatched pairs Number of allo-sera Antibody production rate Total number of epitopes Kind of epitopes A* %119 A*2601 Immunogenic aa position for Ab. production aa position of HLA- A*2601 putative epitopes Putative epitopes of anti sera produced by HLA-A*2601, A*2602 mismatched mothers Immunogenic aa position for HLA-A*2601, A*2602 mismatched pair Immunogenic amino acids positions for A*2601 antibody production QRRNHTANTDQRTREWAS Maruya, Terasaki, et al. Clinical Transplants 2008, p.221 A*2601 Epitopes (detected number) Distance ( angstrom ) Amino acid position Amino Acids # of aa minmax 0603QRT (3) QRT 0607REW REW 0202QR QR 0304RNH RNH 0309TAN TAN 0310ANT ANT 0102D1 90 D 0801AS AS 0606R1 163 R

Patient 1 25/M Tx: 3/7/08 Idica, Terasaki, et al. Clinical Transplants 2008, p.231 PT DN ABCDRB1DQDRB345Bw Effective removal of donor-specific HLA antibody with Bortezomib

Patient 8 30/M Tx: 6/20/08 Idica, Terasaki, et al. Clinical Transplants 2008, p.234 PT24(9)104044(12) DN 23251(5) BwABCDRB1DQDRB345 Effective removal of donor-specific HLA antibody with Bortezomib

Graft Survival (%) Deceased Donor Transplants Years after Transplant Lentine, et al. Clinical Transplants 2008, p.262 T-neg, B-neg (reference) B-pos, T-neg B-not measurable, T-neg T-pos, B-positive T-positive, B-not measurable Undifferentiated-negative Undifferentiated-positive

Living Donor Transplants Years after Transplant T-neg, B-neg (reference) B-pos, T-neg B-not measurable, T-neg T-pos, B-positive T-positive, B-not measurable Undifferentiated-negative Undifferentiated-positive Lentine, et al. Clinical Transplants 2008, p.262 Graft Survival (%)

5 pioneers in History of Transplantation David H. SachsRobert A. GoodBen Cosimi Jean-Michel Dubernard Herman Waldmann