TRB Planning Applications Identifying the Long-Range Transportation Improvement and Funding Needs for Urban Areas in Texas By Kevin M. Hall, Texas Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 User Perspective on Deploying 511 Al Kosik Director, Traffic Management Section TxDOT National Transportation Operations Coalition Talking Operations.
Advertisements

FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Statewide Mobility Performance Measures Team Meeting Webinar June 17, 2013.
Proposition 1 Formula Distribution Proposal for FY 2015 PRELIMINARY CONCEPT PROPOSITION 1 FORMULA DISTRIBUTION PROPOSAL FOR FY 2015 TxDOT/Stakeholder Working.
Determining the Free-Flow Speeds in a Regional Travel Demand Model based on the Highway Capacity Manual Chao Wang Joseph Huegy Institute for Transportation.
The Hurricane Brett Experience Ismael Soto, P.E. Texas Dept. of Transportation Corpus Christi District.
Applying DynusT to the I-10 Corridor Study, Tucson, AZ ITE Western District Meeting Santa Barbara June 26th, 2012 Jim Schoen, PE, Kittelson & Assoc. Khang.
Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7. Key Issues to Explore: Capacity of the mainline sections of NYS-7 Adequacy of the weaving sections Performance.
You Are the Traffic Jam: Examination of Congestion Measures
TRIP ASSIGNMENT.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.
Fuel Economy in Harris County-2007 Graciela Lubertino, PhD.
May 7, 2013 Yagnesh Jarmarwala Phani Jammalamadaka Michael Copeland Maneesh Mahlawat 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Talking Freight Seminar presented by Richard Margiotta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. September 21,
Forecasting Travel Time Index using a Travel Demand Model to Measure Plan Performance Thomas Williams, AICP Texas A&M Transportation Institute 2015 TRB.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
Investigation of Speed-Flow Relations and Estimation of Volume Delay Functions for Travel Demand Models in Virginia TRB Planning Applications Conference.
Mississippi River Bridge An Analysis of Alternatives DRAFT Final Report Presentation January 31, 2007.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
1 Modeling Active Traffic Management for the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project Terry Klim, P.E. Kevin Fehon, P.E. DKS Associates D.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model Mobility Analysis November 7, 2003.
Multimodal Corridor System Management – Incorporating Analysis of Transit, Demand Management Programs and Operational Strategies Presented by Bill Loudon,
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Energy Law, Fall 2010 Natashia Holmes
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
Traffic Parameters for use with MOBILE6 in Ky. - Update by Jesse Mayes, P.E. Division of Multimodal Programs July 22, 2003.
TRB Transportation Applications Conference Congestion-Free Freeways US Department of Transportation Establishing a Metropolitan.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
+ Creating an Operations-Based Travel Forecast Tool for Small Oregon Communities TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 20, 2009.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
MOBILITY 2030: THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH METROPOLITAN AREA North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
S.H. 121 – Dallas, Texas Case Study Presentation National Summit on Future Transportation Funding and Finance Strategies April 11, 2007 Michael Morris,
Assessing the Marginal Cost of Congestion for Vehicle Fleets Using Passive GPS Data Nick Wood, TTI Randall Guensler, Georgia Tech Presented at the 13 th.
Bharath Paladugu TRPC Clyde Scott Independent Consultant
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Daivamani Sivasailam TPB Technical Committee October 5,
Analysis of the IH 35 Corridor Through the Austin Metropolitan Area TRB Planning Applications Conference Jeff Shelton Karen Lorenzini Alex Valdez Tom Williams.
THE DRAFT CAMPO 2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN Mobile Meeting Presentation.
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative ITS JPO Lead: Mike Freitas Technical Lead: John Harding, Office of Transportation Management.
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Presentation to Transportation Planning Board October.
Semi-Automated Approach to Develop Focus Area Forecasts from a Statewide Model 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 17-21,
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
2007 Urban Mobility Report Principal Speaking Points.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
2015 Urban Mobility Scorecard Tim Lomax Texas A&M Transportation Institute Austin Chamber of Commerce December 2015.
1 National Governors Association Roundtable Presentation April 2, 2001 Dr. Christine Johnson Director, ITS Joint Program Office Program Manager, FHWA Operations.
Transportation Modeling – Opening the Black Box. Agenda 6:00 - 6:05Welcome by Brant Liebmann 6:05 - 6:10 Introductory Context by Mayor Will Toor and Tracy.
City of New Braunfels Regional Transportation Planning Garry Ford, P.E., PTOE City Engineer June 13, 2017.
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Overview of FHWA CMAQ & System Performance Measures
Network Attributes Calculator
Performance Measure Exploration Preparing for the 2018 RTP
TRB Planning Applications Conference 2017
TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL UPDATE
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Presented to 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference
Category 2 Parameters Transportation Management Areas (TMA) – 200,000+ pop. 8 TMAs in Texas Austin Corpus Christi Dallas-Fort Worth El Paso Hidalgo County.
Development of New Supply Models in Maryland Using Big Data
Application of a Macro Based Capacity Constraint Assignment Technique
Presentation transcript:

TRB Planning Applications Identifying the Long-Range Transportation Improvement and Funding Needs for Urban Areas in Texas By Kevin M. Hall, Texas Transportation Institute Tim Lomax, Ph.D., P.E. Texas Transportation Institute Greg Lancaster, Texas Department of Transportation

TRB Planning Applications Identifying Needs and Solutions Texas Mobility PlansTexas Mobility Plans –Cooperative effort:  25 Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs);  Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT);  Texas Transportation Institute (TTI). –Develop “Needs-Based” Plans

TRB Planning Applications What is a “Needs-Based” Plan? Extension of current financially constrained planning process (i.e. MTP’s);Extension of current financially constrained planning process (i.e. MTP’s); Identifies/addresses unmet needs;Identifies/addresses unmet needs; Return to “Vision” oriented approach:Return to “Vision” oriented approach: –Mobility goals that lead to…  Multimodal corridor solutions, including…  People and Freight. Strategic plan and funding requirements – not a detailed project list.Strategic plan and funding requirements – not a detailed project list.

TRB Planning Applications Mobility Plans and the Texas Congestion Index (TCI) A process and one of several performance measures;A process and one of several performance measures; Estimation techniques to produce the measures developed from:Estimation techniques to produce the measures developed from: –Urban travel demand models; and, based on –Air quality modeling procedures; Statewide consistent model and air quality conformity analysis process (TxDOT-TPP).Statewide consistent model and air quality conformity analysis process (TxDOT-TPP). What is it?

TRB Planning Applications Texas Congestion Index Examines results with freeways, arterials and transit;Examines results with freeways, arterials and transit; Peak period travel (6 AM to 9 AM; 4PM to 7PM);Peak period travel (6 AM to 9 AM; 4PM to 7PM); Used to measure current and future conditions;Used to measure current and future conditions; Can perform “What-If” scenarios;Can perform “What-If” scenarios; Open process for user input.Open process for user input.

TRB Planning Applications Texas Congestion Index Basis of measurement is:Basis of measurement is: Value of Time Required for a Trip During Peak Period (6-9 a.m., 4-7 p.m.) Value of Time Required for the Same Trip at Free-Flow Speeds

TRB Planning Applications Texas Congestion Index TCI Value of 1.3:TCI Value of 1.3: –Indicates that a peak period trip requires 30 percent more travel time than the same trip at free flow speeds – or – –A 20 minute free-flow trip would require 26 minutes in the peak.

TRB Planning Applications “Needs-Based” TDM Process Step 1: MTP assignment;Step 1: MTP assignment; –Capacity restraint assignment; –Identifies links exceeding congestion threshold value. Step 2: All-or-nothing assignmentStep 2: All-or-nothing assignment –Basis for identifying “needs” and adding capacity; Step 3: Edit links on network exceeding threshold congestion level;Step 3: Edit links on network exceeding threshold congestion level; 5 Steps (Primarily Automated)

TRB Planning Applications “Needs-Based” TDM Process

TRB Planning Applications “Needs-Based” TDM Process Step 4: Mobility assignment;Step 4: Mobility assignment; - Second capacity restraint assignment. Step 5: Determine network and assignment result differences between MTP and “Mobility” assignments.Step 5: Determine network and assignment result differences between MTP and “Mobility” assignments. Continued

TRB Planning Applications “Needs-Based” TDM Products FacilityTypeDeltaVMTDeltaVHT Delta Lane Miles Interstate-8, Freeway89,3871, Prin. Art. 112,5802, Minor Art. -272,845-6, Corpus Christi Study Area Example Note: Summed for all area types.

TRB Planning Applications “Needs-Based” TDM Products Corpus Christi Long Range Plan

TRB Planning Applications “Needs-Based” TDM Products Corpus Christi Needs-Based Plan

TRB Planning Applications “Needs-Based” TDM Process Travel model runs to support Mobility Plans:Travel model runs to support Mobility Plans: –Base year; –Forecast (MTP Improvements); –“Needs-Based”/Mobility Plan; –No-build scenario; –Innovative financing option. –Interim years if available…

TRB Planning Applications “Basic” TCI Calculation Steps Obtain planning model volumes with transit trips already removed;Obtain planning model volumes with transit trips already removed; Derive travel speeds on links by hour from volumes and capacities;Derive travel speeds on links by hour from volumes and capacities; –Utilizes air quality process. Use free-flow speeds as “base case”;Use free-flow speeds as “base case”; –Table of equals by urban area.

