Parameterization and Performance in Multiscale Ocean Models Todd Ringler, Qingshan Chen, Doug Jacobsen, Phil Jones (LANL) LA-UR-xx-1234 The Model for Prediction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DOE Global Modeling Strategic Goals Anjuli Bamzai Program Manager Climate Change Prediction Program DOE/OBER/Climate Change Res Div
Advertisements

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Discretizing the Sphere for Multi-Scale Air Quality Simulations using Variable-Resolution Finite-Volume Techniques Martin J. Otte U.S. EPA Robert Walko.
Low-frequency variability in the mid-latitude atmosphere induced by an oceanic thermal front: Application to the North Atlantic Ocean Yizhak Feliks 1,2.
HYCOM and the need for overflow/entrainment parameterizations.
1 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
GFDL’s unified regional-global weather and climate modeling system is designed for all temporal-spatial scales Examples: Regional cloud-resolving Radiative-Convective.
A Cloud Resolving Model with an Adaptive Vertical Grid Roger Marchand and Thomas Ackerman - University of Washington, Joint Institute for the Study of.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Dynamical Downscaling of CCSM Using WRF Yang Gao 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yun-Fat Lam 1, John Drake 1, Kate Evans 2 1 University of Tennessee, USA 2 Oak Ridge.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U.S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY Global Climate Modeling Research John Drake Computational Climate Dynamics Group Computer.
1 WRF Development Test Center A NOAA Perspective WRF ExOB Meeting U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C. 28 April 2006 Fred Toepfer NOAA Environmental.
1 Pendahuluan Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: H0062/Teori Sistem Tahun: 2006.
HOW AESOP GOT A SUNTAN A fractured fairy tale (with apologies to the producers of the Rocky and Bullwinkle show) The cast of this episode: Oliver Fringer.
B1 -Biogeochemical ANL - Townhall V. Rao Kotamarthi.
Weather Research & Forecasting Model (WRF) Stacey Pensgen ESC 452 – Spring ’06.
Climate Initiatives and Opportunities J. J. Hack (NCCS)
Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research J Michael Kuperberg, Ph.D. Dan Stover, Ph.D. Terrestrial Ecosystem Science AmeriFlux.
1 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
LINDSEY NOLAN WILLIAM COLLINS PETA-APPS TEAM MEETING OCTOBER 1, 2009 Stochastic Physics Update: Simulating the Climate Systems Accounting for Key Uncertainties.
Japan/East Sea Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) Patrick J. Hogan and Harley E. Hurlburt Naval Research Laboratory, Code 7323, Stennis Space Center,
1 NOAA’s Environmental Modeling Plan Stephen Lord Ants Leetmaa November 2004.
Computational Math Group Amik St-Cyr, Ram Nair, Natasha Flyer Group Head: Piotr Smolarkiewicz.
Dr. Frank Herr Ocean Battlespace Sensing S&T Department Head Dr. Scott L. Harper Program Officer Team Lead, 322AGP Dr. Martin O. Jeffries Program Officer.
Who are we? -Group of active climate researchers with diversified expertise in a wide range of disciplines relevant to climate science, including atmosphere,
1.Introduction 2.Description of model 3.Experimental design 4.Ocean ciruculation on an aquaplanet represented in the model depth latitude depth latitude.
and Modelling the North Pacific Ocean
NOCS: NEMO activities in 2006 Preliminary tests of a full “LOBSTER” biogechemical model within the ORCA1 configuration. (6 extra passive tracers). Developed.
What is a Climate Model?.
Comparison of Different Approaches NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR is Sponsored by NSF and this work is partially.
Marine organic matter in sea spray Nd vs. SO4, binned into low-OM, intermediate OM, and high-OM groups Adding marine organic matter as a source into ACME.
Impact of partial steps and momentum advection schemes in a global ocean circulation model at eddy-premitting resolution Barnier Bernard et al.
Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research DOE Workshop on Community Modeling and Long-term Predictions of the Integrated Water.
Earth System Modeling Framework Status Cecelia DeLuca NOAA Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences University of Colorado, Boulder.
CMRS Review, PPPL, 5 June 2003 &. 4 projects in high energy and nuclear physics 5 projects in fusion energy science 14 projects in biological and environmental.
CPPA Past/Ongoing Activities - Ocean-Atmosphere Interactions - Address systematic ocean-atmosphere model biases - Eastern Pacific Investigation of Climate.
The Linear and Non-linear Evolution Mechanism of Mesoscale Vortex Disturbances in Winter Over Western Japan Sea Yasumitsu MAEJIMA and Keita IGA (Ocean.
Land Ice Verification and Validation (LIVV) Kit Weak scaling behavior for a large dome- shaped test case. It shows that the scaling behavior of a new run.
Ocean modelling activities in Japan (some of activities in China and Korea are included in the report) report to the CLIVAR Working Group for Ocean Model.
