A Logic Based Foundation and Analysis of Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August 6 2009Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Faster-Than-Light Paradoxes in Special Relativity
Advertisements

Special Relativistic Paradoxes PHYS 206 – Spring 2014.
Building Spacetime Diagrams PHYS 206 – Spring 2014.
A Logic Based Foundation and Analysis of Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 1.
A Logic Based Foundation and Analysis of Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 1.
Amsterdam, September 27, 2014.The end of timePage: 1 Hajnal Andréka and István Németi Defining time and space experimentally.
Lecture 13 Space Time Diagrams ASTR 340 Fall 2006 Dennis Papadopoulos.
Wednesday, October 24: Midterm #1 Material covered: Events, reference frames, spacetime The interval Simultaneity (and relativity thereof) Lorentz transformations.
Theory of Special Relativity
Phy107 Fall 2006 From last time… Einstein’s Relativity ◦ All laws of physics identical in inertial ref. frames ◦ Speed of light=c in all inertial ref.
Mike Stannett, University of Sheffield New Worlds of Computation, LIFO, Orléans, 23 May 2011.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2008 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29 Lecture Notes 2.
P460 - Relativity1 Special Theory of Relativity In ~1895, used simple Galilean Transformations x’ = x - vt t’ = t But observed that the speed of light,
PHY 1371Dr. Jie Zou1 Chapter 39 Relativity. PHY 1371Dr. Jie Zou2 Outline The principle of Galilean relativity Galilean space-time transformation equations.
Principle of special relativity Their is inconsistency between EM and Newtonian mechanics, as discussed earlier Einstein proposed SR to restore the inconsistency.
EPPT M2 INTRODUCTION TO RELATIVITY K Young, Physics Department, CUHK  The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Special Relativity & General Relativity
Chapter 37 Special Relativity. 37.2: The postulates: The Michelson-Morley experiment Validity of Maxwell’s equations.
Time Dilation, Length Contraction and Doppler
General Relativity Physics Honours 2005 Dr Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29
1 PH300 Modern Physics SP11 1/27 Day 5: Questions? Time Dilation Length Contraction Next Week: Spacetime Relativistic Momentum & Energy “I sometimes ask.
A Logic Based Foundation and Analysis of Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 1.
Amanda Dorsey Faranak Islam Jose Guevara Patrick Conlin
The Theory of Relativity. What is it? Why do we need it? In science, when a good theory becomes inadequate to describe certain situations, it is replaced.
Physics Montwood High School R. Casao. The special theory of relativity deals with uniformly moving reference frames; the frames of reference are not.
What Do We See in a TE? James Robert Brown Understanding and the Aims of Science Leiden, June 2010.
Page 1 Phys Baski Relativity I Topic #9: Special Relativity I Transformation of Variables between Reference Frames –Non-relativistic Galilean Transformation.
Phy107 Fall From last time… Galilean Relativity –Laws of mechanics identical in all inertial ref. frames Einstein’s Relativity –All laws of physics.
1 1.Einstein’s special relativity 2.Events and space-time in Relativity 3. Proper time and the invariant interval 4. Lorentz transformation 5. Consequences.
Edmund Bertschinger MIT Department of Physics and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research web.mit.edu/edbert/Alexandria General Relativity.
 Newtonian relativity  Michelson-Morley Experiment  Einstein ’ s principle of relativity  Special relativity  Lorentz transformation  Relativistic.
Announcements Exam 3 is Monday April 13. Will cover the rest of Chapter 4, all of Chapters 5, 6, 7 & 8. New Sample Questions that include Chapter 8 are.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2005 Dr Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29
