Public spending pressures Robert Chote Carl Emmerson Christine Frayne.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Advertisements

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
K-14 Education Spending and the Budget Shortfall Comparison of State General Fund Revenue and Expenditure Increases to Increases in K-14 (Prop. 98) Guarantee.
Real GDP USs Real GDP EUs Real GDP Japans Real GDP.
EuroCondens SGB E.
Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-01. Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-02.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
BEA Local Area Personal Income and Employment county data ( ), 04/22/2010 release. Estimates of detailed employment and wage data for the states.
Addition and Subtraction Equations
Analyzing the Impact of Granularity on IP-to-AS Mapping Presented by Baobao Zhang Authours: Baobao Zhang, Jun Bi, Yangyang Wang, Jianping Wu.
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
2002 AAPG Briefing Energy and Environment: A Partnership that Works Energy Supply Setting Pete Stark IHS Energy Group Washington, D.C. 23 September, 2002.
Australias Intergenerational Report Considering future liabilities of Government in a fiscal context 22 April 2013.
Disability status in Ethiopia in 1984, 1994 & 2007 population and housing sensus Ehete Bekele Seyoum ESA/STAT/AC.219/25.
Multinational Comparisons of Health Systems Data, 2007 Bianca K. Frogner, Meghan Bishop, and Gerard F. Anderson, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University November.
CEAL Treasurers Report Toshie Marra UCLA March 21, 2007.
Long term public spending trends* John Hawksworth Head of Macroeconomics PricewaterhouseCoopers March 2006 *connectedthinking.
Performance of Hedges & Long Futures Positions in CBOT Corn Goodland, Kansas March 2, 2009 Daniel OBrien, Extension Ag Economist K-State Research and Extension.
Copyright © 2007 Global Insight, Inc. The U.S. Economic Outlook Nigel Gault Group Managing Director North American Macroeconomic Services Office of State.
CALENDAR.
2007 ITBS/ ITED Results Cedar Rapids Community Schools.
1 1  1 =.
27  9 =.
AS/A2 The national economy
AS/A2 The national economy The UK Economy: a Health Check How well has the economy been performing, and whats round the corner? The UK Economy: a Health.
IFS Recent trends in poverty Luke Sibieta Institute for Fiscal Studies 28 th March 2006.
Public finances Christine Frayne Institute for Fiscal Studies.
IFS Fiscal rules and public spending Gemma Tetlow Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 February 2007.
Public spending Carl Emmerson. Total Managed Expenditure Source: HM Treasury.
IFS Uncertainty in the forecasts Carl Emmerson. © Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2004 Previous HMT forecasting errors Source: HM Treasury (2003)
Post Budget Briefing Institute for Fiscal Studies 23 rd March 2006
Decimals 10ths and 100ths.
PSU Study Session Fall 2010 Dan Sprik
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
The Pecan Market How long will prices stay this high?? Brody Blain Vice – President.
- D A N I S H A G I N G R E S E A R C H C E N T E R - Fatigue – an indicator of early aging? Why do we age so differently? Anette Ekmann.
The 2004 Fiscal Budget 1 October 2003.
Look at This PowerPoint for help on you times tables
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
SUOMEN PANKKI | FINLANDS BANK | BANK OF FINLAND Growth rates high, but GDP not yet at its 2008 level 1Erkki Liikanen
Tax Base Volatility (Update) Thomas Stinson Matthew Schoeppner July 22, 2008.
Least Common Multiples and Greatest Common Factors
Before Between After.
Rotary Club of Space Center August 6, 1964 – August 6, 2014 Presidents and District Governors.
2.10% more children born Die 0.2 years sooner Spend 95.53% less money on health care No class divide 60.84% less electricity 84.40% less oil.
NI Executive Budget 2010 BRIEFING FOR CAL COMMITTEE.
Subtraction: Adding UP
Name ____________________ Date ___________ Period ____.
Statistics on Obesity, PA & Diet: England, Jan 08 i Compiled by Sally Cornfield on behalf of PAN-WM Headline Findings.
: 3 00.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Clock will move after 1 minute
Vorstand FB Tarif industriAll-Europe, Basic Metals Committee, Luxembourg, Collective Agreements of the European Steel Industry.
NI Executive Budget 2010 Pre-Consultation. Outline Background and Context UK Fiscal Position Implications for NI Budget Way Forward Key Questions.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Murach’s OS/390 and z/OS JCLChapter 16, Slide 1 © 2002, Mike Murach & Associates, Inc.
Graeme Henchel Multiples Graeme Henchel
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
© Institute for Fiscal Studies PBR 2009: filling in some details Robert Chote
IFS CSR 2007: Not the final settlement? Carl Emmerson Institute for Fiscal Studies Presentation to LGA Conference, “the comprehensive spending review”,
Budget 2003 Briefing Institute for Fiscal Studies
Carl Emmerson Institute for Fiscal Studies
Spending Review 2004 IFS Press Briefing
Institute for Fiscal Studies
Public finances Christine Frayne.
Presentation transcript:

Public spending pressures Robert Chote Carl Emmerson Christine Frayne

Total Managed Expenditure (TME)

Composition of total managed expenditure

What increases might we have?

CSR 2007 TME (real increase) TME – (health + education + ODA) TME – (health + education + ODA + SS and TC) PBR ( to ) – Labour years ( to ) Labour under Tory plans ( to ) SR to date ( to ) Current plans ( to ) Source: HM Treasury

CSR 2007 TME (real increase) TME – (health + education + ODA) TME – (health + education + ODA + SS and TC) PBR ( to ) – Labour years ( to ) Labour under Tory plans ( to ) SR to date ( to ) Current plans ( to ) Source: HM Treasury

CSR 2007 TME (real increase) TME – (health + education + ODA) TME – (health + education + ODA + SS and TC) PBR ( to ) – Labour years ( to ) Labour under Tory plans ( to ) –0.2–0.7–0.2 SR to date ( to ) Current plans ( to ) Source: HM Treasury

Possible CSR 2007 allocations TME as PBR (1) TME constant as % GDP (2) Other spending constant as % GDP (3) TME constant in real terms TME1.8 TME minus health, education, ODA 0.8 TME minus health, education, ODA, social security and tax credits –0.1 Source: HM Treasury

Possible CSR 2007 allocations TME as PBR (1) TME constant as % GDP (2) Other spending constant as % GDP (3) TME constant in real terms TME TME minus health, education, ODA TME minus health, education, ODA, social security and tax credits – Source: HM Treasury

Possible CSR 2007 allocations TME as PBR (1) TME constant as % GDP (2) Other spending constant as % GDP (3) TME constant in real terms TME TME minus health, education, ODA TME minus health, education, ODA, social security and tax credits – Source: HM Treasury

Possible CSR 2007 allocations TME as PBR (1) TME constant as % GDP (2) Other spending constant as % GDP (3) TME constant in real terms TME TME minus health, education, ODA –2.0 TME minus health, education, ODA, social security and tax credits – –4.9 Source: HM Treasury

Annual cost of different illustrative alternative scenarios TME as PBR (1) TME constant as % GDP (2) Other spending constant as % GDP (3) TME constant in real terms TME1.8 Spending cut/increase over 2007 CSR (2005–06 terms) –£8½ bn Additional funding required (2005–06 terms) No change Source: HM Treasury

Annual cost of different illustrative alternative scenarios TME as PBR (1) TME constant as % GDP (2) Other spending constant as % GDP (3) TME constant in real terms TME Spending cut/increase over 2007 CSR (2005–06 terms) –£8½ bnNo change Additional funding required (2005–06 terms) No change +£8½ bn Source: HM Treasury

Annual cost of different illustrative alternative scenarios TME as PBR (1) TME constant as % GDP (2) Other spending constant as % GDP (3) TME constant in real terms TME Spending cut/increase over 2007 CSR (2005–06 terms) –£8½ bnNo change + £6½ bn Additional funding required (2005–06 terms) No change +£8½ bn+£15 bn Source: HM Treasury

Annual cost of different illustrative alternative scenarios TME as PBR (1) TME constant as % GDP (2) Other spending constant as % GDP (3) TME constant in real terms TME Spending cut/increase over 2007 CSR (2005–06 terms) –£8½ bnNo change + £6½ bn–£35½bn Additional funding required (2005–06 terms) No change +£8½ bn+£15 bn–£27 bn Source: HM Treasury

Public spending pressures Robert Chote Carl Emmerson Christine Frayne