Promoting security, travel, and trade Transportation Border Working Group – April 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Focus 2010: Are you ready for an improving economy? Secure Borders and Open Doors Sara Wiebe Director General Pre-Border Programs.
Advertisements

1 Detroit River International Crossing (DRIC) New International Trade Crossing (NITC) Briefing for the Transportation Border Working Group November 8,
2012 Fall TBWG CBP Washington Updates. Field Operations Facilities Program Management Office 2 TBWG: CBP Washington Updates Agenda LPOE Magnitude of Need.
Beyond the Border Action Plan Border Infrastructure Investment Plan (BIIP) 1.
PUBLIC BORDER OPERATORS ASSOCIATION BORDER INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT UPDATES Canada – United States Transportation Border Working Group Meeting Vancouver,
1 Canada Border Services Agency Transportation Border Working Group - Border Infrastructure Updates Quebec City October, 2010.
Beyond the Border Integrated Cargo Security Strategy Canada – United States Transportation Border Working Group Detroit, Michigan April , 2013.
Real World Technology Solutions for In-transit Freight Border Security.
Office of Research and Information Technology International Border Crossing Program Electronic Screening Transportation Border Working Group November 1,
Public Border Operators Association Border Infrastructure Project Updates Canada – United States Transportation Border Working Group Meeting April 19 –
Border Wait Time Test, Evaluation and Deployment of Automated, Real-Time Technologies Project Briefing– October 22, 2013 Tiffany Julien- FHWA.
Border Infrastructure Project Updates Transportation Border Working Group – November , Ottawa, Ontario.
Pacific Corridor Enterprise Council K. David Andersson President February 16, 2006 Presentation Vancouver Cross Border Regions Roundtable.
TBWG – The Ottawa Update Canada Border Services Agency Montreal, Québec October 23, 2013 Jay LaFrance, Canada-US Relations.
FHWA at the Border David Franklin U.S – Canadian Border Coordinator Office of Planning.
Transportation Border Working Group Montreal October 22 and 23, 2013 CBSA Project Update.
Transportation Border Working Group Chicago Plenary - Ottawa Update April 29, 2009 Ted Mackay, Transport Canada.
BC / WA J OINT T RANSPORTATION M ANAGEMENT F RAMEWORK Paula J. Hammond, P.E. Washington State Department of Transportation Secretary & Executive Council.
Beyond the Border Action Plan Border Infrastructure Investment Plan (BIIP)
Roger Petzold Federal Highway Administration Border & Interstate Team.
Freight Performance Measures Crystal Jones FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations.
SAFETEA-LU Highlights Roger Petzold Office of Interstate and Border Planning Federal Highway Administration Transportation Border Working Group Nov. 9,
Office of Research and Information Technology International Border Crossing Program Electronic Screening Transportation Border Working Group April 19,
FMCSA Update Canada-United States TBWG Plenary Meeting Chicago, Illinois April 28-29, 2009.
An Introduction to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Transport Transports Canada Canada Transportation Border Working Group New York State.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION BORDER WAIT TIME WORKING GROUP.
Beyond the Border Action Plan: Implementing a Shared Canada – U.S. Vision for Perimeter Security and Economic Competitiveness Alan Langford – Customs and.
1 FHWA Talking Freight Seminar Weigh-in-Motion: the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance’s Perspective Will Schaefer, CVSA Vehicle Programs Director.
Federal Government’s Role in Promoting Innovative Financing Northern Border Finance Workshop - May 16, 2007.
1 Freight Performance Measurement Presented to Transportation Border Working Group on 7 June 2006.
Land Port of Entry Modernization Transportation Border Working Group – Washington Update October 28 th, 2009.
WSDOT SW Region, Vancouver, WA December 7, 2009 WSDOT SW Region, Vancouver, WA December 7, 2009 Tolling Study Committee.
Canada Border Services Agency Update Presentation to: Transportation Border Working Group Bellingham, Washington June 7, 2006.
TBWG – The Ottawa Update Canada Border Services Agency Buffalo, New York April 9, 2014 Jay LaFrance.
Cross-Border Coordination FHWA’s Role in Border Planning Lisa M. Dye International Transportation Program Engineer Federal Highway Administration Border.
1 Transportation Infrastructure Programs Past, Present & Future Transportation Association of Canada Fall Conference September 2011 Edmonton, Alberta.
Talking Freight Seminar Presenter Chuck Horan Director of Enforcement and Compliance.
Land Port of Entry Modernization Efforts Transportation Border Working Group – Washington Update April 14, 2010 Transportation Border Working Group – Washington.
1 Transportation Border Working Group Washington Update.
Border Efficiency Research Initiatives American Transportation Research Institute August 16, 2006.
Beyond the Border Canada – United States Transportation Border Working Group Buffalo, New York April 8-9, 2014.
Public Border Operators Association Border Infrastructure Project Updates United States – Canada Transportation Border Working Group Meeting October 27.
Southwestern Ontario Border Wait Time Project Update Mike Barnet, P.Eng Intelligent Transportation Systems Program Ministry of Transportation of Ontario.
Engaging State DOT’s Engaging State DOT’s 2008 ITS America State Chapters Council Annual Meeting and State Chapters Strengthening Workshop Bernie Arseneau,
Land Port of Entry Modernization Transportation Border Working Group – Washington Update April 29, 2009.
The Canada Border Services Agency and Coordinated Border Management Regional Conference of Customs Directors General, April 22-25, 2012.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
Trusted Trader Initiatives - Beyond the Border Action Plan Transportation Border Working Group April 17, 2012.
Border Trade Alliance Maria Luisa O’Connell BTA President March 11, 2008.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Public-Private Partnerships at POEs Spring 2014 Transportation Border Working Group 1.
Michele Mueller Senior Project Manager Applying Intelligent Transportation Systems to Cross Border Issues TC / FHWA Regional Roundtable Mike Barnet Senior.
USDOT’s IntelliDrive Program Smart Roadside Initiative – How it Fits.
2013 Fall TBWG CBP Washington Updates. Field Operations Facilities Program Management Office 2 TBWG: CBP Washington Updates Agenda Historic NB Appropriations.
1 Lacolle/Champlain Border Zone Rehabilitation Project Benoit Cayouette Ministère des transports du Québec and Gerard Cioffi New York State Department.
PORT IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AT SAN LUIS/SAN LUIS RIO COLORADO CONGRESSIONAL BORDER BRIEFING PHOENIX, ARIZONA NOVEMBER 3, 2015 A Key Gateway for Trade, Tourism.
STATE OF TEXAS BORDER PARTNERSHIP WORKING GROUP Kirk D. Fauver Statewide Planning Engineer FHWA TX Division (HPP-TX) June 30, 2004.
Public Border Operators Association Border Infrastructure Project Updates United States – Canada Transportation Border Working Group Meeting April 14,
Technology Subcommittee November Topical Outline Technology Subcommittee Technology Subcommittee RoleRole Work PlanWork Plan ActivitiesActivities.
FHWA Operations Core Business Unit National Associations Working Group April 8, 1999 Christine Johnson Program Manager and Director, ITS Joint Program.
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
Canada Border Services Agency Update Transportation Border Working Group Niagara Falls, Ontario October 24, 2006.
ITS P ROGRAM O VERVIEW JEFFREY F. PANIATI ITS JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE.
Border Wait-Time Emissions Analysis Study 1 Project Briefing Travis Black Federal Highway Administration November 14, 2012.
Transportation Border Working Group - Vancouver October 21 and 22, 2014 CBSA Infrastructure Project Update.
Rice University – Baker Institute
Border Waits Analysis at the Nogales-Mariposa Port of Entry
Promoting security, travel, and trade
Presentation transcript:

