Objective of numerical relativity is to develop simulation code and relating computing tools to solve problems of general relativity and relativistic astrophysics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
by Robert Nemiroff Michigan Technological University
Advertisements

Stellar Structure Section 6: Introduction to Stellar Evolution Lecture 18 – Mass-radius relation for black dwarfs Chandrasekhar limiting mass Comparison.
White Dwarf Stars Low mass stars are unable to reach high enough temperatures to ignite elements heavier than carbon in their core become white dwarfs.
Numerical Relativity & Gravitational waves I.Introduction II.Status III.Latest results IV.Summary M. Shibata (U. Tokyo)
Accretion Processes in GRBs Andrew King Theoretical Astrophysics Group, University of Leicester, UK Venice 2006.
Gamma-Ray bursts from binary neutron star mergers Roland Oechslin MPA Garching, SFB/TR 7 SFB/TR7 Albert Einstein‘s Century, Paris,
Binary Stellar Evolution How Stars are Arranged When stars form, common for two or more to end up in orbit Multiples more common than singles Binaries.
General Relativistic Hydrodynamics with Viscosity Collaborators: Matthew D. Duez Stuart L. Shapiro Branson C. Stephens Phys. Rev. D 69, (2004) Presented.
07 Nov 2003Gravitational Wave Phenomenology Workshop1 Numerical Relativity Deirdre ShoemakerCornell University  The role of numerical relativity in gravitational-wave.
Current status of numerical relativity Gravitational waves from coalescing compact binaries Masaru Shibata (Yukawa Institute, Kyoto University)
LECTURE 20, NOVEMBER 9, 2010 ASTR 101, SECTION 3 INSTRUCTOR, JACK BRANDT 1ASTR 101-3, FALL 2010.
ASYMPTOTIC STRUCTURE IN HIGHER DIMENSIONS AND ITS CLASSIFICATION KENTARO TANABE (UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA) based on KT, Kinoshita and Shiromizu PRD
Life and Evolution of a Massive Star M ~ 25 M Sun.
Non-axisymmetric modes of differentially rotating neutron stars Andrea Passamonti Southampton, 13 December 2007 University of Southampton In collaboration.
The Science of JWST Caleb Wheeler. Table of Contents First Paper Second Paper Nervous standing after I finish early and everyone is too bored to formulate.
GRMHD Simulations of Jet Formation with Newly-Developed GRMHD Code K.-I. Nishikawa (NSSTC/UAH), Y. Mizuno (NSSTC/MSFC/NPP), P. Hardee (UA), S. Koide (Kumamoto.
ECIV 301 Programming & Graphics Numerical Methods for Engineers.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2005 Dr Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29
Black Holes Written for Summer Honors Black Holes Massive stars greater than 10 M  upon collapse compress their cores so much that no pressure.
Gravitational Physics Personnel:C. R. Evans B. Brill T. Garrett M. Peppers ResearchSources of Gravitational Radiation Interests:Numerical Relativity &
Compact Objects Astronomy 315 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 15 “How will we see when the sun goes dark?” “We will be forced to grope and feel our way.”
The Astrophysics of Gravitational Wave Sources Conference Summary: Ground-Based Detectors ( Hz) Kimberly New, LANL.
Construction of gauge-invariant variables for linear-order metric perturbations on general background spacetime Kouji Nakamura (NAOJ) References : K.N.
2次ゲージ不変摂動論定式化の進行状況 Kouji Nakamura (Grad. Univ. Adv. Stud. (NAOJ)) References : K.N. Prog. Theor. Phys., vol.110 (2003), 723. (gr-qc/ ). K.N. Prog.
1 Yasushi Mino Theoretical AstroPhysics Including Relativity (TAPIR), CalTech Index 1: Introduction: LISA project 2: MiSaTaQuWa.
Key Open Problems in Black Hole Physics and Gravitation Theory Today (A personal perspective!) Pankaj S. Joshi.
Black hole production in preheating Teruaki Suyama (Kyoto University) Takahiro Tanaka (Kyoto University) Bruce Bassett (ICG, University of Portsmouth)
Einstein’s elusive waves
Gravitational waves and neutrino emission from the merger of binary neutron stars Kenta Kiuchi Collaboration with Y. Sekiguchi, K. Kyutoku, M. Shibata.
Matlab for Engineers About Matlab Chapter 1. Matlab for Engineers What’s in this Chapter? What is Matlab? Student Edition of Matlab How is Matlab used.
Gravitational waves from neutron star instabilities: What do we actually know? Nils Andersson Department of Mathematics University of Southampton IAP Paris.
