Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Program School Improvement Plan Process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Advertisements

CIP Part IV: Culture Strategies to Address School Safety/Classroom Management/Discipline/RTI Framework/Building Supportive Learning Environments.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
So what can I expect when I serve on a NEASC/CPSS Visiting Committee? A Primer for New Visiting Committee Members.
World’s Largest Educational Community
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
School Improvement Plan 6 Main Areas
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) What is an IEP?  a summary of the student’s strengths, interests, and needs, and of the expectations for a student’s.
Accreditation Visitations Accreditation is… Accreditation is not…
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
A Model for Managing the Self-Study Regional School District No. 8—RHAM High School Hebron, CT.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Chairing a Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Visitation.
Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 1 Getting Ready for SIP: Developing the Action Sequences FALL 2006.
Understanding AQIP (Academic Quality Improvement Project) Some slides and/or information have been borrowed with permission from their originators: 1.
School Improvement Work Day. Continuous School Improvement The Model of Process Cycle for School Improvement provides the foundation to address school.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Lesson Components of an Effective Marketing Plan
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Inventory Planning Training.
Michigan’s School Improvement Process Model Plan Study Gather Data Do Student Achievement.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Program
To use this PowerPoint you will need the following documents found in this module: OIP Stage 3 for the BLT The BLT 5-Step Process Visual The BLT 5-Step.
So What Can I Expect When I Serve on an NEASC/CPSS Visiting Team? A Primer for New Team Members.
Accreditation A New Direction
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
The Quality Review A Reflection.
The Third Year Review A Mini-Accreditation Florida Catholic Conference National Standards and Benchmarks.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Program
Topeka Public Schools Strategic Planning Workshop October 14, 2009.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Title I Schoolwide Planning Comprehensive Needs Assessment Wednesday, October 24, 2012.
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools.
Strategic Planning and AdvancEd Accreditation In partnership with Quality New Mexico Taos NMSBA Leadership Conference July 13, 2012.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
Evidence and Standard Two. The Big Picture The Big Picture Standard Two is about: Curriculum Curriculum Planned, overseen curriculum – with clear outcomes.
Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Program For Early Education Programs Diocese of Orlando Wednesday, March 11, 2015.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
Dearborn Public Schools Building and Teacher Blog Initiative Co-chairs: Shannon Peterson and Robert Attee Members: Troy Patterson, Andy Denison, Nada Alamaddine,
Accreditation Visitations Accreditation is… Accreditation is not…
School Improvement Plan (SIP) Accreditation Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
Pharmacy School Self Study Prof. Abdalla Elkhawad UMST.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
The Nebraska Frameworks External Visitation Team Exit Report.
Accreditation Overview Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Presented by Dr. Jonathan Leff Parent iZone Meeting, 11/12/2015.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
Scaling Up in Illinois Illinois STS Team Deb Kunz Brenda Melcher Barbara Sims.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Office of Service Quality
2009 Shelby County Schools District Accreditation Thompson High School.
S chool I mprovement P lan A Living Document of School Growth.
Accreditation (AdvancED) Process School Improvement Activities February 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator of.
Principals & Self Study Coordinators. School Improvement Concepts Collaboration Data –Collect –Analyze –Use!!! Questions What? So What? Now What?
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Strategic planning A Tool to Promote Organizational Effectiveness
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation
Professional Development Conference 2018
Presentation transcript:

Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Program School Improvement Plan Process

School Profile – Operational Vitality Mission and Belief – Catholic Identity Desired Results for Student Learning – Academic Excellence Analysis of Instructional & Organizational Effectiveness – Academic Excellence & Governance and Leadership Action Plan Accreditation Standards Review School Improvement Plan 6 Main Areas

School Profile – Operational Vitality Mission & Belief Statements – Catholic Identity Desired Results for Student Learning – Academic Excellence Analysis of Instructional & Organizational Effectiveness – Governance & Leadership Action Plan Data Analysis Student Performance Specific Measurable Goals to Document Perceptions Strengths & Weaknesses Accurate Account Complete Picture

First 4 Areas –collecting and analyzing data to get a complete picture of the school’s history, where it is now, and setting goals for future progress Action Plans Make the Goals concrete and measurable Analyze the data Adjust the goals as needed SIP

Role Communication – continual communication about the process with all stakeholders Training of school staff in the process Consensus Building – continual communication between Area Committees, Steering Committee, and school staff to develop ownership of the entire process and final document Membership Chairperson or Co-Chairs Minimum of 4 other members (chairpersons of Committees for Areas 1-4) SIP – Steering Committee

Two main parts the School Improvement Plan process: The Process The Report SIP – Area Committees

The Process Administer the Catholic Identity Survey Analyze the results of the related questions Review and update profile data from previous school improvement plan Review The National Catholic Standards, Benchmarks, Rubrics, and Evidence: Operational Vitality, paying particular attention to: , 10.6, 12.1, Determine the top 2 areas of strength and the top 2 opportunities for growth Area 1: School Profile – Operational Vitality

The Process Collaboratively update and/or create new statements Review The National Catholic Standards, Benchmarks, Rubrics, and Evidence : Mission and Catholic Identity, paying particular attention to: 2.4, 2.6, 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3 Analyze the results of the related questions from the Catholic Identity Survey Determine the top 2 areas of strength and the top 2 opportunities for growth Area 2: Mission and Belief Statements and Catholic Identity

The Process Analyze student performance data Review The National Catholic Standards, Benchmarks, Rubrics, and Evidence : Academic Excellence, paying particular attention to: 7.1-6, Analyze the results of the related questions from the Catholic Identity Survey Determine the top 2 areas of strength and the top 2 opportunities for growth Area 3: Desired Results for Student Learning – Academic Excellence

The Process Analyze instructional program data Review The National Catholic Standards, Benchmarks, Rubrics, and Evidence: Academic Excellence (second half of standard 7 and standard 8) and Governance and Leadership, paying particular attention to: 6.2, 7.7, 7.9, 7.10, 8.1, Analyze the results of the related questions from the Catholic Identity Survey Determine the top 2 areas of strength and the top 2 opportunities for growth Area 4: Analysis of Instructional & Organizational Effectiveness – Academic Excellence continued & Governance & Leadership

Review Standards and Benchmarks Analyze data / Analyze results What does this look like? How do you do it? Conversations, discussions, consensus building Use the rubrics for the benchmarks and gather supporting evidence Dissect and compare results of student performance data (over time, by grade level, by gender, etc.) Compare survey results between staff and parents and students Key Parts of the Process

The Process Review the work and results of the committees of Areas 1 through 4 Using a collaborative process, determine the top three goals Write an Action Plan for each of the three goals to include the Goal Statement, Evidence of success, and Strategies to achieve the goal (including timeline, person responsible and resources) Area 5: Action Plan

Action Plan Goal Statement (includes specific audience, measurable change, and time frame) Evidence (List of evidence that will be used to document and evaluate the success of the goal) StrategyTimeline Person ResponsibleResources Teachers will… Students will…

Area 6 – Compliance with Standards Executive Summary Performance & Progress Report Administrator’s Responsibility

Cover Page Information Page Table of Contents Introductory Materials Executive Summary Performance and Progress Report (for schools completing this study for the second time) Area Reports Appendix The SIP Report

Questions

I am only a phone call or away Mary Camp Associate Director for Accreditation Office: Cell: