Computer Literacy Placement Exam Design and Assessment Amber M. Epps The Art Institute of P ittsburgh.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation of Teaching Portfolio to the Art Institute of Pittsburgh - Online Type Name Here List Degrees and Credentials Here.
Advertisements

Online Course Design Online Course Design EVALUATION AND REVISION
Meeting MSCHE Assessment Expectations
Confirming Student Learning: Using Assessment Techniques in the Classroom Douglas R. Davenport Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Truman State University.
ACADEMIC DEGREE ASSESSMENT & GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay Arts & Sciences Faculty Meeting March 12,
Quality Matters! Using the Quality Matters Rubric to Improve Online Course Design Susan Bussmann and Sandy Johnson NMSU Quality Matters Institutional.
Standard 22D Evaluations HT Accredited Curriculum.
Information Literacy Demonstration – Partnership of Faculty and Library Gergana Georgieva Information Literacy Librarian August 25, 2008.
Part II of our Presentation… is based on projects in the Center for Teaching Excellence and The Office of Undergraduate Studies.
DEEPENING ASSESSMENT LITERACY Fall Objective  Identify best practices for local assessment development  Provide a working knowledge of the WPSD.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
Quality Matters TM : Introduction to QM and to the Rubric The Quality Matters™ Rubric 2008 – 2010 Edition Updated July 08.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Social Inquiry Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
Student Assessment CERRA National Board Candidate Support Workshop Toolkit WS
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
Report to External Review Board W. Spencer Guthrie, Ph.D. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Brigham Young University December 1, 2006 W.
Effective Grading and Assessment:. Strategies to Enhance Student Learning.
Welcome to CSCI-1305! Introduction to Information Technology Instructor: Deborah Batson The seat you take today will be your assigned seat for the semester.
Techniques for Improving Student Learning Outcomes Lynn M. Forsythe Ida M. Jones Deborah J. Kemp Craig School of Business California State University,
Welcome… The attendee will understand assessment basics with a focus on creating learning activities and identifying assessment expectations. Apply the.
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
Assessment 101: Back-to-Basics An Introduction to Assessing Student Learning Outcomes.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Welcome to Coda Land…. You may think you are at Hazen High School…. In fact, you are IN Coda Land and I am THE Coda. By virtue of your immigration into.
Student Forum March5, pm - Collaborate Students will share their thoughts on topics including: --experiences with online courses --ways instructors.
Pleasant Hill Elementary 2012 ~ 2013 Common Core Standards.
If you don’t know where you’re going, any road will take you there.
Learners’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Online Instruction Presented by: Dr. Karen S. Ivers Dr. JoAnn Carter-Wells Dr. Joyce Lee California State University.
Documenting How WTCS Colleges Assess Learning Outcomes.
Using WIDS to Document How Colleges Assess Learning Outcomes.
We’re going to a New Version? Bill Marlow School of Business, IT & Management.
Technology in the classroom. UM weather Great way to begin a day or class –Links to 300 weather sites –Links to 700 web cams to view weather –Radar and.
Learning Outcomes Made Easy Using the Best Tools Jeffrey D. Keith, Ph.D. J. Kelly Flanagan, Ph.D. Russell T. Osguthorpe, Ph.D. Danny R. Olsen, Ph.D. Tom.
Designing for Learning Tools to Help Faculty Design More Inclusive Courses Beth Harrison, PhD University of Dayton.
Organizing for General Education Assessment Linda Suskie, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 3624 Market Street, Philadelphia.
 Integrate the Bacc Core category learning outcomes into the course.  Clarify for students how they will achieve and demonstrate the learning outcomes.
CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University Spring 2015.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Online Radschool Web-Based Software for Radiologic Programs America’s Software Corporation  Call us today for a.
1 Technical & Business Writing (ENG-715) Muhammad Bilal Bashir UIIT, Rawalpindi.
What the*!?# is an SLO? Train the Trainers Workshop Marcy Alancraig Cabrillo College
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
VT University Libraries: Identifying, Teaching, and Assessing What Matters Most Office of Academic Assessment Ray Van Dyke,
Effective Grading Strategies Alison Morrison-Shetlar Faculty Center for Teaching and Learning Adapted from the book Effective Grading by Barbara Walvoord.
Accreditation Visit: OMG! What if they ask me a question?? Accreditation Tri-Chairs: Kelly Irwin Ginni May Don Palm Fall 2015.
Assessment Taskforce Update College Council November 6, 2009.
January 26, 2011 Careers Conference, Madison, Wisconsin Robin Nickel, Ph.D. Associate Director, Worldwide Instructional Design System.
Refresher Course on Assessment A Workshop for Department Chairs, Program Directors, and Others January 22, 2016.
Intentionally Targeting Student Learning Outcomes through Course Assessment and Design Patty Roberts, Ph.D. Patricia Noteboom, Ph.D NASPA INTERNATIONAL.
Getting Ready for the Higher Learning Commission (NCA) July 2011 Dr. Linda Johnson HLC/Assessment Coordinator/AQIP Liaison Southeast Technical Institute.
PROGRAM ASSESSMENT BASICS Alan Kalish, PhD Teresa Johnson, PhD Director Assistant Director University Center for the Advancement of Teaching.
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Cheryl Blanco Smarter Balanced Colorado Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force August 24, 2012.
Institutional Effectiveness at MVCC Institutional Effectiveness at MVCC.
Transfer Course Credit – Institutions of Higher Education Credit for Prior Learning Industry Recognized Credentials/Test Credit AGC – April 2016.
Student Page Top Introduction Task Process Evaluation Conclusion Teacher page Credits Earth Man Says…”It’s a beautiful world, I say, let’s keep it that.
Assessment Instruments and Rubrics Workshop Series Part 1: What is a rubric? What are the required elements? What are VALUE rubrics? February 24, 2016.
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES & UAS Accreditation. Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU)
Speech pathology students’ responses to ePortfolios Abigail Lewis Speech Pathology Psychology and Social Science.
Chris Sweet Illinois Wesleyan University LOEX Annual Conference 4/30/2010.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Quantitative Reasoning Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Director of Policy Analysis and Research
Atta Girl/Boy: Acing your Accreditation Review
Teaching and Learning Commons West Virginia University
Summer 2016 Training: Technology Implementation
Student Learning Outcomes
Reading Street & Assessment
SLOs, Curriculum, and Other Things that Shape Your Classroom
Presentation transcript:

Computer Literacy Placement Exam Design and Assessment Amber M. Epps The Art Institute of P ittsburgh

What is Computer Literacy?  Computer-related terminology  Hardware and software basics  Basic operating system functionality  File management  Using the internet and understanding related issues  Productivity applications

Happy students Happy faculty Why Do We Care? Accurate Placement Students can save $$$ Institutions can save $$$ Assess program requirements Accreditation Various student abilities

Facts  May or may not be a required course  Students complain!  Faculty complain!

Myths  Students already know “this stuff”  Should be removed from curriculum without a backup plan

Survey Says...  Students don’t always know as much as they think they do  Students need to meet minimum proficiency requirements  School-defined  Industry-defined  Every school is different  Need to continue research

So Now What??

Assessment! According to the Higher Learning Commission:  “Assessment of student learning is a participatory, iterative process that:  Provides data/information you need on your students’ learning  Engages you and others in analyzing and using this data/information to confirm and improve teaching and learning  Produces evidence that students are learning the outcomes you intended  Guides you in making educational and institutional improvements  Evaluates whether changes made improve/impact student learning, and documents the learning and your efforts.”

Assessment! (cont)  Accreditation often requires computer literacy standards  Not always fun...but important  Evolving work in progress  Don’t expect perfection right away

Where to Begin?  Know your school’s policies  Who else is involved?  Consider the scope  How many students will be affected?  Online students?  Staffing requirements  Get faculty involved!  Use tools that are available to you

Next...  Platform issues: PC vs Mac  Plan...  What’s important?  What do you want to know?  Start with your competencies  What should students know?  Find balance between theory and application  Ask faculty what matters most

Suggestions!  Use a question pool  Check text book instructor resources  Separate competencies by section  Automate as much as possible  Clear rubrics when manual grading required  What is a passing score?  Pilot test with a focus group  Be flexible and aware of changes  Remote testing?

So I’ve Created My Exam...Now What?  What to assess:  Pass/fail rate overall  Pass/fail rate per major  Pre/post test differences  Anything that’s important to YOU and YOUR school

What Does Assessment Tell Us?  Achievement of learning outcomes  Competency proficiencies  Competency deficiencies  Changes to degree requirements?

Let’s Look At Some Real Examples

Pre-Test: Theory *Based on 80% as Passing Score

Test-Out Results *Based on 80% as Passing Score

Questions!!  Why is the pre-test passing rate so low?  Why is the test-out passing rate so high?

Time to share! Feel free to contact me: Amber M. Epps The Art Institute of Pittsburgh