Relatively Einstein 2005 has been chosen as the World Year of Physics to celebrate the 100th anniversary of Einstein’s Miraculous Year. In this presentation,
The Theory of Special Relativity Ch 26. Two Theories of Relativity Special Relativity (1905) –Inertial Reference frames only –Time dilation –Length Contraction.
1 1.Einstein’s special relativity 2.Events and space-time in Relativity 3. Proper time and the invariant interval 4.Lorentz transformation Einstein’s special.
Time Dilation We can illustrate the fact that observers in different inertial frames may measure different time intervals between a pair of events by considering.
Education Physics Deparment UNS
September 27, 2013.The End of TimePage: 1. The end of Time (defining time and space) Hajnal Andréka and István Németi.
Astronomy 1143 – Spring 2014 Lecture 18: Special Relativity.
The Theory of Special Relativity. Learning Objectives  Einstein’s two postulates in his theory of special relativity: The principle of relativity. (Same.
Wed., Sept. 12, 2012PHYS , Fall 2012 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5 Wednesday, Sept. 12, 2012 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Spacetime Diagram&
Monday, Feb. 9, 2015PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #6 Monday, Feb. 9, 2015 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Relativistic Velocity.
My Chapter 26 Lecture.
Unit 13 Relativity.
Consequences of Special Relativity Simultaneity: Newton’s mechanics ”a universal time scale exists that is the same for all observers” Einstein: “No universal.
11.1 – Frames of Reference and Relativity
1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5 Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2013 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Time Dilation & Length Contraction Relativistic Velocity Addition Twin Paradox.
Chapter 1 Relativity 1.
SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY. Inertial frame Fig1. Frame S’ moves in the +x direction with the speed v relative to frame S.
A recap of the main points so far… Observers moving uniformly with respect to each other do not agree on time intervals or distance intervals do not agree.
1 1.Time Dilation 2.Length Contraction 3. Velocity transformation Einstein’s special relativity: consequences.
Special Relativity /- 5 The End of physics: Black Body Radiation -> Quantum mechanics Velocity of light With Respect to ether Maxwell’s Equations…
The force law in relativity Consider an object that is accelerated by a constant force F, for example a space traveler in a rocket ship. Newton’s force.
Principii di Teoria Generale della Relatività F. Garufi Complementi di Fisica – LM in Matematica.
By: Jennifer Doran. What was Known in 1900 Newton’s laws of motion Maxwell’s laws of electromagnetism.
11.1 – Frames of Reference and Relativity. Inertial Frame of Reference (IFOR) a frame of reference in which the law of inertia holds The FOR must be at.
PHYS 342: More info The TA is Meng-Lin Wu: His is His office hour is 10:30am to 12pm on Mondays His office is Physics.
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #8
STAV Supporting Slides
Administrative Details: PHYS 344
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #6
Special Relativity Contents: The End of Physics Michelson Morley
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #6
Lecture 4: PHYS 344 Homework #1 Due in class Wednesday, Sept 9th Read Chapters 1 and 2 of Krane, Modern Physics Problems: Chapter 2: 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14,
An Introduction To ‘High Speed’ Physics
RELATIVITY III SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY
PHYS 3700 Modern Physics Prerequisites: PHYS 1212, MATH Useful to have PHYS 3900 or MATH 2700 (ordinary differential equations) as co-requisite,
Spacetime Structure.
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #8
Presentation transcript:

A Logic Based Foundation and Analysis of Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 1

 Our Research Group: H. Andréka, J. X. Madarász, I. & P. Németi, G. Székely, R. Tordai. Cooperation with: L. E. Szabó, M. Rédei. Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 2

 Analysis of the logical structure of R. Theory  Base the theory on simple, unambiguous axioms with clear meanings  Make Relativity Theory:  More transparent logically  Easier to understand and teach  Easier to change  Modular  Demystify Relativity Theory Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 3

Logical analysis of:  Special relativity theory Transition to:  Accelerated observers and Einstein's EP Transition to:  General relativity  Exotic space-times, black holes, wormholes  Application of general relativity to logic  Visualizations of Relativistic Effects  Relativistic dynamics, Einstein’s E=mc 2 Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 4 SpecRel AccRel GenRel

 R.T.’s as theories of First Order Logic Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 5

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 6 Streamlined Economical Transparent Small Rich Theorems Axioms Proofs …

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 7 Bodies (test particles), Inertial Observers, Photons, Quantities, usual operations on it, Worldview B IOb Ph 0 Q = number-line W Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 8 W(m, t x y z, b)  body “b” is present at coordinates “t x y z” for observer “m” t x y b (worldline) m Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

1. ( Q, +, ∙ ) is a field in the sense of abstract algebra (with 0, +, 1, / as derived operations) Ordering derived: Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 9  AxField Usual properties of addition and multiplication on Q : Q is an ordered Euclidean field. Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 10  AxPh For all inertial observers the speed of light is the same in all directions and is finite. In any direction it is possible to send out a photon. t x y ph 1 ph 2 ph 3 Formalization:

v m (b) Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 11 What is speed? m b p ptpt psps qsqs qtqt q 1 Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 12  AxEv All inertial observers coordinatize the same events. Formalization: t x y WmWm b1b1 b2b2 m Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 13 Formalization:  AxSelf An inertial observer sees himself as standing still at the origin. t x y t = worldline of the observer m WmWm Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 14  AxSymd Any two observers agree on the spatial distance between two events, if these two events are simultaneous for both of them, and |v m (ph)|=1. Formalization: k t x y m x y t e1 e2 ph is the event occurring at p in m’s worldview Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 15 SpecRel = {AxField, AxPh, AxEv, AxSelf, AxSymd} SpecRel Theorems Proofs … Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 16  Thm2  Thm1 Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

t x y m Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 17  Proof of Thm2 (NoFTL): e1 k ph - AxSelf - AxPh e2 ph1 e3 e2 ph1 - AxEv t x y k e1 - AxField ph p q Tangent plane k asks m : where did ph and ph1 meet?

 Thm3  SpecRel is consistent Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 18  Thm4  No axioms of SpecRel is provable from the rest  Thm5  SpecRel is complete with respect to Minkowski geometries (e.g. implies all the basic paradigmatic effects of Special Relativity - even quantitatively!) Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 19  Thm6  SpecRel generates an undecidable theory. Moreover, it enjoys both of Gödel’s incompleteness properties  Thm7  SpecRel has a decidable extension, and it also has a hereditarily undecidable extension. Both extensions are physically natural.

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 20  Moving clocks get out of synchronism. Thm8 v k (m) Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 21  Thm8 (formalization of clock asynchronism) (1) Assume e, e’ are separated in the direction of motion of m in k’s worldview, m ykyk k xkxk 1t1t v 1x1x xmxm e e’ |v| Assume SpecRel. Assume m,k IOb and events e, e’ are simultaneous for m, m xmxm e’ e Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 22 (2) e, e’ are simultaneous for k, too e, e’ are separated orthogonally to v k (m) in k’s worldview m xmxm ykyk k xkxk ymym e e’ Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 23 Thought-experiment for proving relativity of simultaneity. Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 24 Thought-experiment for proving relativity of simultaneity. Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 25 Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 26  Moving clocks slow down  Moving spaceships shrink Thm9 Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 27  Thm9 (formalization of time-dilation) Assume SpecRel. Let m,k IOb and events e, e’ are on k’s lifeline. m xmxm e e’ k 1 v k xkxk e Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 28Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 29  Thm10 (formalization of spaceship shrinking) Assume SpecRel. Let m,k,k’ IOb and assume m xmxm k k’ e’ e k x k’ Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 30Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 31 v = speed of spaceship Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 32 t x y WmWm b1b1 b2b2 m w mk ev m ev k p q Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 33  Thm11 The worldview transformations w mk are Lorentz transformations (composed perhaps with a translation). Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 34 Minkowskian Geometry: Hierarchy of theories. Interpretations between them. Definitional equivalence. Contribution of relativity to logic: definability theory with new objects definable (and not only with new relations definable). J. Madarasz’s dissertation. Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Conceptual analysis of SR goes on … on our homepage Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 35  New theory is coming: Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 36 AccRel = SpecRel + AccObs. AccRel is stepping stone to GenRel via Einstein’s EP AccRel Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 37 The same as for SpecRel. Recall that Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

 Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 38 World-view transformation t x y WmWm b1b1 b2b2 m w mk Cd(k) ev m ev k Cd(m) Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

 AxCmv At each moment p of his worldline, the accelerated observer k “sees” (=coordinatizes) the nearby world for a short while as an inertial observer m does, i.e. “the linear approximation of w mk at p is the identity”. Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 39 kOb mIOb p Formalization: Let F be an affine mapping (definable). Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 40 The Vienna Circle and Hungary, Vienna, May 19-20, 2008 Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 41Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

AxEv - If m “sees” k participate in an event, then k cannot deny it. Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 42 t x y WmWm k b2b2 m t x y WkWk b2b2 k Formalization: Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

 AxSelf -  The world-line of any observer is an open interval of the time-axis, in his own world-view  AxDif  The worldview transformations have linear approximations at each point of their domain (i.e. they are differentiable).  AxCont  Bounded definable nonempty subsets of Q have suprema. Here “definable” means “definable in the language of AccRel, parametrically”. Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 43Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 44 AccRel = SpecRel + AxCmv + AxEv - + AxSelf - + AxDif + AxCont AccRel Theorems Proofs …

