2015 HCP Work Plan Schedule Tuesday, June 3 rd Submit all comments to HCP Program Manager. Wednesday, June 4 th EAHCP Staff will distribute comments to.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Agua Hedionda Watershed Management Plan Copyright © 2005 Kenneth & Gabrielle Adelman. All rights reserved.

Advertisements

What do you think? 1.Removal of water loving species like sycamore and willow or aquatic plants is the best way to increase stream flow. True or False.

Year 10 ISA Controlled assessment Week starting March 4 th 2013.

Riparian Zone Habitat Assessment Vegetation and More.

2014 Drought Outreach Workgroup. Product of approval 1.Approve regional triggers- provide a comprehensive list of conditions, flow levels, and visual.

Implementing Committee Meeting May 15 th, 2014 New Braunfels MS4 program and the HCP 1.

CITY OF SAN MARCOS/TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY 2015 WORK PLAN BUDGETED CONSERVATION MEASURES.

Bill Orme, Senior Environmental Scientist, State Water Board Liz Haven, Asst. Deputy Director, Surface Water Regulatory Branch, State Water Board Dyan.

South Llano River: One of 2011’sTop Ten National Fish Habitat Action Plan named SLR as “water to watch” WHY?? –Conserve freshwater, estuarine, and marine.

2014 Drought Outreach Workgroup. On March 20 th the Implementing Committee created the 2014 Drought Outreach Workgroup due to the impending drought and.

Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.

Regional Water Conservation Program Update EAHCP Implementing Committee October 17, 2013.

Pine Valley Country Club Stream Restoration: Phase 2 Proposal Presented March 17, 2003 Greg Jennings, NC State Univ Barbara Doll, NC Sea Grant Dave Bidelspach,

Northeast Corridor Greenway Acquisition – Mitigation Feasibility Study Results City Council Workshop June 24, 2014.

The Mission Reach Ecosystem Restoration Project: Floodplain Management Within a Multi-Objective Project Paradigm Steven Schauer San Antonio River Authority.

Bioassessment 1.0. Stream Visual Assessment Protocol 1. Turbidity 2. Plant growth 3. Channel Condition 4. Channel Flow Alteration 5. Percent Embeddedness.

“ We are in the business of healthy ecosystems.” A Business Plan For Ecosystem Health & Large-Scale Watershed Restoration In the Northern Region.

Breewood Stream Restoration Montgomery County Capital Improvement Project to Stabilize the Breewood Tributary November 14, 2012 Sligo Middle School.

Applied Research (HCP Sections & ) Nathan Pence Bob Hall.

Overview of Watershed Systems

City of New Braunfels Edwards Aquifer and the Habitat Conservation Plan HCP Implementing Committee May 29,

Natural Heritage & Urban Forest Strategy (NH&UFS) DRAFT STRATEGY Open House Presentation June 20 th, 2013.

Review of the Operational Procedures and Parliamentary Rules of Conduct of the EAHCP Implementing Committee Implementing Committee Edwards Aquifer HCP.

WHAT MAKES THE EDWARDS UNIQUE? > 1.8 million people depend on it for their source of water.

Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.

Golf Course Water Resources Best Management Practices TOOLBOX  Project Overview  Your Role in the Project April 2009.

KITSAP SMP TASK FORCE Reconvened Meeting #1 November 9, 2011 Draft SMP Progress Update.

POORMANS STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT Plan, implement and evaluate a personal action for sustainability AS Level 2 Horticulture.

June 2002 San Diego River Watershed Management Plan PROJECT OVERVIEW.

May I Have Another Helping Of VISPO? Presented at Uvalde, TX October 3, 2014 Rob Hogan Associate Professor & Extension Economist Texas A&M AgriLife Extension.

Lake Apopka Restoration Proposed projects for Legislative Appropriation.

Stakeholder Committee’s Role. The Stakeholder Committee’s role in Adaptive Management Decision process (AMP) and the HCP Program as follows: Per Funding.

Chumstick Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land development, road construction, and other human activities have affected channel migration and sediment.

How healthy is your watershed? Indicators and Performance Measures for the North Bay Kat Ridolfi San Francisco Estuary Institute North Bay Watershed Council.

2015 EAA Work Plans. Science Committee Review: Applied Research and Ecological Model Work Plans on April 8. Biological and Water Quality Monitoring Work.