Lecture 18 : Weighing the Universe, and the need for dark matter Recap – Constraints on the baryon density parameter  B The importance of measuring the.
Merger of binary neutron stars in general relativity M. Shibata (U. Tokyo) Jan 19, 2007 at U. Tokyo.
THERMAL EVOLUION OF NEUTRON STARS: Theory and observations D.G. Yakovlev Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, St.-Petersburg, Russia Catania, October 2012,
Collapsar Accretion and the Gamma-Ray Burst X-Ray Light Curve Chris Lindner Milos Milosavljevic, Sean M. Couch, Pawan Kumar.
Y.K.Lau Institute of Appl. Maths, CAS. Bondi Sachs Formulation of the Kerr Metric Gravitational Wave Physics of a Kerr Black Hole.
Probing Neutron Star EOS in Gravitational Waves & Gamma-ray Bursts Kim Young-Min, Cho Hee-Suk Lee Chang.-Hwan, Park Hong-Jo (Pusan National University)
Dynamical Instability of Differentially Rotating Polytropes Dept. of Earth Science & Astron., Grad. School of Arts & Sciences, Univ. of Tokyo S. Karino.
THEORETICAL ASTROPHYSICS AND THE US-NVO INITIATIVE D. S. De Young National Optical Astronomy Observatory.
General Relativistic MHD Simulations with Finite Conductivity Shinji Koide (Kumamoto University) Kazunari Shibata (Kyoto University) Takahiro Kudoh (NAOJ)
Evan Knight and Adam Mali UCORE, Summer ‘07 Under Prof. James Imamura and Kathy Hadley.
1 Building Bridges: CGWA Inauguration 15 December 2003 Lazarus Approach to Binary Black Hole Modeling John Baker Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics.
Initial Data for Magnetized Stars in General Relativity Eric Hirschmann, BYU MG12, Paris, July 2009.
Cactus Workshop - NCSA Sep 27 - Oct Cactus For Relativistic Collaborations Ed Seidel Albert Einstein Institute
Numerical relativity simulation with Microphysics National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Yuichiro Sekiguchi Masaru Shibata (YITP) Kenta Kiuchi (YITP)
Phase transition induced collapse of Neutron stars Kim, Hee Il Astronomy Program, SNU 13th Haengdang Symposium, 11/30/2007.
Black Holes in General Relativity and Astrophysics Theoretical Physics Colloquium on Cosmology 2008/2009 Michiel Bouwhuis.
Black Hole Universe -BH in an expanding box- Yoo, Chulmoon ( YITP) Hiroyuki Abe (Osaka City Univ.) Ken-ichi Nakao (Osaka City Univ.) Yohsuke Takamori (Osaka.
Stellar Corpses and Other Space Oddities
PTA and GW detection --- Lecture K. J. Lee ( 李柯伽 ) Max-Planck Institute for Radio astronomy Aug
Magneto-hydrodynamic Simulations of Collapsars Shin-ichiro Fujimoto (Kumamoto National College of Technology), Collaborators: Kei Kotake(NAOJ), Sho-ichi.
LIGO-G Z LSFinn/Penn State1 Detection as a statistical process The goal of data analysis is to distinguish between “signals” and “noise” »One.
Isola d’Elba 28/05/2006 Non linear effects in pulsations of compact stars Andrea Passamonti Andrea Passamonti Aristotle University of Thessaloniki VESF.
Einstein 2005 July 21, 2005 Relativistic Dynamical Calculations of Merging Black Hole-Neutron Star Binaries Joshua Faber (NSF AAPF Fellow, UIUC) Stu Shapiro.
Numerical Relativity in Cosmology - my personal perspective - Yoo, Chulmoon ( Nagoya U. ) with Hirotada Okawa ( Lisbon, IST ) New Perspectives on Cosmology.
Soichiro Isoyama Collaborators : Norichika Sago, Ryuichi Fujita, and Takahiro Tanaka The gravitational wave from an EMRI binary Influence of the beyond.
APS Meeting April 2003 LIGO-G Z 1 Sources and Science with LIGO Data Jolien Creighton University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee On Behalf of the LIGO.
S5.40. Module Structure 30% practical tests / 70% written exam 3h lectures / week (except reading week) 3 x 2h of computer labs (solving problems practicing.
Gravitational wave sources
BLACK HOLES SIMULATION and visualization
The Quest for Gravitational Waves: a global strategy
Outline Part II. Structure Formation: Dark Matter
Detection of gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers
Stellar core collapse with QCD phase transition
P4 : Stellar system formation and life appearance conditions
ACRES Final Presentation July 25, 2018
Neutron stars and beyond
PRE(Photospheric Radius Expansion) X-ray burst simulation with MESA(Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics) rd CHEA Workshop Gwangeon.
Fred Rasio Northwestern University
Note topic for chapter 17 what is the source of the sun’s energy
Presentation transcript:

Objective of numerical relativity is to develop simulation code and relating computing tools to solve problems of general relativity and relativistic astrophysics. Numerical relativity lab. course – welcome. The word “numerical relativity” is used for the simulations which involve dynamical spacetime evolution, and in which one can not simplify the Einstein equation using symmetry to avoid solving constrained dynamics. Numerical relativity is used in highly non-linear regime, and generic spacetime for which analytic method (or approximations) can not be used.

Numerical relativity lab. course – welcome. Problems motivated from the importance in relativistic astrophysics: 1. Binary neutron star merger and subsequnet formation of a hypermassive neutron star or a black hole. 2. Binary black hole merger. 3. Black hole –neutron star binary merger, and a massive disk formation. 4. Heavy stellar core collapse to a proto-neutron or a black hole formation. (relating to the supernova, or hypernova.) 5. Dynamical or secular instability of a rapidly rotating neutron star. These phenomena are considered as the sources of Short  -ray burst (1, 3) Long  -ray burst (4) Gravitational waves (all of the above). Problems motivated from classical or mathematical general relativity: Critical phenomena. Existence of the solution of Einstein equation.

Initial data preparation (Elliptic eq.) Time evolution: Einstein-Euler system, or GRMHD (Hyperbolic eq., also solve Gauge eq.) Micro physics, (neutrino, radiation, magnetic field, Realistic EOS) GW extraction, BH horizon finder Computing elements in numerical relativity. Analysis of the simulated data (GW spectrum, merger remnant) Visualization

° Plan for the numerical relativity course – Practical aspects. However, the instructor may not have know ledges about many of the above. Exploit web resources for an easy solution. Self-teaching and sharing of knowledge of each other are requested. Practically learn skills of the scientific computing (and skills of the scientific research) from a collaboration for developing numerical codes in numerical relativity. Those skills may include basic know ledges of : Operating systems, mainly Unix, and associated tools. Computing language, FORTRAN90/95, Mathematica, (debugger, MPI…) Graphics and visualization. Documentation for the code collaboration. Writing a paper (if we could produce a substantial results). Instructor's role for these aspects is more for tutoring and coordination. Always think about what kind of contributions that you could make.

° Plan for the numerical relativity course – class organizaton. Roughly 1/2 of the class would be used for actual coding – practical learning for the computing. 1 st stage– making the initial data code for a rapidly rotating compact star. In practice, refer to some FORTRAN 77 codes (written by me), develop a code in FORTRAN90/95. (Learning numerical methods as well as FORTRAN90/95.) 2 nd stage – Develop a simulation code following standard formulations, and/or try more difficult initial data code. Roughly 1/4 of the class would be used for status report of each of you, discussion and coordination to proceed the code collaboration. Roughly 1/4 of the class would be used for lecturing theory, physics, math and numerical methods necessary for the numerical relativity. For those who wish to have deep understand of the numerical relativity would have to go through (many) original papers. (A list of references should be made. )

° Planning of computer simulations. First of all, one should check that the problem you are going to solve is (astro)physically (or scientifically) well motivated or not Grasp what kind of physics is involved in the problem. ex) What kind of physics should be used in the problem (GR necessary)? What kind of time/length scales are involved? Is any simplification/analytic method for the problem available? 1. Evaluate if the simulation is the most effective solution for the problem. ex) usually, it is difficult to go beyond the dynamical time scale for the simulations check if the current computing resources is enough for our purpose. Software: Hardware: Memory, CPU.