Promoting security, travel, and trade Transportation Border Working Group – April 2008

2 OVERVIEW Current Activities to Meet the Need Communicate need Program Review Strategic Resource Assessments Border Wait Time Study Funding successes and challenges Maintain program priority Current Activities to Meet the Need Communicate need Program Review Strategic Resource Assessments Border Wait Time Study Funding successes and challenges Maintain program priority Next Actions Stakeholder outreach Memorialize the GSA-CBP-DOT partnership Extend efforts into new service areas

3 CURRENT ACTIVITIES TO MEET THE NEED Communicate Need Work together to communicate the need within the ports as a coordinated effort. Personnel Technology Infrastructure Infrastructure (ports and roads)

4 PROGRAM REVIEW Strategic Resource Assessments Strategic Resource Assessments FY 2008 Refresh –LPOE underway –Expansion to air and sea ports SRAs allow CBP to achieve the following: –Align facility investments with CBP’s mission –Target available resources to the areas of greatest nee –Plan, budget, and execute facility investments objectively and fairly Strategic Resource Assessments FY 2008 Refresh –LPOE underway –Expansion to air and sea ports SRAs allow CBP to achieve the following: –Align facility investments with CBP’s mission –Target available resources to the areas of greatest nee –Plan, budget, and execute facility investments objectively and fairly Current LPOE Portfolio Inventory LPOE Facility OwnershipTotal GSA-owned96.558% GSA-leased22.514% CBP-owned4327% NPS-owned11% Total Facilities163