Towards development of a Regional Arctic Climate System Model --- Coupling WRF with the Variable Infiltration Capacity land model via a flux coupler Chunmei.
“Very high resolution global ocean and Arctic ocean-ice models being developed for climate study” by Albert Semtner Extremely high resolution is required.
Xylar Asay-Davis Matthew Hecht, Philip Jones, Mathew Maltrud, Christopher Newman, Mark Petersen, Todd Ringler Los Alamos National Lab PDEs on the Sphere.
Use of Mesoscale and Microscale Results to Improve the Mars Climate Database Near-Surface Variability Model E. Millour, F. Forget, A. Spiga April 6, 2011.
1 Accomplishments. 2 Overview of Accomplishments  Sustaining the Production Earth System Grid Serving the current needs of the climate modeling community.
Earth System Curator and Model Metadata Discovery and Display for CMIP5 Sylvia Murphy and Cecelia Deluca (NOAA/CIRES) Hannah Wilcox (NCAR/CISL) Metafor.
Presented by Adaptive Hybrid Mesh Refinement for Multiphysics Applications Ahmed Khamayseh and Valmor de Almeida Computer Science and Mathematics Division.
Ice-Based Observatories network in the Arctic Ocean Andrey Proshutinsky, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution NOAA Arctic Science Priorities Workshop,
Institut für Küstenforschung I f K Numerical experimentation with regional atmospheric models Hans von Storch and Ralf Weisse 8IMSC, Lüneburg, 15. March.
Shu-Hua Chen University of California, Davis eatheresearch & orecasting
Page 1 Andrew Lorenc WOAP 2006 © Crown copyright 2006 Andrew Lorenc Head of Data Assimilation & Ensembles Numerical Weather Prediction Met Office, UK Data.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U.S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY Data Requirements for Climate and Carbon Research John Drake, Climate Dynamics Group Computer.
Presented by LCF Climate Science Computational End Station James B. White III (Trey) Scientific Computing National Center for Computational Sciences Oak.
Development of an Atmospheric Climate Model with Self-Adapting Grid and Physics Joyce E. Penner 1, Michael Herzog 2, Christiane Jablonowski 3, Bram van.
High-Resolution Ocean and Ice Models for Forecasting and Climate Projection Albert J. Semtner Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943, USA This talk.
Presented by Ricky A. Kendall Scientific Computing and Workflows National Institute for Computational Sciences Applications National Institute for Computational.
Representing Effects of Complex Terrain on Mountain Meteorology and Hydrology Steve Ghan, Ruby Leung, Teklu Tesfa, PNNL Steve Goldhaber, NCAR.
HYBRID LARGE EDDY SIMULATION/REYNOLDS AVERAGED NAVIER-STOKES FORMULATION FOR NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICITON H. A. Hassan North Carolina State University,
AO-FVCOM Development: A System Nested with Global Ocean Models Changsheng Chen University of Massachusetts School of Marine Science, USA
NOAA Northeast Regional Climate Center Dr. Lee Tryhorn NOAA Climate Literacy Workshop April 2010 NOAA Northeast Regional Climate.
Gent-McWilliams parameterization: 20/20 Hindsight Peter R. Gent Senior Scientist National Center for Atmospheric Research.
A41I-0105 Supporting Decadal and Regional Climate Prediction through NCAR’s EaSM Data Portal Doug Schuster and Steve Worley National Center for Atmospheric.
Emerging Research Opportunities at the Climate Modeling Laboratory NC State University (Presentation at NIA Meeting: 9/04/03) Fredrick H. M. Semazzi North.
UPDATE FROM THE OCEAN MODEL WORKING GROUP
Performance of the VIC land surface model in coupled simulations
What is a Climate Model?.
*supported by the Army Research Office
What is a Climate Model?.
