Comprehensive Cross-organizational Data Management NCAR Executive Committee April 24, 2014 Contributors: Matt Mayernik – IIS Eric Nienhouse – CISL Steve.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Manatt manatt | phelps | phillips New York State Health Information Technology Summit Initiative Overview and Update Rachel Block, Project Director United.
Advertisements

Pulling it all together… with thanks to Sheila Anderson.
Consultative Group of Experts OTHER INFORMATION CONSIDERED RELEVANT TO THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE OBJECTIVE OF THE CONVENTION Jack Fitzgerald Workshop on the.
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Joint CASC/CCI Workshop Report Strategic and Tactical Recommendations EDUCAUSE Campus Cyberinfrastructure Working Group Coalition for Academic Scientific.
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
The Vision, Process, and Requirements for Creating EarthCube Presentation at Second EarthCube WebEx Aug 22, 2011.
Alliance for Strategic Technology (AST) SUNY Business Intelligence Initiative January 8, 2009.
Corporation For National Research Initiatives NSF SMETE Library Building the SMETE Library: Getting Started William Y. Arms.
THE JOINED UP WORLD OF E-RESEARCH Professor Neil McLean National Technical Standards Adviser to the Department of Education Science and Training (DEST)
Research Data Service at the IT Pro Forum HEIDI IMKER, DIRECTOR.
African Librarianship and the Academic Enterprise Prepared By: Kay Raseroka Director: Library Services University of Botswana.
April 2, 2013 Longitudinal Data system Governance: Status Report Alan Phillips Deputy Director, Fiscal Affairs, Budgeting and IT Illinois Board of Higher.
Computing in Atmospheric Sciences Workshop: 2003 Challenges of Cyberinfrastructure Alan Blatecky Executive Director San Diego Supercomputer Center.
Reorganization at NCAR Presentation to the UCAR Board of Trustees February 25, 2004.
Pennsylvania GTO 3-Year Strategic Plan NSGIC Annual Conference 2005 Rochester, NY Jim Knudson Stacey White
1 Robert S. Webb and Roger S. Pulwarty NOAA Climate Service.
Slide: 1 37 th WGISS meeting|Cocoa beach | 14 april 2014 Richard Moreno WGISS chair report.
Value & Excitement University Technology Services Oakland University Information Technology Strategic Planning Theresa Rowe October 2004 Copyright Theresa.
SIMCorBSIMCorB 1 Outreach Projects n SIMCorB Web site (8.3.1) n Strategic partnerships with other organizations (8.3.2) n Promote awareness of scientific.
Human Resource Management Lecture 27 MGT 350. Last Lecture What is change. why do we require change. You have to be comfortable with the change before.
Managing Research Data – The Organisational Challenge at Oxford James A J Wilson Friday 6 th December,
NCAR Annual Budget Review October 8, 2007 Tim Killeen NCAR Director.
1 INFRA : INFRA : Scientific Information Repository supporting FP7 “The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author.
SIMCorBSIMCorB 1 Policies and Procedures n Data administration and quality assurance standards, policies, and procedures (8.2.1) n User requirements for.
Preserving Digital Collections for Future Scholarship Oya Y. Rieger Cornell University
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CDI Webinar Sept. 5, 2012 Kevin T. Gallagher and Linda C. Gundersen September 5, 2012 CDI Science.
NDIIPP The Next Phase Meg Williams Associate General Counsel The Library of Congress.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey A vision for a global community Linda Gundersen Director Science Quality and Integrity US Geological.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
ESIP Federation 101 Federation of Earth Science Information Partners July 17, 2012.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
Software Engineering Committee Status Report: Preliminary Findings and Recommendations Richard Loft and Gerry Wiener SE Committee Co-chairs National Center.
Linking Tasks, Data, and Architecture Doug Nebert AR-09-01A May 2010.
Introduction GeoData 2014 Workshop #geodata2014 June 17-19, 2014,NCAR, Boulder, CO Peter Fox (RPI)
What is GEO? launched in response to calls for action by the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development, Earth Observation Summits, and by the G8 (Group.
Draft GEO Framework, Chapter 6 “Architecture” Architecture Subgroup / Group on Earth Observations Presented by Ivan DeLoatch (US) Subgroup Co-Chair Earth.
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
MEDIN Work Plan for By March 2011 MEDIN will be 3 years into the original 5 year development plan started in Would normally ask for continued.
DataONE: Preserving Data and Enabling Data-Intensive Biological and Environmental Research Bob Cook Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge National.
ESIP Vision: “Achieve a sustainable world” by Serving as facilitator and advisor for the Earth science information community Promoting efficient flow of.
Symposium on Global Scientific Data Infrastructures Panel Two: Stakeholder Communities in the DWF Ann Wolpert, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Board.
WGISS and GEO Activities Kathy Fontaine NASA March 13, 2007 eGY Boulder, CO.
Science Data in the Science Mission Directorate (SMD) Jeffrey J.E. Hayes Program Executive for MO & DA, Heliophysics Division August 17, 2011.
INFORMATION AND NETWORKING Jack Fitzgerald UNFCCC Workshop on the Preparation of National Communications from Non-Annex I Parties Manila, Philippines 26.
Public Access: Update on Progress National Science Foundation April 2, 2014.
ArXiv Update David Ruddy (for Cornell arXiv team) AAHEP6 November 14-15, 2012 CERN.
ARL Workshop on New Collaborative Relationships: The Role of Academic Libraries in the Digital Data Universe September 26-27, 2006 ARL Prue.
Applied Sciences Perspective Lawrence Friedl, Program Director NASA Earth Science Applied Sciences Program LANCE User Working Group Meeting  September.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
1 Data.gov Initiative Implementation Acceleration Discussion Architecture and Infrastructure Committee Meeting March 19, 2009 Mike Carleton and Sonny Bhagowalia.
Presented by Eliot Christian, USGS Accessibility, usability, and preservation of government information (Section 207 of the E-Government Act) April 28,
Institutional data curation implementation 1st African Digital Curation Conference 12 February 2008.
Washington Traffic Records Committee Creating & Coordinating a Shared Vision for Traffic Records 2006 Traffic Records Forum August 1, 2006.
EGI-InSPIRE RI EGI-InSPIRE EGI-InSPIRE RI EGI strategy and Grand Vision Ludek Matyska EGI Council Chair EGI InSPIRE.
NSF INCLUDES Inclusion Across the Nation of Learners of Underrepresented Discoverers in Engineering and Science AISL PI Meeting, March 1, 2016 Sylvia M.
Managing Multiple Projects Steve Westerman California Department of Motor Vehicles Steve Young Mathtech, Inc.
1 Data Warehouse Assessments What, Why, and How Noah Subrin Technical Lead SRA International April 24, 2010.
A Shared Commitment to Digital Preservation and Access.
Announcing the 2014 National Digital Stewardship Agenda.
Digital Asset Management & Storage Program Program Summary
Making Cross-campus, Inter-institutional Collaborations Work
DSET Overview WAG Meeting, Aug. 10, 2017 Matt Mayernik
EOSC MODEL Pasquale Pagano CNR - ISTI
Summit 2017 Breakout Group 2: Data Management (DM)
Capacity Building Enhance the coordination of efforts to strengthen individual, institutional and infrastructure capacities, particularly in developing.
ESMF Governance Cecelia DeLuca NOAA CIRES / NESII April 7, 2017
A Funders Perspective Maria Uhle Co-Chair, Belmont Forum Directorates for Geosciences, US National Science Foundation.
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
The Digital Library for Earth System Education (DLESE):
Presentation transcript:

Comprehensive Cross-organizational Data Management NCAR Executive Committee April 24, 2014 Contributors: Matt Mayernik – IIS Eric Nienhouse – CISL Steve Williams – EOL Steve Worley - CISL

Vision data.ncar.edu data.ucar.edu Single front door to ALL data, software, data services

Working Definition Data Digital assets intended for scientific community use, including files and metadata, publications, reports, images, software (visualization, analysis, model codes), and related data services.

Current Status Users and colleagues “in the know” are well served Know websites, who to contact, what services exist New and diverse community of users is easily frustrated Many services sprinkled across the organization Not well coordinated, no over arching consulting Current websites are not comprehensive

www2.ucar.edu/research-resources/data-archive-services

Why Should We Change? User’s perspective With a top-level unified presentation we can: Simplify user data discovery – Presents a collaborative organization Share metadata with outside entities – Federate data discovery with others (e.g. NASA, EarthCube, etc.) Provide organization-wide consulting – Mitigate challenges like: “I think the data is at NCAR, but I cannot find it” “I got lost looking for the data at NCAR” “I don’t know who to ask”

Why Should We Change? Organization perspective With a unified organization we can: Gain functional efficiency – Cross-organizational interconnectivity will be automated – Improve data services by: Sharing data management expertise Sharing software expertise Sharing infrastructure where appropriate Reducing possible duplication of effort Cost Savings?

Why Should We Change? Policy and Political perspective Forcing factors and opportunities: Federal 2013 White House Directive, “Opening Up Access to Scientific Research” White House “Climate Data Initiative” 2 NSF 2011 NSF data management plan requirement EarthCube: Funding and collaboration opportunities commitments 3

Why Should We Change? Policy and Political perspective, continued Forcing factors and opportunities: Publication Community AGU: 2013 Publications Data Policy 1 AMS: 2013 Statement on “Full and Open Access to Data” 2 Internal, UCAR commitment for “Publication and Information Dissemination” 3 “….. UCAR supports an open exchange of data and scholarly information derived form our research. It is UCAR’s policy to share this scientific and technical information with the community…..”

