Yi-Zen Chu BCCS Case Western Reserve University 9 December 2008 The n-body problem in General Relativity from perturbative field theory arXiv: 0812.0012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regularization of the the second-order gravitational perturbations produced by a compact object Eran Rosenthal University of Guelph - Canada Amos Ori Technion.
Advertisements

Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We have focused largely on a kinematics based approach to beam dynamics.  Most people find it more intuitive, at least when first.
Keplerian-type parametrization : Its relevance for LISA & SKA Achamveedu Gopakumar TPI, FSU-Jena, Germany Birmingham: 30/3/06.
Physics 55 Friday, December 2, Quiz 7 (last quiz) 2.Relativistic mass, momentum, energy 3.Introduction to General Relativity 4.Einstein’s equivalence.
A two-loop calculation in quantum field theory on orbifolds Nobuhiro Uekusa.
1 Tests of gravitational physics by ranging to Mercury Neil Ashby*, John Wahr Dept. of Physics, University of Colorado at Boulder Peter Bender Joint Institute.
Extragalactic Astronomy & Cosmology First-Half Review [4246] Physics 316.
ASYMPTOTIC STRUCTURE IN HIGHER DIMENSIONS AND ITS CLASSIFICATION KENTARO TANABE (UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA) based on KT, Kinoshita and Shiromizu PRD
Developing a Theory of Gravity Does the Sun go around the Earth or Earth around Sun? Why does this happen? Plato } Artistotle } Philosophy Ptolemy }& Models.
Lattice Spinor Gravity Lattice Spinor Gravity. Quantum gravity Quantum field theory Quantum field theory Functional integral formulation Functional integral.
Barak Kol Hebrew University - Jerusalem Jun 2009, Crete Outline Definition & Domain of applicability Review of results (caged, EIH) Standing puzzles Renormalization.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2005 Dr Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29
Universality in ultra-cold fermionic atom gases. with S. Diehl, H.Gies, J.Pawlowski S. Diehl, H.Gies, J.Pawlowski.
Physics 133: Extragalactic Astronomy ad Cosmology Lecture 4; January
Gravitational-waves: Sources and detection
Barak Kol Hebrew University - Jerusalem Bremen, Aug 2008 Outline Domain of applicability Brief review of results Example: 1 st Post-Newtonian order Discussion.
Gravitomagnetism The Myth and the Legend
MANY-BODY PROBLEM in KALUZA-KLEIN MODELS with TOROIDAL COMPACTIFICATION Astronomical Observatory and Department of Theoretical Physics, Odessa National.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2010
1 How to test the Einstein gravity using gravitational waves Takahiro Tanaka (YITP, Kyoto university) Gravitational waves Based on the work in collaboration.
HOLOGRAPHY, DIFFEOMORHISMS, AND THE CMB Finn Larsen University of Michigan Quantum Black Holes at OSU Ohio Center for Theoretical Science September
2次ゲージ不変摂動論定式化の進行状況 Kouji Nakamura (Grad. Univ. Adv. Stud. (NAOJ)) References : K.N. Prog. Theor. Phys., vol.110 (2003), 723. (gr-qc/ ). K.N. Prog.
Gravitational Waves (& Gravitons ?)
1 Yasushi Mino Theoretical AstroPhysics Including Relativity (TAPIR), CalTech Index 1: Introduction: LISA project 2: MiSaTaQuWa.
Gravitational Radiation from a particle in bound orbit around black hole Presentation for 11 th Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves By ASHOK TIWARI.
A Periodic Table for Black Hole Orbits Janna Levin Dynamical Systems approach Gabe Perez-Giz NSF Fellow
ASTR Fall Semester Joel E. Tohline, Alumni Professor Office: 247 Nicholson Hall [Slides from Lecture16]
Crash Course of Relativistic Astrometry Four Dimensional Spacetime Poincare Transformation Time Dilatation Wavelength Shift Gravitational Deflection of.
Fundamental Principles of General Relativity  general principle: laws of physics must be the same for all observers (accelerated or not)  general covariance:
Yi-Zen Chu Particle Astrophysics/Cosmology Seminar, ASU Wednesday, 6 October 2010 Don’t Shake That Solenoid Too Hard: Particle Production From Aharonov-Bohm.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2005 Dr Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29
