Global Design Effort Americas Region Efforts and Resources Mike Harrison GDE

ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 2 Americas Region Efforts & Resources ART Organisation Program Elements FY06 actuals FY07 actuals FY08 (presidential budget) Summary

Global Design Effort The Global Design Effort Mission Produce a design for the ILC that includes a detailed design concept, performance assessments, reliable international costing, an industrialization plan, and a siting analysis, as well as detector concepts and scope. Coordinate worldwide prioritized proposal driven R & D efforts (to demonstrate and improve the performance, reduce the costs, attain the required reliability, etc.) Global R&D program Reference Design Report (RDR) Engineering Design Report (EDR) Value estimate

ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 4 ICFA FALC Resource Board ILCSC GDE Directorate GDE Executive Committee (EC) Global R&D Program RDR Design Matrix GDE R & D Board GDE Change Control Board GDE Design Cost Board GDE Organization ILC Design Effort ILC R&D Program

ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 5 Organization of the ILC-Americas Program The work is broken down into a series of technically-based work packages, documented in MoU’s detailing the co-operative arrangement for the execution of work packages at each lab. Labs report financial status at the work package level quarterly, and technical status semi-annually. The program comprised ~93 work packages for FY06. In FY07, there are ~112 work packages. Starting in FY07, planning and prioritization of the work has been coordinated with plans of the GDE Global R&D Board. The work packages are organized in a WBS structure.

ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 6 WBS structure-level 1 WBS 1: Management (GDE, ART, ILC lab groups) WBS 2: Accelerator design WBS 3: Accelerator R&D WBS 4: Technical Systems design and engineering WBS 5: Infrastructure and test facilities WBS 6: University accelerator R&D WBS 7: Regional Interest In FY08, WBS 4 and 6 will be integrated into WBS 2 and 3

ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 7 WBS structure-level 2 WBS x.2: Global Systems (Commissioning and operations, global controls, installation, instrumentation and feedback, survey and alignment) WBS x.3: Electron sources WBS x.4: Positron sources WBS x.5: Damping rings WBS x.6: Ring to Main Linac WBS x.7: Main Linac: Optics and beam dynamics WBS x.8: Main Linac: RF systems WBS x.9: Main Linac: Cavities and Cryomodules WBS x.10: Beam delivery system WBS x.11: Conventional facilities and siting. x may be 1,2,3, 5, or 7:

ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 8 ART WBS level 2 managers WBS x.2 Global systems:-J. Carwardine* (ANL), R. Larsen (SLAC) WBS x.3 Electron sources-A. Brachmann (SLAC)*, M. Poelker (Jlab) WBS x.4 Positron sources-J. Sheppard (SLAC)*, J. Gronberg(LLNL) WBS x.5 Damping rings-M. Zisman(LBNL)*, M. Palmer (Cornell) WBS x.6 Ring to Main Linac and WBS x.7 Main Linacs: Optics, beam dynamics, P. Tenenbaum (SLAC)*, N. Solyak (FNAL), WBS x.8 Main Linacs: RF systems-C. Adolphsen (SLAC)*, S. Nagaitsev (FNAL) WBS x.9 Main Linacs: Cavities and Cryomodules- S. Mishra (FNAL)*, H. Padamsee (Cornell)-SRF collaboration leader, J. Mammoser (JLab), M. Kelly (ANL) WBS x.10 Beam delivery system-A. Seryi (SLAC)*, B. Parker (BNL) WBS x.11 Conventional facilities-V. Kuchler (FNAL)*, F. Asiri (SLAC) * lead

ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 9 ILC-Americas Regional Team Lab Leaders ANL-Rod GerigBNL-Brett Parker Fermilab-Bob Kephart, Shekar Mishra, Sergei Nagaitsev Cornell LEPP- Hasan Padamsee, Mark Palmer LBNL -Mike Zisman Jefferson Lab -Bob Rimmer, Warren Funk LLNL -Jeff Gronberg SLAC -Tor Raubenheimer, Nan Phinney, Tom Himel TRIUMF -Shane KoscielniakUniversities- Project Leaders

ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 10 FY06 ILC plan and actuals: by machine area

Global Design Effort FY06 ILC plan and actuals: by lab In addition to the above, outside the ILC line, in FY06 FNAL provided a total of $17.4M ($5.4M M&S, $8.1M SWF) in support of SRF infrastructure and generic SRF R&D.

ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 12 FY06 actual cost+commitments: Breakdown by Machine Area ~40% R&D ~20% infra+test facilities ~22% design ~5% engineering ~13% management

ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 13 The FY07 ILC program in the US was aligned with the GDE priorities, and structured to conform to the GDE R&D S0, S1, S2 and RDR plans, to the extent possible on the required time scale. For technical R&D proposed in support of the US regional interest, input also came from the Ozaki panel, a body formed by the LCSGA to advise DOE on activities on regional interest efforts. A plan was developed for a $60M ILC budget. This plan was never used, as the appropriated FY07 ILC budget line was $42M (legislation enacted in Feb 2007). In Feb. 2007, the information on GDE priorities and regional interest was used to develop a $42M program. FY07 planning

ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 14 FY06 ACTUALS VS FY07 PLAN-BY MACHINE AREA

ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 15 FY06 ACTUALS VS FY07 PLAN-BY LAB In addition to the above, outside the ILC line, in FY07 FNAL is providing a total of $26.1M ($8.0M M&S, $9.6M SWF) in support of SRF infrastructure and generic SRF R&D

ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 16 FY07 plans: Breakdown by Machine Area ~40% R&D, ~18% infra+test facilities, ~22% design, ~8% engineering, ~12% management

ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 17 The President’s budget for FY08 has a funding level of $60M for the ILC line. Explicit support for the Detector R&D ($7M) included in this total. Starting in Feb. 2007, the WBS managers were asked to plan to this level for FY08. Final allocations determined after the FY07 budget became known. In addition to the above there is also generic SRF infrastructure and R&D projected at $23M. This funding is predominantly at Fermilab and has been aligned with the ART program at the request of the DOE. It contains support for a cryomodule string test facility, a new EP processing facility, single cell processing R&D, cavity performance analysis, materials research, test facility controls, and industrial development. Funding guidance for FY08

ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 18 FY08 ILC plan, by general category

Global Design Effort FY08 ILC plan, by machine area

ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 20 FY08 ILC plan, by Institution

ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 21 ILC program element evolution, FY06-09 (ILC line only)

ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 22 Summary ART funding support has increased each year since the ILC program inception ($33M -> $42M -> $53M, FY06 -> FY08). Alignment with the GDE global programs is receiving due attention from both the GDE and ART Significant effort in SRF infrastructure continues We will continue to modify the ART plans to reflect the GDE R&D program