CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE www.czso.cz 1 The Quality Metadata System In the Czech Statistical Office Work Session on Statistical Metadata (METIS) 10 -12.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop The MICS4 Process.
The governance of metadata management in the S-DWH
Standardization: quality assurance by standardization, use of common methods and tools – the Polish experience Monika Bieniek Methodology, Standards and.
Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.
The quality framework of European statistics by the ESCB Quality Conference Vienna, 3 June 2014 Aurel Schubert 1) European Central Bank 1) This presentation.
CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE | Na padesatem 81, Prague 10 | Jitka Prokop, Czech Statistical Office SMS-QUALITY The project and application.
© Statistisches Bundesamt, Institute for Research and Development in Federal Statistics Statistisches Bundesamt DESAP - A New Self Assessment Checklist.
The use and convergence of quality assurance frameworks for international and supranational organisations compiling statistics The European Conference.
The Statistical Metadata System: its role in a statistical organization Jana Meliskova Joint UNECE / Eurostat / OECD Work Session on Statistical Metadata.
United Nations Statistics Division
CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, CZ Praha 10, Czech Republic The use of administrative data sources (experience and challenges)
Giovanna Brancato, Marina Signore Istat Work Session on Statistical Metadata (METIS) Metadata and Quality Indicators Reuse for Quality reporting Geneva,
Implementing ESS standards for reference metadata and quality reporting at Istat Work Session on Statistical Metadata Topic (i): Metadata standards and.
European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics (Q2010) 4-6 May 2010, Helsinki, Finland Brancato G., Carbini R., Murgia M., Simeoni G. Istat, Italian.
1 The system aspect of statistical quality Q2014 european conference on quality in official statistics Special session: Consistency of Concepts and Applied.
M ETADATA OF NATIONAL STATISTICAL OFFICES B ELARUS, R USSIA AND K AZAKHSTAN Miroslava Brchanova, Moscow, October, 2014.
CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, CZ Praha 10, Czech Republic Strengthening Statistical Capacity to Improve MDG Data in Conditions.
Quality assurance activities at EUROSTAT CCSA Conference Helsinki, 6-7 May 2010 Martina Hahn, Eurostat.
Training Seminar on Implementation of Effective Quality Assurance Systems in Romanian Higher Education Institutions April 1-3, 2009 Sinaia Criteria for.
Marina Signore Head of Service “Audit for Quality Istat Assessing Quality through Auditing and Self-Assessment Signore M., Carbini R., D’Orazio M., Brancato.
1 1 Development of a competence framework in Statistics Norway HRMT Geneva Jan Byfuglien Beate Johnsen Division for human resources, Statistics.
Development of metadata in the National Statistical Institute of Spain Work Session on Statistical Metadata Genève, 6-8 May-2013 Ana Isabel Sánchez-Luengo.
Eurostat Overall design. Presented by Eva Elvers Statistics Sweden.
How to use the VSS to design a National Strategy for the Development of Statistics (NSDS) 1.
Implementation of quality indicators in the Finnish statistics production process Kari Djerf Statistics Finland Q2008, Rome Italy.
CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, CZ Praha 10, Czech Republic 1 Subsystem QUALITY in Statistical Information System Czech.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
process information Coordination of National Statistical Systems Seminar on the Implementation of Fundamental Principles Konrad Pesendorfer.
CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, CZ Praha 10, Czech Republic Statistical Business Process in the Czech Statistical Office.
1 Improving Data Quality. COURSE DESCRIPTION Introduction to Data Quality- Course Outline.
Monitoring public satisfaction through user satisfaction surveys Committee for the Coordination of Statistical Activities Helsinki 6-7 May 2010 Steve.
Metadata driven application for data processing – from local toward global solution Rudi Seljak Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia.
CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE 1 The Quality Metadata Subsystem In the Czech Statistical Office European Conference On Quality in Official Statistics.
Guidelines on Statistical Business Registers Draft Chapter 8: Quality of SBR Caterina Viviano, Monica Consalvi ISTAT Meeting of the Group of Experts on.
European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics 8-11 July 2008 Mr. Hing-Wang Fung Census and Statistics Department Hong Kong, China (
Statistical Expertise for Sound Decision Making Quality Assurance for Census Data Processing Jean-Michel Durr 28/1/20111Fourth meeting of the TCG - Lubjana.
1 C. ARRIBAS, D. LORCA, A. SALINERO & A. COLMENERO Measuring statistical quality at the Spanish National Statistical Institute.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Principles, criteria and methods Part 2 Quality management Produced in Collaboration between.
Implementation of the European Statistics Code of Practice Yalta September 2009 Pieter Everaers, Eurostat.
Developing and applying business process models in practice Statistics Norway Jenny Linnerud and Anne Gro Hustoft.
CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, CZ Praha 10, Czech Republic Managing Metadata System Projects; Experiences of the Czech.
United Nations Oslo City Group on Energy Statistics OG7, Helsinki, Finland October 2012 ESCM Chapter 8: Data Quality and Meta Data 1.
Quality Frameworks: Implementation and Impact Notes by Michael Colledge.
Beijing, October 19, th International Roundtable on Business Survey Frames Co-ordinating role of the Business Register in Economic Statistics Results.
MICS Data Processing Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data Processing Workshop Overview of the MICS Process.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
RECENT DEVELOPMENT OF SORS METADATA REPOSITORIES FOR FASTER AND MORE TRANSPARENT PRODUCTION PROCESS Work Session on Statistical Metadata 9-11 February.
Linking management, planning and quality in Statistics Norway A coherent planning system Systematic quality work Portfolio management Hans Viggo Sæbø and.
September 12-14, 2006OECD-Eurostat Expert Meeting1 OECD-Eurostat Expert Meeting on Trade in Services Statistics Foreign Affiliates Statistics in Eurostat.
10 August Inter-Regional Workshop on the Production of Gender Statistics New Delhi, India, 6-10 August 2007 Strengthening National Gender Statistics.
The business process models and quality issues at the Hungarian Central Statistical Office (HCSO) Mr. Csaba Ábry, HCSO, Methodological Department Geneva,
Quality at a Glance: Documentation of Quality Indicators at Statistics Austria European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Rome, 8-11 July 2008.
1 European Statistics Code of Practice. I.Institutional Environment Principle II.Statistical processes Principle III.Statistical Output Principle.
1 Recent developments in quality related matters in the ESS High level seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia countries Claudia Junker,
Maria João Zilhão Planning and Quality Control Unit « High Level Seminar “Quality Matters in Statistics” June, Athens, Greece Implementation of the.
National Population Commission (NPopC)
Quality assurance in official statistics
4.1. Data Quality 1.
Survey phases, survey errors and quality control system
Generic Statistical Business Process Model (GSBPM)
Survey phases, survey errors and quality control system
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics
Assessment of quality of standards
Karin Blix, Statistics Denmark,
Hanna Gembarzewska, Monika Grabani
Metadata on quality of statistical information
Prodcom Working Group Item Quality reporting and indicators
2.7 Annex 3 – Quality reports
ESS conceptual standards for quality reporting
Presentation transcript:

