A Preliminary Investigation of Student Perceptions of Online Education Angela M. Clark University of South Alabama Presented at ISECON 2003 San Diego,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
On-line Learning Focus Groups  497 currently enrolled Hope students have taken on-line courses at Hope  Focus groups included 16 students: distribution.
Advertisements

E-Learning Can it replace the traditional classroom? A Case Study at A Private High School Jennelle Irene Spurlock-Johnson Wendy Zhang Leeta Allen-Haynes.
NASULGC-Sloan National Commission on Online Learning.
Attitudes toward Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants for Older Adults among Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) Physicians Patthida Maroongroge, D.D.S.*, Rose L.
Characteristics of on-line formation courses. Criteria for their pedagogical evaluation Catalina Martínez Mediano, Department of Research Methods and Diagnosis.
Terry Eddy Cody Havard Lori L. Braa Session # - 10:25–10:55am.
1 A Course on Multimedia QoS Networking: Transition to Hybrid Offering and Comparative Evaluation Martin Reisslein, Jana Reisslein, and Patrick Seeling.
Amirkabir University of Technology, Computer Engineering Faculty, Intelligent Systems Laboratory,Requirements Engineering Course, Dr. Abdollahzadeh 1 Effectiveness.
1 Becoming a Virtual Professor Preliminary Results of Semi- Structured Interviews Nancy Coppola, Starr Roxanne Hiltz, and Naomi Rotter Presentation at.
1 A Comparison of Traditional, Videoconference-based, and Web-based Learning Environments A Dissertation Proposal by Ming Mu Kuo.
1 A Comparison of Traditional, Videoconference-based, and Web-based Learning Environments A Dissertation Defense by Ming Mu Kuo.
IMPLEMENTATION OF AN E-LEARNING PLATFORM USING CMS
Introduction to Web-Based Learning. Defining Web-Based Instruction Instruction via Internet and Intranet only. Synonymous with online learning.
Introducing the Computer Self-Efficacy to the Expectation-Confirmation Model: In Virtual Learning Environments 授課老師:游佳萍 老師 學 生:吳雅真 學 號:
Summer Online Courses A Distance Learning Alternative for Traditional Campuses North East Regional Computing Program Annual Conference (NERCOMP) Boston.
Life-Long Learning at the Technion: Students' Perceptions about Distance Education and their Learning Experiences Rania Hussein-Farraj, Miri Barak and.
Factors Affecting the Innovation- Decision Process to Adopt Online Graduate Degree Program in Thailand (IEC2014) Siripen Pumahapinyo (1) Praweenya Suwannatthachote.
Effects of video conferencing on teachers’ motivation and participation in professional development: An action research project By Nazima Ally.
Understanding the context of distance students: Differences in on- and off- campus engagement with an online learning environment Associate Professor Stuart.
METHODS Study Population Study Population: 224 students enrolled in a 3-credit hour, undergraduate, clinical pharmacology course in Fall 2005 and Spring.
Digital Texts and the Future of Education: Why Books? A Critique of Mayrath, M., Priya, N., & Perkins, C. (2011). Digital Texts and the Future of Education:
Introduction to Survey Research. What kind of data can I collect? Factual Knowledge Factual Knowledge Cognitive Beliefs or Perceptions Cognitive Beliefs.
Evaluation and analysis of the application of interactive digital resources in a blended-learning methodology for a computer networks subject F.A. Candelas,
ICEE 2005 July 25-29, Gliwice, Poland Implementation of E-Learning in Engineering Education: Evaluation of Students Skills and Learning Approaches James.
Course Delivery Options. Course Delivery Comparison Traditional Meets two days a week for full semester Course material delivered mainly in classroom.
Case Study: A Comparison of Online and Face- to-Face Learning in High Schools in the United States By Lori Cummings and Kelly Granfield EDTEC 690, Professor.
Stuart Hollis Where are we now? An exploration of the provision of teacher training programmes for the Learning and Skills Sector following the 2007 Workforce.
Exploring College Students’ Perceptions of Their Peers With Disabilities Katie Beck a and Kellie Risberg a, Faculty Mentor: Mary Beth Leibham b, Ph.D.
FAEIS Project User Opinion Survey 2005 Thursday, June 23, 2005 Washington, D.C. H. Dean SutphinYasamin Miller ProfessorDirector, SRI Agriculture & Extension.
An Evaluation of SLIS Student Satisfaction and its Global Impacts Christina Hoffman, MLS Dr. Samantha Hastings, Interim Dean The University of North Texas.
ONLINE VS. FACE-TO-FACE: EDUCATOR OPINIONS ON PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DELIVERY METHODS BY TERESA SCRUGGS THOMAS Tamar AvineriEMS 792x.
Maximizing Learning Using Online Assessment 2011 SLATE Conference October 14, /12/ P. Boyles, Assistant Professor, Chicago State University,