Successful Past DM Initiatives Community Data Portal (circa 2002) – Many lessons learned – Not all inclusive – Needs a technology refresh Non-centralized approach Data Citation Working Group (2011-ongoing) NCAR Technical Note, (Mayernik et al., 2012), Established the process for placing DOIs on data, software, and services

Stakeholder surveys UCAR/NCAR 2013 Survey, Data Users Sub-group, Verbatim Responses 1 Generally satisfied “We need your data”, “get access to scientific data”, ”thanks for your data sharing which is very helpful in my research work”, “the main priority should be gathering global high-resolution data”, “more data and tutorials”, “more convenient to download data”, etc. Data management survey to support ITC Planning (May 2013) 2 Internal, 121 responses (92% NCAR, 8% UCP) Common challenges: insufficient storage space and data organization, lack of funding and expertise Common interests: backup and repository services 1 Files “UCAR – Subgroup Tables.xlsx”, “UCAR – Verbatim Response.xlsx” 2 Why Now? - Internal

Strategic plans – New NCAR, ongoing UCAR Strategic Plans – Completed, UCAR ITC Strategic Plan Data Services Working Group Worley (CISL), Mayernik (IIS), Wright (IIS), Williams (EOL), Strand (CGD), Schmitt (HAO), Nienhouse(CISL), Keene (MMM), Hermida (Unidata) Good organizational review, recommendations, implementation suggestions, some resource estimates Why Now? – Internal, continued

Strategies 1.Best practice guidelines for data and software management 2.Data management plan advice and assistance 3.Archiving and access systems for data and software that need, but do not currently have, repositories 4.Unified system for discovery of UCAR resources 5.Develop appropriate digital preservation solutions 6.Facilitate collaboration between data and software staff 7.Prepare systems for external integration opportunities 8.Make data open and machine-readable for external applications 9.Structure IT to meet 24x7 needs where applicable 10.Tighter coordination of UCAR administrative databases ITC Data Services Working Group Report

1. Guidelines As a service, create and maintain best practice data and software management guidelines. Too many ad hoc systems Complete systems: standards-based, sustainable, cost effective Understand Principles: Stewardship, data lifecycle Make us recognized data management experts among peers

3. Archiving and Access Create, adapt or identify an archiving and access system for research data and software that need, but do not currently have, sufficient, secure and publicly accessible repositories. Too many orphan datasets – not in managed repositories Improved archiving and access supports tightly linking scholarly publications and data Long-term data preservation is essential Secures the intellectual properties and scientific findings of the organization

4. Discovery Create and maintain a unified and flexible system for discovery of UCAR publications, data, software, and services. Past, did well with centralized method for data (Community Data Portal), 10-yr old effort Need a new approach: Expand, more data, publications, more software, and services Convert to a distributed method Add richness to the metadata standard Sustainable!

Should we take on this challenge? Where to Now? data.ncar.edu data.ucar.edu Single front door to ALL data, software, data services

Not a new idea NASA DAACs -> ECHO/Reverb NOAA (very immature state) USGS These services are driving user expectations for similar services at UCAR/NCAR

NCAR Strategic Context Contributions to the Plan Imperatives 1 Develop, maintain and deploy advanced observational facilities and services More comprehensive and broadly accessible data and services are necessary Develop, deliver and support a suite of advanced community models Requires coordinated access, consulting, advanced analysis tools, and data delivery Develop and sustain advanced information and computing system services Requires support for robust IT systems and coupling of expertise with scientific research Develop and transfer science to meet societal needs Expertly done data services for the scientific community are the foundation to develop knowledge transfer to society 1

First Steps for Success A sketch: best done with a cross-organizational team All-in participation across the organization Realize the UCAR “open data” policy to the largest possible extent Support access with methods and tools to make it easy Make a plan to scope all the data assets Design a survey that IDs the assets and user expectations (current and forward looking) Do the survey Evaluate the Survey Create an inventory Identify user requirements for data services

First Steps for Success, continued Assess feasibility across the organization – Define scope and effort required – Define processes and responsibilities for user consulting – Define standards for metadata, data access approaches, and interoperability Leverage and participate in community standards and federation efforts – E.G. EarthCube, ESG/ESGF 1, ESIP 2 – Best done from complete cross-organizational plan

To Start: Setting the Table All-in participation across the organization Form Data Stewardship Engineering Team (DSET) DSET membership 1 person minimum, 2 person maximum from Labs or Sub-Labs Qualified to represent all the data assets for the science community from their organizational entity Kick-off meeting Give this presentation again Clarify vision in the context of engineering Discuss how to: Make a plan to scope all the data assets Vet and refine the survey idea Establish DSET leadership, meeting schedule, and communications

To Start: Setting the Table, continued Intra-Lab meetings DSET representatives - hold informational and fact gathering meetings with Lab data asset owners Foundation for survey questions regarding data assets and user services How many meetings? DSET meetings Monthly to begin, possibly less frequent later Consolidate information from the whole organization Design, execute, and evaluate the survey Assess feasibility across the organization Scope, effort, processes, responsibilities, standards, etc.

To Start: Setting the Table, continued DSET report out on feasibility Representatives to their respective Directors DSET to the EC? Timetable Difficult to predict, easier after a DSET meeting or two Optimistic 6 months, hopefully not more than 1 year

Questions? Comprehensive Cross-organizational Data Management Contributors: Matt Mayernik – IIS Eric Nienhouse – CISL Steve Williams – EOL Steve Worley - CISL