Trigger validation for 13.0.30.2 Event size TrigDecision Jets Electrons Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL Physics Validation Meeting – 9 October 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tracey Berry1 Looking into e &  for high energy e/  Dr Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
Advertisements

L2 chains for single-beam menu Muon full reconstruction T2Calo starting from MBTS Ricardo Gonçalo, Denis Damazio.
Jet Slice Status Report Ricardo Gonçalo (LIP) and David Miller (Chicago) For the Jet Trigger Group Trigger General Meeting – 9 July 2014.
Releases & validation Simon George & Ricardo Goncalo Royal Holloway University of London HLT UK – RAL – 13 July 2009.
Trigger Data Formats From CBNT to ESD and/or DPD June 11, 2008 Fabrizio Salvatore, Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL.
TriggerDecision update PESA-Algorithms – 16 November 2006 Status in rel nightlies Next steps for TriggerDecision Other random bits of news Ricardo.
Top Physics Validation: Reconstruction, Simulation and Bytestream Paul S Miyagawa The University of Manchester.
Trigger validation Ricardo Goncalo, RHUL Physics Validation - 14 September 2007.
The ATLAS High Level Trigger Steering Journée de réflexion – Sept. 14 th 2007 Till Eifert DPNC – ATLAS group.
Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 21 May Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 21 May 2007 Patrick Ryan.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
Top Trigger Strategy in ATLASWorkshop on Top Physics, 18 Oct Patrick Ryan, MSU Top Trigger Strategy in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics Grenoble.
Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 6 June Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 4 June 2007 Patrick Ryan.
Data-based background predictions using forward events Victor Pavlunin and David Stuart University of California Santa Barbara July 10, 2008.
Trigger Tools for Physics Analysis Some use cases Building a data sample Event by event analysis Input from across the Atlantic conclusions Thank you!
Trigger Software Validation Olga Igonkina (U.Oregon), Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) TAPM Open Meeting – Mar. 1, 2007 Outline: Status of infrastructure Schedule.
1 Modelling parameters Jos Vermeulen, 2 June 1999.
Trigger-aware analysis Current status Under development What’s missing Conclusions & Outlook Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL)
TRIGGER-AWARE ANALYSIS TUTORIAL ARTEMIS Workshop – Pisa – 18 th to 19 th June 2009 Alessandro Cerri (CERN), Ricardo Gonçalo – Royal Holloway.
The New TrigDecision Nicolas Berger, Till Eifert, Ricardo Gonçalo Physics Analysis Tools session ATLAS Software Workshop – Munich, March 2007.
What’s in the ATLAS data : Trigger Decision ATLAS Offline Software Tutorial CERN, August 2008 Ricardo Gonçalo - RHUL.
Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) Higgs WG meeting – 28 th August, 2007 Outline: Introduction & release plans Progress in menus for cm -2 s -1 Workshop on trigger.
Trigger Menus Invisible Higgs input to trigger menus for initial running 4/9/2007 Invisible Higgs CSC Note meeting Ricardo Goncalo, RHUL.
Plans for Trigger Software Validation During Running Trigger Data Quality Assurance Workshop May 6, 2008 Ricardo Gonçalo, David Strom.
Trigger Offline DQ Monitoring DQ Meeting – 27 Oct 2009 Ricardo Goncalo for Trigger Offline Monitoring.
Preparation for the Beatenberg Trigger Workshop Ricardo Gonçalo Higgs sub-group conveners meeting – 9 Jan.09.
Level 2 ID-tracking truth association Trigger AOD discussion 13 December 2006 Ricardo Gonçalo - RHUL.
Jet Trigger On-Call Shift Summary Ricardo Gonçalo - LIP.
DPDs and Trigger Plans for Derived Physics Data Follow up and trigger specific issues Ricardo Gonçalo and Fabrizio Salvatore RHUL.
Trigger ESD/AOD Simon George (RHUL) Ricardo Goncalo (RHUL) Monika Wielers (RAL) Reporting on the work of many people. ATLAS software week September.
Status of trigger software and EDM Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL – on behalf of ATLAS TDAQ.
Full Dress Rehearsal (FDR1) studies Sarah Allwood-Spiers 11/3/2008.
Organisation of the Beatenberg Trigger Workshop Ricardo Gonçalo Higgs WG Meeting - 22 Jan.09.
