JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker PHOBOS Review Physics Simulations Mark D. Baker Physics PHOBOS design is sound. –( & PHOBOS Computing Project is on.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
Background effect to Vertex Detector and Impact parameter resolution T. Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.) Feb LC Detector Meeting.
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
Conor Henderson, MIT APS April 2001 Measurement Of Charged Antiparticle To Particle Ratios by the PHOBOS Experiment at RHIC Conor Henderson Massachusetts.
Status of the OPERA experiment Yoshiaki Nonoyama Nagoya Univ.
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
Multiplicity Fluctuations in 200 GeV Au-Au Collisions Zhengwei Chai Brookhaven National Laboratory for the Collaboration APS April Meeting, Denver, 2004.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
Gábor I. VeresQuark Matter 2006, Shanghai, November 14-20, Anti-particle to particle ratios in p+p, Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions at RHIC Gábor I.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin Presented by A.Litvinenko.
Femtoscopy BNL Workshop 6/21/2005George Stephans Very Low p T in x Past, Present, and Prospects.
Christof Roland/MITMoriond,March, Results from the PHOBOS experiment at RHIC Christof Roland (MIT) for the PHOBOS Collaboration.
Measuring Mid-Rapidity Multiplicity in PHOBOS Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago For the collaboration.
Centrality measurement and the centrality dependence of dN charged /d  at mid-rapidity Judith Katzy (MIT) for the PHOBOS collaboration.
HADES coll. meeting, Oct. 31, 2007 Charged pion production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV results of data analysis from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 Jehad Mousa.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
Background from pion beam interactions with LH2 & solid state targets J.Biernat/I.Koenig/J. Markert/W.Przygoda/P.Salabura.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Anti-particle to Particle Ratios in Cu+Cu RHIC Vasundhara Chetluru University of Illinois, Chicago For the collaboration Division of Nuclear.
Performance of PHOBOS Vertex Finders in 200GeV pp Collisions at RHIC Richard S Hollis University of Illinois at Chicago For the PHOBOS Collaboration Fall.
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
G. Musulmanbekov, K. Gudima, D.Dryablov, V.Geger, E.Litvinenko, V.Voronyuk, M.Kapishin, A.Zinchenko, V.Vasendina Physics Priorities at NICA/MPD.
Phobos Collaboration and Management Wit Busza Phobos Technical Cost and Schedule Review November 1998.
UC Davis June st Rosi Reed Low Energy Test Run Results Rosi Reed University of California at Davis.
V.Petracek TU Prague, UNI Heidelberg GSI Detection of D +/- hadronic 3-body decays in the CBM experiment ● D +/- K  B. R. 
Charged Particle Multiplicity Measurement in 200 GeV pp Collisions with PHOBOS Joseph Sagerer University of Illinois at Chicago for the Collaboration DNP.
Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Status of the TOF February 22, 2001 Straight-line tracking What have we learned?
Year -2 topics simulations needs for these Barbara Jacak March 2, 2001.
FTPC status and results Summary of last data taken AuAu and dAu calibration : Data Quality Physic results with AuAu data –Spectra –Flow Physic results.
Status Report particle identification with the RICH detector Claudia Höhne - GSI Darmstadt, Germany general overview focus on ring radius/ Cherenkov angle.
Results from the Experiment at RHIC Abigail Bickley University of Maryland For the Collaboration Topics in Heavy Ion Collisions June 25-28, 2003, Montreal.
8 April 2000Karel Safarik: Tracking in ALICE1 Tracking in ALICE  OUTLOOK: Requirements History Tracking methods Track finding Tracking efficiency Momentum.
Lecture 07: particle production in AA collisions
Status of the Phobos experiment at RHIC S.Manly Univ. of Rochester ( for the Phobos Collaboration APS - Atlanta.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
1 Fast Pixel Simulation Howard Wieman, Xiangming Sun Lawrence Berkeley Lab.
Spectrometer Based Ratio Analysis Technique Discussion of Corrections Absorption Correction – As the collision products pass through the detector, some.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
S.Manly - RHIC Park City 3/00 Status of the Phobos experiment at RHIC S.Manly Univ. of Rochester ( for the.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
Charged and Neutral Kaon correlations in Au-Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV using the solenoidal tracker at RHIC (STAR) Selemon Bekele The Ohio State.
THE PHOBOS EXPERIMENT AT RHIC Judith Katzy for the PHOBOS Collaboration.
PHOBOS at RHIC 2000 XIV Symposium of Nuclear Physics Taxco, Mexico January 2001 Edmundo Garcia, University of Maryland.
QM2004 Version1 Measurements of the  ->     with PHENIX in Au+Au Collisions at 200 GeV at RHIC PPG016 Figures with Final Approval Charles F. Maguire.
Hadron production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV analysis of data from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 for high resolution tracking (Runge-Kutta tracks) Pavel Tlustý,
Hadron Spectra from Gábor I. Veres / MIT for the PHOBOS Collaboration.
Study of Charged Hadrons in Au-Au Collisions at with the PHENIX Time Expansion Chamber Dmitri Kotchetkov for the PHENIX Collaboration Department of Physics,
Data Analysis Practice looking for Φ(1020) Nuclear Physics Ⅲ Kyung-Eon,Choi.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
Charged particle yields and spectra in p+p and Heavy Ion Collisions with ATLAS at the LHC Jiří Dolejší (Charles University Prague) for the ATLAS collaboration.
Susanna Costanza - Pavia Group PANDA C.M., Stockholm – June 14, 2010
Di-electron elliptic flow in
M. Kuhn, P. Hopchev, M. Ferro-Luzzi
Measurement of track length and time-of-flight hypothesis
The LHC collider in Geneva
STAR Geometry and Detectors
Charged particle multiplicity in Pb-Pb collisions from NA50 experiment
Study of hadronic resonances in the ALICE experiment
Special Considerations for SIDIS
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
for the PHENIX collaboration
Presentation transcript:

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker PHOBOS Review Physics Simulations Mark D. Baker Physics PHOBOS design is sound. –( & PHOBOS Computing Project is on track.)

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker PHOBOS Physics Goals Typical physics topics: –Look for Excess Entropy Source Size & Lifetime (HBT) Multiplicity distributions and fluctuations –Look for collective phenomena (over large V) Low transverse momentum –Look for unusual medium effects Phi mass and width Study QCD confinement and vacuum

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Detailed GEANT simulation

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Types of Uncertainties Statistical (Poisson) –Unavoidable in event-by-event physics –Can be made negligible for distributions Instrumental –Fluctuations in non-ideal detector Landau fluctuations Secondary production, etc. Systematic

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Event-by-Event Multiplicity Instrumental uncertainty:

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Event-by-event dN/d 

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Measuring Multiplicity Corrections Spectrometer –Measure p distributions for primaries –Measure dE/dx distribution directly Vertex Detector –Measure dE/dx directly Multiplicity Detector: –Effective measurement of most secondaries: –Primaries: independent of Zvtx  , 

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Measurement of secondaries PHOBOS testbeam data (May ‘97) Thin = 6 mm, Thick = 6 cm Beampipe: Supports: Magnet:

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Measurement of secondaries PHOBOS: Very preliminary data. (May ‘97) Beam thru hole: 50k 5GeV

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Measurement of secondaries PHOBOS: Very preliminarydata! (May ‘97) Fe targetNo target Beam hits detector: Beam thru hole: 5 GeV beam:

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Tracking Results Hough Transform Studies –Limited acceptance, non-GEANT Spectrometer design optimized and validated Efficiency & ghost rate acceptable –Full acceptance GEANT studies Validated above results Template Tracking Code –Limited acceptance, non-GEANT Fully integrated in ROOT/C++ Results look good.

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Hough Tracking Event Display Placeholder only. Will use baker_sideways.ppt

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Efficiency and Ghosts Full GEANT simulation –100% efficient planes Hough Transform –Tight cuts Results: –85% efficiency –No p dependence –Ghosts negligible

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Momentum Resolution

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Tracking vs. Plane Efficiency No major problem –1% plane inefficiency 2% tracking inefficiency –Probably improvable (better covariance matrices)

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Track finding - very low Pt  deg   deg  7 planes, E>800 keV 7 planes, all hits Stopping Kaon

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Particle ID by dE/dx safe extended

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Particle ID - very low Pt

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Particle ID - very low Pt mass parameter

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Spectrometer Acceptance

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker HBT Acceptance Truth Resolution smeared

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker PHOBOS HBT Capabilities “Standard” Scenario –Extrapolate from low E Exotic Scenario I –Very large source

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker PHOBOS HBT Capabilities “Standard” Scenario –Extrapolate from low E Exotic Scenario II –Very rapid expansion

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker HBT Summary We can measure 20 fm sources accurately. –10% systematics with simple analysis –Easily improved. We can distinguish interesting physics from a simple baseline extrapolation.

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Phi Rates Assumptions: –15  K K / central event –100 Hz central events (15% central & vtx cut) –Yields: 9x10  K K /nominal week Reconstructed  K K –1 nominal week (15% central cut) Si-extended + TOF: 230,000 Si-only conservative PID: 50,000 +  +   + 

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Phi Resolution Resolution:  (Minv) = 1.6 MeV –Dominated by momentum resolution –Calculated 2 ways: Fast Simulation Analytic propagation of errors Error on Width (after 1 nominal week) –0.7 MeV (extended-dE/dx + TOF) –1.0 MeV (conservative-dE/dx only)

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Phi Width Measurement Placeholder only see baker_sideways.ppt

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Phi Width Measurement Placeholder only see baker_sideways.ppt

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Computing Organization ~9 FTEs total Mark Baker Chris Conner Patrick Decowski Rudi Ganz Edmundo Garcia-Solis Clive Halliwell Don McLeod Andrzej Olszewski Lou Remsberg Gunther Roland Ashutosh Sanzgiri George Stephans Cyrus Taylor Adam Trzupek Robin Verdier Frank Wolfs Barbara Wosiek Krzysztof Wozniak

JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker Conclusions Physics capabilities look good! –N, dN/d  –HBT –Phi mass Technical capabilities look good –Track Finding –Particle ID –Low p acceptance T