5 Identifies and prioritizes facility requirements: Premised on the CBP operational strategy and objective assessment criteria Utilizing a deliberate process of data analysis and stakeholder coordination –California Border Master Plan –Border Wait Time Study Identifies and prioritizes facility requirements: Premised on the CBP operational strategy and objective assessment criteria Utilizing a deliberate process of data analysis and stakeholder coordination –California Border Master Plan –Border Wait Time Study Criteria and Weights STRATEGIC RESOURCE ASSESSMENTS

6 BORDER WAIT TIMES In early April 2008, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) met with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to: –Discuss current initiatives on standardizing border wait time measures; –Determine procedures for expanding port of entry technologies to monitor traffic wait times at the border; –Federal highway regulations and protocols for expansion of the FHWA and Canadian Border Security Administration (CBSA) traffic monitoring technologies. In early April 2008, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) met with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to: –Discuss current initiatives on standardizing border wait time measures; –Determine procedures for expanding port of entry technologies to monitor traffic wait times at the border; –Federal highway regulations and protocols for expansion of the FHWA and Canadian Border Security Administration (CBSA) traffic monitoring technologies.

7 FHWA currently conducting various projects designed to quantify crossing and delay times at major U.S. land ports of entry between Canada and Mexico. Goal for CBP and FHWA is to develop and implement a system that would enable crossing times to be more easily and precisely measured. FHWA current studies focused on measuring border delays and crossing time for freight. CBP hopes to align with FHWA, Canadian and Mexican counterparts to identify and develop a technology that can also be applicable to supporting the measurement of passenger vehicle crossing times. BORDER WAIT TIMES

8 TRAFFIC MONITORING TECHNOLOGIES Several traffic monitoring technologies currently in use/being analyzed are: –Variable sign messages; –Automatic Vehicle Identification (Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)); –Automatic license plate readers; –Mobile phone location; –Inductive loop technologies; –Global Positioning Systems. Several traffic monitoring technologies currently in use/being analyzed are: –Variable sign messages; –Automatic Vehicle Identification (Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)); –Automatic license plate readers; –Mobile phone location; –Inductive loop technologies; –Global Positioning Systems.

9 CURRENT CBP INITIATIVES FOR REDUCING BORDER WAIT TIMES CBP recently convened a Land Border Wait Time Workgroup to address issues related to land border wait times including: –Facilities and infrastructure improvements; –Recruiting and retention of inspectional staff; –Wait time measurement methodologies; –Time and motion studies of inspectional processes; –Outreach to the public and other stakeholders; (continue on next screen) CBP recently convened a Land Border Wait Time Workgroup to address issues related to land border wait times including: –Facilities and infrastructure improvements; –Recruiting and retention of inspectional staff; –Wait time measurement methodologies; –Time and motion studies of inspectional processes; –Outreach to the public and other stakeholders; (continue on next screen)

10 CURRENT CBP INITIATIVES FOR REDUCING BORDER WAIT TIMES –Review of existing policies to find efficiencies; and –Expansion of Trusted Traveler Programs. –Inventory wait time initiatives (CBP, FHWA, Transport Canada, CBSA, State, etc.); –Inventory wait time processes at current CBP ports of entry. –Review of existing policies to find efficiencies; and –Expansion of Trusted Traveler Programs. –Inventory wait time initiatives (CBP, FHWA, Transport Canada, CBSA, State, etc.); –Inventory wait time processes at current CBP ports of entry.

11 CBP GOALS Develop standards and implement a system that would enable crossing times to be more easily and precisely measured. Deploy a technology to accurately monitor and measure the time required for passenger and commercial vehicles to traverse the crossing. Collect baseline dataset for cross-border travel times for planning and policy applications. Predictive vs. reactive. Tie measurements to distribution solution: U.S. Department of Transportation Traffic Management Centers, variable message signs, web sites, (I-95 Coalition), radio, etc. Develop standards and implement a system that would enable crossing times to be more easily and precisely measured. Deploy a technology to accurately monitor and measure the time required for passenger and commercial vehicles to traverse the crossing. Collect baseline dataset for cross-border travel times for planning and policy applications. Predictive vs. reactive. Tie measurements to distribution solution: U.S. Department of Transportation Traffic Management Centers, variable message signs, web sites, (I-95 Coalition), radio, etc.