General Relativity Physics Honours 2009
Hawking radiation for a Proca field Mengjie Wang (王梦杰 ) In collaboration with Carlos Herdeiro & Marco Sampaio Mengjie Wang 王梦杰 Based on: PRD85(2012)
Quantum Gravity and emergent metric Quantum Gravity and emergent metric.
Wednesday, Mar. 5, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #13 Wednesday, Mar. 5, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Local Gauge Invariance and Introduction.
Multipole moments as a tool to infer from gravitational waves the geometry around an axisymmetric body. Thomas P. Sotiriou SISSA, International School.
Black Holes - Observation How do you see something you can’t see ?????
On finding fields and self force in a gauge appropriate to separable wave equations (gr-qc/ ) 2006 Midwest Relativity Meeting Tobias Keidl University.
18/04/2004New Windows on the Universe Jan Kuijpers Part 1: Gravitation & relativityPart 1: Gravitation & relativity J.A. Peacock, Cosmological Physics,
Possibility of detecting CHRISTODOULOU MEMORY of GRAVITATIONAL WAVES by using LISA (Laser Interferometer Space Antenna) Thus, the final form of the memory.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO: A New Window on The Universe Duncan Brown Syracuse University RIT Physics Colloquium November 19, 2007 LIGO-G Z.
Yi-Zen Fermilab Monday, 7 February 2011 Don’t Shake That Solenoid Too Hard: Particle Production From Aharonov-Bohm K. Jones-Smith, H. Mathur, and.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2008 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 560, A29 Lecture Notes 9.
Binary systems as sources of gravitational waves
Space-Time coordinates are not fundamental,
Motions of Self-Gravitating bodies to the Second Post- Newtonian Order of General Relativity.
The Meaning of Einstein’s Equation*
General Relativity and Cosmology The End of Absolute Space Cosmological Principle Black Holes CBMR and Big Bang.
First Steps Towards a Theory of Quantum Gravity Mark Baumann Dec 6, 2006.
Gravitational Self-force on a Particle in the Schwarzschild background Hiroyuki Nakano (Osaka City) Norichika Sago (Osaka) Wataru Hikida (Kyoto, YITP)
1 Yasushi Mino ( 蓑 泰 志 ) WUGRAV, Washington University at St. Louis Index 1: Introduction 2: Self-force in a Linear Perturbation.
+ Quintessence and Gravitational Waves Peng Zhou, Daniel Chung UW-Madison Physics Dept.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2009 Florian Girelli Rm 364, A28 Lecture Notes 6.
Mike Cruise University of Birmingham Searching for the fifth dimension using gravitational waves.
Soichiro Isoyama Collaborators : Norichika Sago, Ryuichi Fujita, and Takahiro Tanaka The gravitational wave from an EMRI binary Influence of the beyond.
The direct detection of Gravitational Wave Fulvio Ricci on behalf of the LIGO Scientific and VIRGO collaborations What next? – Angelicum – 16/2/2016.
Celestial Mechanics VI The N-body Problem: Equations of motion and general integrals The Virial Theorem Planetary motion: The perturbing function Numerical.
Celestial Mechanics IV Central orbits Force from shape, shape from force General relativity correction.
University of Arizona D IMITRIOS P SALTIS Tests of General Relativity with the SKA.
Teruaki Suyama Black hole perturbation in modified gravity Research Center for the Early Universe, University of Tokyo 公募研究 ( 計画研究 A05) 「強い重力場での修正重力理論の検証に向けた理論的研究」
Beyond MOND: TeVeS and its Tests (Depeche MOND) Scott Noble CCRG RIT July 2, 2010.
Wave Physics PHYS 2023 Tim Freegarde.
Generalized quasi-Keplerian parametrization for compact binaries in hyperbolic orbits Gihyuk Cho (SNU) Collaborate with H.M. Lee (SNU), Achamveedu Gopakumar.
Gravitational Wave Detection
LISA Data Analysis & Sources
Tomislav Prokopec, ITP Utrecht University
A New Approach to Equation of Motion for a fast-moving particle
It means anything not quadratic in fields and derivatives.
ASTR Fall Semester [Slides from Lecture16]
Graviton Emission in The Bulk from a Higher Dimensional Black Hole
Presentation transcript:

Yi-Zen Chu BCCS Case Western Reserve University 9 December 2008 The n-body problem in General Relativity from perturbative field theory arXiv: [gr-qc]

System of n ≥ 2 gravitationally bound compact objects: System of n ≥ 2 gravitationally bound compact objects: Planets, neutron stars, black holes, etc. Planets, neutron stars, black holes, etc. What is their effective gravitational interaction? What is their effective gravitational interaction?

Compact objects ≈ point particles Compact objects ≈ point particles n-body problem: Dynamics for the coordinates of the point particles n-body problem: Dynamics for the coordinates of the point particles Assume non-relativistic motion Assume non-relativistic motion GR corrections to Newtonian gravity: an expansion in (v/c) 2 GR corrections to Newtonian gravity: an expansion in (v/c) 2 Nomenclature: O[(v/c) 2Q ] = Q PN

Note that General Relativity is non-linear. Note that General Relativity is non-linear. Superposition does not hold Superposition does not hold 2 body lagrangian is not sufficient to obtain n-body lagrangian 2 body lagrangian is not sufficient to obtain n-body lagrangian Nomenclature: O[(v/c) 2Q ] = Q PN

n-body problem known up to O[(v/c) 2 ]: n-body problem known up to O[(v/c) 2 ]: Einstein-Infeld-Hoffman lagrangian Einstein-Infeld-Hoffman lagrangian Eqns of motion used regularly to calculate solar system dynamics, etc. Eqns of motion used regularly to calculate solar system dynamics, etc. Precession of Mercury begins at this order Precession of Mercury begins at this order O[(v/c) 4 ] only known partially. O[(v/c) 4 ] only known partially. Damour, Schafer (1985, 1987) Damour, Schafer (1985, 1987) Compute using field theory? (Goldberger, Rothstein, 2004) Compute using field theory? (Goldberger, Rothstein, 2004)

Solar system probes of GR beginning to go beyond O[(v/c) 2 ]: Solar system probes of GR beginning to go beyond O[(v/c) 2 ]: New lunar laser ranging observatory APOLLO; Mars and/or Mercury laser ranging missions? New lunar laser ranging observatory APOLLO; Mars and/or Mercury laser ranging missions? LATOR, GTDM, BEACON, ASTROD, etc. LATOR, GTDM, BEACON, ASTROD, etc. See e.g. Turyshev (2008) See e.g. Turyshev (2008)

n-body L gives not only dynamics but also geometry. n-body L gives not only dynamics but also geometry. Add a test particle, M->0: it moves along geodesic in the spacetime metric generated by the rest of the n masses Add a test particle, M->0: it moves along geodesic in the spacetime metric generated by the rest of the n masses Metric can be read off its action Metric can be read off its action

Gravitational wave observatories need the 2 body L beyond O[(v/c) 7 ]: Gravitational wave observatories need the 2 body L beyond O[(v/c) 7 ]: LIGO, VIRGO, etc. can track gravitational waves (GWs) from compact binaries over O[10 4 ] orbital cycles. LIGO, VIRGO, etc. can track gravitational waves (GWs) from compact binaries over O[10 4 ] orbital cycles. GW detection: Raw data integrated against theoretical templates to search for correlations. GW detection: Raw data integrated against theoretical templates to search for correlations. Construction of accurate templates requires 2 body dynamics. Construction of accurate templates requires 2 body dynamics. Currently, 2 body L known up to O[(v/c) 7 ] Currently, 2 body L known up to O[(v/c) 7 ] See e.g. Blanchet (2006) See e.g. Blanchet (2006)

Starting at 3 PN, O[(v/c) 6 ], GR computations of 2 body L start to give divergences that were eventually handled by dimensional regularization. Starting at 3 PN, O[(v/c) 6 ], GR computations of 2 body L start to give divergences that were eventually handled by dimensional regularization. Perturbation theory beyond O[(v/c) 7 ] requires systematic, efficient methods. Perturbation theory beyond O[(v/c) 7 ] requires systematic, efficient methods.

QFT gives systematic framework for QFT gives systematic framework for Renormalization & regularization Renormalization & regularization Computational algorithm – Feynman diagrams with appropriate dimensional analysis. Computational algorithm – Feynman diagrams with appropriate dimensional analysis.

GR: Einstein-Hilbert GR: Einstein-Hilbert n point particles: any scalar functional of geometric tensors & d-velocities integrated along world line n point particles: any scalar functional of geometric tensors & d-velocities integrated along world line

–M∫ds describes structureless point particle –M∫ds describes structureless point particle GR: Einstein-Hilbert GR: Einstein-Hilbert n point particles: any scalar functional of geometric tensors & d-velocities integrated along world line n point particles: any scalar functional of geometric tensors & d-velocities integrated along world line

Non-minimal terms encode information on the non-trivial structure of individual objects. Non-minimal terms encode information on the non-trivial structure of individual objects. GR: Einstein-Hilbert GR: Einstein-Hilbert n point particles: any scalar functional of geometric tensors & d-velocities integrated along world line n point particles: any scalar functional of geometric tensors & d-velocities integrated along world line

GR: Einstein-Hilbert GR: Einstein-Hilbert n point particles: any scalar functional of geometric tensors & d-velocities integrated along world line n point particles: any scalar functional of geometric tensors & d-velocities integrated along world line Coefficients {c x } have to be tuned to match physical observables from full macroscopic description of objects. Coefficients {c x } have to be tuned to match physical observables from full macroscopic description of objects.

