Yvonne Onyeka Business Manager Bromley SCB LCPP in Bromley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Faculty of Health & Social Care Improving Safeguarding Practice: Study of Serious Case Reviews Wendy Rose and Julie Barnes.
Advertisements

Barnardos DVRAM Barking & Dagenham Pilot Emma Gray Domestic Violence & Hate Crime Manager.
An Introduction to Child Protection. Outcomes Understand that it is everyones responsibility to protect children Be aware of signs, indicators, definitions.
Safeguarding Children Abused through Domestic Violence Cathy Blair
Safeguarding Adults in Bath & North East Somerset Awareness Session
Raising a Safeguarding Adults concern in Lewisham.
Serious Case Reviews – key recommendations Clare Kershaw Lead Strategic Commissioner – Standards and Excellence.
Serious Case Reviews Learning and Actions. What is a Serious Case Review? A serious case review is a local enquiry into the death or serious injury of.
Learning from Serious Case Reviews Child B.
What can we learn? -Analysing child deaths and serious injury through abuse and neglect A summary of the biennial analysis of SCRs Brandon et al.
Safeguarding children in Essex- making a difference together
MASH Understanding Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hubs 1.
Assessment, Analysis and Planning Further Assessing the role of fathers/father figures P16 1.
Safeguarding Adults The Care Act 2014 Jo Wilkins Team Manager, Safeguarding Adults Team Reading Borough Council.
The New Inspection Framework The Multi agency arrangements for protecting children The multi-agency arrangements for the protection of children The multi-agency.
Social Worker in Schools Julie Moss Head of Service Child Protection and Child in Need.
Overview of MASH MASH training. What is a MASH?  Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub  A MASH is a centre which brings together agencies (and their information)
Welcome. Suspicion, Disclosure and Discovery Helen Edwards Independent Safeguarding Advisor.
Response to Hidden Harm in Northern Ireland
Exploring the complexities in CP work Caroline Meffan University of Hertfordshire
Child Protection Conferences Caroline Alexander Service Coordinator for Child Protection.
Last Time – Duty of Care What are the consequences of unsatisfactory duty of care? List one key point of your complaints procedure, share this with another.
Engaging families, engaging fathers: Domestic abuse and safeguarding children Angela Everson, WomenCentre, Calderdale Dr Sue Peckover, University of Huddersfield.
Early Help for Shropshire Children & Families Children’s Trust Area Forum.
Thresholds & Referring in to Social Care Simon Harrison Group Manager Referral and Assessment Service.
Being Part of a Core Group Jacqui Westbury – CP Chair/IRO Team Manager Kate Lawson - Safeguarding Nurse Specialist.
Serious Case Review Learning Workshop February 2015.
Serious Case Reviews Local Lessons & Actions
Level 3 Safeguarding Training for GP’s 2013: Pregnancy & Substance Misuse Nicola Nelson Specialist Midwife
Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation P16 Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation Assessing the role.
Safeguarding Children Marie-Noelle Orzel Director of Nursing & Patient Care Executive Lead for Children.
Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation P11 Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation Assessing children’s.
Child Safeguarding in General Practice for Sessional GPs Dr D W Jones.
Jackie Hodgkinson Adult Safeguarding Manager. What is safeguarding? Safeguarding is protecting an adults right to live in safety, free from abuse and.
Care Act Adult Safeguarding Michelle Jenkins – Head of Safeguarding (Adults)
Case K Case Review. Family background Siblings: Child 1 (then 8) and Child 2 (then 2) Mother Absent fathers Extended maternal family members – complex.
KEEPING CHILDREN SAFE Key reminders from the document Keeping Children Safe Part 1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE SEE CUMBRIA LSCB WEBSITE NSPCC LINKS.
Prepared by: Hannah Hogg NSCB Development Manager July 2014 Learning and Improvement No. 1 – EN12.
The Duties and Responsibility of Southend-on-Sea Borough Council Fieldwork Services Report to Children & Learning Scrutiny Committee 15 th October 2007.
Pre mobile infants Compilation of themes arising from recent SCR and Management Reviews.
Sally Johnson, Head of Service (Maternal health) Identifying vulnerability and enabling access to services.
A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A HEALTH VISITOR. Jane Dingley (Health Visitor/Practice Teacher Oct 2013)
ACWA Conference 2010 Barnardos Find-a-Family Working Together – Promoting Positive Relationships to Enhance Permanency Lisa Velickovich and Laura Ritchie.
Working Together has been modified by Working Together 2015 Regulation 5 of the Local Safeguarding Children Boards Regulations 2006 sets out the.
Change Fund Specialist LAAC Health Visitors. Context  A proposal was submitted from health, social work and education to the Early Years Change fund.
Learning from Serious Case Reviews Kate McKenna Associate (SDSA) Anne Partington Nottingham City Safeguarding Children Board Steve Baumber Nottinghamshire.
To Learn & Develop Christine Johnson Lead Nurse Safeguarding (named nurse) - STFT Health Visitors Roles and Responsibilities in Domestic Abuse.
Network Name Celebrating Good Practice Louise Burton & Jane Bhatti Safeguarding Health Practitioners 24 January 2012.
Safeguarding & Social Care Patricia Denney Principal Officer Safeguarding & Social Care, Children, Schools & Families, LB Camden.
SDF Conference & Projects Fair 29 th October 2014 Rosie Kerr, Manager, North Lanarkshire Integrated Addiction Service Eleanor McDermott, Development Officer,
The Common Assessment Framework (CAF) & Lead Professional (LP)
Childrens Social Work Services & Partners Working Together in Localities Tina Russell Head Of Social Work & Safeguarding.
Being in Care. Joint priorities remain to… Improve outcomes for children, young people and families in Birmingham. In particular: Protect children from.
Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation P26 Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation Understanding barriers.
Roles and Responsibilities of the IRO. Role and Responsibilities of IRO When consulted about the guidance, children and young people were clear what they.
Safeguarding Adults Lincolnshire County Council April 2010.
The Policy Company Limited © Safeguarding – Part 1 - Policy.
The New Inspection Framework The Multi agency arrangements for protecting children The multi-agency arrangements for the protection of children The multi-agency.
Safeguarding Process and Decision
Cardiff Partnership Board
The Young Carers Strategy 2017−2019 is being launched during Carers Week, commencing 12 June 2017.
Learning from Derbyshire SCR
2 Serious Case Reviews Child D aged 2 weeks March 2013 – March 2015
SEFTON MASH The Decision Making Process of MASH and how the current restructure will affect MASH.
Role & Responsibilities: Surrey Safeguarding Children Board (SSCB)
Cardiff Partnership Board
Unidentified Adults : Think Family.
Working together to improve the health outcomes of the 0-5s
Hampshire Futures Safeguarding Update July 2017.
Managing Allegations Lead
Presentation transcript:

