Framework for Regulation May 2015

Outline of Presentation 1.Background – Initiation of the Framework – Purpose of the Framework Framework Review – Purpose of the review – Original development process – Issues identified by the review – Objectives proposed by the review 3.The Framework Committee 4.Redefinition of the Framework – Redefinition of the Framework – Vision and Roles – Streamlined development process 5.Current Status of the Elements – 8 completed under original process – 7 revised or under review – 18 potential elements 6.Next Review 2 of 26

Background 3 of X

Initiation of the Framework The Framework for Regulation (formerly the Canadian Framework for Licensure) was initiated by agreement of the Presidents at the Meeting of Members in Montreal on May 23, 2009 to continue to explore, under the auspices of Engineers Canada, a national framework for licensure by requesting the CEO Group to develop a guideline for licensure, consistent with the requirements of the Agreement on Internal Trade. 4 of 26

Purpose of the Framework To support the engineering regulators in their mandate to regulate the practice of engineering, license the members of the profession and to serve and protect the public interest by: capturing excellent national and international practices; responding to emerging trends and challenges; and facilitating fair practices that are accessible, timely, monitored, transparent, objective, impartial and just. 5 of 26

2014 Framework Review 6 of X

Purpose of the Review In 2014, Engineers Canada conducted a review of the Framework development process to: consider the initiative in light of the adoption of policy governance and implementation of the Ends; consider the individual stages of development and determine whether they were relevant or necessary; and determine how best to streamline the development of individual elements. 7 of 26

Original Development Process Research by Engineers Canada staff Development review by CEO Group Consultation 4 month response time Analysis synthesis of CA responses Approval by CA Councils Endorsement by Engineers Canada Board Implementation documentation by CEQB 8 of 26

Issues Identified by the Review The review identified issues with the Framework constitution including: each CAR consultation process took six months or more; development of an element took approximately 2 years by the time consultations were complete; challenges in synthesizing constituent comments; confusion around the implementation phase, as adoption and implementation is the purview of individual CAs; and development of the Framework is an operational activity under the responsibility of the CEO as captured in End E-1. 9 of 26

E-1 Consistency in Regulatory Standards & Practices E-1Consistency among the constituent associations’ regulatory standards and practices to protect and serve the public interest is the highest priority among Ends. E-1.1 The constituent associations have a nationally consistent framework for regulation based upon best practices. E-1.3 Full mobility exists within Canadian and international jurisdictions where public accountability of engineering practice is required. E-1.4 Foreign credential recognition is timely and consistent as required for immigration and licensure in Canada. 10 of X

New objectives proposed The review proposed new objectives derived from previous experience, feedback from stakeholders and an analysis of overall requirements. The new objectives included: alignment with the Ends; consideration of current and emerging challenges to the profession; a refresh of all elements to ensure standardization; a review of consultation at all levels during the development of elements; and a method to monitor and review progress. 11 of 26

Framework Committee 12 of X

Framework Committee Ann English Chief Executive Officer and Registrar, APEGBC Mark Flint Chief Executive Officer, APEGA Andrew MacLeod Chief Executive Officer, APEGNB Gerard McDonald Registrar, PEO Dennis Paddock Executive Director and Registrar, APEGS 13 of 26

Committee Charges Provide advice and guidance on: 1.the Framework process; 2.identification and validation of Framework elements; 3.validation of assessment processes within the Framework; and 4.promotion of the Framework. 14 of 26

Redefinition of the Framework 15 of X

Redefinition of the Framework The Framework committee met in late 2014 and defined: a new Vision and Roles for the CAs and Engineers Canada; a streamlined process for developing elements that provides for ongoing improvement; a two-year timeline to develop all elements; eliminated adoption and implementation as the measure of success of the Framework; and proposed a further review in 2016 to re-evaluate the effectiveness of the new Framework development process. 16 of 26

Vision The Framework is a set of aspirational elements that form the baseline for engineering regulators. 17 of 26 Constituent associations participate in the development of elements and decide if, when, and how to adopt elements of the Framework. Engineers Canada facilitates the development and ongoing improvement of the Framework. Roles

Streamlined Development Process The new streamlined development process provides for: accelerated development of all elements by Engineers Canada staff; an ongoing process of continuous feedback and improvement; – CAs are encouraged to suggest new elements or revisions to existing elements at any time; and – all suggestions, comments and input provided by CAs will be considered and responded to by Engineers Canada staff. 18 of 26

Current Status 19 of X

Current Status of Elements 8 Elements Completed Under Previous Process available on website for review undergoing review and standardization 20 of 26 Licensing Requirements and Competencies – EITs Code of EthicsContinuing Professional Development Licensing Requirements and Competencies – Limited Licence Accountability of Engineering Organizations Fairness in Registration Practices Licensing Requirements and Competencies – Professional Engineers Negotiating International Recognition Agreements

Current Status of Elements 7 Elements Revised or Under Review in Response to CA Comments available on website for review responses to CAs in process 21 of 26 Definition of the Practice of Professional Engineering Complaints and InvestigationsObjects of the Engineering Regulatory Bodies Enforcement PracticesPrinciples for Complaints, Investigation and Discipline Practices Titles, Rights & Responsibilities Public Identification of Engineering Expertise

Current Status of Elements 18 Potential Elements list available on website development of statements of purpose underway 22 of 26 Appeals of Regulatory Decisions Assessment of Distance Education Transcripts Authentication of Academic Documents Authentication of Professional Engineering Documents Canadian Experience Requirement Competency Assessment Discipline and Inter- Association Applicants Discipline PracticesGeographic Enforcement and Discipline

Current Status of Elements 18 Potential Elements Continued list available on website development of statements of purpose underway 23 of 26 Governance of a Self- Regulating Body IIDD Advancement CriteriaLegislative Authorities Professionalism Assessment: law, ethics, good character Standards of Professional Conduct Supervision and Mobility of EITs Titles, Images and Words Essential to the Engineering Brand Use of Technical ExaminationsVerification of Academic Qualifications

Next review The Framework Committee directed a subsequent review of the development process and status of the Framework in November of 26

Questions? 25 of 26

Engineers make a world of difference For more information contact Beth Deazeley