Human Services Research Institute Overview of Quality Assurance and Enhancement A Framework for Future Directions, Trends and Promising Practices June.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board Governance: A Key to Quality Organizations
Advertisements

March 25, Quality Assurance Overview. March 25, Quality Assurance System Overview FY 04/05- new Quality Assurance tools implemented, taking.
Making a Difference Improving the Quality of Life of Individuals with Developmental Disabilities and their families.
Targeted Case Management
Importance of community-based services for persons with disabilities: Availability and quality International frame June 2012,Belgrade Dr.Vasilka.
Medicaid Division of Medicaid and Long-Term Care Department of Health and Human Services Managed Long-Term Services and Supports.
The Continuous Quality Improvement Process Empowering staff to develop local level solutions.
OVERVIEW OF DDS ACS HCBS MEDICAID WAIVER. Medicaid Regular state plan Medicaid pays for doctor appointments, hospital expenses, medicine, therapy and.
4/30/20151 Quality Assurance Overview. 4/30/20152 Quality Assurance System Overview FY 04/05- new Quality Assurance tools implemented, taking into consideration.
ODP’s Waiver Quality Strategy Where does IM4Q fit in? Dolores Frantz, ODP Diana Ramirez, ODP Jennifer Fraker, ODP William Posavec, ODP.
Evolution of Federal Quality Assurance and Improvement Principles for HCBS Waivers: Movement to More Specific Expectations Valerie J. Bradley, President.
11 Opportunities to Improve Care for Persons with Disabilities: The Community Living Initiative IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL HEALTH REFORM IN A DIFFICULT ECONOMIC.
Human Services Research Institute Overview of Quality Assurance and Enhancement A Framework for Best Practice Val Bradley Human Services Research Institute.
Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and FinancingColorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing 1 CCT & MDS 3.0 Section Q Return to the.
Using State-Level Performance Data: an Update on the National CIP Val Bradley and Sarah Taub Human Services Research Institute.
Human Services Research Institute Quality Assurance: It’s Everybody’s Business Valerie J. Bradley Human Services Research Institute October 23, 2003 South.
1 Money Follows the Person Working Group August 26, 2011.
Health Line of Business Revised Health Domains January 26, 2005 Outcomes / Domains have been revised.
Center for Health Care Quality Licensing & Certification Program Evaluation 1 August 2014 rev.
7/16/20151 Quality Assurance Overview. 7/16/20152 Quality Assurance System Overview FY 04/05- new Quality Assurance tools implemented  included CMS Quality.
1 Webinar on: Establishing a Fully Integrated National Food Safety System with Strengthened Inspection, Laboratory and Response Capacity Sponsored by Partnership.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
An Overview of the Mental Health Remedial Plan California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Division of Juvenile Justice REDEFINING MENTAL HEALTH.
1. Self-AdvocacyObjective 1.1: Increase the number of individuals with developmental disabilities who participate in self- advocacy, leadership and self-determination.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
1 Georgia Division of Aging Services Overview of Programs.
Guardianship for children deprived of parental care A handbook to reinforce guardianship systems to cater for the specific needs of child victims of trafficking.
Pay for Performance for LTSS November 4, 2013 Lisa Alecxih, Senior Vice President.
Best Practices in Health and Safety By Valerie Bradley Human Services Research Institute.
Affordable Care Act Aging Network Opportunities Judy Baker Regional Director Health and Human Services October 18, 2010.
VISIONING SESSION May 29, NWD Planning Grant  One year planning grant, started October 1, 2014; draft plan by September 30, 2015; final plan by.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
1 Long-term Care Vermont’s Approach Individual Supports Unit Division of Disability and Aging Services Department of Disabilities, Aging & Independent.