12 CBP FIELD OFFICES The CBP Office of Admissibility and Passenger Programs recently obtained a comprehensive inventory of all local infrastructure and wait time monitoring and measurement processes at the local ports of entry. CBP hopes to use the inventory to determine if and how the highway infrastructure along with the monitoring and measurement of border wait times can be applied uniformly across northern and southern land border POEs. CBP Field Offices meet regularly with local agencies as part of Border Wait Time Workgroups. The CBP Office of Admissibility and Passenger Programs recently obtained a comprehensive inventory of all local infrastructure and wait time monitoring and measurement processes at the local ports of entry. CBP hopes to use the inventory to determine if and how the highway infrastructure along with the monitoring and measurement of border wait times can be applied uniformly across northern and southern land border POEs. CBP Field Offices meet regularly with local agencies as part of Border Wait Time Workgroups.

13 COORDINATING AGENCIES Several of these local organizations are: –Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) –Niagara Falls Bridge Commission (NFBC) –Peace Bridge Authority (PBA) –Niagara International Transportation Technology Coalition (NITTEC) –Ministry of Transport Ontario (MTO) –Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) –Detroit International Bridge Company (DIBC) –Washington Department of Transportation and –The BC Ministry of Transport through the International Mobility and Trade Corridor (IMTC); –Detroit River International Crossing (DRIC); –Washington Department of Transportation (WA DOT); –Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT); and –Federal Motor Carriers and Safety Administration (FMCSA) Several of these local organizations are: –Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) –Niagara Falls Bridge Commission (NFBC) –Peace Bridge Authority (PBA) –Niagara International Transportation Technology Coalition (NITTEC) –Ministry of Transport Ontario (MTO) –Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) –Detroit International Bridge Company (DIBC) –Washington Department of Transportation and –The BC Ministry of Transport through the International Mobility and Trade Corridor (IMTC); –Detroit River International Crossing (DRIC); –Washington Department of Transportation (WA DOT); –Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT); and –Federal Motor Carriers and Safety Administration (FMCSA)

14 Over the past several years the CBP Field Offices have worked at providing modifications that allow for better separation and “funneling” of commercial and non- commercial traffic, queuing space, prevention of entry without inspection, and the monitoring of border wait times. Projects have been designed to cut down the congestion of truck and car traffic and to alleviate congestion, eliminate bottlenecks, and enhance safety and security. Over the past several years the CBP Field Offices have worked at providing modifications that allow for better separation and “funneling” of commercial and non- commercial traffic, queuing space, prevention of entry without inspection, and the monitoring of border wait times. Projects have been designed to cut down the congestion of truck and car traffic and to alleviate congestion, eliminate bottlenecks, and enhance safety and security. CBP MODIFICATION PROJECTS

15 CBP MODIFICATION PROJECTS Several of these modification projects include: Bridge and facility expansions (Ambassador Bridge, Sault Sainte Marie International Bridge, and Blue Water Bridge) for arriving passenger and container ship traffic; Improving roadway and line of sight approaches in conjunction with the toll plaza relocation; Construction of new commercial Port of Entry designed to reroute commercial truck traffic around the city center and improve traffic flow. Additional lanes and new passenger processing booths to increase the amount of inspection lanes available at border crossings; Widening of approaches to POE to allow separation of cars and trucks; Relocating toll plazas; Added security fencing from the bridge abutments to the Federal Inspection Services area to prevent entry without inspection; Variable Messaging Boards (VMB) and portable VMB’s to indicate border wait times/delays and location of NEXUS lanes; Additional lighting; Restructuring of the highway entry/exit points. Several of these modification projects include: Bridge and facility expansions (Ambassador Bridge, Sault Sainte Marie International Bridge, and Blue Water Bridge) for arriving passenger and container ship traffic; Improving roadway and line of sight approaches in conjunction with the toll plaza relocation; Construction of new commercial Port of Entry designed to reroute commercial truck traffic around the city center and improve traffic flow. Additional lanes and new passenger processing booths to increase the amount of inspection lanes available at border crossings; Widening of approaches to POE to allow separation of cars and trucks; Relocating toll plazas; Added security fencing from the bridge abutments to the Federal Inspection Services area to prevent entry without inspection; Variable Messaging Boards (VMB) and portable VMB’s to indicate border wait times/delays and location of NEXUS lanes; Additional lighting; Restructuring of the highway entry/exit points.

16 CBP WAIT TIME METHODOLOGY Several methodologies for monitoring and measuring wait times include: Cameras and highway loops (Peace Arch and Pacific Highway (southbound)). License Plate Readers; Variable Message Signs; Local traffic cameras that record traffic conditions Blaine, WA (then uploaded to the Washington DOT website); Posting statewide traffic and highway information to the Washington State Department of Transportation and British Colombia Traffic Cameras web sites. Several methodologies for monitoring and measuring wait times include: Cameras and highway loops (Peace Arch and Pacific Highway (southbound)). License Plate Readers; Variable Message Signs; Local traffic cameras that record traffic conditions Blaine, WA (then uploaded to the Washington DOT website); Posting statewide traffic and highway information to the Washington State Department of Transportation and British Colombia Traffic Cameras web sites.

