Toronto Catholic District School Board Budget Consultation Meeting Catholic Education Centre May 5, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NEPTUNE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Advertisements

Elementary Parish and School Financial Update Secretariat for Education Department for Catholic Schools
Adopted Budget Walnut Valley Unified School District Board of Trustees June 19, 2013.
School District No. 50 (Haida Gwaii) DRAFT Budget 2010/2011.
Preliminary Budget Proposals Overview Budget Overview Budget Overview Preliminary Budget Proposals Preliminary Budget Proposals Key Dates.
St. Joseph’s (Thamesford) Accommodation Review Committee Public Meeting St. Joseph’s Catholic Elementary School April 30, 2013.
Budget Hearing and Annual Meeting Monday, August 20,
Adelanto Elementary School District Fiscal Review Presented by: Anthony Bridges, Deputy Executive Officer Diane Branham, Fiscal Intervention Specialist.
Macroeconomics Unit 12 Deficits, Surpluses, Debt Top Five Concepts.
Looking ahead to school year
1 Student Success Program Ministry of Education November 2004.
School Board Budgets Presented February 16th, 2012.
Public Consulting Group School Restructuring in Poland – challenges and proven solutions Łukasz Nowak, September, 2011.
Dick Anastasi Lydia Sellie Board Study Session December 8, 2009.
First Interim Report December 18, Tonight’s Presentation District’s First Interim Report Provides a summary to the Governing Board of the District’s.
Governor’s Proposed Budget & Considerations Under Study Upland Unified School District January 12, 2010 rev. 1/19/10.
CARSONVILLE-PORT SANILAC SCHOOLS DISTRICT UPDATE: March 2015.
Salem-Keizer Public Schools Budget Message.
0 Archdiocese of Boston St Ann, Gloucester Catholic Schools Review Presentation to Parents & Teachers January 28, 2008.
1 Addressing Long-Term Budget Challenges (Part 9) Eva Rae Lueck Chief Business and Finance Officer Glendale Unified School District February 2, 2010 Glendale.
Shrewsbury Public Schools Fiscal Year 2013 Administrative Budget Recommendation March 14, 2012.
School District No. 73 (Kamloops/Thompson) Draft Operating Budget DRAFT BUDGET FOR
Budget Proposal MISSION STATEMENT We will support student achievement by developing and sustaining exemplary educational experiences; creating.
1 Budget Committee Budget 05 March 2009.
BUDGET HEARING AUGUST 20, Update Since the Hearing AVID ◦Additional staff professional development training ◦Building site plans for AVID.
Budget Goals From our 2010/11 Budget: “High levels of student achievement” “Reduced gaps in student achievement” This means our goal is to maximize resources.
San Marino Unified School District Second Interim Financial Report and Long Range Financial Projections March 11, 2008.
Reduction in Certificated Staff For Tahoe Truckee Unified School District.
Ramona Unified School District July 1 st Budget Adoption For The Fiscal Year June 18, 2009.
Lyme Central School District Budget Hearing May 7, 2015.
Toronto Catholic DSB Preliminary Budget Status Committee of the Whole Board April 14, 2008.
School District No. 78 (Fraser Cascade) Final 2009/2010 Budget.
Manchester Essex Regional School District Budget Workshop January 19, 2010.
How Male and Female Students Perform in Toronto District School Board (TDSB) Schools Equally Prepared for Life?
WEST TORONTO ARC PUBLIC MEETING #4 November 5, 2009.
Finance: Three Proposals for ARRA Funding to Increase Access to Financial Assistance for Early Education and Care December 8, 2009.
1 Presentation to the CSU Board of Trustees Committee on Finance 2004/05 Budget Issues November 19, 2003.
January Cal Poly Budget Presentation UPBAC January 2009.
Community Budget Forum FY 2015 Budget Development Dr. Patrick K. Murphy, Superintendent Deirdra McLaughlin, Assistant Superintendent, Finance & Management.
Presentation to Board June 17, 2008 Presented by: J. A. Sabo, Associate Director – Leading Services & Treasurer of the Board BUDGET York Catholic.
QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE ALLOCATION September
Strategic Plan Building Stakeholder Process Timeline District Budget Timeline State and Local Comparative Trends Funding Trends and Issues Reduction of.
Budget REDUCTION OVERVIEW. EXPENDITURE REDUCTIONS GENERAL CATEGORIES Supply Categories These cuts range from printing to software and occupy the.
Budget FEBRUARY 3, Where are we now?
Board of Education Dedicated Service to Our School Community.
Lampeter-Strasburg School District Finance Committee Meeting – February 28, Budget Discussions 1.
September 15, 2008 Budget Workshop Spending Authority.
NewLondonPublicSchools Community Forum November 10, 2015 November 12, 2015 November 17, 2015.
Reducing the FY17 Preliminary Budget Presentation Series for FY17 Budget #6 School Committee Meeting April 26, 2016 Educational Support Center PDC 7:00.
2007/2008 Budget Upper Canada District School Board Presentation to Upper Canada District School Board June 20, 2007.
FHSD Proposition Howell Information.
Williamsville Central School District Long-Range Financial Plan and Reserve Plan Report December 2016 Prepared By: Thomas Maturski - Assistant Superintendent.
Portland Public Schools Proposed Budget
New Hanover County Schools
Ramona Unified School District Board of Trustees June 17, 2008
10/09/2018 VSB Budget 2016/2017 March
Superintendent’s Funding Request FY19
Budget Overview Review of Last Years Budget
PRESENTATION OF THE PRELIMINARY BUDGET
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Balancing the Operating Budget Ward Forum Presentation
RYE SCHOOL DISTRICT PRESENTATION TO THE RYE BUDGET COMMITTEE
Budget February 3, 2015.
Preliminary Proposed Budget April 26, 2016
Budget Report to NISD Board of Trustees
Octorara Area School District
Special Finance, Budget and Enrolment Committee
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Budget February 5, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Toronto Catholic District School Board Budget Consultation Meeting Catholic Education Centre May 5, 2008

