U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting 19-20 October 2004 Attachment D Landsat Status Briefing: ETM+

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lab for Remote Sensing Hydrology and Spatial Modeling Dept. of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, NTU Satellite Remote Sensing for Land-Use/Land-Cover.
Advertisements

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Agency Report, WGISS #22 September 15, 2006 Lyndon R. Oleson U.S. Geological Survey Center for Earth.
Use Of Browse Or Preview Images In Support Of Data Access PV October 2004 Frascati, Italy S. W. Doescher, U. S. Geological Survey R. H. Sunne,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Agency Report, WGISS #24 October 19, 2007 Lyndon R. Oleson U.S. Geological Survey Center for Earth.
LANDSAT Program Update Tim Newman Coordinator, USGS Land Remote Sensing Program National Geospatial Advisory Committee December 3, 2014.
Aqua MODIS Cold FPA Performance and Operation MODIS Characterization Support Team (MCST) April 25, 2012.
SDCG-6 Oslo, Norway October 22-24, 2014 SDCG/USGS: Landsat 7 & 8 SDCG-6 Session 5: Roles and Responsibilities Data flows from CEOS agencies.
History and Features of Landsat 7 By: Andy Vogelsberg Photo of Landsat 7 taken from tures/litho/landsat/land.jpg.
Satellite Thermal Remote Sensing of Boiling Springs Lake Jeff Pedelty NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Goddard Center for Astrobiology.
Lineage February 13, 2006 Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors.
SDCG-7 Session-9 Thursday, March 5, 2015 Country Reports and CEOS Analysis Tools SDCG-7 Sydney, Australia March 4 th – 6 th 2015.
CEOS - NSLRSDA Footprint Server John Faundeen U.S. Geological Survey October Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Geography 121 Lab #4 Finding Landsat Data November 8, 2006 Dave Alleman Pat Clancy Sarah Gustafson.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Landsat Program Update October 2005 Presented By: U.S. Geological Survey, Center for EROS Sioux.
1ESDIS HDF-EOS Workshop IV Landover, Maryland, September 20, 2000 The Landsat 7 Processing System ( LPS ) Level Zero-R Science Products Michael R. Reid.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Web Services Interest Group WGISS #28 September, 2009 Pretoria, South Africa Lyndon R. Oleson U.S.
Western Region CSREES Administrative Officer’s Meeting Monterey, California October 4 – 6, 2005 Janet Downey, Staff Accountant OEP, POFMB, Oversight Section.
USGS Report U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Kristi Kline USGS EROS Center.
SDCG-5 ESA/ESRIN, Frascati, Italy February 24-26, 2014 SDCG-5 Session 2 Landsat 7/8 status and 2013 Implementation.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Landsat 8 Data Policy April 14, 2006 Jay Feuquay Land Remote Sensing.
A METHODOLOGY TO SELECT PHENOLOGICALLY SUITABLE LANDSAT SCENES FOR FOREST CHANGE DETECTION IGARSS 2011, Jul, 27, 2011 Do-Hyung Kim, Raghuram Narashiman,
Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 SLC-Off Gap Filled Product Generation Richard Irish SSAI, NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geometric Assessment of Remote Sensed Data Oct Presented By: Michael Choate, SAIC U.S.
1 Mid-Decadal Global Land Survey Jeff Masek Biospheric Sciences Branch, NASA GSFC Steve Covington Aerospace Corporation / USGS November 1, 2006.
DEVELOPING REGIONAL SERVICE PLANS: AN OVERVIEW EAST TEXAS MEETING October 6, 2005.
April nd IBTrACS Workshop 1 Operational Procedures How can we build consistent, homogeneous, well- documented climate quality data?
EOS/NPP DIRECT READOUT MEETING BENEVENTO OCTOBER 2005 Geoscience Australia 03/000 CRAIG SMITH CURRENT MODIS DB PRODUCTS AND FUTURE PLANS AT ACRES, GEOSCIENCE.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Mid Decadal Global Land Survey Project briefing to the ScanEx RDC 3 rd International Conference,
Remote sensing and in situ measurements in the Global Earth Observing System of Systems Curtis Woodcock, Boston University.
1 NUOPC National Unified Operational Prediction Capability 1 Review Committee for Operational Processing Centers National Unified Operational Prediction.