For compact objects, up to O[(v/c) 8 ], only minimal terms -M a ∫ds a needed For compact objects, up to O[(v/c) 8 ], only minimal terms -M a ∫ds a needed GR: Einstein-Hilbert GR: Einstein-Hilbert n point particles: any scalar functional of geometric tensors & d-velocities integrated along world line n point particles: any scalar functional of geometric tensors & d-velocities integrated along world line

Expand GR and point particle action in powers of graviton fields h μν … Expand GR and point particle action in powers of graviton fields h μν …

… but some dimensional analysis before computation makes perturbation theory much more systematic … but some dimensional analysis before computation makes perturbation theory much more systematic The scales in the n-body problem The scales in the n-body problem r – typical separation between n bodies. r – typical separation between n bodies. v – typical speed of point particles v – typical speed of point particles r/v – typical time scale of n-body system r/v – typical time scale of n-body system

Lowest order effective action Lowest order effective action Schematically, conservative part of effective action is a series: Schematically, conservative part of effective action is a series:

Look at Re[Graviton propagator], non- relativistic limit: Look at Re[Graviton propagator], non- relativistic limit:

n-graviton piece of -M a ∫ds a with χ powers of velocities scales as n-graviton piece of -M a ∫ds a with χ powers of velocities scales as n-graviton piece of Einstein-Hilbert action with ψ time derivatives scales as n-graviton piece of Einstein-Hilbert action with ψ time derivatives scales as With n (w) world line terms -M a ∫ds a, With n (w) world line terms -M a ∫ds a, With n (v) Einstein-Hilbert action terms, With n (v) Einstein-Hilbert action terms, With N total gravitons, With N total gravitons, Every Feynman diagram scales as Every Feynman diagram scales as

n-graviton piece of -M a ∫ds a with χ powers of velocities scales as n-graviton piece of -M a ∫ds a with χ powers of velocities scales as n-graviton piece of Einstein-Hilbert action with ψ time derivatives scales as n-graviton piece of Einstein-Hilbert action with ψ time derivatives scales as =1 Q PN With n (w) world line terms -M a ∫ds a, With n (w) world line terms -M a ∫ds a, With n (v) Einstein-Hilbert action terms, With n (v) Einstein-Hilbert action terms, With N total gravitons, With N total gravitons, Every Feynman diagram scales as Every Feynman diagram scales as

=1 Q PN Limited form of superposition holds Limited form of superposition holds At Q PN, i.e. O[(v/c) 2Q ], max number of distinct terms from -M a ∫ds a is Q+2 At Q PN, i.e. O[(v/c) 2Q ], max number of distinct terms from -M a ∫ds a is Q+2 1 PN, O[(v/c) 2 ]: 3 body problem 1 PN, O[(v/c) 2 ]: 3 body problem 2 PN, O[(v/c) 4 ]: 4 body problem 2 PN, O[(v/c) 4 ]: 4 body problem … … Every Feynman diagram scales as Every Feynman diagram scales as

2 body diagrams 3 body diagrams Einstein-Infeld-Hoffman d-spacetime dimensions

No graviton vertices Gravitonvertices

vertices Gravitonvertices

vertices Gravitonvertices

vertices Gravitonvertices

vertices Gravitonvertices

Perturbation theory beyond O[(v/c)7] for 2 body L requires systematic, efficient methods. Perturbation theory beyond O[(v/c)7] for 2 body L requires systematic, efficient methods. QFT gives systematic framework for QFT gives systematic framework for Renormalization & regularization Renormalization & regularization Computational algorithm – Feynman diagrams with appropriate dimensional analysis. Computational algorithm – Feynman diagrams with appropriate dimensional analysis. But the computation is still hard and long – need for new technology. But the computation is still hard and long – need for new technology.

Perturbation theory beyond O[(v/c) 7 ] for 2 body L requires systematic, efficient methods. Perturbation theory beyond O[(v/c) 7 ] for 2 body L requires systematic, efficient methods. QFT gives systematic framework for QFT gives systematic framework for Renormalization & regularization Renormalization & regularization Computational algorithm – Feynman diagrams with appropriate dimensional analysis. Computational algorithm – Feynman diagrams with appropriate dimensional analysis. But the computation is still hard and long – need for new technology. But the computation is still hard and long – need for new technology.