17 CBP INFRASTRUCTURE/WAIT TIME STUDIES Several studies currently underway include: –Detroit River International Crossing (DRIC) Study; –Texas-Mexico Border Crossing Study; –Mexico-Domiciled Commercial Passenger Carrier Study; –Measuring Border Delay and Crossing Times at the U.S./Mexico Border. Several studies currently underway include: –Detroit River International Crossing (DRIC) Study; –Texas-Mexico Border Crossing Study; –Mexico-Domiciled Commercial Passenger Carrier Study; –Measuring Border Delay and Crossing Times at the U.S./Mexico Border.

18 WAIT TIME STUDY PRINCIPLE OBJECTIVES Principal objectives are to: –Improve border-crossing facilities, operations, and connections to meet existing and future mobility and security needs; –Perform a travel time analysis for passenger and freight flows throughout the Texas/Mexico Border crossings; –Develop a system that is capable of collecting reliable and consistent border crossing time and delay information that can easily be shared; –Assess and compare U.S. and Mexican commercial passenger transport regulations related to driver, vehicle and carrier requirements for in-country and international operations. Principal objectives are to: –Improve border-crossing facilities, operations, and connections to meet existing and future mobility and security needs; –Perform a travel time analysis for passenger and freight flows throughout the Texas/Mexico Border crossings; –Develop a system that is capable of collecting reliable and consistent border crossing time and delay information that can easily be shared; –Assess and compare U.S. and Mexican commercial passenger transport regulations related to driver, vehicle and carrier requirements for in-country and international operations.

19 Conditions straining the Infrastructure include: Rapid post-9/11 evolution of CBP mission and operational requirements Current facilities designed to meet legacy missions Some facilities constructed more than 70 years ago On average, facilities over four decades old Traffic volumes are increasing Increased staffing strains existing facilities Conditions straining the Infrastructure include: Rapid post-9/11 evolution of CBP mission and operational requirements Current facilities designed to meet legacy missions Some facilities constructed more than 70 years ago On average, facilities over four decades old Traffic volumes are increasing Increased staffing strains existing facilities LPOE FACILITIES MODERNIZATION Critical Needs within an Aging Infrastructure Operational impact of maintaining status quo Current facilities cannot meet demands of today, much less the increased demands of tomorrow Current funding levels will not meet CBP’s funding needs for 40 years Evolving security and law enforcement mission requires modern facilities to detect, deter, and prevent Travel and trade facilitation suffers from aging and inefficient facilities Operational impact of maintaining status quo Current facilities cannot meet demands of today, much less the increased demands of tomorrow Current funding levels will not meet CBP’s funding needs for 40 years Evolving security and law enforcement mission requires modern facilities to detect, deter, and prevent Travel and trade facilitation suffers from aging and inefficient facilities

20 $4.9b need MOVING THE PROGRAM FORWARD Harnessing Additional Resources

21 CURRENT ACTIVITIES TO MEET THE NEED Maintain Program Priority Increase funding for the LPOE program –Leverage early success in LPOE modernization –FY2008 proved record year for LPOE construction ($339M) –Jointly planned funding levels would meet CBP’s targets Increase funding for the LPOE program –Leverage early success in LPOE modernization –FY2008 proved record year for LPOE construction ($339M) –Jointly planned funding levels would meet CBP’s targets Reduce time to deliver projects –New design and construction projects will be bundled for more efficient delivery and improved acquisition cycle –Design-Build and prototyping techniques will be utilized to speed development Improve quality and performance of delivered facilities and services Reduce time to deliver projects –New design and construction projects will be bundled for more efficient delivery and improved acquisition cycle –Design-Build and prototyping techniques will be utilized to speed development Improve quality and performance of delivered facilities and services

22 NEXT ACTIONS Moving Forward to Modernize Continue stakeholder outreach Memorialize the partnership between CBP, GSA, and DOT Expand the modernization efforts beyond major construction –Increase the quality and performance of products and services delivered –Show immediate improvements to the CBP Officer working environment Engage next round of SRAs Continue stakeholder outreach Memorialize the partnership between CBP, GSA, and DOT Expand the modernization efforts beyond major construction –Increase the quality and performance of products and services delivered –Show immediate improvements to the CBP Officer working environment Engage next round of SRAs

23