Suomi NPP VIIRS Visible Composite National Geospatial Advisory Committee Meeting December 11, 2013 Tim Newman Acting Program Coordinator Land Remote Sensing.
Remote Sensing Realities | June 2008 Remote Sensing Realities.
LANDSAT Program Update
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Landsat Status and Plans February, 2008 Lyndon R. Oleson U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources.
Radiometric Correction and Image Enhancement Modifying digital numbers.
IT Purchase Request Tool ITPR Capital Planning & Investment Control (CPIC) Financial Systems Office (FSO), 153 & Business & Investment Management Office.
The ISO TC211 Standard Project 19130: Sensor and Data Models for Imagery and Gridded Data Liping Di George Mason University Fairfax, VA, USA
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey June 22, 2009 Landsat Data Gap Readiness Plan Briefing to Landsat Science Team Rochester, New.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Entering A New Landsat Era – The Future is Now Tom Loveland U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources.
MULTI – SOURCE I2I VERIFICATION (ORTHO + LIDAR INTENSITY) Absolute Accuracy Verification:.125 Foot (GSD) RGB Image Data Tuck Mapping, Co-Acquired Ortho.
PACS NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena 10 th - 14 th Sep 2012 The SPIRE Destriper Bernhard Schulz NHSC/IPAC on behalf of the SPIRE ICC 1.
Assessing the Phenological Suitability of Global Landsat Data Sets for Forest Change Analysis The Global Land Cover Facility What does.
7 December 2015 Prepared by: Earth Observation Data Services Caroline Cloutier, A/Manager LGSOWG 35, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia Nov , 2006 CCRS.
GEOG 121 Project 4: Finding Landsat Data Presented by: Dan LaSota Greg Stricker Weiqiang Lin.
Baseline Global Observation Scenario SDCG-8, Session 3 Gene Fosnight (USGS); Frank Martin Seifert (ESA) 24 Sep 2015, Bonn.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Providing Commercial Data to Federal Users Archive Advisory Committee Meeting Jenn Willems, Project.
Reconstructing Forty Years of Landsat Observations
SeaWiFS Highlights July 2001 SeaWiFS Views Eruption of Mt. Etna On July 24, 2001, SeaWiFS viewed a greenish-orange plume resulting from the ongoing eruption.
1 Status Report on GEO Task AR Advocate continuity for moderate-resolution satellite remote sensing, including support for a Landsat follow-on mission.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 2015: Presentation is a product of the U.S. Geological Survey. Published by the Aerospace Corporation.
1 Creating Situational Awareness with Data Trending and Monitoring Zhenping Li, J.P. Douglas, and Ken. Mitchell Arctic Slope Technical Services.
Baseline Global Observation Scenario SDCG-9, Session 3 Gene Fosnight (USGS); Frank Martin Seifert (ESA) 25 Feb 2016, Frascati.
Temporal Classification and Change Detection
Geog 121 Project 4: Finding LandSat Data
Overview of Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation (JACIE)
Analysis Ready Data July 18, 2016 John Dwyer Leo Lymburner
WGISS-43 USGS Agency Report Kristi Kline USGS EROS Center
USGS Status Frank Kelly, USGS EROS CEOS Plenary 2017 Agenda Item #4.14
Dissemination Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive Trade Statistics May 2008,
Landsat Program The World’s Most Sophisticated Optical Observatories of the Earth The World’s Model for International Collaboration in Earth Observation.
MODIS Characterization and Support Team Presented By Truman Wilson
COVE Tool Updates Joint SDCG/GEOGLAM/LSI-VC Meeting September 6, 2018
USGS Agency Status Landsat Operations Jenn Lacey 21 July 2016
Geography 121 Lab #4 Finding Landsat Data
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
SEO Report to WGISS Brian Killough CEOS Systems Engineering Office (SEO) WGISS-46 Meeting October 22, 2018.
Current Status of ROLO and Future Development
Geog 121 Project 4: Finding LandSat Data
Implementation of DCC algorithm for MTSAT-2/Imager
SEO Report to WGISS-47 Brian Killough
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting October 2004 Attachment D Landsat Status Briefing: ETM+ SLC-off Impact and Solutions/Landsat 5 Tracy Zeiler Landsat Project Chief October 19, 2004

