2012-13 ORIENTATION PRESENTED BY DR. DAVID PEAK ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT FOR HUMAN RESOURCES STAFF SPECIALISTS EVALUATION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
California State University, East Bay Human Resources Preparing and Presenting a Performance Review 2007.
360-degree Look at Me The Leadership Effectiveness Inventory (LEI)
Evaluations: Administrative & Classified Employees
Principal & Assistant Principal Evaluation Orientation Administrative Policy GCN-2 Presented by Dr. David Peak Assistant Superintendent for Human.
Campus Improvement Plans
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Peninsula School District
ORIENTATION PRESENTED BY DR. DAVID PEAK ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT FOR HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATORS (NON-SCHOOL BASED) EVALUATION.
Performance Management
Slides originally developed by NJDOE A New Vision For Professional Development.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
EPMS OVERVIEW – Prepare Planning Stages – Provide Ongoing Communication – Performing Evaluation Stage – Address substandard performance. – Use EAP appropriately.
Annual Self Assessment Workshop for Employees
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Assisting Students with Disabilities: A Training Program
ADEPT Framework
Module 2, Transparency #1 Assisting Students with Disabilities: A Training Program Module 2: Effective Supervision of Paraeducators.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Assisting Students with Disabilities
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
APS Teacher Evaluation
Performance Development at The Cathedral of the Incarnation A Supervisor’s Guide.
State Board Mission, Goals, and Policies
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Module 2, Transparency #1 Assisting Students with Disabilities: A Training Program Module 2: Effective Supervision of Paraeducators.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
System Office Performance Management Human Resources Fall 2015.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Teacher Evaluation Overview
Teacher Performance Evaluation System (Summary)
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
Assessing Learners The Teaching Center Department of Pediatrics UNC School of Medicine The Teaching Center.
New Supervisors’ Guide To Effective Supervision
Elementary School Administration and Management GADS 671 Section 55 and 56.
Angela M. Rios EDU 660 September 12,  Shared decision making leads to better decisions  Shared instructional leadership includes ◦ the supervisor.
HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”
Student Achievement Teacher & Leader Effectiveness Overview of Stronge & MyLearningPlan/OASYS Interim Report #1 January 27,
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
Performance Evaluation for Occupational Therapists and Physical Therapists North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Exceptional Children Division.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Teacher Evaluation Process
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Faculty Performance Reviews at MSU
Teacher Evaluation Process
Evaluation Procedures for Classified Employees
Presentation transcript:

ORIENTATION PRESENTED BY DR. DAVID PEAK ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT FOR HUMAN RESOURCES STAFF SPECIALISTS EVALUATION

OVERVIEW OF STAFF SPECIALIST EVALUATION Staff Specialist Performance Standards Goal Setting/Dialogue Process Data Sources Summative Evaluation 2

STAFF SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE STANDARD I. I. Leadership A.Communicates a clear vision for school or unit of effectiveness B.Demonstrates decision-making which is thoughtful and appropriate C.Displays effective planning and organization D.Develops and maintains a positive and productive climate 3

STAFF SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE STANDARD II. II. Supervision A.Utilizes various supervision approaches B.Makes fair, professional, credible evaluations following state and district policy C.Fosters a supportive relationship focused upon continual growth 4

STAFF SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE STANDARD III. III. Communication A.Promotes effective communication B.Demonstrates knowledge and application of communication skills C.Demonstrates/utilizes the N+1 model 5

STAFF SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE STANDARD IV. IV. Basic Job Description A.Performs job responsibilities in a professional and effective manner with student welfare as the primary focus B.Displays professional and technical knowledge 6

STAFF SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE STANDARD V. V. Personal Qualities A.Demonstrates flexibility and adaptability B.Models honesty and integrity C.Demonstrates care and concern for self and others 7

GOAL SETTING/DIALOGUE PROCESS Step One: The staff specialist and supervisor shall meet prior to the end of September to review the performance standards and to formulate appropriate goal(s). The goal(s) will be written by the staff specialist in terms of an action plan. The number of goals will be determined by the staff specialist with supervisor endorsement. The performance standards shall serve as a basis for discussion between the staff specialist and supervisor to assist in determining goals and on-going professional development. Because supervision is not an event, but a process of dialogue, the staff specialist and supervisor will set a schedule at the goal-setting meeting for on-going times for conversation and support. They will also discuss the data sources to be used during the year. 8

GOAL SETTING/DIALOGUE PROCESS Step Two: Prior to the end of 1st semester, the staff specialist and supervisor shall meet to review the progress toward the accomplishment of goal(s). Step Three: Prior to the end of year evaluation, the staff specialist will present to the supervisor any specific written data sources discussed the previous fall. 9

DATA SOURCES Since it is intended that the evaluation process be flexible and individualized, at the goal setting meeting the staff specialist and supervisor will discuss and determine the data sources, which may include: Staff Specialist self-assessment at the beginning and end of academic year Staff Specialist portfolio development Staff Specialist survey of staff and peers based on performance standards Peer coaching and summary dialogue among staff specialist, peer coach and supervisor Supervisor observation of staff specialist’s activities Team/department assessment data Unsolicited input from others Other as specified The supervisor has the responsibility for stating the data sources used in the formal written evaluation. 10

SUMMATIVE EVALUATION There will be an end of year summative evaluation written by the supervisor each academic year. The evaluation shall be discussed and signed by the evaluator and the administrator, each to receive a copy of the report. The signature by the administrator shall not be construed to indicate agreement with information contained in the evaluation. Evaluators are encouraged to discuss strengths and weaknesses of administrator’s performance throughout the year. 11