Balancing Incentive Program and Community First Choice Eric Saber Health Policy Analyst Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
DSDS Quality Assurance Unit State of Alaska, Dept. of Health and Social Services Division of Senior and Disabilities Services (DSDS) Quality Assurance.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
MLC-2 New Hampshire October 12, Quality Improvement Activities for MLC-2 1.Articulate measures to monitor improvement for New Hampshire’s performance.
CMS HCBS Quality Initiative Nancy Thaler CMS/DEHPG Quality Team May 5, 2004.
Spectrum of Self-Directed Care Maryland, Medicaid Office of Health Services John S. Wilson April 5, 2012 Community First Choice.
NATIONAL CORE INDICATORS ADULT CONSUMER SURVEY
1 CT DDS Quality Service Review Connecticut Community Providers Association Presented by Fred Balicki, DDS Quality Management Services May 27, 2008.
Overview of Quality Assurance and Enhancement A Framework for Moving from Quality Assurance to Quality Management Ohio Association of County Boards of.
The Quality Conundrum Achieving Safety, Health and Valued Outcomes.
Analysis of State’s Licensing/Certification Outcomes Processes Person-Centered Outcomes Respect and dignity  Respectful interactions with staff  Age.
GEORGIA CRISIS RESPONSE SYSTEM- DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Charles Ringling DBHDD Region 5 Coordinator/ RC Team Leader.
December 20, A Brief Overview: Real Choice and Independence Plus Systems Change Grants Connect the Dots Meeting December 20, 2004.
1 Developing a Framework for an Early Intervention System of Care NECTAC/ ITCA Finance Seminar May 22, 2006.
Section 1115 Waiver Implementation Plan Stakeholder Advisory Committee May 13, 2010.
Ministry of Healthcare & Nutrition Broader Approaches to Health Strategic Frame Work for Health Development.
MnCHOICES Olmstead Planning Committee June 21, 2012 Alex Bartolic Kristi Grunewald 2.
Using CORE NDICATORS in Federal HCBS Reviews Jon Fortune, Ed.D David Heath, MPA Wyoming Developmental Disabilities Division & the Wyoming INstitute for.
Provider Topics for MCO’s and OLTL  Topics for MCO’s o Safe and Orderly Discharges for NF Residents o Medical Assistance Eligibility o Administrative.
The DMH Division of Developmental Disabilities Difference Wanda Russell Division Provider Relations Lead.
System Principles: The Path to Real Long Term Care Reform.
Family and Child Support Services Breakout Session 3 Building and Reforming Child Care Systems Bishkek, May 2009.
1 Early Childhood Assessment and Accountability: Creating a Meaningful System.
SUPPORTED LIVING ARRANGEMENTS (SLA) For Developmental Services Presented by: Kate McCloskey, M.A., C.P.M. Manager of Quality Assurance Sierra Regional.
Quality Improvement Strategy
Independent Providers within a Quality Assurance & Improvement Framework Dilemmas, Future Directions, and Promising Practices Valerie Bradley & June Rowe.
Comparing Apples to Apples: Use of Common Tools to Rebalance Systems National HCBS Waiver Conference October 28, 2003 Val Bradley & Sarah Taub Human Services.
Defining and Achieving Quality Michigan’s Long-Term Care Conference Troy Hilton March 23, 2006 Alison Hirschel, Esq., Michigan Poverty Law Program Pam.
Monitoring and Oversight Division of Developmental Services Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services 2013 Provider Training Module 15.
1 Copyright © 2012 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2008 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 39 The Advanced Practice.
Overview of the NYS Justice Center for the Protection of People with Special Needs NYS Care Management Coalition May 20, 2016.
How to improve the availability and quality of community-based services? Zagreb,23 November 2010 Dr.Vasilka Dimoska Specialist in social medicine and health.
Home and Community-Based Medicaid Waiver Services Aged and Disabled Medicaid Waiver Update March 2016.
Community First Services and Supports (CFSS)
Quality Assurance: It’s Everybody’s Business
Trends in Quality Assurance
Using State-Level Performance Data: an Update on the National CIP
Presentation transcript:

Human Services Research Institute Overview of Quality Assurance and Enhancement A Framework for Future Directions, Trends and Promising Practices June Rowe and Sarah Taub Human Services Research Institute

Human Services Research Institute Changing Quality Landscape Exposure of fault-lines in the system (e.g., GAO report, etc.) Exposure of fault-lines in the system (e.g., GAO report, etc.) Emergence of self-determination Emergence of self-determination Olmstead decision and proposed closures Olmstead decision and proposed closures Struggles with MIS applications Struggles with MIS applications Direct support staff shortages Direct support staff shortages Expansion of supports to individuals on the waiting list Expansion of supports to individuals on the waiting list

Human Services Research Institute 23 States have been sued for wait listing individuals with developmental disabilities for Medicaid long-term services … Gary Smith, HSRI, 2003

Human Services Research Institute Decreasing/static funding – coming on top of an already strained provider network Decreasing/static funding – coming on top of an already strained provider network Increasing federal expectations regarding a quality framework Increasing federal expectations regarding a quality framework Inefficient “business model” (e.g., clumsy rate structures, redundant, sometimes conflicting monitoring processes) Inefficient “business model” (e.g., clumsy rate structures, redundant, sometimes conflicting monitoring processes)

Human Services Research Institute Signs of Change in Performance Management No longer just better than the institution No longer just better than the institution Rooted in outcomes Rooted in outcomes Emphasis on enhancement and CQI Emphasis on enhancement and CQI Changing role of the state Changing role of the state Changes in experiences of families and people with developmental disabilities Changes in experiences of families and people with developmental disabilities Changes in accreditation approaches Changes in accreditation approaches Inclusion

Human Services Research Institute More Signs of Change Movement away from prescriptive standards to individualized risk management Movement away from prescriptive standards to individualized risk management Collaborative development of standards Collaborative development of standards Inclusion of consumer and family participation in oversight (e.g., PA MN) Inclusion of consumer and family participation in oversight (e.g., PA MN) Satisfaction CQI Consensus

Human Services Research Institute CMS is also opening up the discussion about quality….. The Quality Framework

Human Services Research Institute HCBS Quality Framework rights and responsibilities Domains Participant access Provider capacity and capabilities Participant safeguards Participant outcomes and satisfaction System performance Participant- centered service planning and delivery Participant rights and responsibilities Quality

Human Services Research Institute Participant Access Information and Referral Information and Referral Intake and Eligibility Intake and Eligibility –User-friendly processes –Eligibility determination –Referral to community services –Individualization of services –Prompt initiation

Human Services Research Institute Participant-Centered Service Planning and Delivery  Participant-Centered Planning Adequate assessmentAdequate assessment Free choice of providersFree choice of providers Responsive service planResponsive service plan Participant directionParticipant direction  Service Delivery Ongoing service and support coordinationOngoing service and support coordination Provision of needed servicesProvision of needed services  Ongoing monitoring  Responsiveness to changing needs

Human Services Research Institute Provider Capacity and Capabilities Availability of individual and agency providers Availability of individual and agency providers Review of provider qualifications Review of provider qualifications Monitoring of provider performance Monitoring of provider performance

Human Services Research Institute Participant Safeguards  Prevention and investigation of abuse, neglect and exploitation  Tracking of major and unusual incidents  Ensuring safety of housing and environment  Regulation of behavior interventions  Standards for medication management  Provisions for personal safety and security  Preparation for natural disasters and other public emergencies public emergencies

Human Services Research Institute Participant rights and responsibilities Ensure that participants: Ensure that participants: Exercise civic and human rights Exercise civic and human rights Participate in decision making authority Participate in decision making authority Have provisions for alternate decision making Have provisions for alternate decision making Have access to due process and grievance mechanisms Have access to due process and grievance mechanisms

Human Services Research Institute Participant Outcome and Satisfaction Participant outcomes Participant outcomes Participant satisfaction Participant satisfaction

Human Services Research Institute System Performance Conduct system performance appraisals Conduct system performance appraisals Support quality improvement Support quality improvement Ensure cultural competency Ensure cultural competency Support participant & stakeholder involvement Support participant & stakeholder involvement Maintain financial integrity Maintain financial integrity

Human Services Research Institute

Continuous Quality Improvement Close the loop  Information from quality assurance drives decision making! drives decision making! Therefore…. Therefore….