U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting October 2004 Attachment D Landsat 7 ETM+ SLC Failure: Return to Operations Timeline  May 31, ETM+ scan line corrector failed  July 14, ETM+ acquisitions resumed  September 3, 2003 – USGS approval for recovery attempt; SLC did not restart  September 16, 2003 – Final reconfiguration of instrument completed  September 18, 2003 – Resumed normal LTAP acquisitions, downlinks to ICs  October 22, 2003 – Released standard L1G SLC-off product  October 28, 2003 – New product brainstorming workshop  May 10, 2004 – Released phase 1 SLC-off to SLC-on gap-filled product  November 2004 – Release phase 2 SLC-off to SLC-off gap-filled product

U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting October 2004 Attachment D Initial New Product Development Plan  Requirement for multiple product types to satisfy different user communities –Result will be suite of products based on ETM+ SLC-off data  Use integrated team to provide technical input –Include USGS, NASA and operational agency scientists and engineers –Identify all options for ETM+ product improvement –Identify benefits/risks/complexity/cost-to-benefit for all options –Prioritize options from those easily achievable in the near-term to those that require research prior to possible future implementation  Implement near-term product options that will satisfy some user requirements  Continue with phased development of new product types

U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting October 2004 Attachment D Phase 1 SLC-off Products and Associated Improvements  Enhance existing browse to show impacts to L1G data (i.e. data gaps)  Let users choose the number of interpolation pixels used during processing when ordering products (0-15 pixels)  Implement new interpolation method  Include gap pixel mask with Level 1 products including interpolated products  Implement a Landsat 7 ETM+ SLC-off to SLC-on gap-filled product

U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting October 2004 Attachment D Phase 1 SLC-off to SLC-on Product Summary  Level-1G product is radiometrically and geometrically corrected  Requires scene-to-scene registration  Localized linear histogram matching implemented with static window size  The linear method chosen used a function of the standard deviation for gain and a function of the mean for offset in estimating gap-fill pixels  Highly saturated pixels are excluded from histogram calculation  Optimum input is SLC-on image acquired 1-year prior –Similar phenology improves histogram matching –Minimum cloud cover is recommended to allow scene registration and reduce artifacts; other transient phenomenon also affect final image quality  Search and order system selects default and prioritizes SLC-on scenes based on above criteria  Cost $275/scene

U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting October 2004 Attachment D Phase 2 SLC-off Products and Associated Improvements  Generate enhanced browse data that illustrates the data gaps in each ETM+ SLC-Off image  Implement a Landsat 7 ETM+ SLC-off to SLC-off gap-filled product  Provide user an indication of SLC-off to SLC-off scene compatibility  Implement modified histogram matching algorithm  Include gap pixel mask with Level 1 products that indicates data source of all fill values

U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting October 2004 Attachment D Phase 2 SLC-off to SLC-off Product Summary (slide 1 of 2)  Level-1G product is radiometrically and geometrically corrected  Requires scene-to-scene registration  Localized linear histogram matching implemented with adaptive window  The method was modified to use linear regression in computing pixel transformations  Highly saturated pixels are excluded from histogram calculation