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE 1 The Quality Metadata System In the Czech Statistical Office Work Session on Statistical Metadata (METIS) March 2010, Geneva Czech Statistical Office Jitka Prokop

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE 2 Content 1.Background 2.Quality Metadata System 3.Quality Monitoring 4.Quality Assessment 5.Lessons Learned 6.Conclusions

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Background SMS sub-systems

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Background Links between SMS subsystems SMS-CLASS SMS-VAR SMS-TASKS SMS-QUALITY SMS-USERS SMS-DISSEM SMS-RESP SMS-SERIES Statistical task - a set of statistical activities needed to fulfil a user’s request for statistical information. It can be composed of one or more statistical surveys or similar statistics.

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Quality Metadata System SMS-QUALITY Architecture Based on The ESS concept Quality criteria (e.g. relevance, accuracy, etc.) Quality and performance indicators (respondent burden, cost) The European Self-Assessment Checklist for Survey Managers (DESAP) Statistical Business Process Model Applicable for different types of statistics (in some extent).

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Quality Metadata System Quality Form Map (QFM) Q-attributesModel of Q-attributes in defined structure. Approved by the top management. Includes all proposed Q-attributes. Different types of statistics to be covered. SW application for QFM Defines Q-attributes and/or links into other SMS subsystems Enables inputs of values manually Provides views into DWH Values of Q-attributes are stored in DWH

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Quality Metadata System Structure of the QF Map

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Quality Metadata System Example of QF Map components Group of SectionsSectionsQ-Attributes Design of statistical survey & Relevance Cooperation with users Testing of questionnaire Number of responses in tests of questionnaire – internal, ministries, respondents. Number of testing cycles. Sensitive questions in the questionnaire. Training of staff Scheduled and actual dates Punctuality Feedback form users & their requirements

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Quality Metadata system Levels of Q-attributes 1.Most stable Q-attributes Relates to the whole statistical task, survey, phase of process e.g.: Key users, Information on training of staff, Methodology.. 2.Q-attributes related to processing in a concrete period e.g.: Unit response rate, Extent of sample and frame, Punctuality 3.Key statistical variable In generally defined breakdown e.g.: Coefficient of variation, Item response rate Levels of Q-attributes relate to content and stability of values.