Higgs to WW Analysis in CDF and ATLAS R StDenis. Higgs to WW CDF and ATLAS Reproduction of Previous Results:Identifying, datasets, Rows and columns Data.
Trigger Validation TAPM Open meeting 2 October 2007 Ricardo Goncalo.
Trigger Software Validation Olga Igonkina (U.Oregon), Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) TAPM Open Meeting – April 12, 2007 Outline: Reminder of plans Status of infrastructure.
Latest News & Other Issues Ricardo Goncalo (LIP), David Miller (Chicago) Jet Trigger Signature Group Meeting 9/2/2015.
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
AOD/ESD plans Status and plans focusing on LVL2 e/  and some items for discussion On behalf of: J.Baines, P.Casado, G.Comune, A.DiMattia, S.George, R.Goncalo,
/MuID status report on behalf of the Moore/MuID group. Status in the releases ( Units Migrations DC1/G3 MuonGeoModel Migration DC2/G4) MuID updates Trig.
Trigger validation for Many thanks to Long Zhao, Chihiro Omachi, Julie Kirk, Giovanni Siragusa, Patricia Conde Muiño, Andreas Reinsch, Olya Igonkina,
Overlap Removal and Timing Optimization Studies Nicole Carlson, Northwestern University 8/8/07 Supervisor: Tomasz Bold.
PESAsim – the e/  analysis framework Validation of the framework First look at a trigger menu combining several signatures Short-term plans Mark Sutton.
Status of Monitoring in HLT ALgorithms Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL – BNL Analysis Jamboree – Aug. 6, 2007.
Trigger Validation Olga Igonkina (U.Oregon), Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) on behalf of trigger community Physics Validation Meeting – Feb. 13, 2007.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
M. Pilar Casado 1 Optimization of Tau Menus: L1 & L2 Trigger & Physics week (19-22 March 2007) M. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) on behalf of the Tau Trigger.
Trigger Validation Status and plans for rel.13 Olga Igonkina (U.Oregon) and Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) on behalf of several people Physics Validation – August.
Jet/MET Trigger On-Call Report Ricardo Gonçalo – LIP Jet Trigger Meeting – 31/3/2015.
Performance DPDs and trigger commissioning Preparing input to DPD task force.
22 January 2009 David1 Look at dead material and fake MET in Jx samples mc08 10 TeV simulations, release J0 to J6 are tag s479_r586, ‘ideal geometry’
Using Track based missing Et tools to reject fake MET background Muhammad Firdaus Mohd Soberi UMichigan-CERN Semester Program Thursday, 12 th February.
Trigger Input to First-Year Analysis Model Working Group And some soul searching… Trigger Open Meeting – 29 July 2009.
Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) Higgs WG meeting – 26 th September, 2007 Outline: Programme for today Where we are: –List of tests – post mortem –Slices.
E/gamma report Ricardo Gonçalo for the e/γ slice.
HG 5: Trigger Study for ttH, H→bb Catrin Bernius (UCL) CPPM, Genova, Glasgow, RAL, RHUL, UCL some outline.
Parton-level study of Z  l + l - for luminosity measurement Motivation PDF uncertainties Parton-level study & rate estimation Relaxed cuts & Conclusions.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
H->bb Note Plans for Summer Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) on behalf of the HSG5 H->bb group Higgs Working Group Meeting, 9 June 2011.
Points from DPD task force First meeting last Tuesday (29 th July) – Need to have concrete proposal in 1 month – Still some confusion and nothing very.
L1Calo EM Efficiency Maps Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Weekly Meeting 07/03/2011.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
UPDATE First Look at Trigger Efficiencies from AOD for ttH, H  bb Catrin Bernius UCL ATLAS Physics Meeting
Status of the measurement of K L lifetime - Data sample (old): ~ 440 pb -1 ( ) - MC sample: ~125 pb -1 ( mk0 stream ) Selection: standard tag (|
Introduction 08/11/2007 Higgs WG – Trigger meeting Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL.
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Efficiencies
Update on Invisible Higgs analysis in the tth channel
The University of Manchester
Presentation transcript:

Trigger validation for Event size TrigDecision Jets Electrons Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL Physics Validation Meeting – 9 October 2007

Ricardo GonçaloPhysics Validation - 9 Oct Event Size Andrew Hamilton Measured in sample A events: –1000 events per sample –Numbers in kB/event (~5% uncertainty) Note trigger size for top events: –This grows mostly with size of menu and event complexity –Top events satisfy almost every signature –Trigger EDM actually much more optimised (“smaller”) in rel.13, but menu much larger (~190 chains per level in , as opposed to ~40 in ) In , reduction from ~100kB/ev to ~50kB/ev for top events and for same menu –~35% reduction can be achieved for top events with separate B-physics menu Dataset (AOD)totaleventtruthcaloindetmuonmetjettauegtrig ger 5011.J2_pythia_jetjet PythiaZee PythiaB_BsJpsiphi PythiaH120gamgam T1_McAtNlo_Jimmy

Ricardo GonçaloPhysics Validation - 9 Oct TrigDecisionTool Problem found last week which affects L1 configuration info stored in the AOD –Empty L1 item IDs suppressed in AOD trigger config vector std::vector = {L1_EM05,…,L1_EM100,0,0,0,L1_MU04,…} To read AODs, TrigDecisionTool needs trigger configuration – position in vector taken as item ID  wrong due to “zero suppression” Fix by Till eifert: need to check out TrigDecision (two extra tags needed to write TAG)

Ricardo GonçaloPhysics Validation - 9 Oct Example plots from Till “Sample A” SU3 data using TAG root file directly (TAG writing from AOD shows this bug is fixed) Testing passthrough in EF_e25i L2_2J42_XE30 should accept most events in the sample:

Ricardo GonçaloPhysics Validation - 9 Oct root [16] CollectionTree- >Scan("L1_EM18_XE15:L2_e20_xe15:EF_e20_xe15") ************************************************ * Row * L1_EM18_X * L2_e20_xe * EF_e20_xe * ************************************************ * 0 * 1 * 0 * 0 * * 1 * 1 * 0 * 0 * * 2 * 1 * 0 * 0 * * 3 * 1 * 1 * 1 * * 4 * 1 * 0 * 0 * * 5 * 1 * 0 * 0 * * 6 * 1 * 0 * 0 * * 7 * 1 * 0 * 0 * * 8 * 1 * 0 * 0 * * 9 * 1 * 1 * 0 * * 10 * 1 * 1 * 1 * * 11 * 1 * 1 * 0 * * 12 * 1 * 0 * 0 * * 13 * 1 * 0 * 0 * * 14 * 1 * 0 * 0 * * 15 * 1 * 0 * 0 * * 16 * 1 * 0 * 0 * * 17 * 1 * 1 * 1 * * 18 * 1 * 0 * 0 * * 19 * 1 * 1 * 1 * * 20 * 1 * 1 * 0 * * 21 * 1 * 0 * 0 * * 22 * 1 * 1 * 1 * * 23 * 1 * 1 * 0 * Printout of a sequence of triggers L2_e20_xe15 starts from L1_EM18_XE15... Can clearly see rejection at higher trigger levels

Ricardo GonçaloPhysics Validation - 9 Oct All events EF_e25i passed

Ricardo GonçaloPhysics Validation - 9 Oct Jet slice Level 2 and Event Filter compared (Patricia Conde Muiño) Number of jets/event Level 1 (nr. Of RoIs) same as Level 2 jets (a L2 jet object always created) L2 applied selection  EF has less jet RoIs EF may reconstruct 2 jets in 1 L2 RoI

Ricardo GonçaloPhysics Validation - 9 Oct Top: Low-ET cut by L2 + migration to higher ET (resolution) at EF low-end Bottom: EF energy scale variation ~5% Similar for L2 Large errors (low stats) in middle-ET sample Event Filter Level 2

Ricardo GonçaloPhysics Validation - 9 Oct EF doesn’t reconstruct jets between   =2.5 and   =3.2 (?!!!) –Under investigation Periodic structure at L2 (0.2 in eta and phi) probably due to L1 bias (L1 ROIs, see next page) Experts say all is as expected Also: menu checked and looks as expected

Ricardo GonçaloPhysics Validation - 9 Oct  (L2) -  (true)  (L1) -  (true)

Ricardo GonçaloPhysics Validation - 9 Oct L2 electrons (calorimeter only: L2CaloHypo) Monitorng histos from nightly RTT tests (rel_2 pcache) All normal as far as I could see e10_tight Rcore L33_e22 Rcore E10_tight Eratio L33_e22 Eratio

Ricardo GonçaloPhysics Validation - 9 Oct L33_e22 Et_had L33_e22 Et_em e10_tight Et_em e10_tight Et_had

Ricardo GonçaloPhysics Validation - 9 Oct What’s missing… For detector paper there are no known showstoppers Issues with small impact on performance (e.g. overlap removal for tau signatures) should be fixed in If possible, menus need to be completed for (for use in FDR) – and Next time, have more tests in place to check “offline integration” –Tests for RDO  AOD/ESD were there late –Tests for RDO  TAG and AOD  TAG needed