U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting October 2004 Attachment D Phase 2 SLC-off to SLC-off Product Summary (slide 2 of 2)  Requires SLC-off image(s) acquired as close as possible to primary SLC-off image –Minimum cloud cover in both primary and secondary image(s) to reduce image artifacts; other transient phenomenon also affect final image quality –Minimum cloud cover SLC-on image required to allow scene registration –Random gap placement increases complexity of scene selection that will ensure complete ground coverage  Metadata called the gap phase statistic calculated during input scene production to provide an indication of SLC-off scene compatibility  Search and order system provides list of available SLC-off scenes for gap filling and default SLC-on image for registration –Provides predicted ground coverage for SLC-off images selected based on gap phase statistics  Cost $300/scene

U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting October 2004 Attachment D Composite Gap Area Probability

U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting October 2004 Attachment D Landsat Business Model  Landsat operating funds were derived from three sources* –Appropriated funds48% –Data sales income38% –International cooperator fees14%  SLC failure has impacted the viability of the previous model –FY04 operating funds required 73% appropriated funding  Additional appropriated funds are required to continue mission –Permanent appropriations not yet identified –Data sales still falling –IC income dropping *based on 2003 pre-anomaly budget

U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting October 2004 Attachment D Trends in Landsat ETM+ Data Sales (FY 2000 – 2004)

U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting October 2004 Attachment D Landsat 7 ETM+ SLC-on versus SLC-off FY04 Product Sales Demonstrates the normal sales growth for new products

U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting October 2004 Attachment D Landsat ETM+ SLC-on versus SLC-off Product Demand Demonstrates the increase in SLC-off sales with new product releases

U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting October 2004 Attachment D Other Landsat 7 Status Information  Long term acquisition plan has been modified to aid in the collection of potential SLC-off to SLC-off image pairs; nominal rate increased from 250 to 300 scenes per day  Number of participating International Cooperators is down due to SLC failure; current participating ICs include:  Gyroscope 3 was exhibiting anomalous behavior and was turned off (May 5, 2004); mission continues with no loss of function; accuracy and precision of imagery unaffected  End-of-life based on fuel estimated to be Spring, 2011 Australia, Argentina, Canada, Indonesia, Japan

U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting October 2004 Attachment D Landsat 5 Status  Number of ICs downlinking Landsat 5 has increased. –Australia, Argentina, Brazil, Canada, China, ESA, South Africa, Thailand  Investigation of amplifier behavior resulted in standby operations mode that does not preclude additional IC downlinks  Battery 3 behavior required that it be turned off (May 21, 2004); nominal operations continues with 2 batteries  Addition of telemetry (S-band) downlinks to ASA  New sensor alignment parameters and addition of definitive ephemeris will make geometric accuracy more consistent; data will be available from 1993 forward  Improved radiometric calibration through inclusion of general detector change and changes due to ice buildup in lookup table; up to 20% improvement  End-of-life based on fuel is estimated to be Spring, 2009

U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting October 2004 Attachment D U.S. Landsat Archive (Marketable Scenes through September 29, 2004)  ETM+: Landsat 7 –446,774 scenes –323TB data in archive (RCC and L0Ra) –Archive grows by 300GB Daily  TM: Landsat 4 & Landsat 5 –550,626 scenes –Approximately 135TB of Data in Archive –Archive Grows by 30GB Daily  MSS: Landsat 1 through 5 –641,555 scenes –Approximately 20TB of Data in Archive

U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting October 2004 Attachment D Summary  Landsat Project reacted quickly to SLC failure by quick return to acquisitions, recovery attempt, move to SLC-off operations and new product development.  Three SLC-off product types are available for current and future acquisitions: –Level-1G SLC-off –Level-1G Interpolated SLC-off –Level-1G SLC-off to SLC-on Gap-filled  Users are ordering SLC-off and new products  Landsat 7 and Landsat 5 are expected to continue operations until 2011 and 2009 respectively