Human Services Research Institute Continuous Quality Improvement Design Features Outcomes indicators Provider enrollment Rules, policies, Procedures Quality Improvement  Trends Analysis  Benchmarking  Strategic Planning Remediation  Real time tracking of incidents and follow-up  Analysis of specific trends  Plan of correction  Provider Qualification

Human Services Research Institute What does this means for how states are thinking about quality? Example 1: 5 state licensing study

Human Services Research Institute  Respect and dignity  Rights and responsibilities  Personal safety and risk  Abuse neglect (critical incidents)  Environment  Individual’s funds  Health and Medication  Community inclusion and integration  Independence and Autonomy  Choice and decision-making Person-Centered Outcomes

Human Services Research Institute Strong relationship of person-centered outcomes to service planning Individual involvement in planning Individual involvement in planning Identifying people’s preferences, choices (e.g., services, housemates, work) and personal goals Identifying people’s preferences, choices (e.g., services, housemates, work) and personal goals Assessing/evaluating people’s needs for support Assessing/evaluating people’s needs for support Developing strategies for implementing goals Developing strategies for implementing goals Monitoring people’s progress Monitoring people’s progress

Human Services Research Institute Survey Methodology Person centered survey process have the following in common: Person centered survey process have the following in common: A representative sample of individuals served by the agency A representative sample of individuals served by the agency Surveys are completed through: Surveys are completed through: Documentation Review Documentation Review Interviews with individuals, staff, family, case managers Interviews with individuals, staff, family, case managers All surveys include observation of individuals in the location where they receive services All surveys include observation of individuals in the location where they receive services Surveys also include a review of agency documentation Surveys also include a review of agency documentation related to organizational strength and stability: related to organizational strength and stability: Staff orientation/training Staff orientation/training Incidents/Investigation reports Incidents/Investigation reports Internal QA Plans Internal QA Plans

Human Services Research Institute Safeguarding Outcomes & Requirements Most uniformly prescriptive set of requirements and outcomes: Rights Rights Informing individuals and family members about individual rights and responsibilities Informing individuals and family members about individual rights and responsibilities Abuse, neglect and exploitation Abuse, neglect and exploitation Reporting allegations of abuse Reporting allegations of abuse Investigate allegations, take action if the investigations are substantiated Investigate allegations, take action if the investigations are substantiated Protect individuals from harm Protect individuals from harm Restrictive procedures Restrictive procedures Psychotropic medications, behavior support plans, and restraints Psychotropic medications, behavior support plans, and restraints Require Require –Assessments –Behavior support plans –Data collection and monitoring –External review –Prohibitions or limitations on some restrictions Staff competency Staff competency

Human Services Research Institute Medications: prescriptive requirements for management and administration of medications Medications: prescriptive requirements for management and administration of medications Health: More prescriptive requirements for medications than health, although monitoring of health is growing: Health: More prescriptive requirements for medications than health, although monitoring of health is growing: Routine examinations Routine examinations Identification of health care needs Identification of health care needs Access to health care services Access to health care services special diets nutritional meals special diets nutritional meals Environmental Environmental Greatest requirements: larger residential living situations and/or residences that provided 24-hour staffing and site-based day supports Greatest requirements: larger residential living situations and/or residences that provided 24-hour staffing and site-based day supports Less prescriptive for more independent living situations, people lived in their own apartments and/or received less than 24-hour supports Less prescriptive for more independent living situations, people lived in their own apartments and/or received less than 24-hour supports Accessibility required when needed Accessibility required when needed

Human Services Research Institute More emphasis on staffing and staff competency Less emphasis on staff educational level and degrees Less emphasis on staff educational level and degrees Staff ratios less prescriptive; tied into individual needs Staff ratios less prescriptive; tied into individual needs Staff knowledge and competency seen as an essential safeguard! Staff knowledge and competency seen as an essential safeguard! Some training required before staff can work alone with individuals Some training required before staff can work alone with individuals Emergency procedures (e.g., evacuation) Emergency procedures (e.g., evacuation) Abuse/neglect reporting, Abuse/neglect reporting, Knowledge support strategies for the individual Knowledge support strategies for the individual Administration of medications (if the state has a delegated staff giving medications) Administration of medications (if the state has a delegated staff giving medications) Human rights Human rights Incident reporting Incident reporting First aid and CPR First aid and CPR Medication administration certification in many states Medication administration certification in many states