Yvonne Onyeka Business Manager Bromley SCB LCPP in Bromley

Serious Case Reviews & Procedures 5 SCRs in 4 years 66 Recommendations 15 relating to procedures local / regional/ organisational. Chapter 5 of LCPP Children in specific circumstances (CISC)

SCRs & Procedures in Bromley Procedure AssessmentInformation Sharing Child C

Child D & Child B Long term neglect Several referrals to CSC Referral outcomes not always chased Parental mental health

Child D & Child B Note of one conversation with Child D. “Noted that Child D could not describe an evening meal this information does not appear to have been communicated to anyone” LCPP Information Sharing LCPP 3.3 & 3.4 Assessment thorough assessment & viewpoint of the child. Confirm referrals in writing- all agencies. “instances of referral to Children’s Social Care, which are, effectively, lost by CSC but where this is not chased by the referring HV.” LCPP All referrals from professionals should be confirmed in writing, by the referrer, within 48 hours. “HV3 clearly worked hard with this family but there is evidence from the service of an increasing lack of consistency and capacity to challenge the family.” LCPP 10.3 Unco-operative Parents & the impact of assessment of the child

Child D & Child B “referred them to the dieticians, but did not put this in the context of the safeguarding concerns. … This may have influenced her assessment that the children’s growth and diet was satisfactory. This illustrates the particular importance of consistency when sharing information in relation to complex families with multi-agency involvement. LCPP Chapter 3 Information Sharing. Chapter 6 Assessment “a referral was properly made from maternity services to CSC, in line with procedures for “surprise” births. We know that CSC have been unable to find their records of that referral … no action was taken by the Trust to determine its outcome. LCPP and following All referrals from professionals should be confirmed in writing, by the referrer, within 48 hours. & ensure the referring agency understood what action was to be taken as a result of referral

Child C BSCB had concluded training with Barnardos on DV and the risk assessment matrix. A history of DV - several calls to the police. Notably a MERLIN Report was raised for unborn C. no further action taken by the CSC. LCPP advises consider assess in the case of DV & an unborn child or child under 1 Parents both with histories of depression & the mother self harm. - the parents Supplementary procedure risk assessment considers the increased risk. Further referrals to CSC after Child C was born, stating depression, self -harm, DV, head injury ( father) and the state of the family home. The parents were signposted to other services for parenting advice.

Child C Criteria for carry out Initial assessment were couple’s understanding of impact of DV on children. Domestic violence matrix in the pan London procedures not used. Thus many of the already known indicators of risk were absent LCPP Supplementary procedure on Domestic Violence & Risk Assessment Matrix. Section 47 should have been considered. The same for male and female perpetrators of DV. Parental mental health needs of both parents & other factors eg alcohol, dv & cognitive impairment The pan London procedures state “Parental mental illness does not necessarily affect a child’s developmental needs, but it is essential to always assess its implications for every child in the family. Many children whose parents have mental ill health may be seen as children with additional needs

Child B(08) Baby 1 month old died – possible overlaying (sleeping on sofa with mum) Alcohol misuse (local procedure & LCPP cover parental substance misuse) and domestic violence (LCPP supplementary) Child protection plan on Child B, in a mother and baby placement. Other children in care. The importance of attendance and quality of reports to CP conference (Police CAIT & CP administrative process). Professional in all agencies – primary duty to safeguard & promote welfare of children.

Child B (08) Mother’s relationships characterised by domestic violence, chaotic lifestyle, drink, minor drugs, volatility. Several police MERLIN reports related to violence in family. Domestic Violence (supplementary procedure) (LCPP 5.12) Parental who misuse substances (LCPP 5.34). Affecting parents practical caring skills; perception attention to basic physical needs and supervision… Pre-birth conference took place. Several assessments requested none took place. No core assessment commenced / undertaken. Foster carer did not attend conference. Assessment LCPP Chapter 9.3. and 9.4 role of the lead social worker.

Child P 3 month old - harm due to parental mental illness (LCPP 5.32). Local procedure in place. Other children were in care, however, no pre-birth multi-agency planning (LCPP 6.4). Circumstances required a Section 47 assessment and concerns with the quality of the assessments (LCPP chapter 6.4 & ) Effective collaborative working required. Joint visits for assessment. Adult mental health professionals must identify -service users who are pregnant, who are parents or who have regular access to children, whether they reside with children or not. Professionals should consider the needs of all children as part of their Care Programme Approach (CPA) assessments.Care Programme Approach

Questions What are the issues for Bromley? What should have happened? Would following the procedure prevent a child coming to harm? What happens when implementing the procedure is not clear cut?