Stephanie Curry-Reedley College James Todd- ASCCC Area A Representative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Success Task Force. 1.Increase college and career readiness 2.Strengthen support for entering students 3.Incentivize successful student behaviors.
Advertisements

Overview of Performance Funding Model for Ohio’s Community Colleges
California Community Colleges Student Success Task Force Implementation Update SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 CHANCELLOR’S OFFICE OF THE CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES.
Collaboration for Student Success and Equity Denise Noldon, Interim Vice Chancellor, Student Services and Special Programs and Pam Walker, Vice Chancellor,
SEM Planning Model.
Community College League of California: Equity2015 = I 3 Implement, Integrate, & Institutionalize Student Equity Student Equity Plans: Promising Practices.
Dr. Mark Sanchez, Liz Estrella, Tony Anderson, Dr. Romero Jalomo
Professional Development Day Fall 2014 R. Brown, V. Martinez, K. Moberg, A. Ratto.
Presented by Chancellor Jack Scott. President Obama’s has announced the goal to make America “the most educated country in the world” by 2020 Between.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
GROWING LEADERS Opportunity. Engagement. Achievement. SSSP + SEP Steering Committee: August 26, 2014 Kathy Mendelsohn, Mark Sanchez, Brian.
Student Success Task Force Draft Recommendations Things We Need To Consider Board Report October 25, 2011.
Recommendations Overview Student Success Task Force.
Advancing Student Success in the California Community Colleges Presentation to the American Association of Community Colleges April 2013.
Success for All: Student Equity and the New Student Success and Support Program Strengthening Student Success Conference October 9, 2013.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
Student Services Support Program (SSSP) and Student Equity Plans ASCCC Leadership Institute 2015 Cheryl Aschenbach Cynthia Rico James Todd.
Yes, You Want to Know More
FLEX DAY RECAP OF FALL 2014 AND NEXT STEPS EDUCATION MASTER PLAN.
SB 1456 Implementation Nov. 8, 2012 Diana Z. Rodriguez, Las Positas College John Stanskas, San Bernardino Valley College Miya S. Squires, Butte College.
A 360˚Approach to Student Success & Support and Student Equity The Student Success and Support Program and Student Equity Program Plans Update Sacramento.
Presenters Rogeair D. Purnell Bri C. Hays A guide to help examine and monitor equitable access and success Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Student Equity Report Planning
ALL STUDENT SERVICES RETREAT May 3, ) Introductory Remarks (Penny) 2)Student Success Task Force Recommendations (Penny)  8 focus areas 3)Implementation.
Your Role in the Student Success and Student Equity Planning Debra Sheldon, Specialist, Student Services and Special Programs, CCCCO Cynthia Rico, Counselor.
Kale Braden, ASCCC North Representative Michelle Grimes-Hillman, ASCCC Curriculum Committee Chair James Todd, Interim Vice-President, Student Services,
Implementation of the Student Success Task Force Recommendations Wheeler North, Treasurer, ASCCC Michelle Pilati, President, ASCCC.
Accomplishing the Mission Mission and institutional effectiveness expectations in the revised Accreditation Standards Prepared for MPC Academic Senate.
Student Success B.C.E. (Before the Classroom Experience) Beth Smith, Grossmont College Michelle Grimes-Hillman, Mt. San Antonio College Jesse Ortiz, Woodland.
Integrated Planning = Reacting, Reflecting, Recharging.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Counseling in the 21 st Century Stephanie Dumont, Area D Representative, Golden West College Miles Vega, Counseling, Porterville College Janice Johnson,
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Student Success and Support Program (SSSP): Faculty/Staff Training Llanet Martin, PhD April 28, 2015 (Culinary Arts 227) April 30, 2015 (Instructional.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Sacramento City College’s 360˚Approach to Student Success & Support and Student Equity The Student Success and Support Program (SSSP) and Student Equity.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Creating a Blueprint For Student Equity and Student Success, Part 1.
Equity, Opportunity and Social Justice STUDENT EQUITY PLAN UPDATE Presenter: Angelina Duarte December 8, 2015.
Integrated Planning Randy Lawson 411 Training April, 2016.
Student Success and Student Equity. Shrinking Budget vs. Growing Demand Funding for community colleges had been cut $1.5 billion Enrollment had decreased.
Board of Trustees Presentation Tuesday, October 4, 2016
Erik Shearer, Professor of Art, Accreditation Faculty Co-chair
With Institutional and Program Level Data
Educator Equity Resource Tool: Using Comprehensive Equity Indicators
Randy Beach, south representative CraiG Rutan, Area D representative
Program Review and Integrated Planning: A Conversation About Data
2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Curriculum and Accreditation
CCCAOE – CCCCIO – CCCSSAA – ASCCC Joint Session – April 21, 2016
Stephanie Curry, Reedley College Jarek Janio, Santa Ana College
Curriculum and Accreditation
Advancing Student Success in the California Community Colleges
Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Alice Taylor—West Los Angeles College
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity: Understanding Standard I WITH GUIDANCE ON I.B.3 AND I.B.6 Stephanie Droker, Vice.
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Consideration of Core Outcomes for Strategic Plan
Basic Skills: How to Serve One of Our Most Vulnerable Populations
Student Success Metrics
Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College
Craig Rutan, Accreditation and Assessment Committee Chair
Student Success Initiative
Presentation transcript:

Stephanie Curry-Reedley College James Todd- ASCCC Area A Representative

What you’ll get from this presentation… Brief history, context, and goals for SSSP Brief history, context, and goals for Student Equity Plans The data/evidence and components these plans provide Presentations of standards that apply to SSSP and Student Equity How to use your engagement with planning and implementation for accreditation purposes

The “Student Success” Landscape: The Emergence of SSSP Student Success Task Force (2011) Recommendations A shift for CCC’s, geared to: rebalance priorities, increase responsiveness, increase success rates Refocus and broaden student services delivery

Student Success Task Force: 8 areas of focus 1. Increase college and career readiness 2. Strengthen support for entering students 3. Incentivize successful student behaviors 4. Align course offerings to meet student needs 5. Improve education of basic skills students 6. Revitalize and re-envision professional development 7. Enable efficient statewide leadership and increase coordination among colleges 8. Align resources with student success recommendations

Student Success Act of 2012 (SB1456) First steps to begin implementation of Student Success Task Force recommendations, particularly: require Orientation, Assessment and Educational Planning require students to declare a course of study incentivize success invest in a Student Support Initiative

Student Success and Support Program Generally speaking, what was “matriculation” becomes Student Success and Support Program 3 funded core services + follow-up: (orientation, assessment, counseling, advising, and other student education planning services) Includes institutional and student requirements, and incentivizes student completion of core services Funding formula includes services provided as well as enrollment Must be a clear link to student equity planning data required for funding, and is linked to Student Success Scorecard Must incorporate Institutional Assessment and Effectiveness monitoring

Brief History of Student Equity : The emergence and requirement of Student Equity Plans to — Plans suspended due to budget 2011— Student Success Task Force established 2012—SB — Student Equity Workgroup

Student Equity Funding: June 2014 SB 860 (June 2014): $70 million in Student Equity funding. Trailer bill puts student equity in statute. Strengthens requirements, adds target populations to address disproportionate impact. Plans due January 1, Spending through September. No match. No supplanting.

 American Indians or Alaskan natives  Asian  Black or African American  Hispanic or Latino  Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander Whites Some other /more than one race Current or former foster youth Students with disabilities Low income students Veterans * - disaggregate all categories by gender

Student Equity Success Indicators Measure student populations in terms of: Access Course Completion ESL and Basic Skills Completion Degree and Certificate Completion Transfer

Continuous Quality Improvement Colleges must design goals and activities to mitigate disproportionate impact. Must adopt evidence-based models of remediation and implement placement tests and policies that predict student success and identify areas for remediation.

SSSP and Student Equity Plan Data Components Three major areas: Specific sections on institutional research, monitoring and evaluation. Equity Plan Goals and Priorities for closing Achievement Gaps in Key Indicators link Student Services and Instruction. Budgets that reflect linkages to Student Success and Equity.

 Provided disaggregated data on student success  Created opportunities to dialog about student success and equity  Required us to assess our student services in the areas of assessment, orientation, counseling services and at risk students  Created plans that link student success data and goals to resource allocation

 Student Equity Plans and SSSP Plans can be used to help meet standards IA, IB and IIC  IA- Mission  IB- Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness  IIC- Student Support Services

IA2. The institution uses data to determine how effectively it is accomplishing its mission, and whether the mission directs institutional priorities in meeting the educational needs of students. (Student Equity Plan)

IB1. The Institution demonstrated a sustained, substantive and collegial dialog about student outcomes, student equity, academic quality, institutional effectiveness and continuous improvement of student learning achievement (Student Equity Plan)

IB6. The institution disaggregates and analyzes learning outcomes and achievement for subpopulations of students. When the institution identifies performance gaps, it implements strategies, which may include allocation or reallocation of human, fiscal and other resources, to mitigate those gaps and evaluates the efficacy of those strategies. (Student Equity Plan)

IB7. The institution regularly evaluates its policies and practices across all areas of the institution, including instructional programs, student and learning support services, resource management, and governance processes to assure their effectiveness in supporting academic quality and accomplishment of mission. (SSSP Plan) IB8. The institution broadly communicates the results of all of its assessment and evaluation activities so that the institution has a shared understanding of its strengths and weaknesses and sets appropriate priorities. (Student Equity Plan and SSSP)

IIC1. 1. The institution regularly evaluates the quality of student support services and demonstrates that these services, regardless of location or means of delivery, including distance education and correspondence education, support student learning, and enhance accomplishment of the mission of the institution. (SSSP Plan) IIC2. The institution identifies and assesses learning support outcomes for its student population and provides appropriate student support services and programs to achieve those outcomes. The institution uses assessment data to continuously improve student support programs and services. (SSSP and Student Equity Plans)

IIC5. The institution provides counseling and/or academic advising programs to support student development and success and prepares faculty and other personnel responsible for the advising function. Counseling and advising programs orient students to ensure they understand the requirements related to their programs of study and receive timely, useful, and accurate information about relevant academic requirements, including graduation and transfer policies. (SSSP Plans)

 Remember to document widespread dialog about plan  Create systematic assessments to document progress on achievement of plan outcomes  Link resource allocation to plan goals  Link resource allocation to action that are reviewed and evaluated for effectiveness  Don’t wait until its time for your accreditation self evaluation to use and discuss the plans should be done through out the 7 year accreditation cycle