Low Order Methods for Simulation of Turbulence in Complex Geometries
Presentation transcript:

Parameterization and Performance in Multiscale Ocean Models Todd Ringler, Qingshan Chen, Doug Jacobsen, Phil Jones (LANL) LA-UR-xx-1234 The Model for Prediction Across Scales (MPAS) is a variable-resolution unstructured-grid approach to climate system modeling that supports both quasi-uniform and variable resolution meshing of the sphere using quadrilaterals, triangles or Voronoi tessellations. The MPAS software framework permits rapid prototyping of single-components of climate system models (atmosphere, ocean, land ice, etc.) and offers the potential to explore regional-scale climate change within the context of global climate system modeling. MPAS is currently structured as a partnership between National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and the Los Alamos Climate, Ocean and Sea Ice Modeling (COSIM) team with shared development of the base framework, but component model development focused at each lab (ocean at LANL, atmosphere at NCAR). The MPAS-Ocean model will be a proposed replacement for the LANL Parallel Ocean Program (POP) in the Community Earth System Model (CESM). The MPAS Ocean Model POP Grids: logically rectangular quasi-uniform MPAS-Ocean Grids: unstructured grids quasi-uniform or variable resolution Voronoi Tesselations Global Simulations Coastline is fit to the mesh. high-resolution region low-resolution region Even in the mesh transition zone, the grid is smooth and uniform. Early simulations have been performed using both global high-resolution (15km) configurations and variable resolution configurations that include a 15km region in the North Atlantic smoothly transitioning to 75km resolution throughout the rest of the globe. The variable resolution approach achieves nearly identical results in the high-resolution region at 1/7 th the cost. Comparison to Observations Sea Surface Height RMS x1.15km: Globally uniform grid x5.NA.75km_15km: Variable Res. N. Atlantic Zooming in, the eddy activity is virtually the same using 15km globally or 15km regionally in just the North Atlantic. This shows that specific regions of the global ocean system can be accurately simulated with local mesh refinement. Sea Surface Height RMS x1.15km: Global uniform grid x5.NA.75km_15km: Variable resolution North Atlantic Observations: AVISO The global 15km shows high eddy activity in the ACC, Agulhas formation region, and western boundary currents. These are similar to but more energetic than observations. Outside the refined mesh region, eddy activity is lower in the variable resolution run, as expected. scale: 0 to 80cm Vorticity Kinetic Energy Snapshots do not show any perturbations due to change of resolution in the mesh transition zone. Why Scale-aware Eddy Parametrizations? Performance Mesoscale eddies (50-100km) play a critical role in determining the climate of the oceans. MPAS-O has the capability to fully resolve these eddies in certain regions of interest and leave them un(der)-resolved in the rest of the oceans. MPAS-O presents an unprecedented opportunity for the development and testing of mesoscale eddy parameterizations that can scale smoothly across the disparate set of grid lengths existing in one simulation. Scale-aware Anticipated Potential Vorticity Method (APVM) The anticipated potential vorticity method ([1]) is perfectly energy Conserving and (potential) enstrophy dissipating. It is therefore a desirable closure scheme for simulations of large-scale geophysical flows. With one single parameter α = , the scale-aware APVM ([2, 3]) produces satisfactory results on a diverse range of multi- resolution grids, as shown by the close match between the potential enstrophy spectral curves of the low-res simulations and that of the high-res reference simulation. Plan for Scale-aware Gent- McWilliams closure 1.Explore spatially varying GM parameters for an extended GM closure ([4]) in a general setting (work underway). 2.Revisit existing spatially varying formulations that are based on baroclinic instability theory, experience, and/or observation data. 3.Develop and evaluate formulations that incorporate the local grid length scales. References [1] R. Sadouny and C. Basdevant, Parameterization of Subgrid Scale Barotropic and Baroclinic Eddies in Quasi-geostrophic Models: Anticipated Potential Vorticity Method, J. Atmos. Sci. 42(13), 1985, pp [2] Q. Chen, M. Gunzburger, T. Ringler, A Scale-Invariant Formulation of the Anticipated Potential Vorticity Method, Mon. Wea. Rev. 139(8), 2011, pp [3] Q. Chen, M. Gunzburger, T. Ringler, A Scale-Aware Anticipated Potential Vorticity Method. Part II: on Variable-Resolution Meshes, Mon. Wea. Rev. 140(9), 2012, pp [4] T. Ringler and P. Gent, An Eddy Closure for Potential Vorticity, Ocean Modelling, 39, 2011, pp The MPAS-Ocean model introduces new performance challenges due to the indirect addressing associated with unstructured grids as well as new algorithmic choices. A major concern is that the new model can not match the performance the current structured ocean model (POP) that it is meant to replace. In fact, the initial implementation of MPAS-Ocean is approximately a factor of three slower than an equivalently configured POP simulation, though not much effort has yet been focused on computational performance. Collaborations with SUPER We are working with the SciDAC Institute SUPER to try and identify portions of code that require optimizations. Currently we are in the process of incorporating the use of TAU (Tuning and Analysis Utilities, University of Oregon) into our development, and will continue working with SUPER to improve our model on both current and new architectures. Objectives In order to advance Earth System Science, the SciDAC Multiscale Methods for Earth System modeling project is accelerating the development of a new generation of models that can capture the structure and evolution of the climate system across a broad range of spatial and temporal scales. New dynamical formulations are currently being tested, but will require scale-aware parameterizations of physical processes that accurately represent mechanisms in both fully resolved and un(der)-resolved regions. In addition, these new models must perform well on advanced architectures currently being deployed. The ocean component of this project is focused on developing new scale- aware ocean eddy parameterizations and working with SciDAC Institutes to improve the performance of this new model. Acknowledgement The Multiscale Methods for Accurate, Efficient, and Scale-Aware Models of the Earth System project is jointly supported by the Biological and Environmental Research program and the Advanced Scientific Computing Research program in the Dept. of Energy’s Office of Science.