2 Budget Consultation Meeting May 5, 2008 Agenda  Background  Accumulated deficit in and the Special Assistance Team’s Recommendation  Declining Enrolment  Budget Position  Actions recommended to eliminate the remaining deficit and balance the Budget per legislation  Program Changes  Additional Considerations  Conclusion

3 Budget Consultation Meeting May 5, 2008  Background The Learning Opportunity Grant (LOG) was introduced to support boards in offering a wide range of locally determined programs for students with a higher risk of academic difficulty In the Board received $12.9M for LOG and implemented a number of new programs and expanded others i.e. 5 th Block, Junior Literacy Intervention (JLI), Full Day Kindergarten Pilot, Professional Learning Network (PLN), etc.

4 Budget Consultation Meeting May 5, 2008  Background contd., Changes in the funding formula introduced by the Ministry in resulted in TCDSB receiving $11.5M less in LOG funding due to a reallocation of a portion of this grant to fund the Teacher Salary Gap. However, in spite of this reallocation the salary gap was not fully funded at TCDSB. Reinstatement of this loss in LOG is not expected. As a result of this loss in LOG funding, unfunded salary gap, decline in enrolment and other budget pressures the Board was left in a serious deficit position of $34.4M at the beginning of

5 Budget Consultation Meeting May 5, 2008  Accumulated Deficit and the SAT Recommendations It was impossible for the Board to make reductions in the amount of $34.4M in The Ministry of Education sent in a Special Assistance Team (SAT) to review the Board’s finances and on November 30,2006 they recommended a 3 year Deficit Management Plan to eliminate this accumulated deficit The SAT Plan covered the fiscal years , and and a number of reductions were recommended in each of the 3 years After making the reductions recommended by the SAT for , the accumulated deficit was reduced to $16.7M at the end of The SAT projected that at the end of the 3 year period, , after all the reductions recommended were made, the Board would be in a positive position and be able to submit a balanced Budget