Experiences and Opinions of E- learners: What Works, What Doesn't, and What Competencies Ensure Successful Learning Michael F. Beaudoin (University of.
© All rights reserved 2014 Great Colleges Survey All Campus Update January 21, 2015.
Presenter : Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Developing a Usability Evaluation Method for E-learning Application: From Functional Usability to.
Eric DaubertDr. Anne Cummings Hlas Department of Foreign Languages University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE EFFECTS OF BLENDED LEARNING.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
Teaching Thermodynamics with Collaborative Learning Larry Caretto Mechanical Engineering Department June 9, 2006.
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results Dr Pam Wells Adviser, Evidence-Informed Practice.
Jay Summet CS 1 with Robots IPRE Evaluation – Data Collection Overview.
Using a cognition-motivation-control view to assess the adoption intention for Web-based learning Presenter: Che-Yu Lin Advisor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: 09/30/2009.
Predictors for Student Success in an Online Course Presenter: Jenny Tseng Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: June 21, 2008 Yukselturk, E. & Bulut, S. (2007).
Perceptions of Distance Learning: A Comparison of On-line and Traditional Learning Maureen Hannay Troy University Tracy Newvine Troy University.
Increasing Success Rates in Online Learning Kathy Coleman, Chattahoochee Technical College.
Objectives Describe the online learner Identify methods to determine learner demographics List characteristics of successful online learners List characteristics.
Student-Rated Effectiveness of Virtual Learning as a Replacement Pedagogical Tool Is virtual learning less effective in higher education? Sufficient literature.
Assessing Peer Support and Usability of Blogging Technology Yao Jen Chang Department of Electronic Engineering Chung-Yuan Christian University, Taiwan.
Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning Presenter: Jenny Tseng Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: April 12, 2008 Liaw, S., Huang, H.,
Copyright©2000 G.L. Boerner All Rights Reserved Varieties of Online Classrooms Gerald L. Boerner Dept of Computer Science Azusa Pacific University.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No and Any opinions, findings, and conclusions.
Online students’ perceived self-efficacy: Does it change? Presenter: Jenny Tseng Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: July 11, 2007 C. Y. Lee & E. L. Witta (2001).
ABSTRACT In this study, structural equation modeling is applied to examine the determinants of students’ satisfaction and their perceived learning outcomes.
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
E-learning readiness among young students in Malaysia.
Neag School of Education -- Learning Online -- Understanding the KABs of Successful Online Learners Anthony R. Artino, Jr. Cognition & Instruction Program.
ISECON (San Antonio, TX) November 1, Student Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparison of Two Different Populations Kitty Daniels and Susan Feather.
Student perception and satisfaction in Online Certificate Courses Erman Yukselturk Middle East Technical University Fethi A. Inan The University of Memphis.
Measuring Mathematics Self Efficacy of students at the beginning of their Higher Education Studies With the TransMaths group BCME Manchester Maria.
The relationship between student characteristics, including learning styles, and their perceptions and satisfaction in web-based courses in higher education.
AUTHOR: NADIRAN TANYELI PRESENTER: SAMANTHA INSTRUCTOR: KATE CHEN DATE: MARCH 10, 2010 The Efficiency of Online English Language Instruction on Students’
Continuing Education Provincial Survey Winter 2012 Connie Phelps Manager, Institutional Research & Planning.
The Assessment of Blended Courses: Gathering and Using Faculty and Student Feedback to Maximize Program Effectiveness Orly Calderon, PsyD, Long Island.
Engaging Students in Technical Modules: The Quest to Promote Student Identification of Problematic Knowledge. Dr William Lyons, School of Engineering,
Information Retention in e-Learning De Leon Kimberly Obonyo Carolyne Penn John Yang Xiaoyan.
To flip or not to flip: An exploratory analysis into student attitudes towards the flipped classroom approach to learning Enhancement Themes conference,
The Affects of Visual Strategies in Teaching Students with Autism From the Perspective of Educators Diana Whitlock.
The relationship between student characteristics, including learning styles, and their perceptions and satisfaction in web-based courses in higher education.
Web-Based Virtual Learning Environments:
Can E-learning Replace the Traditional Classroom
Dr. Juliana Lancaster Director of Institutional Effectiveness
Presentation transcript:

A Preliminary Investigation of Student Perceptions of Online Education Angela M. Clark University of South Alabama Presented at ISECON 2003 San Diego, CA

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 2 Impetus of Study Do on-campus and online students’ beliefs and perceptions of online education differ?

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 3 Why is this Important? If there are differences in opinion between these two populations, educational institutions must be cognizant of the factors that influence a student’s perception of online education as we endeavor to attract and retain students to online education programs.

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 4 Paradigm Shifts in Education  Institution-centered paradigm Traditional learning – brick-and-mortar-based format  Learner-centered paradigm Distance-based learning – synchronous via Web Online learning – asynchronous via Web  Anytime, anybody, anywhere learning models

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 5 Factors Affecting Student Participation and Success in Online Learning  Self-Efficacy and Online Courses  Mode of Interaction  Time Commitment and Self-Discipline  Quality of Assessment

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 6 Purpose of Study  Preliminary investigation to assess student perceptions regarding online education to ascertain factors contributing or hindering the success of online courses

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 7 Methodology  Two surveys administered to two populations of students: Those who have previously enrolled in an online course in the CIS department Those currently taking a CIS course on-campus

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 8 Survey Instrument – On-campus Students  General demographic and computer familiarity questions  Likert-scale statements regarding online course perceptions Difficulty of particular course in on-campus vs. online delivery format Perceived level of effort required for online courses Preferences in delivery format Perceived ability to learn more effectively in on- campus vs. online formats

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 9 Survey Instrument – Online Students  Same general demographic and computer familiarity questions  Rewording of statements to reflect that the student had already taken a previous course online  Additional questions regarding effectiveness of tools and components as well as overall satisfaction with the online course experience

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 10 Results  83 surveys returned for first questionnaire; 29 surveys returned for online student survey  Lower response rate for online student survey (24%) may be due to solicitation for participation via

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 11 Perceptions of Online Students Regarding Level of Knowledge Obtained & Success  82% felt they acquired the same level of knowledge in the online class as they would if they had taken the class on-campus  82% felt they could make the same grade regardless of delivery format  Results are consistent with Uskov’s study of innovative web-based teaching

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 12 Perceptions of On-campus Students Regarding Level of Knowledge Obtained & Success  36% felt they would learn the same amount of material in the same course online  50% felt they could make the same grade in an online course

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 13 Perceptions of Students on Learning the Same Amount of Material in an Online Course as in a Traditional Classroom Setting

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 14 Perceived Level of Difficulty and Effort Required  Over 60% of online students disagreed with statements that the course was more difficult when taken online versus on-campus  Most online students did not feel that the online version of the course required more effort  No significant differences noted in grade distribution or overall success of students regardless of course format

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 15 Perceived Level of Difficulty and Effort Required Comparing Online Courses with Traditional Courses

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 16 Top Reasons Cited for Taking Online Courses  Scheduling convenience  Work schedule flexibility  Time conflicts with other courses

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 17 Preferences for Delivery Format  Majority in both groups were neutral  Over 60% of previous online students felt that online offerings allowed them to take a heavier course load  Over 90% of previous online students stated they wish more courses were available online

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 18 Conclusions  There are some differences in perceptions between the two populations  For some, scheduling convenience and time conflicts outweigh any disadvantages of online courses, such as low levels of interaction with the instructor and students

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 19 Conclusions  Key to attracting and retaining students in online courses Clear understanding of the beliefs that influence a student’s likelihood of enrolling in an online course Factors that contribute or impeded successful accomplishment of learning objectives  Confirms the results of other researchers  Students desire the flexibility and convenience that online courses provide

University of South Alabama Computer and Information Sciences 20 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Research  Small sample sizes  Sample population was limited to one department  A more extensive scope is needed to examine the relationships in a broader context

A Preliminary Investigation of Student Perceptions of Online Education Angela M. Clark University of South Alabama Presented at ISECON 2003 San Diego, CA