Edwards Aquifer Recovery Implementation Program – Impact to San Antonio October 3, 2011 Green Industry Alliance.

2014 Drought Outreach Workgroup Introduction.

Mission, Brender, and Yaksum Creeks Habitat Conditions Low flows and associated high temperatures affect distribution and abundance of native species.

Understanding Creeks, Rivers, and Riparian Areas.

Garside: SNC2D. The following schedule is for Period 2 Class:

Importance of the Lower Wenatchee River in Salmon Recovery* The Lower Wenatchee is a critical migration corridor for all ESA listed species Of the total.

Flowing water.  vitally important geologically, biologically, historically and culturally.  contain only 0.001% of the total amount of the worlds water.

Program Implementation Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.

Salmon-Safe: Peer-reviewed standards for the management of urban parks and natural areas Carrie Foss WSU Puyallup.

The science of conservation planning Course objective: a free-ranging examination of some key scientific principles and research needs pertaining to conservation.

University Seminar 1100 Instructor Workshop. Stormwater Awareness What is stormwater? Rainwater that does not soak into the soil and grass Rainwater that.

State of the Streams Loudoun County: 2005 Loudoun Strategic Watershed Management Planning Conference February 23, 2006 Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun.

Riparian Areas: Functions and Conditions Authors: Gene Surber, MSU Extension Natural Resources Specialist Bob Ehrhart, Research Specialist, RWRP, Univ.

ESTUARIES Where a freshwater stream meets the sea & the water level changes with the tides Also includes where a river or stream meets a large body of.

Alachua County Forever Timber Harvesting Business Plan June 28, 2011.

Jeff Burkey King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks November 4, 2015.

-Aquifers -Springs -Ponds -Lakes -Creeks/Streams -Rivers -Wetlands Makes up < 3 % of water on earth.

City of Appleton Stormwater Management Update Presented to the June 11, 2013 Utilities Committee.

University of Washington Institute for Hazards Mitigation Planning and Research Visions for Kimball Creek.

Dr. Thomas Hardy Chief Science Officer River Systems Institute Texas State University.

June 6, 2012 Brian Reis, PE.  RPS Espey’s role in the planning process  Key state and federal requirements  Our unique water quantity and water quality.

2035 General Plan Update Joint Study Session on Draft Conservation Element Planning Commission and Parks & Recreation Commission December 1, 2015.

EAHCP Permit Oversight Shaun Payne HCP Coordinator.

Source: Stream Corridor Restoration Manual WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.

City of New Braunfels Watershed Management Programs

Edwards Aquifer HCP Annual Report

Presented By: Fran Borcalli, P.E. Program Manager

Texas Water Resources Institute

San Marcos & Texas State

City of Forest Lake MS4 Program

Report 2 Review of the EAHCP Summary of the National Academy’s 2

Presentation and update on the development of the EAHCP Data Management Program Alicia March 17, 2016.

Stream Management Implementation Program Schoharie Watershed Advisory Committee Meeting October 24th, 2018.

Regional Solid Waste Grants Program

Agricultural Order 4.0 Discussion

Presentation transcript:

2015 HCP Work Plan Schedule Tuesday, June 3 rd Submit all comments to HCP Program Manager. Wednesday, June 4 th EAHCP Staff will distribute comments to Permittees. Wednesday, June 11 th Revised 2015 Work Plans due back to HCP Program Manager Friday, June 13 th Revised 2015 Work Plans posted for Implementing Committee review. Thursday, June 19 th Implementing Committee Meeting

2015 Edwards Aquifer Authority Workplan Budget (as of 5/29/2014) WorkplanRequired by HCP2013 Budgeted2013 Actuals2014 Budgeted2015 Table 7.1Workplan (6/19/14)∆ 7.1 to WorkplansBudget Comments Aquifer Storage and Recovery ** Obtaining Leases & OptionsYes$3,703,290$459,823$4,759,000 $0 ASR O&MYes$1,250,000$69,128$2,194,000 $0 Regional Water ConservationYes$493,250$135,849$986,500$1,973,000 $0 VISPOYes$4,172,000$0$4,172,000 $0 Biological MonitoringYes$400,000$399,988$250,000$400,000$417,029($17,029) reflects BIOWEST contract price Water Quality MonitoringYes$208,505$171,938$474,430$200,000$504,530($304,530) reflects SWCA contract price Ecological ModelingYes$175,000$70,006$175,000 $380,350($205,350) reflects timeline, SOW, and Budget approved by IC Applied Research FacilityYes$500,000$0$327,600$0$75,000($75,000)utilities for FAB ResearchYes$248,576$261,500$526,650$450,000 $0 RefugiaYes$1,684,175$0$1,678,597 $0 contract yet to be executed; final price will be set by contract Program ManagementYes$650,930 $750,000 $0 Science Review PanelYes$0 $430,000$100,000$230,000($130,000) reflects SOW and budget approved by the IC for NAS Program Total $13,485,726$2,219,162$16,723,777$16,851,597$17,583,506($731,909) **unexpended ASR budget will transferred to reserves