TRB Planning Applications “Basic” TCI Calculation Steps Calculate recurring and incident delay:Calculate recurring and incident delay: Account for delay reduction “credits” for operational improvements “not in model”;Account for delay reduction “credits” for operational improvements “not in model”; Summarize by geography, system element and time;Summarize by geography, system element and time; Calculate measures (i.e. TCI value).Calculate measures (i.e. TCI value). Continued

TRB Planning Applications Identifying the Funding Gap 1.71 – No Build Scenario * MTP Improvements (Financially-Constrained Plan) (Financially-Constrained Plan) 1.08 – Mobility Plan Eliminating Severe Congestion 1.39 – Innovative Unfunded Gap TCI Values Values 1.00 – No Delay Financing Solutions

TRB Planning Applications Estimating the Cost of Implementing Mobility Plans What is the cost for adding the lanes miles to eliminate V/C ratio > 1.0 in MTP?What is the cost for adding the lanes miles to eliminate V/C ratio > 1.0 in MTP? –5 years of letting history analyzed to develop cost factors Four main project categories:Four main project categories: –New capacity on new right-of-way; –New capacity on existing right-of-way; –New capacity and reconstruction; and, –Reconstruction only.

TRB Planning Applications Lane Mile Costs Categories Area:Area: –DFW-Houston; –Austin-San Antonio-El Paso; –All other urban areas. Four main project categories;Four main project categories; Roadway type: Freeway or arterial, andRoadway type: Freeway or arterial, and Area type (CBD, urban, suburban, rural).Area type (CBD, urban, suburban, rural).

TRB Planning Applications Lane Mile Costs New Construction on New Right-of-Way (million $) Area Type - FacilityType Dallas-Ft. Worth Houston Austin San Antonio El Paso All Other UrbanAreas CBD Freeway CBD Arterial Urban Freeway Urban Arterial Suburban Freeway Suburban Arterial Rural Freeway Rural Arterial

TRB Planning Applications Lane Mile Costs Other Construction: New capacity on existing ROW, new capacity and reconstruction, and reconstruction only (million $) Area Type - Facility Type Dallas-Ft. Worth Houston Austin San Antonio El Paso All Other UrbanAreas CBD Freeway CBD Arterial Urban Freeway Urban Arterial Suburban Freeway Suburban Arterial Rural Freeway Rural Arterial

TRB Planning Applications Lane Mile Costs Other Construction category weightings:Other Construction category weightings: –New capacity on existing right-of-way 40% –New capacity and reconstruction 50% –Reconstruction only 10% Most accurately represent future project mix,Most accurately represent future project mix, Costs for interchanges, ramps, elevated structures also estimated….Costs for interchanges, ramps, elevated structures also estimated….

TRB Planning Applications Significant Mobility Needs in State $188 billion in needed projects to achieve acceptable levels of mobility in Texas;$188 billion in needed projects to achieve acceptable levels of mobility in Texas; $102 billion estimated to meet those needs;$102 billion estimated to meet those needs; Therefore; there is a total funding gap of $86 billion…Therefore; there is a total funding gap of $86 billion…

TRB Planning Applications Significant Mobility Needs Locally Dallas-Fort Worth: $19.5 billionDallas-Fort Worth: $19.5 billion Austin: $18.3 billionAustin: $18.3 billion Houston: $16 billionHouston: $16 billion El Paso: $10.5 billionEl Paso: $10.5 billion Tyler: $349 millionTyler: $349 million Harlingen-San Benito: $139 millionHarlingen-San Benito: $139 million Brownsville: $97 millionBrownsville: $97 million

TRB Planning Applications Significant Mobility Needs Locally Total additional lane miles needed for the eight TMAs in Texas:Total additional lane miles needed for the eight TMAs in Texas: –11,346 lane miles (2025 value) Lanes miles used as a surrogate for all types of congestion relieving projectsLanes miles used as a surrogate for all types of congestion relieving projects

TRB Planning Applications Conclusions Mobility plans:Mobility plans: –Identify needs beyond MTP; –Identify benefits of addressing needs; –Examine innovative solutions to address unmet needs;

TRB Planning Applications Questions???