NIH Challenge Grants in Health and Science Research RFA OD-09-003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
Advertisements

How your NIH grant application is evaluated and scored Larry Gerace, Ph.D. June 1, 2011.
Effective January 25, 2010 and beyond Information from Part 5. Research Plan of NIAID’s NIH Grants Cycle Website.
INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES WRITING GRANT PROPOSALS Thursday, April 10, 2014 Randy Draper, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Room 125, IBS.
Grant Writing: Specific Aims and Study Design Zuo-Feng Zhang, MD, PhD EPIDEMIOLOGY
Website: where you can find all necessary forms! NIH Grant Writing 101 ASCEND March 2015.
PRESENTER: DR. ROBERT KLESGES PROFESSOR OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AND MEMBER, DEPARTMENT OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND.
Decoding RFAs and PAs Charlotte FlippDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health (EpiCH) Anne EverettDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health (EpiCH)
November 13, 2009 NIH PROPOSAL SUBMISSIONS: 2010 REVISONS.
Funding Research Programs instead of Individual Projects Increase the stability of funding to enhance investigators’ willingness to take on ambitious scientific.
Grant Writing1 Grant Writing Lecture What are the major types of grants available in mental health research? What is the process of grant preparation and.
Creating a Research Plan for a Career Development Award Jill Harkavy-Friedman, Ph.D.
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
Formulating an important research question Susan Furth, MD, PhD Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research
Effective proposal writing Session I. Potential funding sources Government agencies (e.g. European Union Framework Program, U.S. National Science Foundation,
THE NIH REVIEW PROCESS David Armstrong, Ph.D.
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Policy WG NIH policy proposal. Goal: Incorporating global access licensing as one of the additional review criteria Question 1: Should we propose this.
NIH – CSR and ICs. The Academic Gerontocracy Response to the Crisis Early investigator status: first real grant application. K awards, R13s etc don’t.
Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions EFFECTIVE JANUARY 25, 2010.
1 Introduction to Grant Writing Beth Virnig, PhD Haitao Chu, MD, PhD University of Minnesota, School of Public Health December 11, 2013.
COMPONENTS OF A GOOD GRANT PROPOSAL Philip T. LoVerde.
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW Changes to Application Forms and Instructions October 6, 2009.
Proposal Development Sample Proposal Format Mahmoud K. El -Jafari College of Business and Economics Al-Quds University – Jerusalem April 11,2007.
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat K-Series March 2012 Bioengineering Classroom.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
The NIH Grant Review Process Hiram Gilbert, Ph.D. Dept. of Biochemistry, Baylor College of Medicine Xander Wehrens, M.D. Ph.D. Dept. of Molecular Physiology.
Stimulating Peripheral Activity to Relieve Conditions (SPARC) RFA-RM Funding Opportunity Announcement Information to Applicants A New Common Fund.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
Presubmission Proposal Reviews at the College of Nursing (CON) Nancy T. Artinian, PhD, RN, FAAN Associate Dean for Research and Professor.
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH CHALLENGE GRANT APPLICATIONS Dan Hoyt Survey, Statistics, and Psychometrics(SSP) Core Facility March 11, 2009.
Building Sustainable Community-Linked Infrastructure to Enable Health Science Research (RC4) RFA OD Pre-application workshop October 23, 2009.
Components of a Successful AREA (R15) Grant Rebecca J. Sommer Bates College.
1 Preparing an NIH Institutional Training Grant Application Rod Ulane, Ph.D. NIH Research Training Officer Office of Extramural Research, NIH.
J.P. Hornak, , 2004 Research Practices http://
DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY JOINT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OFFICE CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE create collaborate communicate Click to add title of.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
Restructured NIH Applications One Year Later:
GRANT & PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF THE VICE DEAN, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CIHR Project Scheme st Live Pilot Workshop Translating the Open Operating.
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW: GUIDE FOR REVIEW OF RESTRUCTURED GRANT APPLICATIONS.
Pilot Grant Program EGAD Study OCCUPATIONAL & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.
Funding Opportunities for Investigator-initiated Grants with Foreign Components at the NIH Somdat Mahabir, PhD, MPH Program Director Epidemiology and Genetics.
Response to Prior Review and Resubmission Strategies Yuqing Li, Ph.D Division of Movement Disorders Department of Neurology Center for Movement Disorders.
Rigor and Transparency in Research
NIH R03 Program Review Ning Jackie Zhang, MD, PhD, MPH College of Health and Public Affairs 04/17/2013.
Grant Writing for Success
SBIR/STTR Phase 1 Proposal Guidance
NATA Foundation Student Grants Process
Presenter: dr. Robert Klesges Professor of Preventive Medicine
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Research and Grant Writing
Grant Writing Information Session
Grant Title PI Name Intended Institute List of Proposed Key Personnel
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat R-series
How to Write a Successful NIH Career Development Award (K Award)
Writing that First Research Grant
Preparing Research Proposals for NSF and NIH April 20, 2018
Dr. Lani (Chi Chi) Zimmerman, UNMC Dr. Bill Mahoney, IS&T
Approach Section: The “Meat” of the Proposal
How to Succeed with NIH: September 28, 2018
K R Investigator Research Question
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Biosketches and Other Attachments
Pediatrics Grant Writing Support.
Karen Frank Mays Fitchburg State University
Opportunity fund grants at COM
Presentation transcript:

NIH Challenge Grants in Health and Science Research RFA OD

Background New funds to NIH for 2009 and 2010 as part of the ARRA Challenge areas should have a high impact Novel research that addresses knowledge gaps, opportunities, new technologies, data generation, or research methods

Nuts and Bolts Deadline is April 27, to DEH by April 13 th ! Non-modular budget up to $500,000 / year total cost for two years Earliest start date 9/30/09 Research plan is limited to 12 pages NO resubmissions

Useful websites files/RFA-OD htmlhttp://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa- files/RFA-OD html ge.htmlhttp://grants.nih.gov/recovery/faqs_challen ge.html

Useful (?) websites ge_award/Omnibus.pdf --a 181 page documenthttp://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/challen ge_award/Omnibus.pdf egrants.cfm --NIEHS Challenge topicshttp:// egrants.cfm ge_award/IC_ChallengeWebPage.htmhttp://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/challen ge_award/IC_ChallengeWebPage.htm --all institutes

Review Criteria The new (2010) criteria will be used for Recovery Act FOAs. files/NOT-OD htmlhttp://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice- files/NOT-OD html For comparison of current and new criteria ide_comparison.dochttp://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/side_by_s ide_comparison.doc

Grant preparation Project summary / abstract Bibliography and references – 1 page Biosketch – 2 pages. Limit publications to TEN (10) Specific Aims – 1 page Research plan—12 pages

Additional sections Inclusion Enrollment Report Protection of Human Subjects Inclusion of Women and Minorities Targeted/Planned Enrollment Inclusion of Children Vertebrate Animals Select Agent Research MPI Leadership Plan Consortium/ Contractual Arrangements Letters of Support Resource Sharing Plans – Data Sharing Plan, Sharing Model Organisms, and Genome-Wide Association Studies

Research Plan Research area and project title The challenge and potential impact Approach Timeline and milestones

The Challenge / Potential Impact What is the research opportunity, scientific knowledge gap or technology that will be addressed? How broad is the potential impact in science and/or health?

The Challenge / Potential Impact Which community will be affected? What is the size of the community? Will the potential impact be major?

The Challenge / Potential Impact What is the disease or condition that will be studied ? What is the hypothesis to be tested concerning mechanisms underlying this disease/condition?

The Challenge / Potential Impact How will the work disrupt the standard paradigm or create a paradigm where none exists? How will the results transform our understanding of this disease/condition?

The Approach Provide enough information that reviewers can determine what, in general, you are proposing to do, but do not include a detailed experimental plan.

The Approach If your methodology is novel, what is unconventional and exceptionally innovative about your approach? How does your approach differ from what other investigators have attempted to do?

Timeline and Milestones Why is the proposed research uniquely suited to the stated goals of the challenge initiative? What is the likelihood of success? Provide a timeline for the proposed research. To facilitate evaluation of progress reports, describe when you anticipate that essential components of the project will be completed.

New Scoring System 9-point scale (1 = exceptional; 9 = poor) Before review meeting, reviewers and discussant will give a 1 – 9 for each area: Significance Investigator(s) Innovation Approach Environment You will receive the scores for these criteria, even if your grant is “triaged”

New Scoring System (cont) Priority Scores: Before the review meeting, each reviewer and discussant will give a preliminary impact score for that application. This score is evaluation of the overall impact, rather than a weighted average to previous review criteria.

Other ARRA Concepts Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) »Role of trials versus observational studies »Establishing priorities »Optimally using existing resources »Coordinating federal agencies and other research collaborators »Improving research methods »What’s the importance of cost? Public-Private Partnerships

Caveats! No plan survives contact with the enemy “High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.” –Charles Kettering