2015 City of San Marcos/TXState Workplan Budget (as of 5/29/2014) WorkplanRequired by HCP2013 Budgeted2013 Actuals2014 Budgeted2015 Table 7.1Workplan (6/19/14)∆ 7.1 to WorkplansBudget Comments Texas Wild Rice Enhancement/RestorationYes$226,550$226,326$176,000$175,000$178,500($3,500) 2% increase allowed by FMA Sediment RemovalYes$151,800 $180,000$25,000$223,200($198,200) $198,200 carry over from 2013 Non-Native Plant Species ControlYes$278,300 $176,000$125,000$344,405($219,405) $ required to comtinue work Management - Floating Vegetation Mats & LitterYes$92,000$45,027$48,798$80,000$51,298$28,702surplus $ to riparian Non-Native Animal Species ControlYes$35,075$32,957$24,960$35,000$27,960$7,040surplus $ to riparian Bank Stabilization/Permanent Access PointsYes$469,200$468,639$667,450$20,000 $0 Native Riparian Habitat RestorationYes$100,050$99,803$203,000$20,000$55,000($35,000) funding from litter control and exotic species Management - Key Recreation AreasYes$68,700$65,781$56,000 $0 LID/BMP ManagementYes$300,900$300,889$320,000$200,000 $0 Household Hazardous Waste ManagementYes$29,120$14,363$30,000 $0 Sessom Creek Sand BarYes$25,000 $75,000$25,000-- Program Total $1,776,695$1,708,885$1,957,208$791,000$1,186,363($420,363)

2015 City of New Braunfels Workplan Budget (as of 5/29/2014) WorkplanRequired by HCP2013 Budgeted2013 Actuals2014 Budgeted2015 Table 7.1Workplan (6/19/14)∆ 7.1 to WorkplansBudget Comments Old Channel RestorationYes$349,300$349,240$175,000 $0 Flow split managementYes$306,188$127,938$181,250$0$5,000($5,000) for maint and excerise of gates Aquatic vegetation restorationYes$130,772$130,659$220,000$125,000$175,000($50,000) $ from gill parasite - best use of funds Non-native animal species controlYes$90,173$89,965$135,000$75,000 $0 Decaying vegetation removalYes$190,400$168,692$15,000 $0 Riparian improvement - riffle beetleYes$123,050$110,050$75,000$50,000 $0 Gill parasite controlYes$174,931$174,910$175,000$75,000$25,000$50,000 $ to vegetation restoration Restoration of riparian zonesYes$424,530$250,905$430,000$100,000 $0 Prohibition of hazardous material routesYes$10,000- $0$3,000($3,000) carried from previous budgets - yet to be expended Incentive program for LID/BMP stormwater managementYes$300,150$169,340$100,000 $0 Household hazardous waste programYes$65,000$41,449$30,000 $0 Management of public recreation useYes$0-$1,000$0$1,000($1,000) Litter control and floating vegetation managementYes$40,589$37,964$40,000$0$40,000($40,000) approved by IC in 2013 Golf Course Management PlanYes$0-- $1,000($1,000) EducationNo$30,000$3,349-$0 $2,235,083$1,654,461$1,587,250$745,000$795,000($50,000)

2013 Budgeted2013 Actual 2014 Budgeted 2015 Table 7.1 Workplan (6/19/14) ∆ 7.1 to Workplans EAA $13,485,726$2,219,162$16,723,777$16,851,597$17,583,506($731,909) City of San Marcos $1,776,695$1,708,885$1,957,208$791,000$1,186,363($395,363) City of New Braunfels $2,235,083$1,654,461$1,587,250$745,000$795,000($50,000) Program Totals $17,497,504$5,582,508$20,268,235$18,387,597$19,564,869($1,177,272)