Human Services Research Institute Example 2: Monitoring Individual Providers

Human Services Research Institute QA/QI for Individual Providers Why now? Why now? –Increased self-direction –Services more individualized Vulnerabilities Vulnerabilities –Isolation of both the provider and individual –Who is responsible for the skills and competencies of the provider? –Oversight for provider quality left largely in the hands of the individual/family

Human Services Research Institute Challenges to Our Notions of Quality Preventive, upfront Preventive, upfront person-centered QA is key person-centered QA is key – –Basic qualifications, skills and competencies – –Identifying the person’s needs for support, risks, and degree of monitoring in the planning process – –Individual and family competencies to effectively manage individual providers

Human Services Research Institute Individual Providers = More Person-Centered QA Self-monitoring by educated individuals and families Ongoing monitoring by the case manager/support coordinator is critical for early detection/prevention of problems

Human Services Research Institute Monitoring the Quality of Individual Providers Consumer affairs or ombudsman office Consumer affairs or ombudsman office Published report cards on independent providers Published report cards on independent providers Person-centered review processes Person-centered review processes Citizen/peer networking and quality councils Citizen/peer networking and quality councils Consumer/family surveys Consumer/family surveys

Human Services Research Institute Given the changing landscape what are our immediate challenges and potential solutions for sustainability?

Human Services Research Institute Improving the Sustainability of Person-Centered Monitoring Improve the effectiveness and efficiency of current processes Improve the effectiveness and efficiency of current processes Integrate information (FL, PA) Integrate information (FL, PA) Develop internal QA systems Develop internal QA systems Integrate quality assurance responsibilities across the system (MA) Integrate quality assurance responsibilities across the system (MA)

Human Services Research Institute Improve Sustainability Involve families and people with disabilities (PA) Involve families and people with disabilities (PA) Improve up-front quality expectations upfront (PA) Improve up-front quality expectations upfront (PA) Increase transparency of QA systems and development of a demand for information (CT) Increase transparency of QA systems and development of a demand for information (CT) Explore quality assurance for individual providers (UT, OR, NH) Explore quality assurance for individual providers (UT, OR, NH)

Human Services Research Institute Conclusions and Recommendations

Human Services Research Institute Important Next Steps Place individual outcomes at the center of the system Place individual outcomes at the center of the system Enlist assistance of consumers and families Enlist assistance of consumers and families Identify key areas of performance Identify key areas of performance Create a quality management entity Create a quality management entity Make results available and accessible Make results available and accessible

Human Services Research Institute Develop uniform reporting of critical health and safety events Develop uniform reporting of critical health and safety events Develop staff credentialing and expand training options Develop staff credentialing and expand training options Reassess roles and responsibilities of case managers Reassess roles and responsibilities of case managers Refine performance contracting Refine performance contracting

Human Services Research Institute Expand understanding of participant centered planning Expand understanding of participant centered planning Develop a technical assistance capacity Develop a technical assistance capacity Implement risk management and health assessments (OR, MA, CA) Implement risk management and health assessments (OR, MA, CA) Build integrated data systems (CA, FL, PA) Build integrated data systems (CA, FL, PA) Develop hotlines and ombudspersons Develop hotlines and ombudspersons

Human Services Research Institute

Lessons for Providers Develop internal quality improvement plans Develop internal quality improvement plans Work with states to streamline QA/QE procedures Work with states to streamline QA/QE procedures Continue to work to upgrade the status of direct support professionals Continue to work to upgrade the status of direct support professionals Enlist people with disabilities and families Enlist people with disabilities and families Continue to train staff in person-centered principles Continue to train staff in person-centered principles Assume that quality assurance will become more comprehensive and systematic Assume that quality assurance will become more comprehensive and systematic

Human Services Research Institute Final Words “ Beware the Continuous Improvement of Things Not Worth Improving ” “ Beware the Continuous Improvement of Things Not Worth Improving ” W. Edwards Deming