 Thm101 Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 45 Appeared: Found. Phys. 2006, Madarász, J. X., Németi, I., Székely, G. IOb Ob t1t1 t1’t1’ t t’ Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 46  Acceleration causes slow time. Thm102 a k (m) Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 47  Thm102  I.e., clocks at the bottom of spaceship run slower than the ones at the nose of the spaceship, both according to nose and bottom (watching each other by radar). Appeared: Logic for XXIth Century. 2007, Madarász, J. X., Németi, I., Székely, G. Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

ACCELERATING SPACEFLEET Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 48Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

ACCELERATING SPACEFLEET Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 49Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

ACCELERATING SPACEFLEET Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 50Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

h 0 Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 52  Thm103 Proof: We will present a recipe for constructing a world-view for any accelerated observer living on a differentiable “time-like” curve (in a vertical plane): r 0 m wline m h q d Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

UNIFORMLY ACCELERATED OBSERVERS Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 53 World-lines are Minkowski-circles (hyperbolas) Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

UNIFORMLY ACCELERATED OBSERVERS Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 54 Result of the general recipe Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

UNIFORMLY ACCELERATED OBSERVERS Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 55Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

UNIFORMLY ACCELERATING SPACESHIP Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 56 outside viewinside view Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

UNIFORMLY ACCELERATING SPACESHIP Relativity Theory and LogicPage: Length of the ship does not change seen from inside. Captain measures length of his ship by radar: Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

UNIFORMLY ACCELERATING SPACESHIP Relativity Theory and LogicPage: Time runs slower at the rear of the ship, and faster at the nose of ship. Measured by radar: Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 59 via Einstein’s Equivalence Principle Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: μs/day because of the speed of sat. approx. 4 km/s (14400 km/h) +45 μs/day because of gravity Relativistic Correction: 38 μs/day approx. 10 km/day Global Positioning System Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 61 via Einstein’s Equivalence Principle Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 62 via Einstein’s Equivalence Principle Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 63 via Einstein’s Equivalence Principle Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 64 Breaking the Turing-barrier via GR Relativistic Hyper Computing Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Conceptual analysis of AccRel goes on … on our homepage Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 65  New theory is coming: Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 66 Einstein’s strong Principle of Relativity: “All observers are equivalent” (same laws of nature) Abolish different treatment of inertial and accelerated observers in the axioms Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Language of GenRel: the same as that of SpecRel. Recipe to obtain GenRel from AccRel: delete all axioms from AccRel mentioning IOb. But retain their IOb-free logical consequences. Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 67 AxSelf AxPh AxSymt AxEv AxSelf- AxPh- AxSymt- AxEv- AxCmv AxDif Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

 AxPh- The velocity of photons an observer “meets” is 1 when they meet, and it is possible to send out a photon in each direction where the observer stands  AxSym- Meeting observers see each other’s clocks slow down with the same rate Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 68 mOb 1t1t 1 t’ Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

The Vienna Circle and Hungary, Vienna, May 19-20, 2008Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 69 GenRel = AxField +AxPh - +AxEv - + AxSelf - +AxSymt - +AxDif+AxCont GenRel Theorems Proofs …

Manifold  Thm1002  GenRel is complete wrt Lorentz manifolds. The Vienna Circle and Hungary, Vienna, May 19-20, 2008Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 70 k’ p k LpLp M=Events ev m ev k w km wkwk wmwm Metric:

UNIFORMLY ACCELERATED OBSERVERS Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 71Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

 How to use GenRel? Recover IOb’s by their properties In AccRel by the “twin paradox theorem” IOb’s are those observers who maximize wristwatch-time locally Recover LIFs Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 72 Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 73 Timelike means: exist comoving observer Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 74Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 75

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 76Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 77Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 78Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 79 More in our papers in General Relativity and Gravitation 2008 & in arXiv.org 2008 Lightcones open up. Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August

Relativity Theory and LogicPage: 80 More concrete material available from our group: (1) Logic of Spacetime (2) in Foundation of Physics (3) First-order logic foundation of relativity theories (4) FOL 75 papers (5) our e-book on conceptual analysis of SpecRel (6) More on István Németi's homepage (Some papers available, and some recent work) Thank you! Logic Colloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August