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Quality Monitoring Aspects coversQuality monitoring covers CollectionCollection of data / metadata CalculationsCalculations of Q-attributes ChecksChecks with expected values / scales (future; comparisons) based onQuality monitoring is based on Input variableshistory of changesInput variables, incl. „history of changes“ Variables specially designed for quality monitoringVariables specially designed for quality monitoring Related to questionnaire or interview Related to concrete variables ResultsResults of Q-attributes During a sub-process / phase of statistical process At the end of the sub-process / phase After finishing the whole statistical process

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE 11 CollectionCollection of input data for calculation of Q-attributes Calculated Q-attributesCalculated Q-attributes (by SW) e.g. Unit response ratepopulationUnit response rate for the population Unit response ratesstrataUnit response rates for individual strata 3. Quality Monitoring During running of sub-process

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Quality Monitoring After the end sub-process input variablesBased on input variables Editing and imputation rates Distinction of inputs, corrections and deletes Recognition of most edited items specific quality variablesBased on specific quality variables Way (mode) of data collection Type of contact with respondents Aspects of individual imputations (e.g. with or without respondent, technical mistakes)

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Quality Monitoring After the end of the process or After the end of one run of the process Indicators on accuracy Coefficient of variation Item response rates Final unit response rates Imputation rates Revisions Timeliness, Punctuality, Comparability, Coherence

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Quality Assessment The Quality Assessment Guidance (QAG) Purpose, applicability Support for management of process Support for high level decisions Support for quality reporting Self-assessment Auditing Levels - Assessment of Quantitative and qualitative results of Q-attributes Statistical survey / statistical task

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Quality Assessment Ways 4. Quality Assessment Ways of Assessment Categorial assessment Averages of individual results Textual assessment and summary Expert commentaries (suggested issues in QAG) Strong aspects Weaknesses Proposal of concrete actions, priorities

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Quality Assessment Levels of Q Assessment of Q criteria Structure of QA follows the ESS quality criteria and c overs the following levels: statistical variable a.Key statistical variable in particular breakdowns. aggregate b.Statistical variable as an aggregate (average) of the breakdowns or statistical survey. c.Set c.Set of similar indicators, quality of sub-process, quality sub-criterion or criterion. audited statistics d.The audited statistics as the whole.

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE 17 Suggestions -> Collection -> Calculations -> Assessment -> Feedback and actions 5.Lessons learned 1. Links to the phases of the SBP

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Lessons Learned Cross-sectional aspects and Time coordination 2.Cross-sectional aspects differenttypes of statisticsEnsure applicability for different types of statistics duplicitieslinksAvoid duplicities, arrange links with other SMS subsystems expertsInvolve experts: SMS-Quality project team quality methodologists subject-matter statisticians ICT experts, members from other project teams 3.Time coordination mutually coordinated – Committee for the Redesign of SIS and SMSDesign and implementation of SMS-QUALITY and other SMS subsystems to be mutually coordinated – Committee for the Redesign of SIS and SMS

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Lessons Learned 4. SMS-Quality project team Appointed by the top-management Suggests schedule of the SMS-QUALITY activities Regularly reports to the top-management Designed QF-map (Architecture of SMS-QUALITY) => Proposes SW application (content, functions) incl. updates Coordinates implementation and cooperation among activities of involved experts

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Lessons Learned 5. Role of subject-matter statisticians and methodologists (a) Testing phase Quality methodologists Define Q-attributes and explanatory notes into SW application Test the SW applications Administrate SMS-Quality, QF Map, QAG Provide scripts for calculations of quality indicators Suggest scales for quality assessment Subject-matter statisticians Provide data for tests Adjust scales for quality assessment Manage routine quality monitoring, assessment

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE 21 Full implementation Q-methodologists manage Quality methodology updates (according to the ESS development) Support subject-matter statisticians Administration of SMS-QUALITY, updates Subject-matter statisticians manage Collection of Q-attributes (automatic or manually) Quality assessment, self-assessment Approval of results of assessment 5.Lessons Learned 5. Role of subject-matter statisticians and methodologists (b)

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Lessons Learned 6. Compliance with ESS quality framework SMS-QUALITY should be designed as a flexible tool to ensure easy methodology updates, taking into account development on the ESS level. Application software should have necessary flexibility concerning collection, monitoring and assessment procedures.

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Conclusions Development of SMS-QUALITY has been scheduled with highest priority for the next two years. Further progress in development of SMS-QUALITY will depend On available human and financial resources due to fact the same experts are involved in real production of quality reports and in development of SMS-QUALITY. On progress of other SMS subsystems. Development of quality methodology on both national and international levels shall be taken into account.

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE 24 Thank you for your attention.