6 Budget Consultation Meeting May 5, 2008  Declining Enrolment TCDSB has been experiencing declining enrolment for the past few years For the average daily enrolment (ADE) is projected to drop by 899 net. (Elementary 1,311 decrease & Secondary 412 increase) As the Ministry’s Funding Model is based on enrolment, drop in enrolment equals reduction in grants and accordingly relative expenditure reductions of $5.8M have to be made, in , to address the enrolment decline

7 Budget Consultation Meeting May 5, 2008  Budget Position After balancing the current year position, an in year surplus of $2.7M is projected. This in year surplus is applied to the accumulated deficit to reduce it to ($14.0M), [$16.7M-$2.7M] According to the 3 year deficit management plan, the Ministry’s expectation is that TCDSB balances its Budget as required by the Education Act. To address the projected decline in enrolment of 899 net. reductions in relevant expenditures are required to match the reduction in Grant Therefore, the expenditure reductions are required as follows: Elementary Teachers ($7.1M) Support Staff *($1.5M) Reduced Occasional Teachers projection($0.9M) Increase in expenditure for Secondary Teachers due to enrolment increase $2.8M Total reductions required due to enrolment changes($6.7M) By applying the above reductions, the accumulated deficit is now reduced to ($7.3M) [$14.0M-$6.7M] * Support Staff includes Education Assistants, Paraprofessionals, Teacher Consultants, Administration & School Operations,

8 Budget Consultation Meeting May 5, 2008  Actions recommended to eliminate the remaining accumulated deficit of ($7.3M) and balance the Budget All expenditure categories were reviewed and assessed. Some categories are already in a deficit position, such as Facilities Maintenance & Repairs ($2.9M) and Transportation ($3.5M). TCDSB has approximately 20 closed schools and unless these schools are disposed they continue to be a strain on resources Failure to address cuts in a permanent approach will only cause a doubling of the deficit in subsequent years and reduce the Board’s ability to address new higher priority needs Small schools continue to be a financial drain on the resources of TCDSB

9 Budget Consultation Meeting May 5, 2008  Program changes The proposed program reductions were selected because there are some counter balances in supports provided for other early learning programs such as: - Primary Class Size Reduction (PCSR) which provides for additional elementary teachers, since 2004/05, to comply with the Ministry’s primary class size reduction - Ontario Focused Intervention Partnership (OFIP) which provides 4 levels of Intervention support in 38 schools. Additional resources are provided in 22 schools in the primary division and 49 schools in the junior division - Best Start Program - Parenting and Family Literacy Centres - Welcome to Kindergarten Program The reductions in programs to individual schools were based on research and consistent criteria ensuring that the neediest schools would continue to receive support

10 Budget Consultation Meeting May 5, 2008  Additional Considerations The Programs identified for potential reductions are as follows: - Professional Learning Networks (PLN) elementary & secondary - the concept is favoured by the Ministry but not currently funded - 5 th Block Literacy – grades 1&2 - is an early literacy intervention program provided in 82 schools for students in grades 1&2 who need additional support in developing beginning reading skills. The program would continue in 50 schools in Junior Literacy Intervention – grades 4&5 - is an early literacy intervention program provided in 43 schools for students in grades 4&5 who need additional support in developing reading fluency and comprehension. The program would continue in 27 schools in Full Day Senior Kindergarten - the Board has approved this program over the past 4 years which operates in 7 schools with a total of 15 classes. This program is currently not being offered in other English Boards because of lack of funding

11 Budget Consultation Meeting May 5, 2008  Conclusion Although no final decisions have been made and the Board of Trustees has not approved the Budget, it has been necessary to initiate surplus and layoff notices to staff by May 15, 2008 in order to comply with collective agreement timeframes and the Employment Standards Act. Final approval of the Budget will occur in June as the Ministry’s deadline for submission of the balanced budget is June 30, 2008 We continue to remain hopeful that a number of favourable factors will ease the current situation, such as: Our share of yet unallocated grants An increase in the number of retirements An increase in the number of leaves of absence The following cost pressures could negatively impact TCDSB: Increased cost of Utilities Continued declining enrolment Ageing Technology, both hardware and software, IT infrastructure State of the economy in Ontario