Examining the CCSS in Practice through lesson plans and student work Class 3 Part 1 March 14, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Rigor Grade 2 Overview.
Advertisements

Playing games in the K-2 classroom
O PERATIONS AND A LGEBRAIC T HINKING - OA K-2 P UTTING IT TOGETHER : N UMBER S TRATEGIES AND S TORY P ROBLEM T YPES Math Teacher Leader Meeting January.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 Using the Relationship Between Addition and Subtraction.
Teaching Math to Young Children
Effective Math Questioning
Designing a Continuum of Learning to Assess Mathematical Practice NCSM April, 2011.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Grade 3-5 Fraction Development in the Common Core State Standards Wisconsin Mathematics Council, Inc. Leading quality mathematics education in Wisconsin.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2011 Addition and Subtraction of Fractions Part 2 Class.
Using Place Value to Add
A Look at Standards for Mathematical Practice, Grades K-2
Productive Math Talk Math Alliance April 3, 2012.
What is a Number Talk? a classroom conversation around purposefully crafted computation problems that are solved mentally opportunity to collectively.
Operations and Algebraic Thinking November 15, 2012.
Welcome Academic Math Coaches! Let’s Mix It Up! Find a seat at a table. Use the dot on your nametag to make sure each color is represented. Green 1-2 years.
Operations and Algebraic Thinking in First Grade
Math Curriculum.
November 2013 Network Team Institute
Transforming Teaching & Learning K - 2 May 23, 2014 Transition To The Common Core.
Phone: cell: Agenda Creating our Learning Community & Norms Setting Personal Goals and Identifying Themes Visualization through.
Elementary Math: Principals Professional Development Fall 2011.
Task 4 Mathematics Boot Camp Fall, 2015.
Review of a few Common Core Standard Math Strategies for Operations and Algebraic Thinking, Grade 1 Graphics licensed through: Buttons licensed through.
Section 2 Systems of Professional Learning Module 2 Grades K-5: Focus on Content Standards.
Making Connections Through the Grades in Mathematics
A GENDA D AY -3 Do Now Gallery Walk-Progressions Let’s Go to the Videotape Reflections.
Vacaville USD December 5, AGENDA Problem Solving and Patterns Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices Number Talks –Computation.
Our Purpose and Agenda Important outcome for 2 nd grade Whole number addition and subtraction Two- and three-digit addition and subtraction Important outcomes.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
CCSS 101: Standards for Mathematical Practice Class 3 March 14, 2011.
Project 2 CCSSM Interpretation Guide Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Summer Institute 2011.
A Look at Standards for Mathematical Practice Gr. 3-5 Class 1 January 31, 2011.
WELCOME ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS EDUCATORS & PRINCIPALS Day 2 Educator Effectiveness Academy Summer 2011.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Mathematical Structures: Addition and Subtraction Word Problem Types Tennessee.
Class 4: Part 1 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Class April 4, 2011.
Laying the Foundation for Single-Digit Addition & Subtraction Fluency Grades K-2 and Beyond Common Core Leadership for Mathematics June 21, 2011 DeAnn.
Common Core State Standards K-5 Mathematics Presented by: Teresa Hardin Amanda Tyner.
Insights About the Grade 1 Learning Expectations in the CCSS Topic #1: The meaning of the equal sign Presented by the Office of Curriculum, Instruction.
Bestpowerpointtemplates.com Points of View – Telling a Story with Data Exploring Computer Science – Lesson 1-5.
CCSS 101: Standards for Mathematical Practice Class 3 March 14, 2011.
Lesson 2-6 Making 10 to Add Mr. Baker 2 nd Grade.
Number Talks. WHY? Promotes early number sense Fosters mental math Develops strategies to understand and solve harder math problems Increases math vocabulary.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Engaging In and Analyzing Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
4 examples with counters 4 examples with number lines
Common Core State Standards: The Wisconsin State Standards Common Core State Standards for Mathematics, Grades 6-8 January 31, 2011.
By Kathy Richardson Assessment #5 Combination Trains Overview & Description of Strategies.
Identify the purpose of interactive notebooks Examine the components of an interactive notebook Look at sample notebooks Identify the Common Core Standards.
By Kathy Richardson Assessment #6 Hiding Assessment Overview & Description of Strategies.
Math Alliance Teaching All Learners Summer 2011 Beth Schefelker Melissa Hedges Chris Guthrie.
Balanced Math Overview
Avery County & ASU Partnership Project in Mathematics AAPP-Math Grades K-2 Day 1 – 2/18/14 Dr. Tracy Goodson-Espy Dr. Lisa Poling Dr. Art Quickenton.
STRONG START Thursday, June 23, 2016 Morning.
Strong Start Math Project
Strong Start Math Project October 6, 2016
Pathways to Teacher Leadership in Mathematics Monday, July 7, 2014
Strong Start Math Project
Single-Digit Addition Fluency Grades K-2
Task 4 Mathematics Boot Camp Fall, 2016.
A Systemic Approach to Basic Facts
Doubles Unit of Study: Addition and Subtraction Strategies PART 1
Doubles Unit of Study: Addition and Subtraction Strategies PART 1
Common Core Leadership for Mathematics (CCLM)
What is OAK 2? Operations and Algebraic Thinking - OA K-2
What is Number Talks? A Number Talk is a short, ongoing daily routine that provides students with meaningful ongoing practice with computation: keep Number.
CCSS 101: Standards for Mathematical Practice
Understanding the Common Core State Standards in Practice
Add and Subtract within 20 Mentally
Single-Digit Addition Fluency: Part 2 Grades K-2
K-2 Math Strategies that work
Presentation transcript:

Examining the CCSS in Practice through lesson plans and student work Class 3 Part 1 March 14, 2011

Talk Moves and Formats Five Talk Moves Talk Formats RevoicingWhole Class RepeatingSmall Group ReasoningPartner Adding on Waiting

Journal Review by Your Peers Read and react to each other’s journal entries about the talk moves/formats Use Post-it-Notes to record your comments in each journal Pass the journals to the right until you get your own journal back Discuss as a group – What stands out after reading all the journals?

Learning Intentions We Are Learning To … analyze students’ thinking on a Continuum of Student Thinking and Understanding, and advance students’ thinking by asking good questions and making adaptations and modifications to move students to the next stage or stages

Success Criteria We will know we are successful when we can understand the components of the Continuum of Student Thinking and Understanding and fill in the form after analyzing student work

A Wisconsin Graphic of CCSS

Common Core State Standards Alignment Task 1 Present your completed Task 1 to the teachers at your table, briefly reviewing the task and student work. What questions did you write in Part 3 to move students’ thinking forward? Discuss your summary answers in Part 4.

Common Core Alignment Task 2 Present your second task to the teachers at your table. What did you see and hear when your students worked on this task? Discuss differences/ similarities between the two tasks in relation to the Standards for Mathematical Practices.

Summary We were learning to recognize three of the Standards for Mathematical Practices—sense making, reasoning, and tools— within a chosen Content Standards progression. We will know we are successful when we can articulate how both a Content Standard and a Standard for Mathematical Practice are infused in a math lesson in the classroom.

Stages on the Form

Finishing the Big Ideas about Basic Fact Development Let’s continue to explore ….. with ten frames

8 + 6 Strategies: Make a ten. Use a double. Use fives. Use some other equivalent problem. Put 8 counters on your first frame & 6 counters on your second frame.

Make a ten: How could you make a ten?

Make a ten: How could you make a ten? Move 2 counters to the top frame. Write an equation = = = 14 Then you have 10 and 4 more counters.

Use a double: What doubles might you use? Write an equation = = = 14 Reason = 12.Reason = 1 Then add 2 more.

Use fives: Can you see some fives? Where? Reason: is 10; need to add 3 more and 1 more. Write an equation = = = 14

Select a problem. Draw a strategy card for the group. Everyone uses ten frames and counters to reason through the strategy and writes an equation(s) that shows the reasoning. Share, compare, and discuss as a group. Repeat with another strategy card. Reflect: Which strategies seem to work best for each problem?

Place 15 counters on the double ten frame. Completely fill one frame, place 5 on the other frame. Decompose to ten: 15 – 6

How can you remove 6 counters in parts by decomposing it in a way that gets you to or “leads to a ten”? Decompose to ten: 15 – 6 Remove 5 counters to get to ten. Remove 1 more. Write an equation. 15 – 5 – 1 = 9 or 15 – 5 = 10; 10 – 1 = 9

Use ten frames and counters to reason through the “Decompose to Ten” strategy. Write an equation(s) to show the reasoning. Share and discuss in your small group Try it: 13 – 5 16 – 7 Brainstorm: What other subtraction facts would lend themselves well to this strategy? Make a list of facts and try them out.

Reflect How do these tasks engage you in the content learning infused with practices? (Mathematical Practices Standards 1, 2, 5) How do these tasks help you to better understand the mathematics? (Content Standards K.OA.4, K.OA.5, 1.OA.6)

Checking in… Standard 2.OA.2: Fluently add and subtract within 20 using mental strategies. By end of Grade 2, know from memory all sums of two one-digit numbers. “Acquiring proficiency in single-digit arithmetic involves much more than memorizing.” ( Adding It Up, NRC, 2001, p. 6) What is that “more” and how do we help students get there?

What other practices were infused in the content learning? Provide specific examples.